CRAZY IS AS CRAZY DOES: Two people I’ve made it my policy not to mess with are the “Reverend” Hank Drost and Mike Foley. Both subscribe to bad-ass variants of that whole “so as you do to the least of my brothers you do unto me” Christian Compassion Thing — popularized most recently by Stephen Colbert in his testimony before Congress. Both do amazing work feeding the poor.
But hat’s not why I steer clear. They’re both scary serious, and in some instances, seriously scary. Certainly neither ever heard about turning the other cheek, and in recent days, Drost and Foley — who operate separately out of parallel universes — have come to feel under attack by business and political interests angry about the growing numbers of homeless people on our streets.
For more than 20 years, Drost — an insurance agent by day — has been running what’s known as the “Hank Show” on the waterfront every Sunday morning down by Pershing Park, feeding about 150 to 200 street people, passing out shirts, socks, shoelaces, toothpaste, mouthwash, and various other sundries. Drost — a former judo champion who insists that he is, in fact, the Biblical Prophet Daniel — does all this out of his own pocket. Daniel is most famous for getting chucked in the lion’s den, but best remembered for over-the-top apocalyptic visions that, in a contemporary context, might have called for psychotropic medications. Like Daniel, Drost is a little quick on the apocalyptic trigger for my comfort. When city officials threatened a few years back to move the Hank Show to a location far from the tourist crowds — at the instigation of some waterfront hotel owners — Hank notified the Powers-That-Be that if he was molested in any way, Santa Barbara would be wiped off the face of the map no later than 5 a.m. the following Monday. This particular showdown took place on a Super Bowl weekend. Given that I had bets on the game, I was much relieved city leaders saw fit not to call Hank’s bluff. I am hoping any business interests upset by the Hank Show will have the wisdom to do likewise. It’s a battle they can’t hope to win.
Foley, by contrast, is quick to never share any mystical thoughts he might harbor. Ruthlessly rational, Foley has run the Casa Esperanza Homeless Shelter off Milpas Street by the train tracks the past several years. On any given day, Foley can count on getting chewed out by clients who insist he’s an insensitive, power-hungry control freak. After that, he’ll get an earful from nearby business owners, who charge — as one described it to me — that the shelter is a “five-star magnet that’s attracting some very bad people to the neighborhood.” So far as I know, Mike does not go home and kick the dog. But when it comes to the mental health bureaucrats not dealing with the influx of psychologically damaged people walking the streets, he has elevated verbal flagellation to a new art form.
With the shelter’s Conditional Use Permit coming up for review by the Planning Commission next month , Foley’s freaking because three members of the City Council — that’s one short of a majority — have already notified him they don’t approve of the free lunch the Casa serves to about 200 street people a day. According to Casa’s critics, the free lunch draws an unhealthy concentration of street drunks, dope dealers, screaming nutballs, foul-mouthed panhandlers, and public defecators to the neighborhood. But Foley counters it’s the offer of a free lunch — which typically consists of a meat stew, potatoes, cooked vegetables, salad, and bread — that often persuades those distrustful of the system to take the first step that ultimately leads to recovery. Or as Foley’s kitchen manager Jose Figueroa put it, “In the seven years I’ve been here, I’ve seen a lot of people get on their feet. I’ve seen people make it happen. Everything starts with the lunch. It acts like the carrot.”
Foley doesn’t pretend there isn’t a problem in the neighborhood; he contends the shelter’s getting scapegoated. When city cops chase the homeless from State Street, from the creeks, from the railroad tracks, and off of TV Hill, where do you think they’re going to go? That we’re still in the midst of the recession that we’ve only just learned officially ended last year only makes matters worse. As do the funding cuts to a mental health bureaucracy never known for its streamlined efficiency.
Adding fuel to the fire, the Police Department has just released a report indicating that there’s been a 6,200-percent increase in reported crime since the Casa opened its doors 10 years ago. But as one cop familiar with police statistics told me, that hyper-ventilated figure is based on the fact that there are 62 calls for service a year from the shelter. Before the shelter existed, there were none. The place was a vacant furniture warehouse.
Police brass contend that reports of their utter lack of enforcement down at Rainbow Park — frequently leveled by Foley and Milpas business owners — are greatly exaggerated. But they also contend law enforcement is an inefficient tool for such problems. Besides, when you can’t put people in jail, you have no credible threat. And when the cops targeted nearby liquor stores for enforcement action — it’s against the law to sell to visibly intoxicated customers — the state Alcoholic Beverage Control board refused to process the cases. If the cops posing as drunks weren’t actually inebriated, it turns out no law had been violated by selling them booze.
At the end of the day, Foley said, City Hall promised to provide the police presence needed to keep the neighborhood safe when the council approved the shelter. For the City of Santa Barbara — which markets itself as an urban icon of care-free luxury — to shut down the only daytime soup kitchen in town won’t look so good. It will look even worse when hundreds of people, now both hungry and mentally ill, are sent streaming throughout the city looking for food. Like I say, I make a point not to mess with Mike Foley.
The folks at City Hall should do likewise.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
Last spring the Downtown Organization in conjunction with the city and several partners started the "Real Change, Not Spare Change" program which enables participating merchants and organizations to accept donations which go directly to Casa Esperanza to assist with outreach. They provide materials and collection boxes for those willing to help, as well as accepting contributions by cell phone. http://realchangesb.org/
For some street people, panhandling is a business model. Educating kind-hearted tourists and soft-touch students away from enabling that lifestyle is a necessary step; and giving generous folks a way to chip in to subsidize real change for people in trouble - change for-better instead of looping for-worse - is another.
There's currently an invitation for more Santa Barbara businesses to join the program with a second Real Change Day set for Oct. 20 when a portion of sales will be donated to Casa Esperanza. This clearly isn't the fix for a growing problem, but it is a part of the fix.
anemonefish (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Milpas St is too small of a geographic area to absorb those homeless populations roaming there. The city and the county have abandoned that neighborhood. We hear advocates saying '83% of the homeless are mentally ill!" So your compassionate answer is to let them wander Milpas? And the county cuts mental health services??? Parks and rec handed that ballfield over to drug users, prostitutes, and loiterers years ago. Call them to rent the ballfield, and they'll turn you away, knowing there's a shortage of parks for kids to play ball. The mayor told the neighborhood, 'why don't you put up some money and rent a cop of your own?' when the neighborhood never wanted that shelter there, and fought it! The city and county have completely screwed that neighborhood over, and it's time for that to stop.
downtownres (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2010 at 12:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Am guessing that the elimination of the free lunch deal is the source of Ken Williams' rather over-dramatic diatribe ("already bodies pile up") on another local news blog a few days ago wherein he called out the "cold-hearted" citizens of SB?
I think what some people need to consider is the simple fact that LOTS of people are struggling these days.
There are more and more working poor in SB, some of whom resent what they see as the largess and, yes, sometimes misuse and overuse of State and County funds and programs. I do have compassion for the poor and homeless, but as others have noted, I really don't think there's any evidence of starvation or of "hunger be[ing] used as a social policy" as per Mr. Williams. Some people who are homeless do see it as a lifestyle choice and I don't think it's heartless to take note of this fact.
Zipper (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2010 at 12:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The Community Kitchen agreed to open small satellite feeding locations outside the Milpas corridor in order to alleviate homeless foot traffic about six months ago. But the State, in its infinite wisdom, made it illegal for kitchens to send prepared food to off site locations. Casa Esperanza agrees with its neighbors on almost all of the things they want to accomplish and gives 100% towards working with them when they are willing. But is is not the exclusive job of one charity or one neighborhood to bear the brunt of the problem - and with PD's policy driving people purposefully into Milpas - and then doing very little - that is exactly what is happening. Ending the only day-time soup kitchen in the city without putting another action plan in place beforehand to solve the problem will create more crime, more problems in all neighborhoods and the human suffering will be immoral. Rather than bashing charities and neighborhoods, maybe it is time to demand an end to the politics of appeasement and maybe it is time that our leaders step up and actually solve the problem in a meaningful, proactive and compassionate way. If you beleive that homelessness will go away if the unsheltered are deinied acesss to food, you may also be expecting that Santa Claus is preparing to make a trip down your chimney in a few months. Perhaps if more people decided that if you mess with the poor, you mess with me, our community would be a much better place.
java805 (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2010 at 4 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This issue is far more complicated than Nick makes it out to be. Yes there needs to be compassion towards those that are homeless and hungry. Yes there needs to be an emergency shelter available. But what those who paint the businesses and residents of the Milpas corridor as heartless and anti-homeless fail to acknowledge is that the mere presence of an organization like Casa Esperanza that has no program requirements like sobriety or a no-loitering in the neighborhood policy IS A MAGNET for transients. Why ever should this neighborhood be forced to absorb the entire burden of this population? Offering a food program for the hungry is one thing, Casa has become a gathering place for more than just those who are homeless, down on their luck, or hungry. It has become the nucleus of bad behavior, nuisance and criminal nonsense, drug dealing, prostitution et al. This isn't about feeding the hungry - this about how that program is administered. Period. Mike Foley is a bad ass?? He is a highly compensated executive that doesn't want to see his gig go away. Leave Casa there but run it right. Mike's argument that they see individuals come through their lunch program and get into assistance programs is great but what's the conversion percentage? They serve hundreds and hundreds of meals a week and they get 1 to 2 people a month into some sort of program? Thats not a great return in relation to the burden on the neighborhood. Thats the real problem. And we residents are heartless because we want to work and live in our neighborhood safely and successfully. So the City better not mess with Foley? What about us? We are the ones being messed with.......
turner4 (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2010 at 5:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
i am a native santa barbaran and know a thing or two about the homeless and its trends. i grew up on the eastside and my family owned a business located where casa e. is now. before casa esperanza was here, we had homeless in and around the entire city and yes, the milpas area. as christians, my family and my fellow churchgoers fed and clothed the homeless. and we thanked god when casa opened its doors. we felt that at last a professional organization would not just help them with necessities but with getting them off the streets and into housing. i volunteer at casa and know the great work they do.
shame on milpas businesses, residents, and city council members who think that closing the shelter's lunch program will solve the problem. how myopic and inhumane !!!
the problem will only be solved with casa administrators at the table PLUS support from the city who put them there in the first place.
this problem is eveyone's to work on--as christians, as citizens and humanitarians.
makeadifference (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2010 at 6:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am involved in a local meal sharing - and would just simply say the situation in our city is very complex. Each friend I have on the street has a unique story - we categorize them to make it easier to understand ourselves. I would say that we need to work together to find solutions and not just pass a problem on to someone else. Any healthy city and government will care for the poor and call forth those needed to help. I believe there is a win win here - but we must dialogue peacefully.
syncman (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2010 at 7:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The existence of Casa Esperanza was the results of pro business council members and sympathetic community and church groups, poked and prodded by the chamber of commerce and the downtown organizations, to get the homeless out of the downtown business core. Well the plan failed and the homeless services provided near the Milpas businesses district is now an unwelcome concentration.
I think what we really need to do is get good government back; not just locally but globally here in the U.S. The City of Santa Barbara is trying different strategies but it may be a bigger problem than the city can handle.
I like the idea of "satellite" lunch locations and I think satellite shelters could work too. I don't mind the idea of churches offering services but I am wondering what other locations could work. A permitted and county inspected traveling lunch buss?
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2010 at 8:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Then there's the wonderful work being done by Anthony Carroccio and his team of volunteers at the Organic Soup Kitchen. After over a year of feeding dozens, and sometimes hundreds, weekly, they had to move out of the Veteran's Memorial Building and now provide, healthy, nutritious hot meals to all comers at the Moreton Bay Fig Tree every Sunday. The work of all of these underfunded (if not UNfunded) volunteer operations is literally changing and saving lives. If you haven't visited any of them, stop by, lend a hand and write a check or give an inkind donation of whatever you can spare. You will feel good for a week, I guarantee it.
emptynewsroom (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2010 at 9:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Agree with Don (for a change). I think the problem is too big, and not well understood. Advocates for the homeless, like Foley, have great hearts, and are zealous for the cause. This is wonderful, but unfortunately the neighborhood is suffering from adverse affects, and the answer isn't to denigrate the neighbors as small-minded. Clearly, the solution to move the homeless off State and concentrate them in one area on Milpas isn't working. The homeless are as thick on State, and in West Beach, as they are on the Eastside, and telling everyone to be more tolerant sounds trite when people are defecating on your doorstep. I talked with a newly arrived homeless man tonight. He was drunk in front of my house. He just got out of prison in Soledad, and requested to come here. I am meeting more of those every day. I am all for helping those who fell out of the bottom of the economy, because there but for the grace of God go all of us. That's compassionate. I am also for helping the mentally ill and substance-addicted. We're all fooling ourselves if we think we're above those kinds of problems. But I think something's wrong in the model when we've got to house and feed continual law breakers and watch them deal drugs in Cabrilo park, and we're called ignorant and mean when we start to question whether that's what we really signed up for. Satellite facilities, or spreading the pain, may be a better way. But who will sign up for them in their neighborhood?
downtownres (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2010 at 10:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What has been missed here is that the homeless have always been a huge issue in SB. You can find articles afterr WW1 & 2, a movie about Paradise, articles from the 60's, 70's & 80's. MiIpas is not the "place homeless have been driven to" but they are everywhere. Go look around the Rescue Mission or Salvation Army. State Street, the beaches. by SBCC or IV where numbers are alarming too. Look by the zoo long before Casa opened. Go see who is around Catholic Charities, or Unity.
Milpas is not the haven for the homeless. Casa Esperanza is a wonderful place to obtain help, get fed, & transition elsewhere, but so are the other shelters & services. Casa takes action & provides more services to get people on their feet. Our economy is forcing more & more on the streets. Services are overwhelmed. Budgets are cut. Many volunteer people stepping up to serve are making a huge difference because they are building relationships, finding out what their needs are, helping them re-connect with family, get back to school, get off the streets & get some form of mental or other help as we can. We often have to refer them to Casa. Our government is not meeting the needs. The military is not helping the vets as they should (it's criminal after what they have done for our country) People in homes generally have no idea what the street people have been through. Each person's issue is unique. The outreaches are extremely necessary & food is a way to sit with them & know them better to build relationships of trust.
Public toilets are locked regularly & they are denied access elsewhere. If you needed to go, where would you go? Think about that.
Come spend one evening serving with us in the parks or at Casa and see what you are judging. Let your heart be touched. It could be your uncle, dad, sis, or your own child that is being cared for.
One homeless sign makes it clear :
"At least I am not robbing you"
Please reach out instead of striking out.We desperately need the services Casa Esperanza supplies.
lifesaver (anonymous profile)
October 1, 2010 at 9:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Casa Esperanza tried to create more food locations and opened the prototype, but the State of California did away with the permit that allowed this to continue. Casa's fault? City/PD shoves tons of homeless people into the neighborhood. Casa's fault? City/ PD abandons consistent and proactive policing in the area. Casa's fault? Alcohol outlets openly selling booze to drunk people. Casa's fault? The Mipas Asscoiation disbands two years ago due to lack of leadership and apathy. Casa's fault? Some Milpas neighbors have come out in support of the shelter's work and have asked that Casa stop serving lunch and only serve the people who live there. Logical. Casa Esperanza has stated that they are willing to do that, but only when there is a way for people to get fed somewhere else. A moral position and a fair position. If the neighborhood representatives were smart - and caring - they would champion the development of creative food alternatives throughout the City for those in need. As long as they stay on the attack and demand that hungry people go without any alternatives, they will be perceived by an exponentially increasing number of Santa Barbaran's and heartless. They are not, but as one Milpas business owner recently said about Casa, "perception is reality". Considering that they all agree on tons of ideas that would improve the neighborhood, maybe if people saw them all working toegther on that stuff, more people would come along to help create the resources everyone needs because they want to join the positive energy. Casa Esperanza had over 500 volunteers help them in the last year and they have thousands of donors - that's pretty positive energy. Consideirng that they want to find ways to feed people in other places, and decrease lunches on Cacique, maybe the business people should let bygones be bygones and work together and join Casa in its good and very successful work.
java805 (anonymous profile)
October 1, 2010 at 2:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Catching up. The last paragraph of the above article says “At the end of the day, Foley said, City Hall promised to provide the police presence needed to keep the neighborhood safe when the council approved the shelter.” This is admittance that this facility draws a negative presence. It is time to stop this facility. Make this neighborhood safe for residents, businesses, tourists and all who enjoy living and working in this Santa Barbara neighborhood and near the beach, having a business, being a tourist and customer at Trader Joes Shopping center and Scolari's without being harassed or rudely approached, even at the Eastside library. I've been told cameras are being placed on homes and businesses.
Casa Esperanza is in the wrong location and perhaps the wrong town. Many say, this facility needs to be incorp with and near a health and mental clinic to assist the people that Casa Esperanza is drawing. A drug rehab program is also at this facility, what else? It's been witnessed that very angry men have been arrested from that place, intoxicated or on drugs, enraged. I find it hard to understand this when there are children,their mother's staying there. If Foley lived in this negative impacted area he would be very aware of the conflicts, perhaps he would be more compassionate and not heartless to the feelings of the families, property owners and businesses in the neighborhood are being negatively impacted by the crime, safety and health issues impacted by many drawn to Casa Esperanza. There are many successful interim housing programs in Santa Barbara for indiv and families in need. Such as Transition House and about 5 other programs, which do a great job assisting families. Also in Ventura and I just received a call today for clothing to be picked up for their homeless shelter.
The originators who approved Casa Esperanza at it’s present location trusted all would work out, but it hasn’t and need to recognize they just did not know that their would be such huge Negative Impact brought on in the vicinity of Casa Esperanza. Thousands are impacted in one way or another. Ten years is more than enough time to recognize the failures of this facility and now make the correct decision that Casa Esperanza’s programs aren't administered correctly and it must come to a close. This neighborhood has to heal. There are the police statistic reports to back up it’s huge negative impact to the area. The City Council and City Manager know addl Police Officers are needed, with a surplus of City funds available. There should not be any question of any shortage of funding of money for Police Officers for the safety of it’s residents, tax payers, tourists or businesses of the impacted area and neighborhood. Ten years is enough this facillity must stop. We look forward to the day this area finds calm without a negative facility in the area, then the Police can focus on other area City needs. This neighborhood will be back to enjoying all it has to offer.
birdseyeview (anonymous profile)
October 4, 2010 at 2:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm getting really good at spotting the sock puppets:
User profile: makeadifference
Joined: Sept. 30, 2010
Comments posted: 1 (view all)
Pinatubo (anonymous profile)
October 6, 2010 at 3:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The FACTS are: 10 years to make a positive diffence and "the Police Department has just released a report indicating that there’s been a 6,200-percent increase in reported crime in the area since Casa opened its doors 10 years ago". Crime to the neighborhood, businesses, grocery and convenient stores etc. Along the way with this crime, the neighborhood properties have lost value in property values as Realtors and Lending professionals have stated. Sock Puppet! Who is responsible!
birdseyeview (anonymous profile)
October 7, 2010 at 12:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)