Paul Wellman
Patrick Fourmy at Santa Barbara City Council April 12, 2011
Diary of a Wimpy Dog
Poodle Chases His Tail as City Council Deliberates the Fate of the City’s Oldest Pot Shop, The Compassion Center
Thursday, April 14, 2011
COMPASSION NOT SERVED HERE: Sometimes I really wish I smoked pot. Tuesday night was one such occasion. Maybe some high-grade product was required to follow the circular reasoning and snake-eating-its-tail logic that propelled the City Council’s deliberations over Santa Barbara’s oldest pot shop — The Compassion Center on upper De la Vina Street. In any case, the punch line is that after 11 years in business, the Compassion Center is toast. I’d say it got blindsided, sucker-punched, tossed under the bus, and fed to the fishes. It’s true the center’s owner — the cranially kinetic Patrick Fourmy — hurt his cause more often than he helped it. But for S.B., it’s a significant loss. In the smarmy, nudge-nudge-wink-wink legal twilight zone of medical marijuana, the Compassion Center was a straight-up operation that kept its head down and, for the most part, its nose clean. Since 2001, there hasn’t been a complaint or problem other than a robbery last October. To a ridiculous degree, the center managed to get along famously with neighbors, seven of which submitted gushing testimonials. There are no nearby schoolkids for the center to imperil, and better yet, it’s situated spitting distance from Cottage Hospital — exactly where a medical pot shop should be. It’s drawn rave reviews from a host of medical professionals with superstar credentials — not just pot docs who write up $99 prescriptions. Most notably, Dr. Steve Hosea, Cottage’s Director of Clinical Care, who conspicuously does not sport dreadlocks or adorn his waiting room walls with Bob Marley posters, praised Fourmy for running a safe haven that’s comfortable for older patients in the throes of life-threatening medical trauma. Many of these people, he noted, are initially reluctant to even consider medical marijuana — let alone try it — and simply could not deal with the trendier hipster emporiums where it’s mandatory for employees to sport cored-out earlobes.
Angry Poodle
Going into Tuesday’s council meeting, Fourmy didn’t have a prayer. He’d previously been shot down by the Planning Commission, and before that by the city’s hearing examiner. He was asking the council to reverse those decisions and issue him one of the three pot-shop permits allowed under the city’s new dispensary ordinance passed last June. It didn’t help that four of the seven councilmembers would prefer to ban dispensaries completely. Even worse, City Attorney Steve Wiley was leading the attack. For the past six months, Wiley has argued that Fourmy has been running an “illegal operation” because he ceased doing business for 30 days or more back in 2008 (more on why this is important later). But this claim is based on evidence that strikes even Fourmy’s harshest critics as decidedly flimsy. Even so, it effectively killed the center’s permit application every step of the way. On Tuesday night, Fourmy presented evidence and testimony — admittedly way late and many dollars short — that, if accurate, rebutted the factual foundation of Wiley’s argument. But Wiley remained unfazed. He countered that it had become legally irrelevant whether those “facts” were true. Under the terms of the city’s new pot law, Wiley argued, Fourmy had until January 29 to secure a legal permit. Because he failed to do so, Wiley continued, Fourmy was legally required to shut down. That Fourmy remained open, he said, is a clear violation of the city’s pot-shop law. And that, he concluded, was ample cause for the council to reject Fourmy’s appeal. I still haven’t recovered from the whiplash that induced. For a while I thought I was trapped in an M.C. Escher painting. To his credit, Councilmember Grant House tried to grapple with the concentric circularity of Wiley’s argument, but only got a stiff neck for his efforts. Were it not for Wiley’s initial assertions of these questionable facts, House suggested, Fourmy would have gotten all the necessary permits by last December. If that had happened, House continued, Fourmy never would have run afoul of the January 29 deadline. And then, he concluded, the council could give approval.
The 30-days issue matters because Wiley decreed years ago that any pot shop operating under the city’s previous legal guidelines that went out of business for 30 days or more had forfeited its status as a “legal nonconforming” operation. Up to then, that’s how the Compassion Center had been designated. In 2008, the Drug Enforcement Agency threatened to seize the properties and freeze the bank accounts of area landlords who rented space to pot shops. A lot of pot shops got evicted or went out of business. Wiley claims the Compassion Center was one of them. Fourmy claims otherwise. He insists he stayed continuously in business, but moved to the back of the building, installing a sham music store — Harmonic Alliance — in front to avoid federal scrutiny. Wiley said city inspectors dispatched to the scene reported that the Compassion Center went out of business. But Wiley and other city officials admit the inspectors never walked around the building; they just looked at the storefront window. It’s not clear they ever got out of their car. It should be acknowledged Fourmy resisted Wiley’s entreaties for meaningful documentation. His attorney huffily stated City Hall would need a subpoena. Dumb move. On Tuesday, two people testified they had been in the Compassion Center at the time Wiley said it was closed, and that pot was being sold. Fourmy also produced letters from his landlord’s attorney, his paper supplier, the company that sold him pharmaceutical equipment, and his credit union all purporting to demonstrate the Compassion Center had stayed in continuous operation since 2006. Conspicuously lacking, however, were payroll records for his nine employees. On that score, Fourmy could be in hot water. Under questioning by Councilmember Michael Self, he admitted he withheld no social security, no workman’s comp, and issued no 1099 tax forms. Self gently suggested Fourmy’s permit problems might be the least of his troubles. In a last-minute effort to buttress their case, Wiley and city planners assigned to the pot-shop detail stated they’d received correspondences from the Drug Enforcement Agency stating that Fourmy had, in fact, ceased operations for 30 days or more. But those communiqués were conspicuously absent from the staff report and the council hearing.
In hindsight, I’m glad I don’t smoke pot. It would make me more paranoid than I already am.
Related Links
Comments
Wow!! what a lesson in bias and selective reporting this has been...I've surveyed over 6 local paper and online publications and not ONE mentioned my testimony...as HIS immediate NEIGHBOR!!
Fourmy has in many regards created & left a legacy/template of how to run, compassion wise, an interactive and service based center to distribute drugs, i.e. the use of nurses, hopefully this will be adhered to/insisted upon by other "dispensaries"
Personally, on observation it seems the dude was caught in a catch 22 of trying to appease the landlord, the feds and the city by skirting whatever the hell law at the time he skirted, and it appears there were and are many, I don't try to stay up on these laws..but I do know the whole operation as far as "prescriptions" for dope, is a joke,,,I sat there for months seeing, watching and hearing about folks that (apparently--no one will know for sure, except for a few occurences personally with my partner(s)) did not have prescriptions, get the goods with Compassion,,,
then there was the City Police inspection I personally watched in 2008,,,no pot on the premises, i.e. no operations in place in fact, then there were the threats of physical violence to me personally for telling him/them to keep the dope from my ex-addict partner, the robbery, the new millenium operative of "non profit" for all, esp the city (by way of revenue sharing from the state coffers) as far as taxes not being paid or collected on employees to the state and fed coffers...bottom line...this guy had too many hurdles and too many holes in his idea to supply SB with centered sense
the problem: pharmacists out of the loop, pharmacists should be the only distributors of any drug, period. Wonder why their unions haven't attacked this lil problem...in the bud
diva (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2011 at 3:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
BTW in all due respect Marijuana is Dope to some, but Medicine to many, I won't surmise the distinction as that's a personal one, but the public one is blatant when it is not in fact for medicinal purposes--that determination is left to the public, the neighbors and the police to assess at this point
AND!!! In all fairness to Mr. Fourmy,,he announced to the council that he did not know me!!! He appears to have grown a beard, and supposedly has a brother,,but that pesky lil problem of our collective Landlord (my past Landlord as of today) calling him Patrick just seems to keep cropping up .....
diva (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2011 at 3:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The product is over-regulated. Too many hoops to jump through. Rowse, a businessman, could have been sympathetic to this harsh regulatory environment. But Randy Rowse chose to be a Meg-a right-wing ideologue along with small self-described independent Michael Self. Bendy White has been moderated to be as limp as wet noodle. Dale Francisco, for the most part, just had to sadistically sit there and enjoy (what does D.F. do for a living anyway.) Frank Hotchkiss, a (h)ollywood type, enjoyed the movie but didn't get it; he pulled a Hotchkiss, as Das would say.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2011 at 6:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Leaning more towards Fourmy being the wrong dude for this job. Despite he and his supporters being well intentioned for knowing, as do I, that marijuana helps many people with serious illnesses. However, these shops should at minimum be regulated like liquor stores w/ certain rules on what they sell, who they sell to, hours of operation, and a need to follow the law with taxes and payroll. The problem is these shops opened with no oversight. The feds created a backlash with heavy handed threats, the laws have evolved, and now city hall is after them for having a history of operating with inadequate oversight. The catch-22 blame lies with the original legislative approval, a naive belief MJ would not be abused, and the initial hands off approach. Marijauana law is in flux, and Fourmy's a fall guy.
wonarrowfan (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2011 at 3:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Diva has a chip on her shoulder because other people won't babysit her boyfriend. She also seems to blame them for being the victims of a robbery. Maybe she's to blame. Death threats? Pretty unbelievable, but delusions of grandeur yes.
Being familiar with Mr. Fourmy's operation, it was the most legit one could ever hope for. People's ignorant biases need to be ignored and common sense needs to prevail.
EZK (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2011 at 6:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Exhibit A for drug laws run amok. Some day rational politicians (driven by rational people) will rescind our insanely stupid drug laws. Sadly, it probably won't happen in my lifetime or that of my kids...but it will come to pass.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
April 15, 2011 at 2:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Don't give up SezMe. We got close last fall, closer than I ever thought in my lifetime. Fact is, we just can't afford this insanity much longer. Let freedom ring! ... it's cheaper.
OldDawg (anonymous profile)
April 15, 2011 at 5:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
can you believe the time/money wasted by the county on stuff like this? Can't grow weed, but you can grow poppies...?????
spacey (anonymous profile)
April 15, 2011 at 12:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
>>"Wonder why their unions haven't attacked this lil problem...in the bud."
*puts on sunglasses*
YEEEEEAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!
Pinatubo (anonymous profile)
April 15, 2011 at 7:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Santa Barbara has a long history of litigation filed only for harassment and to destroy people financially and ruin their reputation, with judgments calling the lawsuits malicious litigation and civil rights violations. Wiley lost his suit against Heather Poet and the Green Well sued the city and won - both were judged to be civil rights violations by the city. Fourmy will be #3.
The basis for denying a permit is the city's allegation that the business was closed for 30 days, although a sufficient number of patients testified that they bought medicine during the 30-day period in question to prove they were open.
Consider a hypothetical business in the same situation regarding a period of closure, one that sells rocks and is run by the world's worst businessperson - no records of supplies, utilities, payroll, etc. 100 customers can bring in rocks and swear under penalty of perjury (a felony, I think) that they bought the rocks during that period. Would a court charge these 100 people with perjury because they bought rocks from someone who didn't keep good records?
The proof that the business was open can only be supplied by collective members.Compassion Center's patients unfortunately don't have rocks. If the city had a legal basis to subpoena records, the city would have done it. If Fourmy had supplied payroll info the city would have said "OK, you kept paying employees so they wouldn't find another job, but that doesn't mean your business was open". If they had supplied cash register receipts, the city would have said "It's easy to change the date on a CR and generate phony receipts, that doesn't prove you were open". Utility bills? You can keep the thermostat set at 80 degrees with doors locked 24/7. Fourmy has given the city the only proof that exists to prove the business was open.
It's a major mistake to interpret our city and county governments' actions in terms of law. The appropriate paradigm is viewing them as psychopaths with no conscience, no respect for the law, no empathy for the people they destroy, and entitlement to whatever action gets them what they want. Schneider and the city council gave us a sufficient number of hours of this behavior during the 2-year dispensary ordinance farce that the appropriate unit of measurement should be weeks, rather than hours.
Wiley and the D.A. attack people they perceive as weak or vulnerable, and my guess is that Fourmy's son's car accident was a trigger.
It doesn't make sense to try to make sense of it - it's a game.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
April 17, 2011 at 10:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Its a game and a downright shameful and disgusting one. We don't have a City Attorney or DA's office that is at all interested in justice or protecting people, they only wish to adavnce their own careers and play schoolyard bully.
Maybe we need cuts in Wiley and the DA's offices before we start cutting teachers, librarians and the like.
EZK (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2011 at 12:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Diva" doesn't have a chip on her shoulder whatsoever, if she did, she would of chipped right back at them with litigation, which is a waste of time and energy...my response was in the need for the truth to be told, i.e. the police inspection for marijuana storage on the property in 2008, etc.
Nor did "Diva" say there was a "death threat", there was a threat of bodily harm, that I should "watch my back"...where that was intended to go, I don't know, and quite frankly!! I had forgotten about it all until about 10 days ago
Nor was "Diva" the victim of a robbery, that was referencing Fourmys 1/2 mill in crops not being reported to the authorities as stolen, initially, as I understand it
Re: "Diva's" request for a "baby sitter" for her "boyfriend"..well I'll acquiesce a bit of truth in that direction,,,,but if we are going to talk about "Compassion" and its due center, I don't think such a request of keeping drugs out of the ready access of known addicts is too much to ask from a licensed dispensary, now do you?
diva (anonymous profile)
April 20, 2011 at 2:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
re: 14noscams comment...yours is informed and a good oversight of this mess...if in fact he was "delivering" the goods during said illustrious 30 day period, then, yep, he was definately operating...I guess the question remains about if there was a corresponding demand that a storefront named such delivery service, that I did not see in late 2007 or the first 8 months of 2008, but maybe he just had a business card or something in the window...bottom line, as far as I am concerned, that property owner, when he took my first 9K check out of my hand, assured my demands would be met re: absolutely no marijuana situation whatsoever at that location, next door to me--I had a right to inquire about any existence of it before I made the commitment to locate there--my right that was not met, so he was assisting too--either way, it seems its all about trying to play everyone at once,,,a judge will have to be the oversight in this probably in the long run
diva (anonymous profile)
April 20, 2011 at 2:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Diva is the neighborhood busybody who will distort facts and expect everyone's world to revolve around her.
EZK (anonymous profile)
April 21, 2011 at 10:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@ Diva: Why is a raven like a writing desk?
TheSorceress (anonymous profile)
April 22, 2011 at 8:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
re: "E2K"
"Diva is the neighborhood busybody who will distort facts and expect everyone's world to revolve around her."
..hmmm,,,who the hell could this be??? "Diva" hasn't been in the "Neighborhood" for close to Five years....could it be.>>>Some one with a Vested Interest?????????
diva (anonymous profile)
April 27, 2011 at 12:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
re: "Sorceress"
"@ Diva: Why is a raven like a writing desk?"
Hahahahah...I dunno, Witch...why are you talking in tongues..we all know that is some kind of well known drug induced Koan...but I ain't gonna indulge ya that for this kind of base B.S. on the local level
diva (anonymous profile)
April 27, 2011 at 12:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Diva you don't have a clue. All of your dealings were with Patrick's brother Chris. For you to go in front of the city council and hurl a bunch of insults and lies at Patrick, just proves that you don't do your research, aren't in touch with reality, and you have set yourself up for a slander lawsuit. I hope you get what is coming to you.
lukearcher (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2011 at 1:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I would imagine that few people in SB understand that Patrick Fourmy was growing his marijuana in Mendocino County, Albion, and then shipping it to his 'store' in SB. This entailed many violations of law, including labor laws. His operation was illegal in Mendo, and his gardens got busted two years running. He was infamous for his arrogance, disregard for the neighbors, and the law.
So, if his supporters want to quibble about whether he was closed for more or less 30 days, or whether he has friends, they are surely missing the main point. This drug dealer, wanna-be gangsta does not care about laws, only profits.
For a couple of years there were 'scripts' from SB blowing in the weeds here on Navarro Ridge Rd. (so much for respect for privacy). His operation was intrusive, abusive and hated in the neighborhood in which he was growing. Any questions?
I'm sure the IRS would have a few.....
farmwarrior (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 8:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It looks like the Fourmys want to protect themselves from a 'wrongful-death' lawsuit more than they want to keep their 18yr old out of jail. Question: Was Tyler delivering his dad's "medical Marijuana" at the time of the killing? Since Fourmy (Patrick) was denied a permit to operate his 'dispensary' in Santa Barbara, who is keeping track of the millions of dollars being collected through these 'unauthorized' sales?
Patrick Fourmy had many undocumented workers growing his 'medical Marijuana' in Mendocino County, and of course, delivering it to his dispensary in Santa Barbara. None paid taxes.
farmwarrior (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 8:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)