• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits
    :Santa Barbara County Jail

    Paul Wellman (file)

    :Santa Barbara County Jail


    Vote Yes on Measure S

    The Independent‘s Endorsement of the Half-Cent Tax to Build a New Santa Barbara County Jail


    Thursday, September 2, 2010
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Share Article
    Facebook Facebook
    Twitter Twitter
    Google+1 Google+1
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    Yahoo! Buzz Yahoo! Buzz
    diigo Diigo
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!
    Share on Myspace Myspace

    If common sense, financial self-interest, or human decency held sway, Measure S would be a slam dunk. Unfortunately, new jail measures are notoriously hard to pass, in part because they — like all tax increases — require a two-thirds supermajority to win voter approval. But for Santa Barbara County voters, Measure S poses the last, best, and only realistic crack at building a much-needed new jail, and we urge you to support it.

    No matter what you think about the fairness or sanity of certain laws, the need for a new jail is factually incontrovertible. Our current jail was built in 1971, but by 1986, a population cap was ordered in response to a lawsuit filed by inmates. Since then, as previous sheriffs have struggled to find more space, the Grand Jury has issued one harrowing study after another about jail overcrowding. In 2000, then-sheriff Jim Thomas proposed a sales tax to fund a new jail that was rejected by voters. Six years ago, Lompoc’s police chief Bill Brown managed to upset the entrenched incumbent, Sheriff Jim Anderson, largely by laying out a strategy for building the new jail. This November 2, that strategy faces its toughest test.

    Our current jail features about 800 beds, but on any given weekend, the real population is closer to 1,000 inmates. These numbers, however, only hint at the real problems. In the past 10 years, the average jail inmate has grown considerably more violent. Ten percent are behind bars either for murder or attempted murder, nearly 40 percent for gang-related offenses. Mixing and matching inmate populations to minimize violent eruptions has become an art akin to dancing with nitroglycerine. Making matters more explosive, at least 25 percent of all prisoners are prescribed psychotropic medications while the vast majority struggle with various addictions.

    The 305-bed facility proposed for North County, where most of the people in custody come from, will cost $80 million to build and about $17 million a year to run— that’s serious money. But Brown’s already secured a commitment of $56 million in state funds to cover most of the construction costs — that’s serious money, too. The remaining construction costs and operating expenses would come from the $30 million a year that Measure S would generate in sales tax revenues during its 14-year life span. But building and running the jail would take only half the money provided by Measure S. The remaining $15 million a year would be split three ways between fire protection, law enforcement, and, most critically, prevention and intervention programs designed to keep people out of jail.

    While all three categories need serious financial help, we’re convinced the contribution to prevention and, for those already in jail, intervention will make the biggest, most immediate difference. While we would have preferred even more support, the estimated $70 million during the next 14 years will have an undeniably profound impact on programs dealing with the mentally ill, the addicted, the homeless, and those drawn to gang life. We recognize that county jails are less than ideal treatment venues for people struggling with these demons, but we also know that, without a credible threat of incarceration, many won’t pursue the treatment they need. With about 1,800 inmates released early each year due to overcrowding, no such threat exists anymore in Santa Barbara County. This reality negates any rehabilitation that the county jail could provide while simultaneously undermining any potential for deterrence.

    We understand new taxes are never popular, especially during a recession. But if Measure S passes, county residents will actually experience a half-cent reduction in their sales-tax burden. That’s because a statewide one-cent sales tax will expire at the same time Measure S goes into effect. Plus, unlike other taxes, Measure S is strictly local — revenues will be collected and spent solely in Santa Barbara County under the watch of a citizens advisory committee appointed by the supervisors to ensure funds are spent as they should be.

    We understand there are plenty of misgivings about Measure S, including the legitimate concern about using the criminal justice system to further perpetuate social inequities. But those issues won’t be addressed by voting against Measure S, as the status quo only intensifies them. There’s not a shred of research showing any social benefit from jail overcrowding. The evidence to the contrary, however, is overwhelming. Please vote yes for Measure S.

    Comments

    Independent Discussion Guidelines

    I can not support this.
    The city and county are robbing the taxpayers by continuing to pay outrageous pension benefits.
    The money is there they are just electing to fund pensions instead of a new jail, parks, homeless etc.

    loneranger (anonymous profile)
    September 2, 2010 at 5:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Wow. a surprise endorsement, so long before the elections...I saw the "all problem solving" expenditure chart, but I didn't see an expense there for media buys...I've loved watching each individual bought out, and now the Indy.

    windows (anonymous profile)
    September 2, 2010 at 10:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    This bill is a disgusting attempt to hold a gun of fear to people's heads to satisfy the prison industry. Maybe if the DA's office was less zealous in bloating their resumes there'd be less people arrested on trumped charges I.e. the recent sting on "illegal contractors" a majority of whom we're just people looking for a job such as painting or landscaping, NOT building bridges or jails for that matter. Or perhaps the Hortipharm case, all of which defendants have had their bail go from one million to zero but they still had to spend unjust time in jail as the DA stalled and stalled because they evidently have no case.
    Why can't they have a half cent tax increase just for intervention or rehab? And why does a new jail take preference over our schools, roads, libraries?Those are alot of things that help people stay away from the lure of illegal activities.
    Vote NO if care at all about this city and its soul, vote NO if you ever want to have any faith in the justice/legal system in this community, county, country.

    EZK (anonymous profile)
    September 2, 2010 at 12:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Gag, wheeze, schneez . . . . "Buelshout!"

    What a drivelous stab at trying to get folks to drink the Sheriff's kool-aid concoction.

    In fact, common sense, financial self-interest, and human decency all will be served by voting NO on S.

    Jail-overcrowding is a profoundly shameful condition in our society-- a condition that has resulted from the badly misplaced priorities of political leaders and the unrelenting efforts of those who stand to gain from diverting more and more public money into putting more and more people into more and more jails.

    Jail-overcrowded is a symptom of a diseased criminal justice system, and voting for more this measure is a sure-fire way to exacerbate and intensify this evil.

    No thanks, Indy. You really missed the point on this issue, and one can only hope that there were some strong voices against this misguided grunt of yours.

    Say it aint so, Angry Poodle, that you weren't in the room when this stinker was let loose.

    Pee-yoooooo!

    southlander (anonymous profile)
    September 2, 2010 at 12:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    "If common sense, financial self-interest, or human decency held sway, Measure S would be a slam dunk."

    If common sense, financial self-interest, or human decency held sway: we wouldn't be filling up our jails with people who shouldn't be there!

    When China can point to the US and accuse us of Human Rights violations because we have the *highest percentage of our population behind bars*, there is a serious problem.

    I'm sorry, but the solution is NOT to build more jails so we can pack them full of more people who don't belong there.

    Why won't the elected officials listen to the voters? Heck, why doesn't the Indy listen to it's readers. I just don't get it, why are their heads in the sand?

    Come on Indy...

    bronc (anonymous profile)
    September 2, 2010 at 2:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    If Santa Barbara County jails were allowed to send all of their mentally ill population to a State or County mental hospital, I don't think we would need a new jail. This new sales tax should be directed towards a new mental health facility. A new jail will continue the mismanagement of the mentally ill population at a cost that is above and beyond that of a new county mental hospital. Pushing for more of the status quo is a disservice.

    The Indy continues its tradition of more government for better or worse.

    Georgy (anonymous profile)
    September 2, 2010 at 4:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    PAAAAAAAALEEEEEEEEEAAAAAZZZZZEEE

    The leftist Independent is pushing for a tax and bigger government? GET OUT!!!

    Nothing to see here, move along.....

    jukin (anonymous profile)
    September 2, 2010 at 5:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Yes on 19, that will help alleviate the prison population.

    EZK (anonymous profile)
    September 2, 2010 at 9:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    We probably wouldn't need a prison at all if Prop 19 passes.

    loonpt (anonymous profile)
    September 3, 2010 at 12:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    I, too, am surprised by the Independent's endorsement of Measure S. At a time when the economy is in an almost unprecedented free fall, the idea of an increased sales tax to fund a North County Jail is outrageous. The Sheriff was ready to close the current one during budget hearings.

    In addition, there is an enormous amount of necessary infrastructure work needed across our County and all of California. Why not train prisoners--dare I say put them in chain gangs under strict supervision and discipline-- and get them to do some good old fashioned work like the rest of us who pay for their keep? Our community schools and many our County government buildings could be improved through janitorial services, gounds keeping, and drought-resistent landscaping that aren't being funded due to budgetary shortfalls. Teach prisoners work skills and a work ethic, require that they work, and transition them out of the prison system.

    This just should not be put on the back of the tax payers and the local merchants who are already suffering under this recession.

    gsjoh (anonymous profile)
    September 3, 2010 at 2:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Go to any public school campus in this county and look at the numerous "portable" classrooms. Build a $ 30 million jail while our kids are going to school in the equivalent of FEMA trailers? No Way!

    What kind of message does this send our children about how society values education?

    I'd gladly pay an additional half cent sales tax if it went to improving our school facilities. Maybe if we invested more in schools and education would need so many damn jails and prisons.........

    sbbrian (anonymous profile)
    September 4, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    What messages does the Indy intend to convey by the photo that accompanies its warped view of this issue?

    It shows a clean and well-lighted room similar to a military barracks, back far more accommodating that most. Like military personnel, persons who are in jail must expect to live in no better conditions than soldiers subject to rigorous military discipline and bare-minimum conditions. This picture does NOT portray a place that provides less than this, and any claim otherwise is bunkum in a clown suit.

    The writers above speak truths that the Indy and the Sheriff find too inconvenient to bear, and so they turn to the chapter on Blatantly False Propaganda in order to try to sell the S=$cheme.

    For shame, Indy. For shame.

    southlander (anonymous profile)
    September 5, 2010 at 11:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Why aren't the prisons self-supporting? After all, with all the captive labor, energy, and time to lay around in bed, surely this creative group can handle it. There is way too much human capacity languishing in prison beds to ask for handouts.

    gsjoh (anonymous profile)
    September 5, 2010 at 9:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Yes on Proposition 19 and Yes On Measure S.

    My Republican Mama is probably rolling in her grave. But we need to change the drug policy in this country.

    We also need a Jail in North County. If you've followed the issue of Jail overcrowding in Santa Barbara County (if you've read the Independent for more than a few months) you know this.

    You can complain (like Andy Caldwell) that the Board should have done this years ago. But here we are.

    local (anonymous profile)
    September 7, 2010 at 11:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Yes on Proposition 19 and no on Prop S. A bigger jail system and more prisons, like war, are not the answer. The voters expressed their desire for education several years ago--not in the prison system but in our public schools and in educating our youth yet their desires and the funding towards K-12 education are now gutted. How odd--the Independent, the Santa Barbara News Press, the Daily Sound, the Sheriff, the Democrat-electeds (Wolf, Schneider, Farr, et. al.) are all in agreement...the establishment in the 1960s and the establishment now. Where are the Green Party, the Peace and Freedom Party and the Liberterians to offer up some new and creative ideas? Jail crowing? How about class-room overcrowding?

    gsjoh (anonymous profile)
    September 10, 2010 at 10:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I am as bleeding heart liberal as they come. Way to the left of all those supes, who I admire, respect and support greatly. However, there is NO WAY I can support this regressive sales tax for more jails. Sales taxes are the most regressive of any form of tax meaning they have the biggest impact on the poorest people. NO NO NO to Measure S

    Noletaman (anonymous profile)
    October 6, 2010 at 1:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    YES on Prop 19 will also help overcrowding issues.

    girlslocker (anonymous profile)
    October 7, 2010 at 9:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    The pic looks like A or B block pretrial... and for my homies there...LOL!

    Most people there are pot smokers, dui's, homeless, and people who owe money to government. Dangerous criminals... LIE... they go to state pen.

    SB independent (and useful idiots responding here) are owned by employe unions, like seiu and prison guard unions.

    Worst part: Independent states, "passing a half pct tax will result in a 1/2 pct *decrease* in sales tax" ?????? Cmon guys, these phoney liberal shills are LYING to you.

    diversified (anonymous profile)
    October 29, 2010 at 9:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    okay....all that you are seeing on proposition "S" is a tax raise and are completely over looking the need for a Northern jail. You complain that with the rescission we are in, there is no money to go into the jail system. You claim we need more schools, well sorry but in the times we are living in, jails are necessary! Building more schools would be like buying "hundreds of tons of fish food to throw into the ocean believing that it will help world hunger by growing the fish population. " The truth is that if people don't want to be in school which many don't, making more school is doing just that. There are plenty of schools! Building a northern jail would make for more jobs and help with the economy along side with the decreasing of vast amount of inmates that are being let out due to the FACT of over crowding in county jails

    alexi1845 (anonymous profile)
    October 31, 2010 at 3:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Log in to comment

    Forgotten your password?

    Sign up

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Click here for current conditions

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Summer Adventure Guide 2011
    • Wedding Guide 2011
    • Best Of 2011
    • 2010 Election Coverage
    • Blue Green Guide 2011
    • Local Heroes 2011
    • 2011 Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • 2011 Foodie Awards
    • Stupid, Inept, or Corrupt?
    • It's My Life
    • Helicopters United
    • What Was Bacara’s Dworman Thinking?
    • White Denim Hits the Road with Wilco
    • Summit for a Cure
    1. S.B. Filmmaker Mike DeGruy Killed in Helicopter Crash
    2. Stupid, Inept, or Corrupt?
    3. New Hospital Helipad Sees Heavy Action
    4. Bye Bye, Redevelopment Agency
    5. S.B. Symphony to Perform Tribute to Ansel Adams
    6. Santa Maria Police Standards' Slippery Slope
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2012 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.