By the time Artisan Court—55-units of strategically targeted affordable housing—opened its doors for business this Wednesday, the new three-story structure at 422 East Cota Street already had a waiting list of prospective new tenants. Although the new digs are decidedly small—450 square feet—rent is cheap, ranging from $408 to $817 a month. The Santa Barbara Housing Authority—which developed the $17 million project with $5.2 million in loans from the City of Santa Barbara and $1.2 million in federal stimulus funds—is reserving about one-third of the rooms for “emancipated” foster kids, many of whom find themselves homeless within the year they turn 18. Another third of the units will be set aside for people making their way off the streets. The rest will be designated for downtown workers earning less than $30,000 a year.
By building smaller units than building codes normally allow at higher densities—and with less parking provided—the Housing Authority can build projects that are affordable to people who otherwise would not be able to secure a spot in Santa Barbara’s forbidding housing market. By keeping people off the streets—and out of the revolving door between county jail, the courts, and the emergency room—City Hall is hoping to reduce the indirect costs associated with homelessness while providing a leg up to those who might benefit.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
We need an affordable artist complex that is inclusive of artists working in all mediums. Ventura's WAV complex is the perfect example (Working Artists Ventura); live work space in various sizes and configurations, an outdoor theater and another indoor auditorium, gallery exhibition space and more. And its all solid artists.
EZK (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2011 at 12:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The city should create affordable units for young professionals/mentors who benefit the city in one way or another whether it be in civics, the arts (etc). Right now they are simply subsidizing corporations that pay low wages (food service/retail). Why spend so much money (Housing Loan Program) to bring in outside talent when there are plenty of talented individuals locally who would like to live here, but choose to move elsewhere due to lower rents. It is time to subsidize progress.
Chato (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2011 at 7:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This could have been done with existing apartment buildings.
Instead, the high-density project kept the employees at the Santa Barbara housing authority busy with unnecessary work, while the rest of us who live here have to endure a denser Santa Barbara. The Santa Barbara housing authority's tactics for enfringing on the public need to be corrected by the city council.
Georgy (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2011 at 3:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Poor, sad, "SantaNa": you are so easily confused!
A couple minutes of Google-time, and I've got your diabolical information:
-- McGillivray Construction Inc
-- 1800 North Olive Street, Ventura, CA 93001-0338
-- (805) 648-1517
It's a gi-mungous scandal for you!
I remain hopeful the day will come when you post a comment coherent enough to let us know what it is you are against.
binky (anonymous profile)
April 19, 2011 at 4:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)