Since 1986, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s office has been under court order to release jail inmates early because of overcrowding, and year after year the Grand Jury has emphasized the need for a new North County jail. On a recent day in October, the jail’s population was 903 people. Capacity is 788.
And since 2008, Sheriff Bill Brown has released roughly 5,500 inmates early from the Goleta facility, which was built in 1971. Of that number, 289 have re-offended and been re-incarcerated. Three years ago, Brown secured $56.3 million for a new 304-bed jail through state funding via Assembly Bill 900. Under the award’s terms, the county would have to put up $26.7 million. To do that, Brown went to the voters in 2010, who overwhelmingly rejected a half-percent sales tax that would’ve paid not only for the construction but also the ongoing operation of the building.
So, with the county budget the tightest it’s been in years, Brown was left to brainstorm. That was, until recently, when the state announced it would be releasing even more funding for local jail facilities under a second phase of AB 900.
Faced with several options in this new phase, Brown will pursue one that, if granted, will actually allow Santa Barbara to build a bigger facility for less county money. His plan is to go to the state and propose it pay $80 million toward a 376-bed jail that would include expanded medical and mental health services. The option would allow for more state money to go toward things like construction and design. And the county would only have to contribute a onetime, net capital cost of $9.4 million, plus some money to cover cash flow debt load. The county is planning on borrowing the money via a bond.
The county must submit its application to the state by mid January and should hear in March whether it is recommended to receive the $80 million. If the recommendation is that the county receive funding, it is likely to receive it. If the recommendation is that the money go to other counties, Brown can take his application out of consideration and stick with the $56.3 million he had before.
It’s a convoluted, confusing process with some risks but potential high reward for the sheriff, who called the opportunity a “once-in-a-generation chance.”
But the big issue, county officials are in agreement, isn’t the actual capital construction of the building, but the estimated $17 million per year it will cost to operate the jail once it opens in 2018. To pay for that, County CEO Chandra Wallar and Brown have come up with slowly ascending contributions from the county’s general fund.
The county, this fiscal year, already set aside $1 million in a fund dedicated to ongoing jail operations. Next year, under this plan, the county would set aside $2 million, the next year $3.3 million, and on and on until the jail opens. The steady increases in general fund contributions would mean the county will eventually have stockpiled more than $24 million to go toward jail operations once the facility is ready for business in 2018. From 2018 on, that excess balance will be worked off as the general fund contribution continues to crawl up, until the county eases into a 100 percent ongoing general fund contribution that covers jail operations.
But it’s those increases that raise eyebrows in the County Administration Building, where officials wonder if such contributions are realistic. “I’m sitting here looking at that going, ‘Man, that’s a tough one right there,’” County Auditor-Controller Bob Geis said.
But the county doesn’t need a surefire approach in line right now. It just has to show the state it is serious about getting the jail up and running once the facility is built and that a conceptual plan is in place. Officials are hopeful that other funding could originate somewhere, that the economy turns around, and that, somehow, it will work out.
Some area residents, meanwhile, question whether the county has its priorities straight to begin with, saying the county should not be focused on increasing incarceration facilities but on reforming a broken system. PUEBLO Boardmember Barbara Lotito, in a letter to the supervisors, suggested the they “question the need for funding a new jail rather than funding treatment and job-training programs, shelters, immigration reform, and other support for our ever-increasing noncriminal segment of the prison population who are mentally ill, addicts, homeless, and/or undocumented workers.”



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
"A 376-bed jail that would include expanded medical and mental health services", what is there not to like but the County should view any new construction an 'At Risk Project', in a fake growth economy. Though expansion of medical and mental health services does sound (without viewing the true difinitions of the services offered) good but what would those expansions be?
I believe the County should go ahead with its paln to take advantage of the State offered money.
dou4now (anonymous profile)
December 7, 2011 at 7:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
sweet. more money (millions!) from the general fund for criminals..
"The county, this fiscal year, already set aside $1 million in a fund dedicated to ongoing jail operations. Next year, under this plan, the county would set aside $2 million, the next year $3.3 million, and on and on until the jail opens."
Regulate & Tax marijuana and release the non-violent criminals. There's a solution that would put money BACK into the general fund.
local_sb (anonymous profile)
December 7, 2011 at 8:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
As the article correctly points out, it is not the capital cost of building the jail that is the real cost it is the $17 million per year that it will cost to operate it. Also, since pension costs are climbing at a higher rate than CPI, that $17 million dollars per year will probably grow at a rate of at least $500,000 per year forever. That means that in 10 years the cost to operate the North County jail could very well be $22 million per year. Yikes! The only way to pay for this out of the County General Fund would be to eviscerate all the other County programs, including the County Fire Department. By the way, this would not add jobs to the North County. Corrections Officers are a specialized professional class that go to special academies to receive their training. In the old days, all rookie Sheriffs Deputies started out in the jail and were rotated out when they got seniority. That is not the case today. Nowadays, these highly specialized professionals are itinerant and peripatetic workers who work three 12 hour shifts per week and have four days off. This shift arrangement allows them to live long distances away from where they work, commute, and spend the off hours sleeping in shared apartments rented by groups of corrections officers as temporary quarters during the days they work. I will predict that very few of the corrections officers that staff the Santa Maria jail will actually live in Santa Maria. We need to stop putting people in jail for minor stuff and find other means to punish and rehabilitate them. Jail should be reserved for serious offenders. Otherwise the majority of our tax dollars will ultimately end up paying for warehousing criminals. Is that what we want?
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
December 7, 2011 at 2:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Eckerman,
Where the he!! did you get your info from about corrections officers?? You couldn't be more wrong. They work the same hours, buy homes in the same places and have the same longevity with the sheriff's department that the deputies do, but for less money. They attend a totally different academy and are governed by different state agencies, thus the different job class. To say they're some sort of nomadic drifters is absurd.
The reason departments hire staff just for corrections is because it's cost effective and they're dedicated to working there, not just waiting to work the streets. The deputies don't want to work the jail.
By the way, they do work 3 12 hour days with 4 days off, but then they work 4 12 hour days with 3 days off and lots of overtime. Just like the deputies.
You sound like some of our local editorial writers that do no research and write as if they're omniscient.
Validated (anonymous profile)
December 7, 2011 at 3:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Build a school instead.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 7, 2011 at 9:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Validated, I got my information from 2 sources: The first is a peace officer who has worked as a peace officer for nearly 30 years, the second source is a current corrections officer who is considering moving to a rural area and commuting to a more urban job and has been talking with colleagues who do the same. Perhaps the examples I have heard are not as widespread as I heard. However, my two sources tell me that there is a lot of movement amongst corrections officers especially from lower paying counties to higher paying counties. The higher paying counties are more urban and if the officers want live and raise children in more sub-urban or rural communities the long distance commute mode is one at least some of them have chosen. The 3-12 schedule is conducive to such a commute mode. Perhaps I generalized too much from specific examples, but I did not make it up out of whole cloth.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
December 8, 2011 at 8:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
That 30 year veteran officer you talked to sounds as if he knows nothing about modern corrections, especially SB county. What you described might be more applicable to state corrections, but again, certainly not SB.
The fact is housing in the Santa Barbara area is so expensive that the vast majority of all law enforcement personnel live 45 mins or more from their work location. That includes Police officers, Deputies, Custody Deputies and support personnel.It comes down to whether or not they would rather rent a small place or own a home. On the flip side most cities or Sheriff's offices outside the SB area have staff that live within 15 mins of work.
To say you "generalized too much" is putting it lightly. I'd say you're talking out your ...
Validated (anonymous profile)
December 8, 2011 at 3:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well Validated, during his career the 30 year veteran has worked as a patrol officer, under cover narcotics detective, internal affairs officer, State Park Lifeguard, State Park Ranger, Sheriffs Deputy, and DA investigator and served in agencies all over California. During his career, he has seen it all. The corrections officer I mentioned has less experience but is of the younger generation who is experimenting with newer concepts of life/work balance. In fact that corrections officer does not live in Santa Barbara but does live a lot longer than 15 minutes from work. I am not claiming to be the final authority on these matters, but as I said before, I'm not making this stuff up. It is happening.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
December 8, 2011 at 8:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Priceless (anonymous profile)
December 9, 2011 at 7:55 a.m.
Ok Priceless and Validated, I have a better idea. Let's go into debt and build the jail then gut the other County departments to tune of $20 million + per year to run the thing and find out if it really helps the employment situation in Santa Maria (after we lay off all the County workers who already live here in order to free up the $20 million) and makes the County a better place for all of us. I say, build it and fund it and then live with the consequences and don't complain if things don't work out quite as rosy as was predicted.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
December 9, 2011 at 8:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)