DUI defendant Peter Lance was thrown out of a pretrial hearing Monday after he interjected into the proceedings to accuse Judge Brian Hill of “muzzling” witnesses. Lance — a freelance journalist who has already published eight parts of an ongoing series in the Santa Barbara News-Press alleging misconduct by his arresting officer, Kasi Beutel — was excluded from the hearing in an effort by Hill to regain control of a courtroom circus.
“This isn’t the Eastern bloc — it’s the United States of America,” Lance said as court bailiffs gripped him by the elbow to escort him out of the courtroom. “The whole world is watching this.”
Lance’s interjection came after Hill ruled that several defense witnesses — who had all been arrested by Beutel on suspicion of driving under the influece — should submit a declaration to the court alleging that Beutel had forged their signatures on a Trombetta waiver to deny them a blood test on the night of their arrest. Hill’s ruling broke course with his decision last Tuesday to allow two defense witnesses to testify on the stand that they had not signed the Trombetta waivers that bore their signatures.
Hill proceeded to deny a request by Lance’s defense attorney, Darryl Genis, to put Beutel on the stand. While Genis wanted Beutel to testify regarding her alleged forgery of the Trombetta waivers, Hill maintained that Beutel should testify when the trial begins.
At this point, Lance — who had stayed silent for the first hour of the proceedings — could resist no longer, and interrupted to reprimand Hill for muzzling both Beutel and the defense witnesses. Hill excluded him from the courtroom almost immediately.
From the first few minutes of the hearing, Hill tabbed courtroom conduct as the focus of the day by admonishing Lance and Genis for their “totally inappropriate behavior” in a pretrial hearing last Tuesday. He called out Lance for leaving the courtroom to take a phone call and “cheerleading” the defense witnesses before chastising Genis for accusing the court of “filibustering” the proceedings.
While he held neither Lance nor Genis in contempt of court, Hill declared that “what happened last time we were in court is not going to happen again, under any circumstances.”
At first, Lance obeyed Hill’s order, only making his feelings known by nodding his head, whispering to Genis, and, at one point, using hand gestures. When Hill said he had not yet read the entirety of Lance’s five-part series, Lance wordlessly corrected the judge by holding up eight fingers to signify that his series was, in fact, eight parts long. But Lance needed words to protest Hill’s decision to deny testimony from Beutel and the defense witnesses, and his day in the court quickly came to a close.
Lance was not the only person to be excluded from the courtroom Monday, as audience member Cruzito Cruz was thrown out for clapping during the proceedings. Cruz — a community activist and City Council candidate who was arrested by Beutel last March for DUI but never faced charges after his blood test revealed a 0.00 blood alcohol content — burst into applause when Genis made a motion to limit police presence in the courtroom due to their “intimidating effect.” As bailiffs escorted him out of the courtroom, Cruz pointed at the four uniformed officers in the audience and declared, “They shouldn’t be here!” Hill denied Genis’s motion on the basis that the courtroom is open to the public.
After the two courtroom ejections, the hearing settled down and the court accomplished its primary task of the day. Hill collected 20 signatures from two defense witnesses, Alison Woolery and Rachel Morales, for handwriting experts to analyze. The pretrial hearing will resume Friday to allow the court to collect signature samples from Lance — a task that was scrapped from Monday’s agenda.
Out on the courthouse lawn after the hearing came to a close, Genis and Lance weighed in on Hill’s motivations. According to Genis, Hill took “extraordinary measures” to prevent evidence that would be damaging to Beutel’s credibility from being exposed in the courtroom in an effort to protect Beutel.
For his part, Lance went even further. “There’s no doubt in my mind that this judge was gotten to by someone over the weekend,” Lance said. “Hill is acting as a district attorney in a judge’s robe.”
Related Links
- What Gag Order? [ July 27, 2011 ]
- Police Officer Demands Retraction [ July 14, 2011 ]
- DUI Case Swerves Off the Map [ July 7, 2011 ]



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Why doesn't Lance write an 8 part series about how you can justify driving drunk? What a tool!
waz (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 8:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Bad move by Lance. Can't do his case any good. Still, why would/how can the judge deny defense witnesses ability to testify?
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Besides Lance apparently off his meds or needing a meeting, or both, we should not overlook the unique election campaign stylings of Cruzito Cruz here.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 8:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
And why are four (4!) uniformed officers in the audience on a Monday morning - or any morning for that matter on a pretrial? What is this costing the city? When's the next court date?
at_large (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 8:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
His behavior is reprehensible, but what else can be expected from an ass? Lance is a jerk through and through. He is also apparently someone who takes no responsibility for his own actions.
If the officer accused of unethical and illegal behavior is proven to have altered the tests, then she needs to be fired and charged. That does not, however, excuse this man, who cares for nothing but his name and no one except himself, who is attempting to wiggle out from under his own offense. Let's not forget who chose to drink and drive.
Amara (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 9:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Drive drunk, get caught, write a series of articles. Livin' the dream I tell you, livin' the dream :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is all on par for a News-Press "personality". Being the news and then reporting on it is the way they do business. Just printing articles by a guy trying to beat his case shows their ethics.
No different than Lanny Ebenstein writing editorials about collective bargaining to highlight his "foundation" and ballot measure, which bolsters his fundraising ability as well. I'm surprised these two don't report on themselves in the third person.
Who knows... Maybe Mr. Lance is simply trying to keep the light from going out on his career in journalism. Is empathy is the proper reaction to his antics?
Validated (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 11:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
John Locke---Read the article again.
The Judge WILL allow these witness to testify, but not until trial begins. Until then, they are allowed to make a written declaration about the signatures, which in theory has the same effect.
Kudos to Judge Hill for keeping court in order. His job is not one I envy.
turningthepage (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 12:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Didn't the whole Newspress debacle begin as a function of another Newspress "journalist" getting popped for a deuce? :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 2:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I like how the News-Press has enlisted its entire staff to propagate a conspiracy theory. Terry Tyler’s editorial reads like Jesse Ventura with his "band of brothers" article.
I have no doubt that if the grand jury and CA Attorney General's office found Lance's accusations unfounded they too would be part of the conspiracy.
Lance reminds me of a woman from my high school graduating class desperately trying to again play the popular girl at our reunion. Avoiding the details of her adult life, and failed attempts to disguise the effects of gravity, she spends the night putting down others to convince some she still has it going on. With a few old (similar) friends and several glasses of wine realty is held off for another night.
Validated (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 3:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Jesus, what a circus...
LegendaryYeti (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 4:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I love everyone's conclusion that Lance is guilty until proven innocent here. Let's just mindlessly trust all police officers and believe everything they say. Lance should just rot in jail because he is guilty of building his case in a public forum. And it makes everyone feel uneasy because they hate the newspress and they love our law/judicial system. There just isn't any room for misconduct or lying when it comes to the officers, the DA, or the judges. Right? Beutel must be an honest cop because she has sworn an oath. It's just too bad we don't have any recordings to show how abusive the people have been to her that she's pulled over. To bad/so sad.
Lance will have his day in court, and if you think the allegations that he's uncovered are totally worthless, then you haven't read all 8 pieces. And if you have, you haven't read them with an open mind. Or perhaps you've never spent a night in a jail when you were wrongfully arrested. Try one, and you'd be at least willing to listen to what Lance has to say.
sbsurfguy (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 4:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yeah, 4 cops in a court spectating on a Monday morning? They have nothing better to do? Kind of like when 100 of them walked into City hall to vibe the city about their contract. I am gonna have to call BS. And also, don't let all of your opinions of the News Press totally skew your view on this story. Ok, so maybe Mr. Lance and his buddy Mr. Genis have a little conflict of interest. Conversely maybe they have a valid point. If so, in my book crooked cops would far outweigh a Geraldo Rivera wannabe. Meanwhile this circus will drag on at all of our expenses.
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 5:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks for the clarification, ttp.
Good for you bimboteskie and sbsurfguy. The NewsPress haters are apparently blinded to the concept of innocent until proven guilty, for Lance at least. And clearly do not believe in a truly free press.
BTW, the State has now jumped in and is investigating Beutel for Worker's Comp fraud. Let's see now: allegations of misbehavior in multiple DUI arrests, a documented attempt to change her marriage records, a questionable bankruptcy followed by the sale of several hundred thousand in real estate. What's that old saying? Where there's smoke...
And PLEASE not a investigation by local authorities. They are all tainted by these stories and the best way for them to prove their innocence is to have an outside agency (state AG?) investigate.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 7:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Dude is a freak.....Someone needs to find HIS background....HIS high school (if they had high schools back then) buddies, and see what HE was like. If HE was a prolific whiner who got outta trouble by getting loud and thus, HIS way...I say do it...Quid pro quo....
azuresees (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 7:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
My guess, Bimbo, is that they were sheriff's deputies and not city police officers in the courtroom. The Sheriff's Dept. has the responsibility for maintaining order in the courtrooms [not SBPD], and has deputies regularly assigned to the courts every working day. Usually there's just one deputy in each courtroom, but with the public interest, histrionics and theatrics going on with this matter, I'm not surprised to read that more deputies would have been assigned to this courtroom in an attempt to maintain order.
LegendaryYeti (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 7:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How refreshing to see that Judge Hill's wife or girlfriend allowed him to borrow one of his testicles when he came to work on Monday. Maybe he will be afforded the other one on Friday so he doesn't completely look like Lance Ito. MY GOD MAN, GET A GRIP!
rukidding (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 7:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I was really surprised Monday by ADA Sanford Horowitz repeatedly interrupting Judge Brian Hill, and that Hill's repeated complaints about this were ignored. I guess there are different (if any) rules of conduct for DA's and defense attorneys.
Quite a bit of bias in this article in my opinion.
Amazing how far SBPD, DA and Hill will go to bury the reality of SBPD misconduct. As a long-term plan, destroying our schools through budget cuts is a good move - a literate community is a real threat to corrupt government.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 8:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Indeed, Mr. Lance is innocent until proven guilty. However, he has not claimed that he was not under the influence of alcohol while driving. He is claiming abuse of process. As was posted above, he is not taking responsibility for his bad judgment. His bad behavior in the courtroom just shows that what a narcissist he is. He is lucky that he is not cooling his heels in jail for contempt. Even the biased News Press articles indicate that the man needs serious psychological help.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 9:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yeti:
The article states "uniformed officers", Deputy Sheriffs would be referred to as Deputies or baliffs as the reporter refers to them since thats their role at the court. The article does note "uniformed officers" were in the audience which would indicate spectators and SBPD not SBSO deputies.
pointssouth (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 10:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree with Eckermann above. Although I have enjoyed reading Mr. Lance's series of events and don't believe that this officer is 100%innocent, his behavior in court is just off. I am glad that he is hopefully opening some eyes to a possible problem, but that does not make him innocent of drinking and driving!
m2457 (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 11:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ok, stop speculating.... There were two uniformed SBPD detectives and four SBSO Bailiffs in court last Tuesday and on Monday there were two uniformed SBPD officers and 4-5 SBSO Bailiffs. Normally, there are one or two bailiffs in a courtroom but because of Cirque du Lance, there were more. Perhaps the convicted criminal who complained that she was intimidated gets a little nervous when she sees some cops....I'm just sayin'.
goodprevails (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 11:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Y’all:
Please use reason to guide your thoughts and rants. Keep in mind that the American justice system, civil and criminal, is roundly regarded as the best of all the flawed systems humankind has devised. Please let it play out, but also feel energized to participate and comment, adequately informed. Importantly, please keep yourselves informed with the most accurate information while you let your personal bile fly; at least the green spew will be better-informed – win/win, I think we will all agree.
I, personally, think Rebecca Robbins is way above average on the fact-reporting index, getting better by the report. This latest report conveys a context and texture that I found very informative, having missed the meat-meet myself.
If you can’t or don’t attend the actual real-life hearings where meat meets meat, at least access the first-hand reports, and transcripts when available, of the meat-meets.
Otherwise, please keep the appropriate amount of Kleenex, inter alia, at and in hand for your very personal satisfaction.
Michael Ganschow
zwoirle (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 11:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Zwoirle-
I think my Tryglyceride count jumped 20 points ready your essay on different types of meat.
jshir (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 7:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
bias? In the Indy? Say it ain't so!
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 8:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Next up for the News-Less: a five-part, 10-thousand word investigative series by accused drunk driver, pot possessor, police brawler, and simultaneous city council wannabe Cruzito Cruz. Writing Worth Reading and most assuredly a boost in subscriptions!
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 8:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
As much as I despise the Newspress, I despise the police dept., the d.a., and the judge, even more. The fact that Officer Beutel arrested Cruzito Cruz for d.u.i. only to find out he had a blood alcohol level of 0.00 is proof enough for me that this officer is corrupt and should be fired.
buckwheat (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 9:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Buckwheat: there are drugs (and even lack of sleep) that affect a persons ability to drive. If an officer stopped Cruz (at random, or due to erratic behavior? I don't know) and the blood alcohol test came back negative that does not mean the stop was improper, or the officer's assessment of impaired driving was in error. The blood test is part of the process. Cruz was exonerated by the blood test and it means the process works, not that the officer is out of control.
neworion (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 9:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I have met Judge Hill. He is a good dude and I think in touch with things much more than some of the other honorable bench members...I think he has his hands full with this circus. Hopefully he will get thru it without getting sucked in. I think there is some validity to the statement that some of our other institutions in this small town are a little too cozy.
When is the next hearing? I am thinking of attending.
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 12:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Just read today's part in the series. "Some of the requested Trombetta waviers may have been shreadded and destroyed" Really??????????????? Wow.
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 1:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
neworion: the fact the Cruz was not convicted is evidence enough for me to believe Beutel's arrest of Cruz was falsely done. The system does not work when police officers are corrupt!
buckwheat (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 3:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Another little tidbit I thought was interesting was that while ON PATROL continues it's quest for an emmy by filming our cities finest serving and protecting it's citizens, A request by a producer on channel 17 (a non profit) to film in the court during this case was denied. Isn't this kind of a double standard?
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 4:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Y'all:
Shredding! Depending on your age, ask your parents or grandparents, probably your mother or grandmother, about the infamous 18 and a half minute gap in the Nixon White House tapes. Mention Rosemary Woods to get a better reaction.
The more it changes the more it stays the same.
Isn't it curious that in 2011, it's paper/papyrus at issue, and in 1972 it was electronic recording?.
Just askin',
Michael Ganschow
zwoirle (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 9:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
More, y'all:
Shredding original paper forms with purportedly original inked signatures (and potential latent palm prints of the actual signator) allegedly waiving an important statutory right in multiple cases is provocatively suggestive of an ongoing process, perhaps collective, to destroy evidence of forgery, i.e., police-fostered destruction of evidence that is potentially, even likely, to exonerate wrongly accused criminal defendants, is one thing.
Then there is the police's "erasure" of police audio recordings of events that are being directly and acrimoniously contested in several ongoing criminal proceedings. Perhaps we can take solace that our law enforcement personnel can also deal with and destroy digitally encoded information that might help the defendants as a sign that while they might be malicious they are not current day luddites.
Just tryin' to look at the glass as half-full,
Michael Ganschow
zwoirle (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 10:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think Wendy Mccaw should promote Lance to Publisher, like she did Travis Armstrong when he got his DUI! Look what wonders it did for the Newspress!
travisbgone (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 3:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
No...she gave that job to Arthur (her boyfriend). Probably a pretty fun party over there at the press!
travisbgone (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 4:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I did not read Lance's article about the waiver destruction because I don't want to sully my hands or my mind. But does the waiver destruction have to do with normal record keeping, or was Lance's waiver destroyed intentionally, along with all the other chuckleheads who now claim they were forged? I kinda doubt this latter scenario, and talk of latent palm prints on originals extrapolating to SBPD malfeasance is a bit far-fetched to me. We're really getting into black helicopter-land now. You really have to (re)consider the source of the allegations (Lance, Kenny, Genis, drunk college students, Cruzito Cruz, Wendy, Arthur, etc.) and start looking at their collective credibility as much as Beutel's.
Robo (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 6:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"The fact the Cruz was not convicted is evidence enough for me to believe Beutel's arrest of Cruz was falsely done. The system does not work when police officers are corrupt!"??? - buckwheat
Really? So, if someone gets arrested and it doesn't end up in a conviction, the arresting officer is automatically corrupt? Wow! There's a great legal mind at work! Get a grip, buckwheat! Otay?!
waz (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 7:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
jfklbj: Perhaps so, but I would politely disagree about your stonewalling assertion. The press release from the city the other day pretty much said they were going to look into Lance's charges, which I have repeatedly said are perhaps 2 or 3 small gold nuggets hidden in a ton of mud. And it really comes down to a subjective decision by someone (the D.A., the courts, etc. etc) if Beutel's credibility viz-a-viz her bankruptcy should be taken into account as to the circumstances surrounding Lance's arrest. And just because Lance, his acolytes at the N-P and some forum posters say it should be doesn't make it so, and is not indicative of any "corruption" of the D.A., the courts, etc. That is what I despise most about Lance and the N-P, their attitude that if anyone dares disagree with them then they are "corrupt". What a complete bunch of tools.
Robo (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 4:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I for one would like to know when the circus starts tomorrow? It is Friday, August 5, Judge Brian Hills courtroom... at what time?
This story, these allegations, the cover up, the stonewalling, I think I'd like to be present when the sh_t hits the fan....and it's going to folks. I would surmise that Mr. Lance has at least powered the fan up. Good for you.
Let's hope an investigation is done outside of the DA's office by an independent authority and not by one of the wagons doing the obvious circling.
sbsurfguy (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 7:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Robo:
My dad, Edward F. Ganschow, , aka Bud Ganschow, USMC, now inurned at the Arlington National Cemetery with full military honors, next to my mom, Dolores Clifford Ganschow, flew Vice-president Nixon's helicopter in 1959, HUS2, aka Marine Corps 2. You clearly have no clue about military helicopters, nor their pilots nor missions. Please use helicopter references, black or otherwise, as you have a quantum of information to support your contribution. I had thought you were better than that.
Michael Ganschow
zwoirle (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 11:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
sbsurfguy: Court starts at 8:30 a.m., and Lance might get underway fairly quickly, so get there then and take a seat between Fatso Steepleton writing his breathless commentary, sage Zwoirle and bloggers on all sides of the story who publish unread blogs. The story, the allegations, the cover up, the stonewalling, the murders, the dame, the shamus with a heart of gold, the DUI shyster lawyer, the insane client, the cop who has a trouble with money, the corrupt judge, the corrupt D.A., the corrupt bailiff, the corrupt courtroom clerk, the corrupt court reporter, the corrupt light fixtures, all will be on display for your perverted pleasure, you sick puppy.
Sorry, it's late. Odds are you will just see Lance tossed out again. Maybe that Carlitos Cruzeros dude too, whatever his name is. Should be entertaining!
Robo (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 11:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Sounds delightful Robo, thank you. I've just found out that my blog has had one view, so it can't be considered unread, although that view might have been my own view so chances are it doesn't count.
On my way to the vet first, as I am a sick puppy in need of treatment.
Cheers
sbsurfguy (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 8:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Zwoirle (Michael): From Wikipedia: "Black helicopters is a term which became popular in the United States militia movement and its associated political circles in the 1990s as a symbol and warning sign of an alleged conspiratorial military takeover of the United States, though it has also been associated with men in black and similar conspiracies."
So obviously no offense was intended to any Ganschow family member. Sounds like your father was a true American hero.
Surfguy: I did not know you had a blog, so no offense intended either. What is your blog? I would like to read it regardless of whether or not I agree with what you have to say, and I promise not to post any snarky comments.
Boy, am I on a roll of offending people or what?!!?
Robo (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 8:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
There are just too many curious circumstances regarding things being shredded, recordings lost, stories not coo berating between members of our "finest", workman comp claims after the fact.... If I hear one more story about a BSing cop making up another reason they are pulling someone over, I am going to puke. This is rampant and a revenue generator. Nobody is looking for alternatives to deal with this issue. Yeah, people mess up, but it is more of a guilty until proven innocent setup than the other way around. I hope they put cameras in all the cars after this. Wonder if Beutel will be working the DUI checkpoint this weekend? And to all the News Press haters, I am not a huge fan either, but really? If this is going on shouldn't it be addressed?
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 1:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Look at the picture posted on top and make your own decision, is that a photo of a "dispassionate" man? I say no, but then again I tink everyone else already figured that out. What a joke this whole thing has been .
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
August 7, 2011 at 2:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lance may have an issue, he may have a credible background, but his display in court shows him to be a joke!
whatsinsb (anonymous profile)
August 9, 2011 at 11:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)