Climate change, it appears, is not agreeable with Californian-grown fine wines. According to a study from the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University released last week, a 1 degree Celsius uptick (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) in average global temperatures would potentially shrink the amount of suitable land for growing top tier wines in California, specifically Napa Valley and the Santa Ynez Valley, by an estimated 20 to 50 percent by the year 2040. The study, which focused explicitly on the type of environment needed to grow only the top quarter of the most expensive wines on the market, used climate modeling to come to its conclusion. The researchers also predicted that, by 2040, Napa and Santa Ynez would not only see an increase in the average daily temperature during growing season but also a marked increase in the number of days when temperatures top 95 degrees Fahrenheit.
Climate Change Threatens Fine Wine Production
Thursday, July 7, 2011


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace




Previous Month



Comments
The climate change of our record cold winter?
That climate change?
jukin (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2011 at 11:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
jukin, your hatred of all things you identify as "liberal' is causing gaps in your logic:
Wouldn't a "record cold winter" signal a change from the norm, according to your belief that weather is synonymous with climate?
binky (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2011 at 11:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You can't argue with junkin. He/she/it is way more credible than the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University.
SBLoc (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2011 at 11:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Of course climate change is happening, the climate is always changing.
Temperatures have leveled off and been dropping for the last 10 years. We were coming out of a mini-ice age during the later half of the 19th and 20th centuries, so of course temperatures have been trending higher.
The truth is that temperatures were MUCH higher during the medieval warming period, and plenty of fine wine was being grown throughout England during that time. Currently, England is a bit too cold to be a strong producer of fine wines. So IF temperatures continue to go up, which will cause CO2 levels to rise (it's not the other way around as many man-made climate change proponents will have you believe), we may have to shift some crop production to places that are more suitable for wine grapes. However, with the increase in CO2 levels, agriculture will get a nice boost because plants breathe CO2. There would also be more arable land, and no noticeable rise in ocean levels.
I haven't seen any evidence that any major disasters would be caused by an increase in global temperatures.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2011 at 3:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let us not forget the recent peer reviewed study that concluded that the last ten years of cooling coincided with China's industrial boom. All of the dirty coal burnt over there released sulfur particles that reflected sunlight back into space.
Or maybe you find the idea of burning coal to increase global cooling offensive, we could go to Australia and wipe out the feral camels in exchange for carbon credits. Click,Click Boom!
Disturber (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2011 at 3:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Climate change? What climate change? Let's just stick our heads in the sand and pretend it doesn't exist. That should work well, right?
Nockamixon (anonymous profile)
July 8, 2011 at 1:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"The climate change of our record cold winter?
That climate change?"
-- jukin
No, the climate change of the current southern USA record heat wave and drought.
That climate change.
================
See, when you make an idiotic comment, it can turn around and bite you in the patootie.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
July 8, 2011 at 2:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What will the Yuppie wine "tasters" do?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
July 13, 2011 at 3:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)