In a region notorious for a rigorous planning process, it’s rare for a developer to scrap an approved project and start all over. But that’s exactly what Bob Comstock is doing with The Village at Los Carneros, which he purchased last September from a partnership between the Bermant Development Company and Rockwood Capital. That team, known collectively as Rockber, had managed to get 279 units approved by the Goleta City Council in February 2008 and were working to add — and likely to get approved — anywhere from 279 to 369 more units on the 43-acre site, which is sandwiched between Highway 101 and the city’s industrial parks, just to the west of Los Carneros Road.
“We’ve gone back and changed everything,” admitted Comstock proudly this past Thursday. “The product didn’t fit today’s market.”
Instead of Rockber’s approved three-story structures, Comstock — a Manhattan Beach-based developer who’s remembered rather fondly in Goleta for working a deal to both preserve most of the Ellwood Bluffs and develop a high-end project out there called The Bluffs — prefers a predominantly two-story development, save for two three-story apartment complexes. Specifically, Comstock is proposing 428 total units: 56 single family homes (ranging from 2,000 to 2,300 square feet); 228 condos arranged in triplexes and townhomes (1,300 to 1,700 square feet); 74 market-rate apartments; and, in a partnership with People’s Self-Help Housing, 70 residences for people from the very low to low income bracket. The development — which also must comply with plans for a five-acre neighborhood park on the northwestern corner — will be accessed via a new road at the Calle Koral intersection as well as another road between Cremona Drive and Tecolotito Creek and, probably, a bridge over the creek at the end of Cortona Drive.
If Comstock’s idea works out like Rockber’s did, it’s very likely he’ll be able to get the entire project approved. The previous proposal never “really got any negative input during any of the hearings,” explained Alan Hanson, a senior planner for the City of Goleta, on Friday. “That project had what I would say was widespread support from the community. I really don’t anticipate that will change with this proposal.”
Hanson did point out, however, that there are some significant environmental resources on the site, mainly due to Tecolotito Creek and its riparian corridor, which he called a “very significant biological resource.” The partially approved Rockber project was located in the middle of the property, but Comstock’s fully fleshed out project comes much closer to the creek. “Now we have a project that’s moving closer to that corridor, so that’s going to become a bigger issue,” said Hanson. “There is more development in much closer vicinity than what was previously approved.”
Though admitting that it’s uncommon for already approved projects to be resubmitted, Hanson did not seem overly surprised that Comstock had done so with The Village at Los Carneros. “Given these economic times, I think anything is possible,” said Hanson, who explained that the first public hearing on this project will be before the Design Review Board and should occur within the next few months.
Comstock is very optimistic, and proud to hopefully one day be offering brand new homes in the hard-to-find $450,000 to $600,000 range. “We’re really excited about this product,” said Comstock. “We think we’re going to fill a niche that’s not out there today.”


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Math. 429 - 279 = 149, or about 1/3 more. No wonder they're resubmitting.
Old Math. To allow sufficient room for vegetable gardens, fruit trees (to feed homeowners), open space for play and habitability, as well as garages to park required cars and bikes, 5 homes/acre is about max. 43 acres x 5 = 215 homes. I'm old school, obviously. $450,000 for a condo or townhouse sounds pretty pricey to me.
Becky (anonymous profile)
May 1, 2010 at 11:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I don't know anything about this proposal, but I lived for years on a tenth of an acre and we produced more food than we knew what to do with, and had plenty of space to park and play besides.
water (anonymous profile)
May 1, 2010 at 1:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
WATER, a tenth of an acre is only about 4,300 sf which is a postage stamp lot ...maybe 50 feet wide by 80 feet or so long. Hardly ample. A traditional 60's/70's era Goleta area home sits on at least twice that and more often closer to 10,000 sf I think. The NEW URBANISM school of planning that tries to make small lots "feel" big doesn't work. Small lots feel small. Comstock paid a pile for this office park/industrial land that has freeway and train noise, is not near ANYTHING like a residential neighborhood (school, park, retail shops, QUIET, etc). If settling for a house or condo with this density in this location is the price of living in the area, it's too high. Density belongs in urban settings and should occur vertically. Not in areas that our General Plan wisely dictated be "Industrial"....
60Hotel (anonymous profile)
May 2, 2010 at 5:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well, it looks like more work is to be done. Burials, burials,burials. Tisk,Tisk Tisk.
KsenSku (anonymous profile)
May 4, 2010 at 10:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@60Hotel: I agree that this is not the right site for a denser project that will intrude on the riparian habitat. Fortunately, the right site is right there on the other side of the freeway, on the Bishop Ranch, where there is room for a "new town" type project with a shopping center, a school, a couple of churches, a few hundred townhouses ("row houses" we used to call them back in the old country) and several 3-story buildings of 2-bedroom apartments, all within easy bicycle distance of the jobs in the industrial park area.
ljp93105 (anonymous profile)
May 5, 2010 at 7:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)