A new alliance of Milpas Street business owners is forming to try to beat back what they see as a deterioration of their neighborhood due to the presence of homeless people. Alan Bleecker, owner of Capital Hardware and the group’s leader, said he would be filing papers soon to create an organization called The Milpas Community Association. The alliance will ostensibly replace the now disbanded Milpas Association, which dissolved reportedly because its president moved to Oregon.
Mr. Bleecker said his new group would launch a crusade to take their neighborhood back using tools like an “adopt a block” program, Neighborhood Watch and the city-championed anti-panhandling campaign “Real Change, Not Spare Change”. They would also be petitioning the City for help solving problems that are “obvious” according to Bleecker; things like drug use, prostitution, defecation and urination.
“We’re assembling an organization of businesses who are disenchanted with the fact that there are so many people coming to the lower Milpas area and getting services but not respecting the community and neighborhoods,” Mr. Bleecker said. To read more, see homelessinsb.org.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace




Previous Month



Comments
That's awesome.
Good luck.
Lars (anonymous profile)
September 14, 2010 at 3:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Clearly, the people there along Milpas Street need to lead on this.
So what does the writer mean by "filing papers soon"?
Filing for what? Incorporation? A Neighborhood Watch?
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
September 14, 2010 at 7:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"filing papers soon" ? succession from the downtown chamber?
I can't help but wonder though what it is that this new group really wants. I understand the problems but what is it that this new group can do that is constitutional. Can they close Casa Esperanza? A couple years ago a bunch of dressy drunks from West Beach met in a neighborhood "bar" with council member Falcone to discuss all the homeless activity, including drunkedness of all things. Suggestions posted were mean and hateful with no real solutions offered.
The only real solution is a national response and yes it will take money for housing, food, clothing, health care or in other words promote the general welfare for these human beings.
I can't help but wonder why it is that our federal government cannot be sued to promote for this dignified "general welfare" that is preambled in our national constitution. When we have national standards that only allow perfect people to perform functions like serving up a hamburger, washing cars or perform on reality shows on the LCD, then what are the rest of us imperfects supposed to do? Die?
I know there will be a lot of well-to-do who would scoff at providing for the basics. I know the some will think this is unfair and that these basics would be freebies or socialism and all. But it is only in the context of the self that anyone would deny everyone the basics before the government provides free or subsidized barns for our horses, recreational activities such as hiking, lawn bowling, golfing and skateboarding and "free" socialist lanes of traffic and parking for our family's 2 or 3 SUVs and a couple sputtering and puttering recreational vehicles.
So write your senators. Tell them we need a national response. Oh and don't forget to tell them how to pay for it and what you're willing to give up.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
September 14, 2010 at 10:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Being homeless is not illegal.
Being 'tough on homeless' doesn't solve anything, it only propagates more homelessness. All you are doing is digging a bigger hole for these people. Not to mention it is extremely uncompassionate and just plain mean.
Maybe some of these business owners will experience it some day and change their mind. In fact, can we get a list of these business owners so I know what stores NOT to go to on Milpas? Maybe we as a compassionate community can help expedite that process.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
September 15, 2010 at 9:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Those who are forming this new association seem to have positive goals, as seen in paragraph two. Acting as a group, they may be able to come up with some solutions to making Milpas a safer and cleaner area again. The problems are there already, but working together in a positive way may help to resolve some of the problems.
bajamama (anonymous profile)
September 15, 2010 at 12:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If I were standing behind the counter at my hardware store watching the rain come down and suddenly a guy burst in demanding something to fix the hole in his roof I'd make sure he left the store with what he needed but I wouldn't rush and I wouldn't coddle him. If, as an afterthought, he purchased an axe to chop a hole in his neighbors roof I'd think he was either nuts or evil...
I'll translate that for Mr. Bleecker who, despite owning a hardware store, is acting more like the wet customer.
We've all watched as the Milpas corridor deteriorated and State Street was pressure-blasted and primped like a young bride, every morning, without fail. Apparently State Street is worth the extra effort, I don't know, maybe Mr. Bleecker should take that up with City Hall instead of sitting in on the review processes of his neighbor, the Shelter. The Shelter helps people, it feeds them, it clothes them, it gives them a chance to make another run at life. It's a good and a loving thing and in comparison to it Mr. Bleeckers concerns are pretty petty. Besides, we all saw what was happening: Homeless people didn't sweep down Milpas and turn it into a wallow, the City and buisiness owners allowed Milpas to fall apart and homeless people filled the vacuum. It could have been stopped, years ago, if Mr. Bleecker and other local merchants had used a little foresight and formed an association then, when it could have done some good.
Instead here we sit and the rain is coming down and Mr. Bleecker comes bursting in demanding roofing supplies and I, for one, have little sympathy for him. Moreover, his wanting to somehow manipulate or otherwise effect the operation of the shelter to get what he wants is lazy and mean-spirited, kind of like chopping a hole in your neighbors roof just because yours is leaking...
shibboleth (Wayne Gilbert Myers)
November 19, 2010 at 2:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)