In a curious case that is still being looked into, nearly 200 paychecks from the first pay period of the new school year were delivered short earlier this month, while, just a few days later, the woman in charge of payroll for the district abruptly resigned. And while he wouldn’t say the two incidents are nefariously connected, Superintendent Brian Sarvis did explain last week that the paycheck mix-up wasn’t the first of its kind and that an outside audit would likely be done in the coming weeks to make sure that nothing more serious had happened.
Specifically, paychecks issued on September 30 and October 1 were printed up for less than they should have been because too much money was taken out for health and welfare benefits apparently due to incorrect data entry, according to district officials. The error was caught and new checks were printed in less than 24 hours. On the same day the last erroneous checks were issued, payroll coordinator Patricia Vogt voluntarily resigned from her post, one that earned her between $95,000 to $108,000 a year. As for the independent audit, the district is considering bringing in the Fiscal Crisis and Management Team, the same group that provided an outside — and ultimately scathing — look at its beleaguered Special Education department last year, though any such move would require the approval of the school board.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace




Previous Month



Comments
>>>Patricia Vogt voluntarily resigned from her post, one that earned her between $95,000 to $108,000 a year.
That much money for a payroll clerk?!?!? No wonder the teachers can't get what they deserve. Pay a grade school teacher that much and you would attract nothing but the best. Of course you would have to get rid of some of the non-performers, which the union would never allow.
sbsailor (anonymous profile)
October 21, 2010 at 7:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The education system is the biggest Ponzi scheme going. Ripping off the students, teachers and tax payers. This is just the tip of the ice berg.
lordleadbetter (anonymous profile)
October 21, 2010 at 9:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Amen sbsailor & lordleadbetter.
NO ONE should involved with the schools should be making that kind of money until Johnny can read and write (in English), arts & music are back in the schools, school is a safe place for everyone to be, and the energy spent on enforcing political correctness/indoctrination is instead spent on...hello...making sure kids are educated in the subjects they need in order to get into the workforce.
"The Schools" and "Education" are sacred cows in our society which no one dares challenge. Taxpayers just shut up and hand over more and more money, with no accounting for what has been and is being spent, including these insane salaries for the paper pushers and big shots at the top of the pile.
When are we ever going to start examining and putting a stop to these ridiculous salaries and fat benefit packages for these people? How the HELL is a paper pusher deserving of 6 figures when teachers and bus drivers, who have actual contact with kids and who are doing actual day to day hard work in the trenches, are scraping by on just enough to pay rent? Why are those teachers buying supplies out of their meager salaries while the executives who have made a career out of pushing paper and counting beans, are laughing all the way to the bank every payday?
When are taxpayers going to stop just shuffling along and fearfully handing over more and more money to "Education", with no accounting for how that money is spent, and while ANYONE is making 6 figures working for "The Schools"?
Disgusting!
Holly (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2010 at 6:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Nobody working in education should make 6 figures, eh? Superintendants? Principals? Payroll Coordinators? Sure, cutting everyone down to $60K might feel good, but how would education improve once those you drive those people into other sectors? Do you think a 6-figure administrative employee will stick around if you cut his salary to $60K? Or that he can be replaced by someone who is willing to work for $60K? You've obviously never tried to hire in a competitive market, or you're dreaming - and these kinds of comments don't help move the debate about education forward.
vwalton (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2010 at 8:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Gotta agree with Holly on this one. Pay our teachers. It's no wonder they have a strong union. They have to . . . with all the morons running education.
Draxor (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2010 at 10:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
One big difference is that it would be nearly impossible to force the "abrupt resignation" of a teacher doing the kind of shoddy work that this woman was allegedly doing. And that's because of the union. Let's not be naive to think the union actually cares about the kids and their education. The union is out to protect it's own dues pipeline. It doesn't want to see anyone forced out, no matter how poorly they perform. But I agree on the exorbitant salaries at the district office. The entire system needs fixing.
Scooter (anonymous profile)
October 23, 2010 at 1:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow - I'm in the wrong field for sure. Get paid fat cash to crunch some numbers, skim a little bit extra off the teachers' salaries, resign later when anyone catches wind of it, and take off to a Carribean Island to live off my fat greed (that last part's mine)? I would love to be paid a lot to rob people. And now that there's this opening...
Gaijin (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2010 at 12:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)