Only a few months removed from deciding to convert several of their long-time Continuing Education offerings from free to fee-based, Santa Barbara City College administrators ended widespread community speculation this week by announcing that a majority of their Adult Education summer semester courses will be cancelled. Explaining the decision as a nasty side effect of ongoing state budget problems, Continuing Education Vice-President Dr. Ofelia Arellano confirmed the class cancellation rumors this week while also saying that “a limited number of certain fee-based course offerings will remain” in place when the summer semester starts on June 14. Though she couldn’t say which classes would go ahead as planned, she did explain that the survivors would be classes that students need for completing certificate programs and diploma requirements, as well as fee-based things like yoga, foreign languages, and assorted cooking classes. “Directors are still finalizing which classes will be offered, and we should have that information on our Web site by June 1 or very soon after,” concluded Arellano.
Interestingly enough, the announcement comes as various student- and faculty-filled stakeholder groups, such as the newly formed and SBCC-recognized Association of Continuing Education Students (ACES, the first of its kind for adult education student populations in the state) and the Continuing Education Instructors Association, cry foul about the transparency of the decision-making process. Less than convinced by the school’s explanation that a projected $2.6-million budget shortfall has it once again needing to make cuts and disheartened by the recent suspension of the Continuing Education Advisory Committee (a faculty, student, and administration group that was convened last year as news broke about planned cuts and rate hikes for adult education), the ACES group, echoing concerns that many students and teachers had in the months leading up to last winter’s contentious free-to-fee decisions, issued its first official statement earlier this week: “The community has a right to be intimately involved in determining the needs of the College. The College Administration does not have the right to dictate or determine the goals of the Community College without due process and due diligence.” To that end, the group is planning on taking their requests for a more public and inclusive dialogue, including the reinstatement of the Advisory Committee, to SBCC’s Board of Trustees meeting on May 27 when Adult Ed-related items are slated to be discussed.
On the bright side, according to Arellano, thanks in large part to the summer cancellations, the school should be safe from having to cut any courses from its fall, winter, or spring catalogues. However, she added that more free courses would be converted in the coming months to a fee-based system.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Re: Arellano's comment: "the school should be safe from having to cut any courses from its fall, winter, or spring catalogues. ... more free courses would be converted in the coming months to a fee-based system." Converting to fee based is essentially cutting classes in some cases. When seniors are asked to shell out approximately $50/month and close to $100 a class, that will kill many classes. From what I hear from staff and faculty, the environment is toxic at CE right now. Between micromanaging to incompetence, no one is happy there.
Go to the Board Meeting on Thursday!
1wahine (anonymous profile)
May 19, 2010 at 11:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree. Most of the classes converted by the Board in Spring failed and were cancelled because the fees were too high for seniors on limited incomes and the minimum class size could not be reached. The administration won't even listen to alternatives. The list of classes that Serban and Arellano want to cut (or convert then cut) for fall at Adult Ed is growing daily. Older Adult Movement classes to improve and maintain heath, music and choral classes, Parent Child Workshops, Art Talks, literature and Arellano said she is still looking at more arts and crafts classes. Soon they will eliminate all the senior and parent child classes and just keep the higher reimbursement classes for ESL, GED,and certificates. And don't believe "the Chancellor made me do it" - it isn't true. Other community colleges administrations are supporting their Adult Ed programs and working to keep their classes in place and fully reimbursed by the state. SBCC has a surplus of almost $6 M from last year alone and over $22M in reserves and they are cutting more classes in credit and non-credit summer and next year.
SBcommunitymember (anonymous profile)
May 20, 2010 at 11:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks, Ethan, for keeping this issue in the public eye. the 2 previous comments are right on target. As a teacher myself (not at SBCC), I have friends in 2 other colleges who have administrators that SUPPORT the teachers and programs. I suggest a thorough, in depth article about SBCC as a whole since Serban took over. Misappropriation of funds, denying health care to adjuncts, cutting courses in credit and noncredit while having a surplus, hiring new administrators .... And do you remember that she demanded to have a ceremony ($$$) when she took over?
whatsername (anonymous profile)
May 20, 2010 at 11:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Just a slight correction: the CE Consultation Council (not advisory committee) was created in the spirit of sharred governance, to be meetng through out the year. It was canceled after 4 meetngs in 5 weeks, just after Arellano got what she set out for: a reccomendation to cut summer. it was a sham to make people think they were beiing iincluded in the decisionmaking process.
1wahine (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2010 at 12:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I have a friend who teaches the ESL and he has to beg the mostly illegal immigrants to come to class so that the class will continue. He even asks them to bring family members to keep the numbers up. He said students come sporadically and won't work very hard at learning the language. If the class cost money would they be more serious about coming?
On the other hand, a have another friend who teaches the senior water aerobics and there is a huge waiting list for people wanting to take the class. She said this class gives seniors the mobility they don't have any other time in their lives and really helps them exercise their muscles in a way they can't do otherwise. On top of that, for many of them, the class is the highlight of their week and they cry when they can't get into the class. This class costs quite a bit of money for many of them, but they sacrifice to take it.
What seems so unfair to me is that the seniors pay property taxes (and have most of their lives) for schools, yet they are can't take classes. On the other hand, illegal immigrants get to take free classes, but do not pay taxes to support the educational system.
sunnyday (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2010 at 9:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"sunnyday" I have a similar experience!!
I have a friend who teachs ESL too! And she has a class with perfect attendance, and a tired but anxious immigrant population eager to learn, and so grateful for the opportunity.
On the other hand, my OTHER friend is tired of her Senior Water Aerobics class filled with old folks complaining about how cold the water is, how their bowels have moved too little or too late, constantly missing classes or trying to sneak in without paying.
What seems unfair to me is that the immigrants are working sometimes two or three jobs of hard labor, and still putting in solid work on their ESL classes in an effort to make a better life in their new country. On the other hand, all the Prop.13-enabled-tax-shirkers spend their golden years whining about excess taxation and the high cost of SBCC extension courses.
That's so weird.
binky (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2010 at 10:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I imagine that both the stories of binky and sunnyday could be true but it's more likely they are using the stories to make a point.
Either way, the approach administration is taking towards cutting affordable classes for seniors is unacceptable. What happened to the 'community' in community college?
whatsername (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2010 at 12:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh ... my story is definitely true!
It's on the Internet, fergawdsake.
binky (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2010 at 3:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It is true because it is onthe internet! come on!
lmeoriole (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2010 at 5:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Check the waiting list for the water exercise class. I think you can find out how many people are waiting on the list (it's around 50).
Pop into any ESL class (around the 3rd class) and see how many people are really there. It's suppose to be 15, but you'll see it really to be about 7-8.
sunnyday (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2010 at 9:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Rather than wiping out the entire Adult Ed program all at once, the SBCC Board and Administrators are dismantling our wonderful classes piece-by-piece.
It’s happening in slow motion so that no one will suspect or complain very much.
The Board is ultimately responsible for all this. Note that several Board members are up for re-election in November.
Why don’t we connect the dots and elect NEW Board members who will nurture Adult Ed instead of destroying it…!?
The steamroller will continue to flatten our beloved program, unless we act.
heyday (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2010 at 2:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The stories about ESL vs. Senior Health are so sad. None of this emnity existed before Serban. The Trustees made a bad choice when replacing Romo with Serban. The fact is, cuts should be made far away from the classroom and the students. Instead Serban and Arellano are busting the piggy bank to get more administrative staff. These staff will certainly need new equipment, office space and furniture. Hey, I have an idea. Anyone who has a chance, take a walk around Schott and Wake. Visit the Admin. Offices, the STEP offices, etc. Say Hi. Take note of what you see. After all, we are tax payers and this is a public school. Maybe the campus will just sit there all Summer.. Then, lets all take the same route next September when classes are back. Notice if the Admin. Offices reflect the SBCC Pres. and Vice Pres. Statements that there is NO money. Serban's Press Box is just the beginning of "queenly" project spending.
artfarm (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2010 at 4:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)