The criminal case of Kenneth Barber has all of the elements you could ask for in a courtroom drama, and then some.
Two alleged attempted murders in Santa Barbara County Jail witnessed only by the victims, allegations of intimidation and threats, and connection to the Aryan Brotherhood prison gang, all revolving around Barber, representing himself in a case that could put him behind bars for life.
Barber is accused of stabbing two other inmates in the northwest D-Mod of the County Jail in August 2008. At the time, the area was reserved for hardcore general population inmates, typically those with prior prison terms or affiliations with street or prison gangs.
Barber comes with quite a history. In 1999 he was convicted of mayhem for biting a man’s ear off. He’s named in a book called Dangerous Attraction, a true life crime novel about the brutal murder of a Ventura woman at the hands of a skinhead. The book claims that Barber himself was a skinhead, and that he helped gather information used to threaten and intimidate witnesses testifying against the man eventually convicted for the murder. Most recently, in 2008, Barber was sentenced to 10 years in state prison after being convicted of several drug charges. He was in Calipatria State Prison on those drug convictions when he was brought back to Santa Barbara to face the attempted murder charges.
Barber, who once ran a tattoo shop, represents himself, filing motion after motion in carefully scripted handwriting on yellow sheets of legal pad, and was appointed an investigator to help him dig around, gathering and conducting interviews. His most recent investigator, however, Ron Rose of Orcutt, asked Judge Frank Ochoa Monday afternoon to be replaced after the judge told him he was skating on very thin ice.
The judge told Rose and Barber – who, while in court, shuffles through paperwork with his hands cuffed together – that some of the tactics Rose used in interviewing one of the victims more or less amounted to intimidation. Rose told the judge he was just reading questions provided to him by Barber. “The last thing I want to do is anything wrong,” Rose told Ochoa, who told the investigator he was making a wise choice by dropping out.
Rose and Barber were joined in court Monday by prosecutor Kimberly Smith, Deputy County Counsel Kelly Scott, and an attorney representing the Department of Corrections, all set to address a number of requests for information from Barber, who had sent several subpoenas to several agencies, including the Sheriff’s Department and Department of Corrections. Much of their concern, Smith said, was that he was using subpoena power as an attempt to “ascertain all kinds of information not related to trial.”
Given Barber’s history of alleged intimidation tactics, safety of witnesses was their prime concern as they moved to quash many of his requests. Ochoa agreed. “The things you’re asking for are largely unrelated to your defense at trial,” Ochoa said.
Over and over, however, Barber asked Ochoa for a private in-camera hearing with the judge, explaining that he needed the information as part of his defense strategy, which he didn’t want to disclose in front of the prosecution. He often raised his voice over that of the normally soft-spoken Ochoa, which prompted the judge at one point to admonish the defendant – “When I’m speaking, that’s a time for you to listen.”
Certainly an intriguing element to the case is the amount of evidence involved. At Barber’s preliminary hearing in February, the first victim in the jail assault case testified that he’d been working out with Barber in a cell when Barber became upset with what he apparently perceived to be a slight and left the room.
A few minutes passed, and Barber returned, the victim said, arms extended like he wanted to give the man a hug. Instead, the victim claims, he made a swiping movement, slicing the left side of his neck, saying, “You’re goin’ work out when I tell you to work out.”
A responding custody deputy found Barber in a different area of the jail “in what appeared to be an embrace” with a second victim. As Barber is quick to point out, the deputy could not tell if the embrace was part of a fight or one of the men rendering first aid. Indeed, when the two finally separated at the command of the deputy, the alleged victim slipped on a pool of blood, and Barber helped him up. It was discovered, however, that the second victim had one of his arms slashed, resulting in more than dozen stitches. Blood found on Barber, who had no injuries, tested positive for the second alleged victim.
Apparently no weapon was found, though the prosecution suggested a razor could easily have been flushed down one of the toilets in the area. Barber argued that the first alleged victim has made contradictory statements and had “possible animosity” toward him.
The pressure and threats against the first alleged victim began almost immediately, the prosecution has suggested, and Barber purportedly told the victim he was a leader and shot-caller in jail. The second alleged victim more or less disappeared. But in testimony from the prelim, a detective said the second alleged victim, through a series of head nods and non-verbal actions, suggested Barber was behind his injuries.
Barber, meanwhile, has asked for advisory legal counsel to aide him in preparation for trial, though he still plans to represent himself. Barber is scheduled to be back in front of Ochoa Monday morning, when a motion to dismiss the case will be heard.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace







Previous Month



Comments
Hey! DonMcDermott and EatTheRich! Where are you to defend this steaming pant-load's extracurricular activities? DonMcD. Aren't this idiot's actions just another bi-product of "the corporate 'conservative' chamber of commerce type organizations" and "conservative thuggish gangs at the top who set up corrupt standards and promote ruinous economic, social and environmental policies"? And, ETR. I'm sure for ol' Mr. Skinhead "recidivism prevention programs work when they are properly funded and when the personnel are properly trained". But, only when "the voters in this state pull their heads out of their rears and stop funding prisons and restore funding to educational and public services". Problem solved! Yeah, right.
waz (anonymous profile)
July 28, 2011 at 8:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Donny Boy & ETR are probably helping this slimer write a writ so he can better represent himself in court.
Of course, there IS the possibility they won't defend this d-bag's activities because after all, he ain't a "person of color" & therefore not afforded the same protections from the likes of Don & ETR.
He's also NOT a crusty bum (not to be confused w/ "homeless") on State Street mooching off of the ssystem.
But waz, you touch on an interesting point: Somehow, some way, this malaka's actions ARE somehow the fault of Dale Francisco, Michael Self, Frank Hotchkiss & Randy Rowse, a bi-product of those supposed corporate conservative thugs w/ corrupt standards that promote ruinous economic, social & environmental policies. I'm sure Don & ETR will make the much needed connection.
As for recidivism prevention programs, maybe Don & ETR can offer to house this lovely individual (& others like him) in their homes :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
July 28, 2011 at 6:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It's funny. Everyone, especially the liberal element, is so conspicuously mute on this guy. Where's the outrage about how he's being treated by "the system"? Where's the righteous indignation of the "if only" crowd? Where are the innumerable excuses for why this guy is such a coIossal drain on society? I guess when you're a pigmentally challenged dirt-bag, your allies list tends to dwindle. Well, I guess guys like this are good for one thing; unveiling the hypocrisy of liberalism.
waz (anonymous profile)
July 29, 2011 at 7:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Waz, here's my answer: 1 fiNgEr Up! :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
July 29, 2011 at 8:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm surprised Judge Ochoa told him anything, oh wait, I see why, he doesn't live in Montecito. It's okay, go ahead and throw the book at him.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
July 29, 2011 at 8:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
A mad pit bull attacks? What do you do? You put the dog down. This guy is filled with rage for whatever reason, well too bad, it is time to go "Nazi" on this guy and gas him...
contactjohn (anonymous profile)
July 30, 2011 at 4:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Waz, wow you might want to read out loud what you wrote and loosen up a little because what you are saying discloses, I sense, a lot of rage, kind of like our little skinhead friend here... get help.
contactjohn (anonymous profile)
July 30, 2011 at 4:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey contactjohn! You may want to brush up on your reading comprehension skills, and learn how to spot glaring sarcasm when you see it. If you got from my posts, especially my first post, that I have any problem with having this skinhead idiot put away for a long time, you're wrong Not that I should have to explain it to you, but it sounds like you need alot of things explained to you. You see, DonMcDermott and EatTheRich are a couple of guys who are always whining that the system is so unjust for one reason or the other. That is, if you're a minority charged with and/or convicted of a crime. However, if you look like the subject scumbag here, all bets are off. Suddenly, DonMcD and ETR are silent on the subject. So, try reading BOTH of my posts on this article out loud. And, while you're at it, try looking up some posts written by DonMcD and ETR. However, reading their posts aloud is difficult, since it's hard to read aloud and gag at the same time.
waz (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2011 at 7:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It amazes me how quickly people can pass judgement on another human being after reading a single article. Actually it is quite sickening. There ARE two sides to every story. Have any of you people, whom are so quick to say 'gas this guy ' as if he is some sort of animal, ever think that this man might be innocent? And why are you so quick to pass judgement? My guess would be because of his past. Well people change! Wake up people...... Last time I checked nobody is perfect.
dwn4thekauz (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2011 at 5:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Sorry. But, this guy IS an animal. He's a white supremicist scumbag, and unless you've been living under a rock for the majority of your life, you should know that these idiots seldom change. You would think, if he's really making at attempt to change, that he would at least make try to grow his hair to cover the tats on his head.
"Last time I checked nobody is perfect."????
That's what you would say to someone who just scratched your car or spilled paint on the driveway!
"In 1999 he was convicted of mayhem for biting a man’s ear off."!!!!
Really? He bit a guy's ear off? Oh well. Nobody's perfect.
waz (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 7:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Do you know this man personally? How can u say he is a scumbag? Because of his looks? Tattoo's? After reading one newspaper article, it seems to me, you already have your mind made up. Wow! How's that for judging a book by it's cover. This man is an "alleged white supremist". Automatically, with society as screwed up as it is, a caucasian male cannot shave his head without being stereotyped as a 'white supremist'. This man is not an idiot by far, nor have i been living under a rock. To those of you who are so quick to pass judgement maybe you should look a little further into this story. In 1999, he was convicted of mayhem for biting a man's ear off. He didn't pull a Mike Tyson move and just decide to bite an ear. It was a bar brawl that obviously got way out of hand. If biting an ear is the only way you can defend yourself in that moment, i myself would consider it.
To all the ignorant people in society, wake up!
dwn4thekauz (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2011 at 10:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What about his latest drug convictions? He got ten years! I'm sure that's not for simple possession. By what you're saying, either this guy is guilty of these crimes, or he's the unluckiest s.o.b. that ever lived. I don't have to personally know someone to make an assessment as to whether they are a scumbag or not. I find it amazing that you can read this story and NOT come to at least some conclusions that this guy is something of a drain on society. What do you think he's been doing for a living most of his adult life?
waz (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 7:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I am just going to assume that none of you have ever experienced the wonderful California Penal System. Here is the thing. You don't go into the Pen a gangster in most cases unless you were already. You don't go into the pen and think you will come out the same. Unless you are extremely lucky and truly above everyone else, you become in a lot of cases everything you were not. You people need to first understand how to survive in prison before you start passing judgement to this HUMAN BEING! You were so easy to pass your judgement it was clearly forgotten the alleged victims were inside the same Jail. That makes them criminals also. Yet you have nothing to say about them. Maybe this is just another one of those prison gang things where the victims teamed up and are trying to get this guy busted.
It just pisses me off that so many people attack and accuse people without knowing a damn thing and some of the people on this topic should probably be in the same prison living the same innocent peaceful life these guys have to live in a system that clearly treats them fairly.
Also for all of you ignorant people on here. You need to consider that he isn't a skinhead because he wanted to be, maybe he had to make a choice to survive in prison. If he bit someones ear off in a bar fight then perhaps he did it to also save his life. Maybe he didn't start the fight, maybe he was jumped on my some drunk that got the better of him so he did what he absolutely had to do and ended up in prison which just lead to more and more violence. some of you people think prison is a Sunday school class, but it is something you make choices and do things you normally would never consider doing and all to survive and in some cases it was all because you simply didn't want to die in a bar. Also, you people that (including the state of Cali) that think he can be a skinhead and in the AB are seriously stupid. Have any of you watched the news, or specials they have done on the AB? They don't like skinheads and the state has stated the same thing. You can watch several very well documented movies on the prison system, AB and skinheads on netflix. You people should be bitch slapped for jumping on someone you know nothing about and passing your very uneducated and unethical judgement against. Until this guy is found guilty then you need to accept that he very well may be innocent and shut your damn mouths!
namesake (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 3:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Namesake, the reason many, if not most or all of us, have never experienced the CA Penal System is because we haven't had the pleasure of commiting crimes in the same nature as the lovely poster example this article provides.
You throw a lot of "maybes" out there & it makes me think of an old saying: Jail is full of innocent people.
The "maybes' that you supply for this guy are feeble @ best, ridiculous @ worst. There's no "maybe" w/ this guy, he's the cause of his own problems, look up his rap sheet.
W/ that said, this (me) innocent personally has never been thrown in the klink, but maybe that's because this innocent has never given the authorities a reason to throw him in the klink.
As for the othe inmates involved, well, MAYBE they were trying to turn their lives around & along came this scumbag to ruin that? MAYBE?
But hey, they're just as guilty too & that's the price of NOT being an innocent: Dealing w/ crapbuckets like this guy.
No judgement, just going by the rap sheet that follows this crapster around.
This guy ain't innocent & if that deserves the bitchslap you speak of, so be it. So be it. Yo, waz, 1 fInGeR uP! :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 6:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hank,
Your must have rode the short bus! The idea that he is guilty because of his rap sheet is the same idea that your gay because your name is Hank! The fact is that nobody knows the truth, including the state of Cali which is why they are still waiting around trying to figure things out. In the mean time people like you pass your judgement without knowing anything at all except a rap sheet that may or may not be entirely true.
namesake (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2011 at 8:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"I am just going to assume that none of you have ever experienced the wonderful California Penal System."
That's right, I haven't. It's not that hard to stay out of prison. You act like this guy just fell ass backwards into the system. There's a word that seems to be missing from the vocabularies of people like you; Accountability.
"You don't go into the Pen a gangster in most cases unless you were already."
What? Seriously? So, what you're saying is most gangsters are made in prison? I do believe that YOU were the one that rode the short bus. I believe these scuzzy little gangsters mostly start their idiotic gang banging activities in their teens.
"If he bit someones ear off in a bar fight then perhaps he did it to also save his life. Maybe he didn't start the fight, maybe he was jumped on by some drunk that got the better of him so he did what he absolutely had to do and ended up in prison."
And, you talk about speculation. Alot of your type keeps speculating that this guy was just sitting at a bar, minding his own business, when suddenly he was attacked. Self-defense is an affirmative defense to assault and battery. If he would have been able to prove that he was defending his life by biting a guy's ear off, he wouldn't have been sent to prison. Oh, I know. All these guys were railroaded by the system. They're all innocent.
waz (anonymous profile)
August 8, 2011 at 8:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)