It’s fitting that a place known for its giraffes might stick its neck out for a fundraiser, and that’s exactly what the Santa Barbara Zoo is doing with its first Zoo Brew on Saturday, June 5. “The notion of a Zoo Brew and ‘Saving Wildlife’ is something a number of zoos across the nation have done before,” explained Rich Block, the zoo’s CEO. “In the zoo community, we don’t treat things as proprietary; good ideas are treated as good ideas and pretty much shared. Certainly a wine tasting is nothing new in this area, but we thought a beer tasting just might be.”
The beer people are certainly lining up. “Right now we have 20 breweries participating, but a few more seem to come on board every week,” said Dean Noble, the zoo’s marketing director, happy to say that it all benefits his employer. “We’ve got virtually every local brewery participating.” The list includes Anacapa Brewing Company, The Brewhouse, Firestone Walker Brewing Company, Island Brewing Company, Santa Barbara Brewing Company, Telegraph Brewing Company, and even the C.A.R.P. Homebrewers. Breweries from other regions range from Speakeasy to Stone, Wyder’s to Widmer.
The Brewhouse has even created a special sudsy treat for the event. “It’s a Fox Tail Pale Ale, named after the cute little charmer island fox at the zoo,” explained Pete Johnson from the Brewhouse. “I think Santa Barbarans have a lot of reasons to feel lucky we live here, but part of that is the zoo, so we picked a local boy who was endangered to name the beer after. Plus, I just like drinking beer with foxes.” Johnson describes the beer as “a classic American pale ale, somewhat citrusy with a strong hop character but a fair amount of English malt for balance and sweetness.”
The Brewhouse will also be featuring its Habanero Pilsner, which Johnson says is “flavored with hot chili peppers. It’s not that often you get to taste something that’s cold and wet and hot.” He’ll also bring along a third beer, but he’s not sure which one, yet. “Perhaps it will be the Condor Pilsner,” he suggested, “technically named after the whale-watching boat, but I’m sure that was named after the bird, so there you go.”
The zoo-brew connection isn’t just merely about playful names. “Guests will stroll the zoo grounds, too,” said Noble. “The hilltop [the site for the tasting area] is adjacent to the new California Trails section of the zoo that features condors, foxes, the Pacific rattlesnake. I hope people go visit their ‘neighbors’ they rarely get a chance to see in the wild.”
Food choices, which, unlike the beer, must be purchased separately, aren’t quite as wild. Explained food services director Chris Gambler, “The zoo will be serving up some sure-to-please, pub-friendly favorites, such as beer-basted bratwurst and grilled sausages, along with Buffalo wings, beer-battered onion rings, and wedge cut fries.” Added Noble, “We hope the aroma of the grills will be irresistible. Our people are always looking for things that can be eaten with one hand or with little dexterity.”
That free hand might get a chance to pet one of the zoo’s animal ambassadors, who will also be taken into the event. “Their work is really voluntary,” is how Block put it, tongue-in-cheek. “We can’t always count on them being willing to be taken into groups. But the Channel Island Fox, he’s really the top dog, so to speak. He’s the epitome of animal magnetism and terribly photogenic. Plus the beer is named after him, so we hope he’ll make an appearance.”
Of course, even if attendees don’t see the fox, they will enjoy brews made from Oregon to San Diego. “I think ambience will improve even the finest beer,” said Noble. “I don’t know how many beer festivals have a hilltop 360-degree view of the Pacific, the mountains, the towering palm trees.” Or there’s Johnson’s way of looking at it: “The lure of great beers is always enough to get me anywhere, but helping out the zoo? It’s a great place we’ve got. I spent a lot of time over there when my son was five or six years old.”
4•1•1
Get slightly animal during Zoo Brew at the Santa Barbara Zoo, 500 Niños Drive, Saturday, June 5, 2-6 p.m. Tickets are $40 per person for unlimited tasting; tickets may be available at the door at $50. See sbzoo.org.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
Mr. Clausen, your comments, please, on this distasteful view of our animal instincts...
virtuallynothing (anonymous profile)
May 25, 2010 at 5 p.m. (Suggest removal)
virtuallynothing, you're on to something!
You could say, "Cue clausen."
And don't forget his fellow Temperance and Anti-Saloon League member "Holly," who also will carry our nation toward an anti-spirit spirit: "Tis here we pledge perpetual hate, to all that can intoxicate."
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
May 25, 2010 at 5:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Mr. Clausen, your comments, please, on this distasteful view of our animal instincts."
Do it at home.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 26, 2010 at 2:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
CAB: (Those underscores are such a waste of typing space) As I suggested to your friend virtuallynothing on another blog, I think you two would go over well at a Mothers Against Drunk Driving meeting.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 26, 2010 at 2:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What is the "Temperance and Anti-Saloon League", kids? Help me out here, I don't get it.
How does the fact that I object to drinking and driving, or the fact that EVERY function nowadays is an advertisement for the local alcohol production/sales industry make me a "Temperance and Anti-Saloon League member"?
I believe that every adult should have the inalienable right to put into or take out of his/her own body whatever s/he wishes. If you want to drink or smoke pot, go right ahead.
Prohibition doesn't work. We've seen this before and we see it now every day in the dismal failure that is the "war on drugs".
As long as you aren't driving or inflicting your intoxication on those who don't want to be around it, I will happily stand up in any court in the land and proclaim your right to carry on as you please.
My objections are raised when A: minors are involved, B: drinkers are also driving, C: Nearly EVERY function now involves alcohol and D: the wino/ brew-snob mob frantically keep trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear by pretending that wine/beer are not REALLY alcohol, and are instead some sort of upscale elixir which lend a special cachet to the function at hand.
Additionally, the fact that people have not yet figured out that they are being had on by the alcohol production/sales industry in this County, and who continue shilling and advertising for this juggernaut, is just sad.
If anyone DARES to mention the Emperor's glaring nudity, s/he is swiftly mocked and declared a "Temperance and Anti-Saloon League member" by those who are made uncomfortable by these simple truths.
No, I am NOT in favor of any form of Prohibition. I AM in favor of the truth. I am in favor of drinking NO alcohol before or while driving. Just as your right to smoke ends where my lungs begin, your right to drink or get high ends BEFORE the driver's seat. You don't get to make the choice for me and my family to pour alcohol down your gullet, then take our lives in your hands when you choose to then drive.
Why is that so very hard for some people to understand?
Holly (anonymous profile)
May 26, 2010 at 9:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"What is the 'Temperance and Anti-Saloon League', kids? Help me out here, I don't get it:
Because C.A.B. and V.N. have no ammo and they know it so they have to distort what others say.
"Why is that so very hard for some people to understand?"
Because denial is a main component of alcoholism--even if the alcoholism involved is dry co-dependency.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 26, 2010 at 10:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
C'mon, Bill. Other than correcting one typo, how were your exact quotes distorted? Speaking of which, from another of your comments to me:
"VN: Most of your above post isn't worth commenting on since most of it is a personal put down (God forbid if one questions the way people behave)"
You might look at your line in parentheses for a moment. And, as the policeman/prosecutor/judge/and jury, ask God exactly where you should stand for the best angle to get that first stone out of your hands and hit your target.
"Because denial is a main component of alcoholism--even if the alcoholism involved is dry co-dependency." No accusatory or judgmental tone here, Bill, right? Need another stone?
If I may quote Holly:
..."people MUST get along with others, whether they like them or not...Don't like kids, dogs or cars? My message to the folks who don't want anyone else to live or have freedom of movement in "their' community is simple: Too bad..deal with it; this is the grown-up real world...it's NOT all about you, sweetheart...."
It's not all about you, sweetheart.
It's not about ammo, Bill.
It's about amar.
virtuallynothing (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 12:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Virtuallynothing: Since you claim to seek the truth, I think you would be interesting in what I posted on the West Beach festival link where you accuse Mothers Against Drunk Driving of serving alcohol at their events and to save you the trouble, I provide your accusatory quote, then my response, then the link that leads to the story.
As for "amar", which I assume is a reference to the infinitive of the Spanish verb for "to love", I'm the one who is trying to raise awareness to the dangers of drinking and driving. Si, una parte de amar a cada uno u otro es no temar lo que piensen otros, y continuar hablar la verdad. Que le vaya bien. -B.C.-
"...though I have "told MADD off" as you phrase it. When they've sponsored 'benefits' which serve considerable amounts of alcoholic beverages MADD requested from and was donated by the very profit mongers you abhor and castigate. " -Virtuallynothing-
Virtuallynothing: In response to your above allegation about M.A.D.D., I contacted Silas Miers, Programs Specialist for the Sacramento, Ca, charter office of Mothers Against Drunk driving, and in the voice mail message I received from him today he told me that Mothers Against Drunk Driving has it written in to their policy that they absolutely are not to purchase or serve alcohol at their events and that if there is a third-party fundraiser which benefits M.A.D.D. where alcohol is planned to be served, M.A.D.D. will request that the alcohol not be served.
If you have any further questions, or wish to verify what I am writing , Mr. Miers can be reached at 916-481-6233 extension 104.
http://www.independent.com/news/2010/...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 6:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"I'm the one who is trying to raise awareness to the dangers of drinking and driving." -- billclausen
No, you go far beyond that; you use these comment areas to harass and attempt to belittle those who enjoy alcohol. And you have never had ANYONE defend drinking and driving, yet you persist.
And Holly says:
"As long as you aren't driving or inflicting your intoxication on those who don't want to be around it, I will happily stand up in any court in the land and proclaim your right to carry on as you please.
"My objections are raised when A: minors are involved, B: drinkers are also driving, C: Nearly EVERY function now involves alcohol and D: the wino/ brew-snob mob frantically keep trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear by pretending that wine/beer are not REALLY alcohol, and are instead some sort of upscale elixir which lend a special cachet to the function at hand."
Holly starts out with a nice sentiment, and proceeds to engage the Shrill-o-meter with various Straw Man attacks and imaginations, and gallops headlong into an odd kind of tilting at the windmills of people's aesthetics (which she doesn't share or even believe in).
And she has, and never will, encounter a rational online defense of driving drunk or enabling minors to drink and/or drive -- nobody wants that -- and persists in torching any an all who may derive a benefit or enjoyment from alcohol.
As I said, check out the Women's Christian Temperance Union: They are still around.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman%27...
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 6:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr. Burnett: I'm not remotely interested in the W.C.T.U. and you cite them to draw attention away from the main point I make which is that people attend these events, consume alcohol, then drive home.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 8:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Muy bueno, Guillermito. Pero era latino, no español. Sin embargo, su uso de la palabra 'temar' es confuso. ¿Quiso usted 'temer' 'o timando'?
virtuallynothing (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 8:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You got me on that one. I thought it was "temar" when I should have said "temer".
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 9:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh, and Bill, the MADD events to which I referred were in the 'mid to late '80s. Do ask Mr. Silas Miers exactly what MADD's policy was in Santa Barbara between 1985 and 1988, if he knows. I have had nothing to do with them since. Nor has MADD's founder Candy Lightner. Since you seem to be fond of links, here's one for you:
http://alcoholfacts.org/CrashCourseOn...
Usted hace mucho ruido, Bill. Un tambor vacío es el más fuerte.
A Dios.
virtuallynothing (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2010 at 9:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nice sleight of hand, but are they doing that now? So back to the original issue: How do the people who attend these alcohol events get home?
For the record, I am against prohibition. My only concern is drinking and driving.
Yeah, keep on with the insults because you know you can't address the real issue at hand.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2010 at 4:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
VN: for what it's worth, I JUST read your e-mail to me. (Somehow it got dumped in the spam folder) I hear what you are saying about distracted drivers and I agree with you that drinking and driving is by no means the only problem.
What it really comes down to is that we disagree about the dangers of the growing number of bars/alcohol outlets but I totally agree with you about distracted drivers being a huge threat. Either way, I think both issues need to be addressed and let me assure you that while I won't budge on the issue of alcohol, I in no way mean to play down the dangers of distracted driving, and didn't realize you had been run into by someone who had been texting on the cell phone.
Hopefully, our comments will raise awareness to both these issue. -B.C.-
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2010 at 2:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)