Mixed Messages
Voters Resist Cuts to Public Schools but Oppose Paying More to Avoid Them
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Californians love Jerry Brown’s plan for fixing state finances. They just hate what’s in it.
That’s the bottom line of a just-out statewide poll of the attitudes of voters about the governor’s fiercely debated proposal on whether to supplement billions in state spending cuts with a batch of higher taxes in order to craft a solution to the chronic budget deficit.
The survey, by the widely respected Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC), underscored a plain, if bedeviling, fact about politics in the state, where most voters are of two minds about what they want from government: a high level of services joined to a low level of taxation.
Capitol Letters
As George Orwell famously noted, “Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously — and accepting both of them.”
Some key findings from the new PPIC poll are as follows:
• Nearly two-thirds of voters favor Brown’s plan for an up-or-down special election on his proposed deficit reduction plan.
• Nearly two-thirds also say they support the substance of the plan, which includes not only $11 billion in reductions already approved in Sacramento but also about an equal amount in new revenue, to be generated by extending temporary higher income-, sales-, and vehicle-tax rates, which otherwise are set to expire.
• Large majorities, however, oppose the specifics of his tax proposal, with just 46 percent favoring continuation of increased tax rates, which were approved for two years in 2009.
“Californians have favorable views of the governor’s revised budget plan and his special election idea,” said poll taker Mark Baldassare. “Yet the fact that fewer than half support his tax and fee package raises questions about the outcome if the voters have their say.”
Talk about a master of understatement.
As a policy matter, voters strongly disapprove of any further cuts in three of the four largest program areas in the budget: 73 percent oppose reductions in K-12 schools, 64 percent don’t want decreases in higher education, and 61 percent disagree with health and welfare cuts. The only major budget cut that a majority of voters support is in prisons and corrections, with 80 percent in favor.
Taken together, the survey results on taxing and spending challenge Brown with a stunningly complex political calculus as he faces a constitutional budget deadline of June 15.
For starters, some of his Democratic allies at the Capitol, fearing the public might reject his tax plan, now are pressing him to craft a legislative strategy to push through his program, which avoids the need for a special election; some Democrats also have begun trying to roll back some cuts enacted earlier this year because tax revenues came in several billion dollars higher than expected. The governor has vowed to veto any such spending that gets put back into the budget; he also is sticking to his promise to seek public approval for any tax increases, a vow that was the centerpiece of his campaign.
Another newly complicating factor is the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision ordering California to reduce overcrowding in state prisons. Despite the desire of voters to reduce spending on the corrections system, the court ruling means the state may have to spend more on prisons; the alternative is releasing thousands of prisoners to the custody of county jails, which cannot afford to house them without additional funds from the state; those will not be forthcoming without approval of higher taxes.
Finally, the governor is still confronted by the unanimous opposition of Republicans, who have thwarted him by withholding the four votes he needs in order to achieve the constitution’s two-thirds super-majority requirement for making any policy move involving higher taxes.
On the surface, at least, Brown remains sanguine, insisting he will yet find the sweet spot to balance the countless conflicting demands on the budget, the singular issue that has dominated politics in Sacramento since his inauguration in January. Asked about the PPIC poll findings, he retreated to full Zen mode: “It’s a little hard to interpret.”
Continuing to seek political support for his plan, Brown addressed a major state Chamber of Commerce event a few days ago and offered this assessment of where things stand:
“There is a zone of potential agreement, and that’s what I’m looking for,” he said. “And I have to tell you, pushing back the Republicans is just about as difficult as pushing back the Democrats. I’m glad that I’ve come here in my declining years to give it the college try.”
Related Links
Comments
Yes the 'people' are conflicted. To get us out of the hole Bush got the world into we're going to have to grow and/or pay more or accept a degraded standard of living, degraded communities. We need to advance, progress.
The average home usually has at least a couple SUV type vehicles, a motor boat/recreational vehicle, a motorcycle or two, a pair of ski-whoop-di-dos in the garage. We are experiencing an inefficiency and maybe we need to spend more on what matters most; food, shelter, education, transportation, healthcare, infrastructure, energy, safety.
But Bushies et al continue to lead with the rhetoric that everything is tax free fun and games. Republicans continue with more hype that the government needs to balance its' budget now that we're in bad times and in at least 2 wars. We can operate that way but the U.S.A. financed its' revolution and that's how it has been done ever since. Americans always borrow to spend. In bad times you have to spend money to make money, even if it is borrowed. We borrow to finance our homes, cars most have credit cards, and with balances. Now is not the time to retract on what matters.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
June 9, 2011 at 7:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I don' think the 'people' are conflicted...I think they know that there are way less important things to cut, but the politicians put the kids (and the future of the country) on the chopping block first. It's like the Taliban building their bunkers in schools and say "how can you hurt the children"?
Democrats and Republican politicians all want the same thing...money and power...the DC Machine. Our Forefathers saw it coming and tried to limit it with the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The government is now way more than anything described therein, and the citizens are losing their liberty and freedom.
Get back to the Constitution and most of this Nation's problems will get worked out...sorry lazy leaches, you may need to motivate.
Sam11 (anonymous profile)
June 9, 2011 at 9:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Sam11; you don't know what you're spouting about if you cannot tell me how much it costs for you to live and thrive here in the U.S.A. The next time you and your tea party types claim you're 'taxed too much' you must ask and answer two questions; 1. How much does it cost to live here and 2.) how much money do you extract off of the system.
How much does it cost to feed the machine that feeds yourself and family, educates, provides a parking spot at the beach; a tee-off; a riding trail, cleans up after the disasters, picks up the pieces, and puts the bumps, cement barriers and guardrails in the freeway lanes that are supposed to keep you from bumping into the other ignorant tea party whiner in the lane next to you. And maintenance on all of it is done with inflated dollars that often makes it much more expensive when it deteriorates and needs replacement.
You/We don't do budget. The legislature does, or should if we would allow them to. It's really difficult to hear of the idiotic masses tell me they're taxed too much when they don't even know how much it costs to live here.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
June 10, 2011 at 6:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Don:
Worse than the idiotic masses are people who make idiotic and general statements like the average home has a camper, boats, jetskis or a motorcycle. Hilarious as your comments always are it also shows how in touch with your own personal reality, were you not defending the unwashed masses the other day in terms of Dictator Dales attack on the Brown Act.
BTW just a ugly truth for you the people actually do budget in this state they have done it multiple times at the ballot box. Where do you think the money for bullet trains and other feel good items are in the budget come from thus giving the legislature smaller amounts in the general fund to actually budget with. Its worth noting also the fees people pay to drive those cars,boats, campers, skidoos, and motorcycles and the gas they pay to operate them is heavily taxed.
Bush caused many problems we are all paying for but to let our Democratic controlled Assembly and Senate off the hook for overspending is actually idiotic. It can also shrink down to the local level with the council both progressives and moderate/conservative fringes spending redevelopment funds like crazy rather than see them go back to the state.
Governor Brown has been a breath of fresh air unfortunately dealing with extremist Democrats and Republicans is perhaps a no win game for him in actually getting the state back on track.
pointssouth (anonymous profile)
June 10, 2011 at 5:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
pointssouth; Sorry that you don't agree that Carifornians approved prop 1A in 2008. As screwed up as the voters can be about many things this was a good progressive investment and economic stimulus for the State.
My point about people including Carifornians is that they don't generally do their own budgets very well let alone have good knowledge about the State or national budgets. Typically we rely on sound-bites and TV advertisements during campaigns. But I do agree that ballot initiates can have negative effects and that is why I think it best to let the legislature do the budget rather than by voter ballot initiative.
Voters are irrational when they think their toys are more important than necessities. Clearly people do not understand their impact on the environment or the budget while they're self-absorbed and entertaining themselves whist buzzing around the planet; all the while blaming lazy politicians for the potholes in the road.
Lastly, our Democratic controlled Assembly and Senate do budget just fine when given the chance. It is the Republican side of the house that screws things up and gets in the way of stability, or now recovery. Again as you acknowledge Bush's republicans majorities created a massive financial bubble and then popped it. It is a cycle that repeats itself when people like you blame the Democrats instead of those that are responsible.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
June 10, 2011 at 11:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)