Amid all the flying spittle and bitter controversy over bulb-outs and other traffic safety improvements to the City of Santa Barbara’s troubled streets, and in a time of seemingly skyrocketing crosswalk injuries to pedestrians, one simple, effective, and increasingly popular solution has been overlooked. Cities in Japan and throughout the U.S. have adopted the crossing flag approach, saving lives and lots of money. It’s time our City Council put down the hatchets and looked into this system.
A crossing flag system is simple. A small metal or plastic bin is attached to a pole on each corner of the intersection. Several brightly colored plastic flags are placed in each bin. A decal or small sign explains how to use the flags. The idea originated in Japan, and was first adopted in the mid-1990s by the City of Kirkland, Washington. Since then it has spread to Seattle and some other Washington cities, as well as to Salt Lake City, Utah; a couple of cities in Wisconsin; Buffalo, New York; and Burlington, Vermont, among others.
How does it work? You grab a flag, hold it confidently out in front of you, wait until oncoming traffic stops for you, and then cross the street. Put the flag in the bin on the far side of the street when you get there. That’s it.
It’s so effective that systems are popping up all over the United States. Traffic officials in Salt Lake City observed, “City staff has noted a dramatic increase in the willingness of drivers to yield to pedestrians carrying orange flags…[J]ust having the flags sitting in their holders raises motorist awareness of pedestrians by making the crosswalk locations more visible.”
Most cities that have tried the flag approach have kept it going and steadily added intersections to the program. Salt Lake City has flagged 174 intersections, Seattle 23 to date, and Kirkland, Washington 73. Kirkland, by the way, has one of the lowest pedestrian death rates in the United States; they’ve produced a video that can be seen on YouTube.
A 2006 study by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration [PDF is here] stated that, “The research team found no formal studies in the literature on the effectiveness of crossing flags; however, anecdotal information has indicated that these crossing flags are effective in improving driver yielding behavior.”
Flagging an intersection costs around $200. Keep in mind that the City is pondering whether to spend $326,000 to equip just one dangerous intersection with safety improvements, and you can see that this is a dirt-cheap way to go. The flags, which cost $2 to $3 to replace, tend to disappear; many communities enlist neighboring businesses or residents as adopters of the intersection and they replace flags as needed. In Menomonie, Wisconsin, the flags are removed at night to reduce theft and vandalism. But of course, $325,800 will buy a lot of replacement flags.
The City should also consider the possibility of simply distributing pocket-sized flags to all residents and making them available to visitors at their hotels. This would eliminate the theft problem, raise awareness of pedestrian safety issues, reduce maintenance costs to zero, and make every intersection a flagged intersection at no additional cost to the community. Distributing 100,000 flags would cost less than equipping one intersection with traffic signals or bulb-outs. (I made a prototype version of a telescoping flag out of a discarded television antenna and a bit of yellow material for under a dollar.) Imagine every citizen packing his or her own personal traffic calming device. Imagine yourself as a pedestrian being in control of oncoming traffic for a change. Imagine a safer community at very little cost.
What do you think, City Council? Do you want to waste time and money bickering over enormously expensive solutions to this problem, or do you want to solve it for a pittance? A test system could be in place at Figueroa and De la Vina Streets within a week. Why not give it a try?
Owen Dell is a landscape architect, author of Sustainable Landscaping for Dummies and other books, co-star of Garden Wise Guys, and 44-year Santa Barbara resident. He can be reached through his website at owendell.com.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
or one could wear a creature from the deep alien mask and flippers...
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
August 17, 2011 at 6:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Great! Now pedestrians who don't know enough not to cross the street when cars are coming, can now die with a stupid little yellow flag in their hand. I have little doubt the city council's going to give this little nugget a go. After all, when all of the flags have been stolen by roving teens, or are adorning the stolen shopping carts of some of our urine soaked schizophrenics, the city can hire some union shop to keep producing the flags for twenty times more than they're worth. Sounds like a great idea! It's right up their with the painted blue line!
waz (anonymous profile)
August 17, 2011 at 8:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hard to tell for sure from the Kirkland video, but it looks like they were using the flags at an intersection already equipped with bulb-outs.
OldDawg (anonymous profile)
August 17, 2011 at 8:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Since too many self-obsessed Santa Barbara drivers already ignore traffic lights and limit lines at crosswalks, why would they pay attention to a little yellow flag?
Here's a better idea: leave a supply of paint ball guns at intersections so we can freely splatter offensive drivers!
discoboy (anonymous profile)
August 17, 2011 at 10:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Nice try by the creative Owen there, but about two seconds after the time of that photo he is about to get killed himself.
And we can read here that jkflbj here is writing it over and over again under a theory that repetition makes something true.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
August 17, 2011 at 5:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Here's an idea. When a car is coming, don't attempt to cross the street. Crazy, but it just might work.
waz (anonymous profile)
August 18, 2011 at 8:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
People who watched the City Council meeting 2 weeks ago will recall that there are multiple safety objectives for the intersection that the author is standing at. Many of the accidents cited by the Transportation Dept and the traffic engineer were car-on-car. Bulbouts give cars crossing the intersection a better "line of sight" but flags would not help in this regard.
Other things that can help were mentioned in that meeting, including removing parking spaces near the intersection and removing trees (especially at the other nearby problem intersection @ DLV and Canon Perdido).
That intersection in the YT video looks like it might have a bulbout.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
August 18, 2011 at 9:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I would like a personal escort at each intersection and for each time a must cross a street in Santa Barbara.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
August 18, 2011 at 5:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@waz
The California Vehicle Code states:
21954. (a) Every pedestrian upon a roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the roadway so near as to constitute an immediate hazard.
(b) The provisions of this section shall not relieve the driver of a vehicle from the duty to exercise due care for the safety of any pedestrian upon a roadway.
To highlight, pedestrians are to yield when cars are "so near as to constitute an immediate hazard." This means that an auto at a distance would instead be required to yield right-of-way to the pedestrian, so that your statement of, "who don't know enough not to cross the street when cars are coming" just shows your ignorance of the requirements.
When receiving a driving license, it is assumed that one is agreeing to follow the 'Rules of the Road', which would include those laid out in the CVC. Drivers do not have carte blanche on the roads.
As to the flags, they probably work, because they not only work to get the attention of drivers, via color and movement (the vertical orientation of the human body is easily missed by viewing drivers--it's a biological issue), they also signal *intent* to cross the road. It's important that intent be conveyed, as to avoid the pedestrian on the curb playing the "can I go now" game, which signals hesitation and only makes drivers continue to barrel down the road, without stopping for them. The other, more life-threatening option is to risk stepping off the curb, and hoping/praying that oncoming drivers have the sense and ability to control their vehicles.
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2011 at 7:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It sounds like an interesting idea that should be tried. As mentioned I drive down De La Vina and will stop if pedestrian is in croswalk. That is THE LAW. If I don't notice person or they are hesitating on curb and not in crosswalk yet I continue. By the way posted speed limit is 25 to 30 mph on this & most residential streets. Flag may make pedestrian more visible and signal intent to cross.
rabbitrun (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2011 at 1:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Attach the flag to a lance. Use it to shatter windshields and impale drivers that don't yield.
Tambora (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2011 at 2:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
jfklbj....you make sense. So does the article. Many people who use electric wheelchairs and scooters have long flexible poles attached to their conveyances in order to better be seen as they move through foot traffic AND across streets. Those flags DO make a difference.
What I find sad is that it is so politically correct in SB to just bash everyone who drives a car...while sticking hands in driver's pockets to collect hefty registration and fuel taxes which pay for the road maintenance and creation of special bike lanes. Everyone seems to hate drivers, yet they are quite willing to make drivers PAY for everything.
This is a city. Lots of people live in SB. Some drive motor vehicles, others ride bikes, some use scooters and electric wheelchairs, others walk. There IS room for all, but not at the exclusion of anyone. I know that is not the popular or PC mob-mindset of the masses, but it IS the truth.
Holly (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2011 at 8:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
equus_posteriori (fitting name) -
Maybe we should hold up copies of The California Vehicle Code instead of little yellow flags. Personally, I'll just stick to waiting until all on-coming traffic has passed before I attempt to cross the street. Although, waving little flags in the air would give the local hippies yet another reason to draw attention to themselves. Why should the Solctice Parade be the only time of the year when they can say, "Hey! Look at me! I'm walking here!"
waz (anonymous profile)
August 22, 2011 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@waz
I guess you mean the "Solstice" Parade? About all I got out of your pointless rant was that you didn't use a spell-checker. And, with all that time waiting for the on-coming traffic to pass, you probably had time to use one. . . .
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 2:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I may make a spelling error every once in a while, but at least I can cross the street without getting hit by a car. Real good catch on that spelling error though. You must be so proud.
waz (anonymous profile)
August 25, 2011 at 8:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Well, if you "until all on-coming traffic has passed", I doubt that you ever actually cross the road. You could probably learn something from the proverbial chicken.
And calling you out on the spelling error was only because the rest of your post was less noticeable.
Methinks you simply like to strut and fret upon the stage.
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
August 26, 2011 at 8:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow! When did crossing the street ever become such a difficult endeavor for you people? Oh! I forgot! It's hard to cross the street safely when your head's up your behind!
waz (anonymous profile)
August 26, 2011 at 10:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I just have one question. Why are all you people so pissy and nasty to one another? Got some anger management problems? And how come you all hide behind those silly secret names? What's the point of all this meanness and bickering anyway? Well, I guess I should admit that's four questions before somebody calls me out on it. And I've double-checked my spelling too.
OwenDell (anonymous profile)
August 26, 2011 at 8:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I, Carlos Wazny, for one was not pissy or nasty. Just giving my opinion on what I consider to be a very bad idea (perhaps with a little added commentary on typical Santa Barbara public policy formulation). Now old horse's hindquarters on the other hand, he/she thinks it's an absolute stroke of brilliance.
waz (anonymous profile)
August 29, 2011 at 8:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@OwenDell
Haven't you heard, it's the new millenia, where online anonymity lets one be the jerk that is normally unacceptable in public. The main problem is, that online comment streams not only allow the behavior, but I think it actually magnifies it.
Some people like to take not-so-subtle jibes at others, and when they get called on it, go crying like they are the victim. It's so common, that it must be an "average man" trait. Many are apparently also fans of drama, and I find posts by these people often demonstrate a lack of reading-comprehension, and seem to employ attitude as a tool in place of volume, since they can't kick and scream in a typed post.
@was (Carlos Wazny)
Do you want the last word? You can have it. :)
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
September 1, 2011 at 7:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So, are you just mad that I thought your idea was stupid, or that I just expressed an opinion at all?
waz (anonymous profile)
September 1, 2011 at 8:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm not mad at all, and that's part of your lack of understanding. It's as if you project your own insecurity onto others as a defense mechanism.
My issue is more of *how* you express yourself--which is pretty childish, IMO.
If you're the same CW that works at Alliant Techsystems, then I also find it hilariously ironic, that you truly work in "rocket science", yet fail at basic, adult social interaction. (Still, I *shouldn't* find it surprising, as that appears to be the norm, nowadays.)
p.s.--I think this is approaching "flame war" status, so I will let this go here, although I won't necessarily shy away from it in other threads.
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
September 1, 2011 at 11:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Okay. The next time I "express myself", I'll try to be less childish, and check everyone's postings for spelling errors, and be sure to harp on those minor errors instead of giving my honest opinion. By the way. Thank you, for helping me to better understand my "insecurities". You are almost as insightful as you think you are.
waz (anonymous profile)
September 6, 2011 at 9:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)