The longtime supervisor of the Santa Barbara Police Department’s business office was arrested Friday morning for allegedly embezzling at least $100,000 in parking citation funds. Karen Flores, a non-sworn member of the SBPD for 22 years, is accused of grand theft and sits in jail with her bail set at $250,000.
Deputy Police Chief Frank Mannix explained during a press conference Friday afternoon that discrepancies in the city’s ledger sparked a seven-month investigation which concluded that Flores was diverting parking citation revenue into her private bank account. “We were all shocked,” said Mannix. The announcement comes at a time when the department is already defending itself against suggestions that one of its officers fudged paperwork during DUI arrests.
Mannix said Flores confessed to taking $100,000 over a period of four to five years, but believes “the losses are much greater.” The exact amount is still being determined and authorities think that only parking ticket cash was taken, and that Flores acted alone. The DA’s office has yet to determine the exact charges it will file.
Flores is expected to appear in court this Tuesday and has been placed on unpaid administrative leave. According to her Facebook page, she graduated with an accounting degree from Santa Barbara City College, is married, and lives in Santa Ynez.
Before Flores was suspected of the grand theft embezzlement, though, she was on the original investigative team trying to determine the source of the bookkeeping discrepancies. Flores had been the business officer supervisor for 15 years, and knew the parking citation revenue system — which is more complicated than people realize, said Mannix — better than anyone else. “The very person we relied upon the most to assist us in this investigation turned out to be our suspect,” Mannix said.
“While she was part of the investigative team in the beginning, we were aware and attuned to the potential of embezzlement,” Mannix went on. “This was part of the process of closing out the accountability loopholes and exposing the guilty party, while still protecting the reputation of the innocent people who were legitimately doing their job.”
Flores, Mannix explained, was adept at covering her tracks, changing her methodologies over time and figuring out new ways work around the system, which was being checked and double-checked by authorities as they ruled out computer and accounting errors. A number of agencies were involved in the effort, including the DA’s office, the city finance department, and city and police information technology units.
Mannix wouldn’t go into detail of how exactly Flores committed her alleged crime, citing the ongoing investigation, but did say authorities have solid physical evidence implicating their suspect. The police department nets approximately $4.5 million in proceeds from parking tickets each year, and has purportedly implemented procedural changes in how it processes citation money.
During the press conference, police representatives were quick to distance the department from Flores. “Every single member of our department is proud of the job that we do and the mission that we serve,” Mannix said. “When someone has betrayed that trust, any sympathy for that person goes away.”
City Administrator Jim Armstrong said while it’s impossible to guarantee that all city employees are honest, safeguards are in place to prevent criminal activity. In light of Fridays announcement, however, those efforts will be doubled, Armstrong explained.
City Councilmember Frank Hotchkiss said he attended the press conference to show that he’s “1,000 percent” behind the police department. “I was shocked like everyone else,” said Hotchkiss upon learning of Flores’s arrest.
He also said he wanted to make clear that this investigation is totally separate from the accusations of misconduct that investigative journalist Peter Lance and the News-Press have lobbed at the police department and its personnel in recent weeks. Flores’s alleged crimes are not representative of the department as a whole, Hotchkiss said.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
I guess that somebody was trying to enhance their retirement pension fund the old fashioned way :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 6:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Great! Now that Karen Flores is going to be there 24-7, doing time, she can work for free! Yeaaaa...... Call it "volunteer" work. A practice our educational system tries to promote to our children all the time. The old work and give your time to someone else and not expect to be paid for it, in order to keep honest hard working people who want a job from being able to find one. No wonder Mrs. Flores wanted to be paid in advance. Her error was in that she was not "big" enough to be respected. If she could steal trillions of dollars, everyone would want to know how she did it. You know, like Obamma is doing to us all right now!
LowOrbit (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 8:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am sure Lance will find some way to wrap this story into his case and make it one of his 28 parts to prove that even tho he was drunk everyone is out to get him!!!
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 8:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lance was drunk? In TheKnow cannot possibly know... but sure, let's just assume that you're right and that every arrest was legitimate, by the book, performed by a completely honest police officer who would never make a false arrest to benefit themselves. Sure, that scenario makes me feel so much better now. Thanks. InTheKnow is more like InTheSand
sbsurfguy (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2011 at 1:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Police noted that they proceeded with great care to protect the reputations of innocent people in the department."
Seems they do that for the "not so" innocent ones as well...
cartoonz (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2011 at 3:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Looks like SBPD may have an integrity problem.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2011 at 9:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hang Ten surfguy!!! Do a little research for yourself, Lance admitted to have three cocktails before driving, and that was probably lowballing himself! Nowhere does he ever say he was not drunk, he is doing an OJ defense and throwing so much flak up there to see what sticks to confuse the simple people such as yourself. But I see you have already drank his koolaid. He would be proud of you.
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2011 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@Innie: you continually miss the point that, even if Lance was staggering drunk and clearly guilty, we may have a serious cancer in our local law enforcement and justice communities. Is that not of any importance in your worldview?
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2011 at 5:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
stealing from the police...that doesn't sound too brilliant.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
August 7, 2011 at 7:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"The police department nets approximately $4.5 million in proceeds from parking tickets each year..."
Really? That's over $12,300 per day! If an average parking ticket is $50 (I have no idea if that is correct) that means the SBPD writes about 250 parking tickets per day.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
August 8, 2011 at 2:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Just another example of an out of control Police State.
I bet the chief got part of the cut....it should be investigated.
rstein9 (anonymous profile)
August 8, 2011 at 8:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Lance may have been drunk and very well may be a dirtbag, but he has uncovered evidence, maybe not totally conclusive, but evidence of an officer lying under oath either on documents or in court. He has published the documents and made them available. He has brought forward witnesses. It is suspicious that now some of the court ordered and necessary documents for the forgery investigation are destroyed and we have been informed of this so late in the case. I understand many businesses and government agencies operate near paperless and this is for efficency reasons, but after looking into the proceedures SBPD, as inspired by this blog, documents are not supposed to be shredded for 90 days unless there is a reason to not shred them. My understanding is Mr. Genis asked that Mr. Lance's form not be shredded, but it still was. This paints a bad picture that needs to be investigated. I would ask intheknow what evidence do you have that Mr. Lance's accusations, as supported by the published documents, witness testimony and the word of a minister, are false? I'm not trying to put you on the spot. If you have evidence that would restore the reputation of this officer, I think we all need to know. And Saying Mr. Lance is not credible is not enough for me due to the documents he's published and the other witnesses accounts and testimony. Thank you.
interested1 (anonymous profile)
August 8, 2011 at 3:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Good call Interested1. Agreed! Integrity problem... I agree. I wonder if a change up at the top would help some of this?
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
August 9, 2011 at 10:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Excellent, interested1.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
August 9, 2011 at 5:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hmm they police their own and then people see this as a bad thing.. weird. Maybe they should have just covered it up (as everyone of the nay sayers thinks they would).
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
August 9, 2011 at 9:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Are you guys really surprised that ONE sbpd employee has been arrested? " please" they are a bunch of liars starting with the so called CHIEF even when you try to help them they
WILL find a way to screw you
formersber (anonymous profile)
August 16, 2011 at 8:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)