Most families living on California’s Central Coast probably aren’t too worried about the dangers of coal pollution. Without the sight of ominous clouds billowing from nearby coal-fired smokestacks, it’s easy to assume that we’re relatively safe from coal’s toxic pollution.
Unfortunately, that’s not the case. You don’t need to live next door to a coal-fired power plant to suffer the effects of coal pollution.
I learned this firsthand when I recently received test results showing that I have an unsafe level of mercury in my body. And I’m not alone.
Tens of millions of American women and children – as many as one in six American women, according to the Environmental Protection Agency – are at risk from toxic mercury that is released into our air by coal-fired power plants. After it enters the atmosphere, the mercury eventually rains down into our rivers, lakes, and streams – contaminating the fish we eat. Each year, a shocking 48 tons of the toxin are pumped into our air from coal-fired power plants in the United States.
This is a frightening amount of pollution because of how extremely dangerous mercury pollution is to human health. Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that is especially dangerous to young children, nursing mothers, and women of childbearing age. Mercury exposure affects a developing child’s ability to walk, talk, read, write, and learn. After serving more than 20 years as a nurse and health advocate for the Santa Barbara School District, I’m appalled that we would continue to jeopardize the health of our families this way.
During the past few months, the Sierra Club, America’s largest grassroots environmental organization, has been holding mercury-testing events around the country that enable people to find out for themselves how coal pollution is threatening their health. The events, held in more than 30 cities across the U.S., found a substantial number of people with levels of mercury in their bodies that the EPA considers unsafe.
Though I do not live near a coal-fired power plant, I was one of the participants who learned she has a potentially dangerous level of mercury. Truly, coal pollution is a problem that can affect anyone regardless of where they live.
But there’s good news, too. This is a problem we can solve.
Up until now, coal-fired power plants have essentially had a free pass to pollute, even though they are our nation’s largest source of mercury pollution. Thankfully, earlier this year the EPA proposed updating standards to help protect families from mercury by establishing emission limits for the nation’s fleet of power plants.
According to the EPA, these new protections would save as many as 17,000 lives and prevent 120,000 cases of childhood asthma every year. The long-overdue air toxics safeguard would also help prevent disease, avoid hospitalizations, and create new high-paying jobs for workers installing and operating pollution control equipment.
The proposed safeguards answer the demand of grandmothers like me who are urging the EPA to protect our kids – and future generations of kids – from toxic pollution. We need the EPA to stand up to the big polluters that for decades have fought against Clean Air Act requirements to clean up their facilities.
Unfortunately, during the past year, we’ve seen powerful interests try to defund and gut the Clean Air Act. Most recently, one of the committees on which I serve passed legislation to stop EPA from finalizing this common sense step to reduce mercury pollution.
That is the wrong way to go. Unless the EPA is able to enforce commonsense standards to reduce the amount of toxic pollution from coal-fired power plants, everybody, including families here in the Central Coast, will continue suffering the unseen toxic effects of mercury pollution. And we will be that much further from embracing the clean energy future that leaves coal in the past where it belongs.
The Clean Air Act has been protecting the health and safety of Americans for the past 40 years and, as a result, our air is safer to breathe and our water is safer to drink. Recent analyses by the EPA have shown that for every dollar spent on cleaning up air pollution under the Clean Air Act, we’ve received $26 back in healthcare savings. In fact, the Clean Air Act has been one of the biggest environmental and public-health success stories in history.
And we can do even better. With a strong and enforceable Clean Air Act, a better future – free from coal pollution – is on our horizon.
Lois Capps represents California's 23rd Congressional District in the United States Congress.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
For the last 15 years, a small group of people who were smart enough to buy electric cars like the Toyota RAV 4 EV, have been charging them using solar panels on their home roof tops. That's right- no oil, gas, fumes, nothing, 15 years, no problems at all. The best EV (electric vehicle)was arguably the General Motors EV1, but it never really was sold, only leased, and when the leases expired, the cars were crushed. Meanwhile, 15 years later, GM is trying to hoodwink us into thinking the volt is anything other than a glorified oil burner like the rest. The Nissan Leaf is now being released, but in small numbers, despite the huge demand. Just think- all electric and all solar on all rooftops= no 4 trillion dollar wars, no gulf spill, no warming, no murcury. Ask your congressman- "Where are the electric cars?" EV1DOTorg
spiritpen (anonymous profile)
July 24, 2011 at 1:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
SBRC (now Raytheon) grew and processed HgCdTe crystals used in IR detectors at Hollister and Glen Annie for years on R&D contracts, and production is now done in Santa Maria. From my experience, SBPD and SBFD ignore calls regarding adults showing young children how cool mercury is (liquid mercury really IS fun to watch, is odorless, and has a high vapor pressure. Most cases of mercury toxicity are caused by exposure to undetectable mercury vapor in air, and children are much more susceptible than adults). One of my kids had a potentially fatal autoimmune disease that can recur throughout life as a result of mercury exposure.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
July 24, 2011 at 2:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Good on Congressman Capps and her staff for working to help make sure the EPA gets in place this nation's first set of standards for getting mercury and other heavy metals out of our air, water, and food.
Here's a list of the most common sources of mercury pollution in the U.S.:
http://www.rodale.com/mercury-polluti...
And here's crystal clear evidence of how politicians and the coal industry have been trying to avoid installing scrubbing equipment in their plants, going so far as to deny mercury and heavy metals are bad for you (incredible!):
http://www.grist.org/pollution/2011-0...
Note the hypocrisy of George W. Bush's former political appointee to the EPA, Jeff Holmstead, cited at the end of the article. I say we make him a mercury-milkshake and see if he man's up to drink it :)
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
July 24, 2011 at 3:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It is great that our Congressional Representative is actually writing up an important environmental issue rather than just rest on her laurels like 99% of the "electeds" who only speak out when they have the pomp and circumstance of the spotlight. Love her or disdain her, you have to admit that Lois Capps is the Congressional Energizer Bunny Rabbit, an indefatigable source, depending on your perspective, of insightful, capable leadership, or of annoying new ways to pester Rebuplicans with new thorns in their collective side.
In the Spirit of Paul Revere, I offer these e flections upon Congresswoman Capp's contest with the nefarious Coal Industry:
This new concern with Hg pollution only underlines the 80,000 ton Godzilla/King Kong in the planetary living room: once we get rid of that coal pollution, then what?
Are we going to
(A) WARM THE GLOBE INTO PLANET MERCURY 2.0??
This will happen if we continue to dump CO2 into the atmosphere? This would turn God's green Earth into a gigantic suana, wiping out Agriculture as we know it, and probably causing an Accelerated Mass Extinction, interminable Resource Wars (masquerading as The Will of the Almighty, Liberation, etc.)
OR
(B) Are we going to countenance an ever-increasing Tower of Babel not going UPWARDS to the heavens, but rather tunneling deeper DOWN into every nook and cranny that will have it, to wit,
TONS OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL??
Added bonus: now but particularly when fast breeders become "popular", spent nuclear reactor fuel doubles as a handy dandy source of weapons grade plutonium...
IMAGINE: Thermonuclear Weapons in the hands of the North Koreans and the Islamic Republic of Iran, under the leadership of the successor of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Il-s... and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_...
the progenitor of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_...
So where is the leadership? Where is the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation? Where is the Dalai Lama? The Archbishop of Canterbury? Where is the George Washington? Who is going to step up and make order out of the plantetary train wreck which is surely going to make the Deluge of Noah look like a dress rehearsal?
All I know is that http://www.appropedia.org/Amory_Lovins does not hold the key. Nice try, but windmills won't erase the spent fuel dumps nor will they reverse global climate change. It's all a day late and a dollar short.
Nothing he suggests will deal with the fact that we are stuck with a choice between a planetary hothouse or a plutonium dump. More and more people every second, and they all want cars and i-pods and big houses...so yes Mercury is bad. We know this. But when Representative Capps gets on the plane, she will use as much petroleum as an entire family in Mexico uses in a year. We need a breakthrough in energy technology AND in political science. Nothing less will work, and Hg is really the LEAST of our worries...
Geof_Bard (anonymous profile)
July 24, 2011 at 4:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Easy there, Geof_Bard.
Reducing mercury and heavy metals pollution is very do-able, we have the technology now (as do other countries), rules/enforcement can be implemented, and benefits will appear in short order.
No argument peak oil and climate change are serious problems for our kids/grand-kids (as are the intransigence of ideologues) but that doesn't mean we shouldn't pick off lower-hanging fruit while we work the tougher long-term issues at the same time.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
July 24, 2011 at 6:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"So, Lois Capps suffers from mercury poisoning. That may explain her confused, stupid rants and ideas."
--bigt
Stay classy, bigt. Stay classy.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
July 25, 2011 at 12:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Cant wait for the Tom Watson counter punch explaining how the defanging of the EPA , which occurs every time Republicans control congress, will benefit business and commerce. He will sweep the little problem of mercury contamination under he rug , and extol the virtues of getting the EPA off the back of business in the name of job creation.
Yup , Tom , low wage jobs with no health plan to treat mercury poisoning .
geeber (anonymous profile)
July 25, 2011 at 4:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why even have an EPA if all you want to do is assign the task to your buddy who will not do his job? Seems like the last republican administration was wasting a lot of our tax dollars on this kind of stay at home work. Heck of a job brownie ??!!?!?
spacey (anonymous profile)
July 25, 2011 at 2:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Truly amazing how ideological indoctrination rears it's ugly head when discussing removing Mercury from our environment and protecting our children. Rigid self awareness features like this that prevent bringing people together for the common good should be identified as the psychosis that it is... fear of anything that is not exactly in your past and future oriented thought matrix? Get help... try some LSD... that will flatline your rigid ego pattern and release you from chronic stimulus response patterns that prevent you from being a caring and loving human being, and give you a glimpse into the present moment... a place you have probably spent little time in recent years... possibly since you were a child.
contactjohn (anonymous profile)
July 25, 2011 at 2:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
EPA and common sense standards shall never meet.
jukin (anonymous profile)
July 29, 2011 at 11:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)