K-9 Krazies
MEA CULPA BLUES
Thursday, June 23, 2011
MEA CULPA BLUES: It’s all well and good to admit your mistakes, but the fact of doing so doesn’t make them any less dumb. Just ask Santa Barbara City Councilmember Francisco, the pied piper of the council’s new conservative majority, about his exertions to get the genie back in the tube and the toothpaste back into the bottle. Two weeks ago, Santa Barbara City Councilmember Dale Francsico successfully led his followers into dubious battle, securing a hard-fought and much-palaverized vote in favor of eviscerating California’s sacrosanct open-government law, otherwise known as “The Brown Act.” For all his admissions, “It was a mistake,” and, “I never should have done it,” the fact is Dale did do it. Just as it defies the laws of physics to “un-ring” a bell, it’s impossible to “un-pull” the trigger after you’ve shot yourself in the foot, especially after you’ve put it in your mouth. Realizing the error of his ways, Francisco brought the matter back for reconsideration this week and secured unanimous support to “un-vote” his previous victory.
Angry Poodle
For high-minded public-policy wonks concerned about political corruption, the Brown Act embodies all Ten Commandments rolled into one. It was passed by the State Legislature in 1953 to chase the politicians out of the smoked-filled rooms and force them to conduct the people’s business in the glaring light of day. The Brown Act requires all governing bodies — except, of course, the State Legislature — to provide members of the public adequate notice of any action they intend to take, and allow members of the public to give their two cents’ worth. As such, the Brown Act qualifies as a royal pain in the ass. First, elected officials have to listen — sometimes ad nauseum — to whatever members of the public, whether they need meds or not, have to say. Of all Santa Barbara’s city councilmembers, Francisco is most impatient with the political peanut gallery. Secondly, the Brown Act limits the ability of elected officials to talk to one another about agendized issues outside of public meetings. Dale, for example, can only talk privately to two other councilmembers about council business. If he were talk to three, for example, that would violate the Brown Act, because four councilmembers — a voting majority — would have discussed an issue behind closed doors. No doubt, as Dale argued, much such discussion would be innocent, enlightening, and genuinely helpful. Dale’s proposal would allow a majority of councilmembers to so enlighten themselves. Dale’s conservative council comrades — Michael Self, Frank Hotchkiss, and Randy Rowse — supported these changes despite strenuous objections voiced by members of the council’s liberal minority. The public needs to witness the reasoning of their elected officials, they argued. It’s called accountability. Even with the Brown Act, many people doubt their input matters and are convinced deals are hammered out well in advance of actual votes. Dale stressed no votes would take place, under his plan, out of the public eye. He only wanted decision makers to have the best information possible.
As a practical matter, the council’s vote to dilute the Brown Act would have as much effect as previous council resolutions to prohibit nuclear war from occurring within city limits. Or even more far-fetched, the city’s ordinance that purports to ban the use of gas-powered leaf blowers. It emerged out of a broader package expressing the council’s support or opposition to a bundle of bills that may go before the State Legislature, but probably won’t. At best, the 90 minutes the council spent debating the issue was an exercise of political voguing. At worst, it gave masturbation a bad rap. But as a political matter, Francisco might as well have dressed up like a piñata and passed out complimentary ax handles to his opponents. Given that Dale, the clear leader of the council’s first conservative majority since the Paleolithic Period, is now up for reelection, that’s not very strategic. That fellow conservatives Rowse and Self — now also up for reelection — were quick to follow Dale’s lead was equally ill-advised. (In a head-spinning display of rhetorical back-pedaling, the conservatives contend that if they could have talked this out in advance, they would never have done something so stupid, but that the Brown Act prevented them from doing so. I would suggest there’s a huge difference between talking and listening, and it’s doubtful they could have heard anything behind closed doors that they did not hear about from the dais.)
As Dale and his posse learned the hard way, open government transcends the usual liberalconservative thing. Right-wing Tea Party activists and crusty conservatives were outraged by his action. Even the News-Press — which endorsed Francisco, Rowse, and Self for reelection before they’d announced they were running — believes the Brown Act was delivered from on high by no less than Moses. It would be a mistake to dismiss Dale’s “mistake” as a mere brain fart. When it comes to intellectual pulchritude, the man is muscle-bound. The real issue, at least in Dale’s mind, is the influence of public-employee unions, who not only give candidates large campaign donations, but can and do meet — at least on occasion — with individual councilmembers during contract negotiations. I get it. What I don’t get, however, is how turning the lights off and keeping the public even further in the dark solves anything. If Dale is genuinely interested in “un-hoisting himself by his own petard” — which literally means to be knocked off one’s feet by the propulsive power of one’s own flatulence — I have a friendly suggestion. Make it a hard-and-fast rule that before any vote, all councilmembers must disclose any and all communications they’ve had with anyone — and their paid lobbyists — and the nature of that communication. That would help expose the influence exerted by all special interests — and not just the ones Dale doesn’t like. Better yet, it’s something the council can do on its own. I don’t know if this will heal Dale’s self-inflicted wound. But it would help take masturbation out of the council chambers and put it back where it belongs.
Related Links
Comments
A lot of people voted for Dale Francisco not realizing his true dictatorial ambitions. This was just another revealing Dale Francisco episode. Still it is nice to have this ministerial masturbation out in public. Francisco and lemmings Self, Hotchkiss and Rowse must go.
And thanks to Nick Welsh for many words of the day and this word pulchritude that describes the ministerial masturbation that must go on and on in the privacy of the supposed "conservative" mind. And now we know why it is that they must always meet in secret high up on Samarkand, to discuss, to gossip and to develop their strategies to tear down democracy even further.
BTW does anyone know how it is that Dale Francisco supports himself here in Lovely Santa Barbara?
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
June 23, 2011 at 6:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
bigt, by "blown the doors off" do you mean that turgid wall of words and one-sided reporting that tells the story of two jerks who got caught driving under the influence of alcohol and then, during their respective contacts with the police, behaved not only with rude definance but also with incredibly bad judgment? If find it interesting that even by their own accounts the perpetrators had been drinking prior to driving and did not comply with the orders of the police officer who was investigating whether or not they were legally impaired. Somehow I just don't feel sorry for either of them. Drinking and driving kills people. Get the killers off the road.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
June 23, 2011 at 8:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
And "bigt" is in no way privy to any stand by the Independent, other than what has been published as an Endorsement, usually in an Editorial around election time.
"bigt" needs to make his arguments by speaking for himself.
Although Darryl Genis is a long-time and much appreciated advertiser, The Independent in no way "vouches" for or against his integrity.
randy (Randy Campbell)
June 23, 2011 at 9:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The excellent proposal here by The Angry Poodle for disclosure of ex-parte communications should be part of a new city ordinance. But if Francisco, Rowse, and Self (all running for reelection) had their way, the city council discussions and dealmaking on any such ordinance would be held in private so the public voters do not know.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
June 23, 2011 at 9:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So, Nick criticizes the Council member when he does something unwise, and criticizes some more when the councilmember re-thinks the decision. Where is the justice? Where is the ability to learn from unwise actions?
It's like taking your poodle to the veterinarian or the taxidermist: either way you get your poodle back.
drdan93109 (anonymous profile)
June 23, 2011 at 11:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why would any news or other media outlet, Independent or otherwise, refuse to accept money from an advertiser regardless of what is being sold? After cigarette ad inserts, any lawyer with a dubious reputation is trivial.
And with his comment here, should we interpret that Dr. Dan (Secord) is part of the Republican Wagon Circle and also believes that the city council should be able to meet in private to decide how to vote?
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
June 23, 2011 at 11:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
jfklbj.
It's bizarre to call people "hypocrits" not based on anything they've done, but based on your belief that they will behave just like your stupid incompetent heroes.
pk (anonymous profile)
June 23, 2011 at 2:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Better to be a probabilistic hypocrit in a future parallel timeline than an old petard, I always say.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
June 23, 2011 at 2:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Somehow you seem to have missed how, under the Republicans in Washington, government secrecy and power grew, along with the deficit (who do you think passed prescription drug benefits and got us into two expensive wars without bothering to worry about how to pay for any of it?) and how Republicans want to restrict women's reproductive options and tell people in general who they can and can't marry. But of course Republicans are opponents of big government. And liberals like to spend money not to help people or create jobs, but just for the pleasure of destroying the country. And of course you have the ability to know they will do this through secretive activities, and we guys will be silent about it because we like paying higher taxes caused by misgovernment and waste.
pk (anonymous profile)
June 23, 2011 at 9:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
bigt: what were these documents: " City planning commissioner Deborah Schwartz submitting
false documents to the city council in an effort to deceive
the council, caught in the act by Frank Hotchkiss at a
council meeting."
---The poodle's suggestion that on every important or contested issue the councilmembers state whom they have spoken with is an excellent one! All the council members claim they want transparency; this would prove it. It should be easy to pass such an ordinance, easy and quick.
at_large (anonymous profile)
June 23, 2011 at 10:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Self's clumsy back-peddling was painful to watch. I don't appreciate how she tried to drag Bendy White down with her (forcing Bendy to defend himself with a clarification).
Omelettes from broken eggs indeed.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
June 24, 2011 at 12:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If we are on the omelet metaphor, the outcome is stickily clear now that Michael Self has egg all over her face the way she attempted to trash Bendy White while whining that White voted for the Brown Act violation issue when he sat on the three-member committee of the city council.
Of course, Mrs. Self cannot fathom that White did a political maneuver to get that on the full city council agenda to make Self and Francisco look bad when they had their open-meeting hissy fits about why they do not want to hold city council meetings in public.
This is a political tactical game of Go while Self only has the capacity for Barrel of Monkeys.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
June 24, 2011 at 11:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If having secret dead in the night meeting to pass the Stimulus or Obama HellCare is good for the feds, why not for our city?
I'll go with because it is a conservative POV and not democrat communist one for $2000 Alex.
jukin (anonymous profile)
July 6, 2011 at 4:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)