A confidential informant—who is related to one of the defendants accused in the 2007 murder of Lorenzo Carachure—broke the case open for authorities and led them to those involved in the murder, according to the case’s prosecutor in his opening statement Tuesday morning, the commencement of what is sure to be a lengthy and complicated trial.
On trial for murder are four defendants—Ruben Mize, Bryan Medinilla, Ricardo Nava, and Raul Diaz—none of whom are older than 21, and all of whom were juveniles at the time of the crime. They all are facing similar, adult charges: murder with a gang enhancement, two counts of attempted murder with a gang enhancement, and one count of being an active participant in a criminal street gang. Mize is also on trial on an attempted murder charge for an assault that took place on January 17, 2008.
Mize’s name is popping up frequently in Superior Court these days, as he has several serious felony cases pending against him. Still a teenager, Mize first became known to police at the age of 12. Specifically, in this most recent case, prosecutor Hans Almgren has alleged that Mize was one of two (Medinilla being the other) who used a knife against Carachure.
In addition to the five charges Mize faces at the Carachure trial, he also faces attempted murder charges for a 2007 stabbing in which the victim was stabbed more than 30 times, charges for an alleged gang-related assault in Juvenile Hall in February 2009, and a charge of inducing or soliciting another to be a part of a gang through a jump-in that allegedly took place in January 2008.
Nava was sentenced in January to 19 years in state prison for attacking a rival Westside gang member in 2007. He pleaded guilty to attempted murder with a gang enhancement.
The prosecution painted a picture Tuesday morning of a callous murder at the hands of a group of people who managed to avoid arrest for some time. Two days prior to the murder, according to Almgren, three people, including Lorenzo Carachure, were attacked on State Street; one of the victims received a broken nose and a black eye. The day of the murder, that same victim was working in the back of the China Pavilion on Chapala Street when Eastsiders allegedly came in and taunted him. Ten minutes later, Almgren said, they returned and said they’d be looking for him later that night.
That prompted him to call his friends, cousins Noe and Lorenzo Carachure, who agreed to walk him home when he got off work that night. At around 10 p.m. the threesome were walking on San Pascual Street, not far from where the three—all of whom were Westside gang members at one time or another—resided, when they were rushed by people screaming “Eastside,” Almgren told the jury of seven women and five men. All three were stabbed, Almgren said. Lorenzo Carachure, 16 years old at the time, was hit in the head with a carjack (Almgren alleges by Raul Diaz) and knocked unconscious, and it was after that that Mize cut Carachure in the neck and Medinilla stabbed the victim in the stomach, according to the prosecutor. He died hours later at Cottage Hospital.
No doubt the X factor in this case will be extracting truthful information from witnesses on the stand. Dozens of witnesses have been subpoenaed and will be sworn in to tell the truth, but gang-related cases can be complicated. Not only do potential threats exist, but several witnesses’ motives for testifying will also be scrutinized.
Three of the defense attorneys made this an issue in their opening statements. Neil Levinson, attorney for Nava, said there was only one witness in the case who was not a gang member, had not worked out a deal with the prosecution, was not biased, and not being paid for his cooperation. And that witness, a man who allegedly saw the scrum from a rooftop on San Pascual, can’t identify any of the combatants, Levinson said. Additionally, “There’s no physical evidence connecting Ricardo Nava to the crime,” he said, a statement later echoed by other defense attorneys about their own clients.
Some witnesses, Levinson said, like Emilio Mora, lied to make a deal with prosecutors and are unreliable. Mora, a longtime Eastside gang member, was charged in this case along with the others, but before the trial he pleaded guilty to two counts of attempted murder with gang enhancements and one count of being an active participant in a street gang. His plea deal, Almgren earlier explained, was contingent on him telling the truth in this trial.
Sam Eaton, attorney for Raul Diaz, told the jury that it was not his client who used the carjack to hit Carachure in the head, but likely Mora. Diaz rode over to the crime scene in the bed of the pickup, and wasn’t aware the others were armed with weapons, Eaton explained. He suggested Mora’s culpability in the crime wasn’t how it was portrayed by the prosecution. Days after the incident, Eaton said, Diaz (who Eaton said was friends with the others, but merely because he lived on the Eastside) was crying in front of others, because he “saw something he shouldn’t have seen.”
As with Mora, Carlos Diaz—who allegedly drove the group to the scene of the crime at the behest of his sister, then a girlfriend of Mize—is expected to testify, having reached a deal with the prosecution. He pleaded guilty to accessory to murder after the fact, with a gang enhancement. He has not been sentenced yet.
Robert Martinez, the older brother of Ruben Mize, was also charged in this case as an accessory to murder after the fact, but his case was severed from the others. He too is expected on the stand, but what he, along with the others, testifies to is still up in the air. “The questions are going to be asked and I’m not really sure what they’re going to say,” Almgren said.
The star of the show Tuesday was Chris Diaz, a cousin of Mize’s who became a confidential informant for authorities when he found out about his cousin’s alleged involvement in the crime. He explained on the stand: “If that had been my son, I wish someone would’ve come forward and said something about it.” He testified that he had had a conversation with Mize and Medinilla in which they both admitted to stabbing the victim, and he later agreed to wear a wire.
Audio from that recording, made when he and Mize were in a car together, was played in court Tuesday. On the recording, Mize can be heard telling Diaz where he “stuck Nemo.” He told his cousin that the “kill shot” was a stab to the neck. He went on to explain that what “helped us out” was that “Nemo” was hit in the head with a carjack, and Carachure “couldn’t get up … arms on the ground like he passed out.” Mize also talked about another incident further down the road on San Pascual—which Almgren is connecting to the attempted murder charge against Mize—and told Diaz, “I was stabbing him in the neck, he was yelling ‘Westside ‘til I die!’”
Chris Diaz is now part of the federal witness protection program, moved from Santa Barbara to an undisclosed location, and has a new name. His cooperation with authorities not only led to arrests in this case, but also led to the 2008 federal indictment of dozens of Eastside gang members in Operation Gator Roll.
James Crowder, attorney for Medinilla, said Diaz has been paid handsomely for cooperating with authorities. “Clearly he has a reason to want to please people,” Crowder told the jury, explaining that Diaz can’t be trusted and what he said can’t be corroborated, especially when it comes to his client. Diaz also has a prior record, he pointed out.
Mize’s attorney, Joseph Allen, reserved his right to give an opening statement until he presents Mize’s defense. The trial is expected to run six weeks, and dozens of witnesses, from doctors who treated Carachure at Cottage Hospital, to police detectives, to gang members and associates, are all expected to take the stand.
Cross-examination of Diaz was set to begin Wednesday morning.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace









Previous Month



Comments
why do those gang brats have to use equalizers, guns and knives? can't they settle their differences the old fashioned way, by duking it out? by actually being tough, but dumb
richardsinclair (anonymous profile)
May 26, 2010 at 12:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
That has been done, but not everybody adheres to the rules of proper "street" fighting, which only rule is "there is no rules."
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
May 26, 2010 at 3:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The prosecutor looks meaner than the defendent.
sixdolphins (anonymous profile)
May 26, 2010 at 8:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree. throw some tats and baggy clothes. and the DA could be an OG.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
May 26, 2010 at 9:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What is an "OG"?
sixdolphins (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 2:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@sixdolphins, OG = "Original Gangsta"
@richardsinclair and AZ2SB,
In the case of any conflict, there is rarely a "fair fight". Escalation of response is the normal path, from street gang battles, to countries at war. Might makes right--even when the "right" itself might not be.
Off-topic,
What's the deal with "being an active participant in a criminal street gang" being considered illegal? I understand the intent of it, but it seems poised to conflict with the Right of Assembly. And, as for the "gang enhancement" tags, I don't even want to open that can. . . .
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 8:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
i think people like the prosecutor shave their heads for several possible reasons:
1. they are pretending they aren't bald
2. they want to look like repo men, bouncers , celeb body guards or prison inmates
in short, they want to look menacing and wind up looking pathetic
richardsinclair (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 10:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Richard- I don't know, this guy doesn't look too pathetic. I wouldn't want to be sitting on the defense side with my life in his hands.
Equuas- These are not gang of protestestors or even a social club. These are gangs of persons in "cahoots" committing crime together, it can be drug dealing, thefts, graffitti or just plain old assualts. At least in a legal sense that is what it is. It sometimes stands on "iffy" grounds though when the gang enhancement is given two to or more persons of the same ethnic background from the same neighborhood, when only one of that group decides to make a "bad" decision. Or better yet, when one person, acting independently and in fear of their life defends themself against an attack is given that charge because they have associated with persons of a gang. Usually, that again, is reserved for a certain racial ethnicity. Most people can be considered a gang associate if you went to public school.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 10:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
i wonder if mandatory classes in parenting would reduce the tendency to join gangs or is peer pressure too great . i.e. do most gang members come from dysfunctional families?
richardsinclair (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 11:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
are you all seriously talking about the prosecutor's haircut and pondering whether there is a psychological reason for his hairstyle? as a thought, how about commenting on the merits or lack thereof of the case he is trying? or maybe the negative impact street gangs (who kill people) have on our community and the health of our young people? last time i checked, the d.a.'s office is responsible for prosecuting those alleged to be in violation of our laws, not to appear on the cover of people magazine.
priorities (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 11:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Here's another follicly-challenged group that is getting their gangsta-asses handed to them via the RICO statutes (@richardsinclair: I'd bet many of them came from very good families):
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/20/bus...
binky (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 12:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
wasted lives, caught up in BS machismo, next stop the penitentiary and on any given day that's a no fun place. look closely because the next time you see these guys they will be old wasted men... change the channel.
contactjohn (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
what can be done to help these miscreants, the underbelly of society? i guess there's big money in the privatisation of prisons. there must be a better answer than warehousing. here in alabama, atmore prison has extensive farms to earn funds and i have "prison blues" made there. an acquaintance is in prison in mississippi for a drug-induced bit of stupidity and says it is not the dept of corrections but of corruption.
richardsinclair (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2010 at 4:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Believe it or not prisons are self-maintaining here in CA. Inmates provide all the labor and there is PIA (Prison Industries Authority) which makes clothes, shoes and soap. They also have beef farms, pork farms, and milk products, plus hay farms to feed the animals. All done with inmate labor. Where the state loses money is in the wages it pays their guards, which of course are run by the biggest, most powerful mafia, er, I mean, union in the state-The Peace Officers Union. Being a prison guard is a very well-paid job, and only dangerous in a few of the high level institutions.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2010 at 11:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
befor any of you start running your mouths about the moms and dads of the kids you should no it takes to to work these days and if they had more programs for they kids then maybe it would stops some of are kids being in gangs and maybe are cops should be more involvide in helping are kids not harasing them we need more cops like paine green and to all u moms who cry every nite about your kids being lock up remeber they made these choices and no they are still your kids and we love them no matter what god bless you moms and dad
cheppa56 (anonymous profile)
June 1, 2010 at 7:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you for the answer equus.
sixdolphins (anonymous profile)
June 2, 2010 at 4:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@richardsinclair no most of these kids didn't come from dysfunctional families. If anything those kids had to much time on there hands there parents worked hard to give them a better life the gangs in Santa Barbara have been there for generations and will continue to be there...
jinx1208 (anonymous profile)
April 11, 2011 at 2:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)