Pending approval by the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, Santa Barbara County has reached agreements with multiple bargaining units that will save the county more than $2.5 million for the 2011-2012 fiscal year, which begins today, July 1.
An agreement with Fire Fighters Local 2046, which represents roughly 194 county employees in the Fire Department, would extend the union’s contract for one year — to 2014 — and defer several scheduled wage increases over the next two years for a grand total savings of more than $3.9 million over three years.
The firefighters — who ratified the agreement — have agreed to delay a 2.5 percent wage increase they already delayed once in December 2010. They won’t receive that increase until June 2012. A 2.5 percent wage increase scheduled for September would be put off for a year, and three more wage increases of 3 percent each spread out over 2012 and 2013 will all also be delayed a year. All of these scheduled increases were already stalled in concessions made by the union in June 2010.
The fire concessions will save the county $1.48 million in the 2011-2012 fiscal year and $1.7 million in 2012-2013.
The Engineers and Technicians Association (ETA), which represents roughly 129 employees, saw its contract expire on June 26. But a proposed memorandum of understanding, which would run to June 2013, would save the county $842,025 in each of the two years of the agreement.
As part of the proposed deal with the ETA — which hasn’t yet notified the county of ratification by its members — the union will rescind and permanently eliminate a 2.5 percent wage increase and a $20 per pay period increase in unit cash benefit allowance. Also eliminated will be employees’ ability to cash out up to 40 hours of accrued vacation leave each year, as well as the ability to use paid sick leave to compute overtime. Members will also participate in a week-long furlough each year.
Finally, a group of 67 confidential employees in 16 different county departments — who are not represented by a union but are in classes similar to those in SEIU Local 620 — will have a previously adopted increase in wages and benefits rescinded. The decision is not negotiated, but rather adopted by a board vote. This employee group was originally supposed to get a 2.5 percent wage increase in April 2010, and an increase in $20 per pay period in cash benefit allowance scheduled for July 2010. Both increases were deferred until last week, mirroring concessions from labor organizations with similar deals.
The county would save roughly $203,000 in 2011-2012 if the board agrees to the elimination of the wage increases.
The supervisors, anticipating some labor concessions, used $1.6 million to adopt the budget for the 2011-2012 fiscal year. According to Human Resources Director Jeri Muth, any savings beyond that amount could be allocated by the board however they wish. Should the board approve these three deals, the $1.6 million would be covered, with approximately $929,528 left over to dole out.
But with the state budget finalized Thursday, the trickle-down effect means the supervisors — who just finished closing a $72 million county budget gap — could find themselves cutting services and personnel soon.
The county continues to negotiate with other labor groups, Muth said, which could lead to more concessions.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Remember all those fire fighters that saved so many homes and lives in all the fires we had. I know my parents house in Mission Canyon is only there because they risked their lives. They stayed in my parents house while the fire blew over and then saved almost the whole community up there. We should increase there wage not suspend their union wage increase...They earn it everyday!!!
miked442 (anonymous profile)
July 1, 2011 at 11:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Deferral just pushes the problem into the future - eliminating the increases is actual savings. More smoke and mirrors from the union-owned Supes.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
July 1, 2011 at 2:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Deferring salary increases is a joke. Am I missing something or does the County think there is a pot of gold at the end of the 2012 rainbow?
Another joke: They can't cash out 40 hours in accrued vacation this year? Guess what that means......they just keep it in their accounts and then add it to their compensation when they retire for purposes of calculating their pension benefits.
WilliamMunny (anonymous profile)
July 1, 2011 at 4:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Again, back to deferments, not concessions. Those are checks that are going be paid later. No real savings there. Again, a failure to lead by the BOS. Look, firefighters are important. But in every other city and county that is in tight economic times, concessions are being made vs. loss of jobs.
The only good news? Doreen and Salud are up for reelection. Maybe us residents can actually show some nerve and elect people with fiscal knowledge and the strength to lead.
Salud......more and more you have shown your true colors. You are not capable at leading at this level. You will never be capable of leading in Sacramento or DC. Those are your true ambitions.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
July 2, 2011 at 11:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What you "fiscal hawks" don't seem to understand is the fire fighters have a contract that runs into 2014 now. They didn't have to give up a single penny and the BOS had no power to take anything away.
So, either you all speak from a level of ignorance, or you know the truth and simply try to fool the reader into believing a lie.
Validated (anonymous profile)
July 2, 2011 at 3:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
miked442,
You must be a firefighter. Please, firefighters are already the highest paid labor group in the county. Earn there keep!!! Please, with the county fire chief telling the board of supervisors that you ran 11,500 calls for service in 2010 that equates to 31.5 calls a day or 1.9 calls per station a day (Divided by 16 stations in the county)
Now you are looking for 14% more in raises!! For what?? Lets see, you work a 24 hour shift, sleep 8 of it with the occasional chase the ambulance call, you get to exercise on-duty, shop on-duty, watch TV, play video games and cook a home meal on-duty in the station. Yes, they earn it alright.
This is not a dig on the fire service but the public has been fooled by slick PR campaigns for years and huge contributions to BOS members to get lavish salaries, retirement packages and benefits.
It is simply amazing to me to think because one does their job they deserve more... Only in America does one foolishly equate doing their job then call them a "Hero" and want to pay them more.
Where can I sign-up for a job that pays $100K+ a year, work 10 days a month, get to sleep on-duty and get everything you ever wanted???
Priceless (anonymous profile)
July 2, 2011 at 4:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Like I say, the rooter man does a tough, nasty job that we really appreciate and that not many people want to do too.
Where would we be without him? Does that mean we should pay him six figures?
JHL (anonymous profile)
July 3, 2011 at 7:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Validated has a point. The city should declare bankruptcy and abrogate all contracts, then renegotiate with private sector compensation as the benchmark. Look around the country; the days of the overcompensated underworked government employee are ending.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
July 3, 2011 at 9:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You're gonna have a hard time finding private sector comparables for police and fire to serve as your benchmark.
OldDawg (anonymous profile)
July 4, 2011 at 6:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I am guessing the firefighters should have just kept their $3 million plus dollars and stuck it to the County. Nobody on this board even really gets it. ... No good deed goes unpunished.... Jump on the band wagons eveyone!!! Hurry!!!!
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
July 4, 2011 at 7:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Validated and others......check on line. Dozens of firefighters, general employees and police unions have come to the table and renegotiated EXISTING agreements. All contracts have a "meet and confer" clause that allows them to do that. Faced with massive layoffs or concessions, most have chosen concessions by renegotiating existing agreements. And guess what? As a person with family members who work in government and a political science degree, I have knowledge of which I speak.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
July 4, 2011 at 10:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
BeachFan,
Why would any labor group renegotiate with a government body that has such a screwed up spending agenda as the SBCBOS. As we have seen year after year the labor groups have given concessions but the BOS DID NOT save it for basic services, because they don't understand what that means.
Why do county employees only agree to salary deferments? It's because they don't trust the BOS enough to sacrifice a future raise for what they (the BOS) call a financially sustainable budget when its know the money might not be spent for that purpose. We saw all the labor groups take their raises this year because of reckless spending by the BOS after last years concessions.
Get real people. The politicians simply want more money to hand out to non-mandated "feel good" entitlements. Would you give up part of your paycheck for that?
Validated (anonymous profile)
July 5, 2011 at 9:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Validated.
Agree with you on this. The current BOS are a bunch of fiscally incompetent individuals that will never learn to live within the County's means at the expense of County services
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
July 8, 2011 at 9:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)