Dr. Gus Frias, coordinator of the South Coast Task Force on Youth Violence, has officially stepped down from the post two months after injuring himself falling down the stairs of his Santa Barbara dwelling. Frias was hired at the beginning of the year to the tune of about $100,000 and had been on the job six months when his accident occurred. Frias—who said he was on the way to a Toastmaster speaking engagement, as part of his job, when the accident occurred on June 21—seriously injured an arm and a wrist in the fall and sustained a concussion.
In a written note, Frias explained the injuries have precluded him from performing his job duties for the past two months. He said his recovery had been hampered because his health insurance carrier delayed authorizing treatment for three weeks. In Frias’s absence, Marcelo Lopez, assistant administrator for the City of Santa Barbara, said that the task force work has continued. While it remains to be seen whether Frias will be replaced or not, Lopez vowed the work will continue.
Frias assumed the post of unofficial “gang czar” this January, roughly four years after the gang-related killing of a juvenile by a juvenile in front of Saks Fifth Avenue on State Street sparked a community consensus that the many governmental and nonprofit agencies dealing with various aspects of gang life in Santa Barbara were not collaborating nearly as well as they could. With such a short time on the job, it’s hard to assess Frias’s impact. A native of East Los Angeles, Frias brought an evangelical fervor and speaking style to his mission, which he backed up with a PhD in higher education from Harvard University. His task was to figure out how best to get services offered by about 200 nonprofits and an untold number of South Coast government agencies to about 160-200 teens enmeshed in the gang lifestyle, as well as about 500 on the fringes. It was also Frias’s challenge to figure out which agencies actually served these specific populations—as opposed to youth in general—how well they did it, and how they could do it better.
By any reckoning it was an unwieldy challenge. According to Fran Forman, Frias’s immediate boss at the Community Action Commission, the task force has just gotten the first draft of a Web page up, detailing all the various services available to at-risk teens and from which agencies and nonprofits. “I know it doesn’t sound like much,” Forman said, “but you have no idea.” She said over 200 nonprofits had to be screened for what they did and how applicable their services were. Many helped kids in general, but when it came to dealing with the at-risk teens that have been targeted by the task force, Forman said there were closer to 10. One of Frias’s other undertakings was to develop a system to evaluate these agencies for how well they do what they claim to do. Forman said that effort is still underway.
In previous public remarks, Frias had lamented the lack of useful data most nonprofits and service agencies compiled by which such evaluations could be made. In addition, Forman said, the task force has struggled to figure out how all the participating agencies could communicate with one another about gang-involved individuals without violating the strict confidentiality requirements adhering to minors. While that remains a challenge, Forman said real progress has been made. In addition, Forman said, two new federal grants have been secured that will ensure that everyone getting released from Los Prietos Boys Camp receives follow-up counseling and referral. “That’s really new,” she added.
By the time of Frias’s injury, many public officials had grown impatient. They wanted more dramatic results and less sermonizing from Frias. County Supervisor Salud Carbajal, in particular, was outspoken in such remarks. Others have expressed concern that Frias had gotten lost in efforts to bolster school safety committees that related only indirectly to the target population. But according to Forman, Frias’s main contribution was his perspective on where Santa Barbara was in the continuum of gang activity. “He brought the biggest, broadest picture that Santa Barbara remains a place where we can still do something about it,” she said. “It’s not out of control. It’s not about drugs. It’s not about the Mexican Mafia. Right now, it’s still just about turf.”
Related Links
- Treating Gang Violence [ February 2, 2011 ]
- Gang Prevention Coordinator Gives Talk [ March 31, 2011 ]
- Discussion and Drama at Gang Task Force Meeting [ June 23, 2011 ]
This story has been amended for accuracy. Specifically, the Probation Department has corrected a previous misstatement that as recently as two years ago the department was not sharing the information in question. The change was not that recent.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
This funded position was a waste of money from the very outset! What kind of results did you expect to see? Give me a break!!!!!
rukidding (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 6:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Between the lines of the main story and the problems coming with the task, we can read again that the current health care system and insurers are not necessarily beneficial to your and everybody’s health.
jnm99 (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 7:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Waste. Of. Money. From the beginning.
Deborah_Samson (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 7:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Timing is everything they tell me & the timing of Dr, Frias' departure is more than coincidentally convenient w/ the timing of SBPD Chief Cam Sanchez's search for greener pastures.
I think Dr. Frias saw the gang problem as overwhelming in this area, not because of the gangs, but rather those bleeding heart coddlers who feel that these poor youths are mere victims of society & must therefore be coddled & appeased.
Someone of Dr. Frias' stature on the subject of gangs knows that harsh punishment must be metted out in most gang related cases, but when your hands are tied by those who feel these gang members are victims, well, let's just say you ain't going to get your way.
Hate to say it, I saw this 1 coming miles away from a LONG time (6 months) ago :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 7:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Obviously, we need to expand the gang injunction to include anyone with an oversized white t-shirt and overly short hair. And tattoos.
Then we really will be "doing something" about the gang problem.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 8:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Aw, come on John, you just described all the White guys I know! Dude, that is just SO f'in' wrong! :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 8:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Punishment should = embarrassment, not prestige. Don't ask me how....
Adonis_Tate (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 9:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"...In previous public remarks, Frias had lamented the lack of useful data most nonprofits and service agencies compiled by which such evaluations could be made..."
So my question is, when the funds $$ were granted to the various organizations that said they were going to deal with gang issues, why were there not performance standards included? Why wasn't anyone thinking about the significance of collecting data so that at some point an assessment could be made of the efficacy of the effort? And when the Milpas Community Association introduced some SB City
Councilmembers to a proven gang-intervention/prevention program why was that successful group ignored?
pedronava (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 9:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Pedro, therein lies the problem: All these "non-profits" wanting $$$ to do what they want, but no evaluations of past or current performance or even a scale as to which tio make such performance traceable.
It doesn't just stop w/ gangs, it transfers to the homeless incorporated groups as well.
Ever wonder why these entities (gangs & bums, NOT HOMELESS!) are getting out of control in SB? :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 10:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The gang problem is so intractable because it is caused by a combination of adolescent psychology and social economy. We are status seeking apes who feel like we are in an evolutionary cul-de-sac if we do not see a path to status. This feeling is especially strong in adolescence. Coincident with this little bit of evolutionary psychology, here in Santa Barbara County (and many other places) we have a fairly sizable population of young adolescent males who do not see a route to status in the dominant or normal society. The problem is a lack of vision. Kids who see the path ahead (usually by observing their parent’s economic success) have a vision of what they have to do to succeed and get status. Kids who cannot see that path seek status in other ways, such as gang membership. Until we can successfully inculcate a vision in the kids who do not have it, the gang option for status will call to them. Harsh punishment is probably (and unfortunately) necessary. But it is treating symptoms not causes. I wish I had a solution to offer, but short of kidnapping these children, removing them from their environment, and putting them in foster homes where the vision of success is modeled, I don’t know what else to do.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 1:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
E, you touch on an intersting point. I think 1 of the main problems in many cases is the generations of gang involvement by family members. When you're surrounded by thugs & they happen to be your kin, well, getting out of the thug life ain't so easy. I like the kidnapping idea, just might work :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 3:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@jnm99
I had the same thought while reading the article.
@Eckermann
I like your line of thinking. So many angry residents of SB react viscerally to "the gang siutation" and just say "lock em up and toss the key". But I think its totally sensible to look at why the problem exists and what might be done about it. There is nothing "liberal" or "bleeding heart" about that approach, its logical. And so are metrics for success, that's a natch, difficult as they might be to come by. But its not like you're weighing a bunch of grapes on a scale. Anyone who's ever tried to design a simulation model (e.g. with cause and effect accurately modeled) knows what I'm talkin' about.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 3:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I’d like to publically apologize for a statement that appeared in an article posted on the Santa Barbara Independent website today called, “Dr. Gus Frias Steps Down after Falling Down”. I’m embarrassed to admit that I provided inaccurate information about the Probation Department’s policies regarding the sharing of information. Prior to Dr. Frias’ appointment as the Coordinator of the Task Force, the Santa Barbara County Probation Department had developed and implemented a referral system to help juvenile probationers access services provided by non-profit agencies and other local organizations. This system allows for the smooth transfer of information about youth who have entered the probation system. Unfortunately my original comments inaccurately implied that information sharing system was only recently implemented.
The Probation Department has worked hard to develop a system that allows them to legally share information with other organizations. This has been challenging because they must accomplish this in a way that complies with state law. I applaud the results of this effort.
Fran Forman, Executive Director, CAC
franforman (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2011 at 5:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hank,
Excellent summary of a very complex problem. What a relief to read a commentary that was not a condemnation or what seems like a "mob-like mentality". Please continue to contribute insight.
Shame on Carbajal for seeking the limelight and a quick-fix.
Kipulani (anonymous profile)
August 25, 2011 at 10:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Interesting analysis, Eckermann. It all starts pre-adolescence, although adolescence these days, this society starts earlier and earlier. Talk with some elementary school teachers and it's informative to hear of the changes that occur towards the end of Grade 4 and then show quite fully in most in Grade 5. Children become less childlike, modeling their older siblings or parents or their immediate home society. Couple that with the loss of academic skills over the long summer vacations and you can see the problems already forming in the lower incomed neighborhoods on the westside and the eastside.
It would be an interesting study-article to report on the schools: how many children/class in area elementary schools, test scores, and availability of summer school - and how many children in fact avail themselves of the opportunities. At least one area elementary school is year-round and it would be valuable to compare that to the others in terms of performance - and gang participation, gang participation in illegal activities, that is, since all groupings, gangs are not necessarily bad.
Dealing/working with gangs, high school ageds, is not bad, but the problem really starts earlier and needs to be nipped there.
at_large (anonymous profile)
August 25, 2011 at 10:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)
These are are all wonderful insights as to what contributes to the neighborhood busting consequences of gang membership and the destruction of community that flows almost naturally from failing to invest in our children. Let's move from the abstract to the practical-mothers with children in hand who have to navigate the real streets of their neighborhoods and confront the dangers on their sidewalks, who drag wagons with 5 gallon water bottles to get clean water to cook their meals, who try to shield their kids from the "urban" Santa Barbara reality,-some are criminals who should be kept away from everyone, some are kids who follow a convenient model, most are those who see no hope.
pedronava (anonymous profile)
August 25, 2011 at 7:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
K, I wouldn't qualify what I said as "insight" in any way, just an observation of sorts.
Like PN said: "These are are all wonderful insights as to what contributes to the neighborhood busting consequences of gang membership and the destruction of community that flows almost naturally from failing to invest in our children"
Now THAT is insight, as ewll as everything else that followed :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 25, 2011 at 7:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What is lacking in local elections is accountability to the community. When the city council just a few years ago had a chance to implement district elections, the highest and best form of neighborhood accountability, every one one the then City Council members-("Progressives included") ALL took a walk and denied working families, parents and their children the way to get the results they deserved. Local government is all about street lights, pot holes, schools and the ability to walk to their corner store to get whatever they need without feeling threatened or afraid. No wonder elected officials have no street cred, no wonder those without a voice are convinced no one really wants to hear what they have to say. No wonder voter turnout is depressed. No wonder those who enjoy the perks of power are just fine with the status quo. Unless you are supporting district elections, don't you dare tell me you care about the people.
pedronava (anonymous profile)
August 26, 2011 at 8 p.m. (Suggest removal)
y'all need to understand something! It does not take an expert to find solutions to stop gangs! The change comes from each individual! Instead of hiring some lame and pathetic so call "expert," the city needs start investing in kids' education who come from low-income families.
killuminati (anonymous profile)
August 27, 2011 at 5:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)