PUEBLO — a political and social services organization dedicated to empowering area immigrants and Latinos — announced a new initiative Wednesday to fight Secure Communities (S-Comm), the federal program that works with local law enforcement agencies to deport undocumented serious criminal offenders.
Standing before the towering façade of Trinity Episcopal Church, PUEBLO activists introduced their new Keeping Families Together Commission, which will work to raise public awareness and promote legislation to take down S-Comm.
“What we want is to have Santa Barbara be united and not be divided because of [S-Comm],” said Mark Alvarado, PUEBLO’s executive director.
PUEBLO’s new initiative comes amid growing national opposition to the controversial S-Comm program, which requires local law enforcement to share fingerprints of detainees with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which can then deport identified undocumented immigrants. But critics — including the governors of Illinois and New York, who have already suspended S-Comm in their states — say S-Comm breaks up families by deporting noncriminals or low-level offenders rather than the serious criminals who pose a threat to society.
According to ICE, which runs S-Comm, 80 percent of S-Comm deportees in Santa Barbara County have been classified as “noncriminal” or low-level offenders, a percentage that is six points higher than the national average. Since the inception of the program in Santa Barbara in January 2010, more than 964 undocumented immigrants have been removed from the county.
As a result, “A lot of people are looking at Santa Barbara County as a flash point because of the high level of deportations here,” Alvarado said.
Paul Wellman
PUEBLO announced at the Trinity Episcopal Church a new initiative Wednesday to fight Secure Communities (S-Comm)
PUEBLO’s new commission hopes to weaken S-Comm by advocating in favor of the TRUST (Transparency and Responsibility Using State Tools) Act, which would allow individual California counties to opt out of the program. The legislation now awaits a vote in the State Senate by the end of this month.
“Really what we’re trying to do is keep our finger on the pulse of the statewide issue,” said Alvarado of Keeping Families Together. “We’re really geared about not letting this issue fall to the wayside.”
A number of community activists spoke at the event Wednesday to voice their support of PUEBLO’s new initiative. Reverend Mark Asman — who is a rector at Trinity Church — denounced S-Comm for “using fear as a way to intimidate members of our community.” Damian Leon — a UCSB student who leads the campus immigration advocacy group IDEAS — echoed Asman’s sentiment before sharing his own childhood experience of getting off a school bus to narrowly avoid being deported by ICE.
Manuel Unzueta — who teaches American ethnic studies at SBCC — also spoke at the event, which was scheduled on the first day of Fiesta to celebrate the contributions of immigrants to Santa Barbara’s history. After praising Latino immigrants for helping build Santa Barbara, Unzueta joked that Old Spanish Days could be more aptly named “Old Mexican Days” since “we don’t have a lot of paellas here; it’s mostly tacos.”
Former Santa Barbara mayor Marty Blum — who signed on to endorse the commission Wednesday — said she thought the new commission was a “great idea,” adding that she thought it was “a terrible thing” that families have been broken apart due to offenses such as talking on a cell phone while driving.
Paul Wellman
Organizers and attendees telephoned Santa Barbara Sheriff Bill Brown to request he support the Trust Act
At the end of the event, PUEBLO advocates took out their cell phones to call Sheriff Bill Brown to urge him to support the TRUST Act and only detain serious criminals while S-Comm remains in place. But Sheriff’s spokesperson Drew Sugars said that support is unlikely to come anytime soon.
“We’re not going to do anything different from what we have been doing,” said Sugars, who added that the Sheriff’s Department does not enforce immigration and is only “upholding the laws as we are required to.”
Sugars also said the Sheriff’s Department thinks the TRUST Act may not be necessary amid a restructuring of S-Comm by ICE that may alleviate some of the criticism of the program.
Related Links
- Secure Communities Deports Noncriminals [ April 28, 2011 ]
- New PUEBLO Leadership [ May 4, 2011 ]
This article has been corrected to reflect that Assemblymember Das Williams did not vote on the TRUST Act legislation. It was erroneously reported that Williams had voted “no.”



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
This organization only wants to allow illegal aliens to keep breaking our countries laws. What other country allows citizens from other countries to come right in and make themselves right at home? You do realise that a couple can illegally come to the US, have a kid and immediately become eligible for housing, food stamps, free medical care....do you think if we went to Mexico we would be offered the same? And people wonder why our government is broke. The first sentence of this article says that Pueblo is dedicated to empowering immigrants and latinos...do you know what would happen if I started a group dedicated to empowering white citizens? When are people going to realise what the term illegal means?
olivia (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 12:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ay Dios mio! Here we go again! Why does PUEBLO always take the side that is questionable? Quien carajo son estas jentes? :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 2:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
(Cuentas veces tengo que hacer la pregunta siguente?...y todavia sin repuesta) Why don't we either A: Enforce our immigration laws, or B: get rid of them altogether?
If someone can come in here from Mexico and expect to be provided services/housing in their language, why not apply this same standard to every single person from India (A billion plus people) China (most populated country on earth) and everywhere else? Why should some people be told to stand in line, wait their turn, then learn the language, while others--simply because of pressure from activist groups--get to cut in front of the line? (Translation to what I wrote in Spanish: "How many times do I have to ask the following question?...and still no answer)
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 5:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The REAL story as usual is in the details. The "Trust Act" is an overreaching piece of legislation that goes FAR beyond what the PUEBLO folks, and Marty Blum, are saying. It goes beyond the so called "opt out" of S-Comm, and actually creates a number of unfunded and LOCAL law enforcement requirements and micromanagement that have nothing to do with Secure Communities. as a liberal dem i am thankful to Das for voting against this ill informed piece of legislation.
Deborah_Samson (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 6:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Question from "billclausen" ("Why don't we either A: Enforce our immigration laws, or B: get rid of them altogether?"):
A. False Dilemma
(also knows as False Dichotomy, False Choice, Either-Or Fallacy, Black and White Fallacy, or Bifurcation)
binky (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 7:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I would think PUEBLO would realize they overreached if even Das voted against the TRUST legislation.
Here's the type of opinion you'll never read in the Independent, LA Times, SF Chronicles, or virtually any other "official" journalism-school type publication. It gives an eloquent explanation of why so many are so bitterly opposed to the attitude of entitlement and superiority of illegal aliens.
http://www.noozhawk.com/article/08011...
revisionist (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 7:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The article is incorrect, PUEBLO is actually an organization dedicated to Reconquista, the political takeover of the US Southwest by Mexicans. They work to displace immigrants and Americans with illegal aliens, they are anti-immigrant and anti-American. They should be charged with sedition.
USAmerican (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 9:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The only problem Secure Communities has is it doesn't deport the entire illegal family together.
USAmerican (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 9:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I see what you mean, USAmerican: ("PUEBLO is actually an organization dedicated to Reconquista, the political takeover of the US Southwest by Mexicans. They work to displace immigrants and Americans with illegal aliens, they are anti-immigrant and anti-American.")
Here's what I pulled right off their website!
"People
United for
Economic Justice
Building
Leadership Through
Organizing
"PUEBLO is a multi-issue economic and environmental justice non-profit organization working to empower the low-income people of Santa Barbara County through educational programs and civic participation."
- - - - -
Sedition indeed.
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 10:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
To Binky: What are you talking about?
To Mr. Burnett: Sometimes organizations who stand for certain things that are good have other elements that are bad. As the saying goes "The devil is in the details".
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 11:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So can me & my family go illegally reside in any other country & expect all the necessary services that come w/ said country's social service system as well as not expect to de deproted as an illegal immigrant? :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 8:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Not necessarily Hank, it depends on the capricious whims of political pressure groups. There is no consistency.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 2:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I meant "deported" & not "deproted." Damned dyslexia! :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 3:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
PortTabacco (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 5:40 p.m.