At 8:15 a.m. on August 31, Courtney Caswell-Peyton appears at the corner of Anacapa and Figueroa streets, pushing herself in her wheelchair while balancing a stuffed-to-the-brim backpack on her lap. She is moving quickly, and halfway up the block the backpack slips off her lap and onto the street. She retrieves it, with some difficulty, then she continues on her way.
Caswell-Peyton, who is in her mid thirties, is moving with purpose because she has an 8 a.m. appointment at Superior Court. She is going to be arraigned on a charge of violating Penal Code Section 647 (e) — unlawful lodging. She received the citation on August 1 at 7 a.m. on the 1000 block of State Street where, presumably, she’d fallen asleep.
In its settlement of an ACLU lawsuit, the City of Santa Barbara agreed to refrain from ticketing 50 of the city’s most chronically homeless disabled people for illegal sleeping and camping and for violating section 647 (e) of the Penal Code. Caswell-Peyton is chronically homeless and disabled; she’s been homeless here for at least two years and in a wheelchair the whole time. To read more, see homelessinsb.org.

Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Share Article
Myspace


Previous Month



Comments
Was this going to go somewhere? Seems like the starter of a tear-jearking opinion piece that got lost in its execution.
Either way, refrain doesn't mean "won't do", it means "resist from doing." If the City has already "refrained" from ticketing 50 chronic homeless people (as this pointless and ridiculous settlement with the ACLU required), this woman is probably out of luck.
Frankly, if she hadn't decided to 'camp out' on State Street, I don't think anyone would have given her a second glance.
sbdude (anonymous profile)
September 2, 2010 at 3:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Likely she was not 'camping out' at all, but fell asleep while sitting in her wheelchair, which if true is a far cry from the sbdude's (and many under- and misinformed residents') preference to assume what is convenient and easy to believe, rather than getting the facts and getting them straight--(something more difficult to do, but also more beneficial for human wellbeing).
4WS (anonymous profile)
September 3, 2010 at 7:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
exactly what is the point of a law against sleeping in the street if you exempt the top 50 people who do it most?? is that some kind of joke? i hope they didnt cut down any trees to print that law. lets do the same for all laws. how about we exempt the 50 most intoxicated people from drunk in public laws? that should be fun to watch.
also, a wheelchair is just a chair with wheels. anyone can sit in one. if the article is trying to imply that she is disabled in some way or does not have use of her legs, it should say so.
years ago being in a wheelchair might have been a stronger indication of disability, but lately it seems that any and everyone can get their hands on a chair, motorized scooter or handicapped parking pass. they can claim old age, obesity, ADD, depression, restless leg syndrome, whatever. it's really a shame for people who are legitimately immobilized.
4WS... i think you may be missing one simple important fact... you dont get on the top 50 most homeless list by accidentally dozing in your wheelchair once. your comment makes no sense.
rcobban (anonymous profile)
September 3, 2010 at 2:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
To quote the article above, and taking it for granted that it is factual: "Caswell-Peyton is chronically homeless and disabled; she’s been homeless here for at least two years and in a wheelchair the whole time."
4WS (anonymous profile)
September 3, 2010 at 5:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)