I left the seventh annual Symposium for Professional Wine Writers with an unsortable onslaught of mixed emotions. To be clear, there’s no doubt that it was a fantastic experience, that Napa’s Meadowood Inn provided a spectacular backdrop, and that I want to stay in touch with every person I met. It’s just that I didn’t necessarily go home with more confidence that wine writing—and lifestyle writing in general—will be a lucrative career. I did go home, however, with an intense admiration for the people there who have never stopped trying.
At 23 years old, I was probably the youngest writer there by an average of 20 or 30 years (although I wasn’t treated as so), and I think this means I have a different perspective on things. Whereas the others seemed more entrenched in their wine-writing careers, I felt more like someone looking into a crystal ball; while the others attended to refine their already rolling careers, I attended in curiosity about whether I could (or should) even continue down this route at all. And while it takes more than four days to figure all of that out, I did learn some meaningful things:
1. In the words of Dominique Browning, former editor of House & Garden, “Don’t let bills get in the way.”
After being immersed in a group of wine writers for a few days, every excuse I’ve ever made to myself for taking a career risk has become null. Decades older than me, most of the people I met had a lot (or everything) at stake when they started their wine writing ventures. Whether that meant quitting their day job to become a total freelancer, or starting a blog in the intimidating face of unprecedented blogger competition, these people did it. And, considering I have the kind of support that would ensure I never end up homeless or starving, I couldn’t possibly look these amazing people in the eyes and tell them that I haven’t pursued something for the sake of “financial stability.”
2. Wine writers are as passionate as winemakers, and big-shot Napa winemakers are as passionate as small-time Santa Barbara ones.
Wine is a luxury product. Wine industry professionals have to acknowledge and accept that they work ridiculously hard on something that (probably) won’t save anybody’s life or, say, solve world poverty. Similarly, writing about wine can feel admittedly bombastic while a tsunami destroys an entire country or riots envelope several nations. Attending the symposium, though, reminded me why I chose wine: Because the little, happy things matter as much as the enormous, dark ones do. Unwavering passion makes the world go ’round, remains elusive in most places, and prevails overwhelmingly in the wine industry.
3. There are as many ways to write about wine as there are ways to enjoy it. Also, there are almost as many people writing about wine as there are people enjoying it.
During one conference, Bruce Schoenfeld, wine editor for Travel + Leisure, asked us, “Why write about wine if not to convert others?” He then argued the difference between a critic and a writer, declaring himself the latter. Schoenfeld explained he writes about the story and life behind a wine in lieu of focusing on subjective sensory characteristics.
In a world where people can publish themselves across cyberspace in minutes, everyone can indulgently string together adjectives about the wines they drank last night. Schoenfeld—and other speakers like Gerald Asher, who discussed similar aspects of the trade—helped restore my faith in the enduring value of solid writing as artistry. This means that wine writers can move forth, assured that even thousands of poorly written wine blogs couldn’t replace one well-written article; readers can feel good about subscribing to wine magazines, knowing that paying for well-written articles is well worth avoiding sifting through thousands of amateur blogs for a fleck of decent material.
4. Objectivity still exists in wine tasting.
A highlight of the symposium for me was Wine Bible author Karen McNeil’s master class in wine tasting, which lured me in with the subtitle, “What Makes Great Wine Great?”
I’m not sure if her unfailingly impeccable appearance or striking composure had anything to do with it, but McNeil had me enthralled with what she calls the “aesthetics of greatness.” She set out each wine to demonstrate a different aspect of greatness, including precision, distinctiveness, and choreography. As a result, I recommend McNeil’s Wine Bible for wine beginners and veterans alike, and thank her for seemingly putting some stability and order into such subjectivity.
I’m sure all symposium attendees left with different perceptions of the days we spent together attempting to demystify the quite unsettling, shifting industry of which we all work so hard to be a part. The most remarkable thing about the symposium, though, is how every writer there seemed to measure success in such a different way than most people in the “real” world. It must be something in the wine.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Its really cool that you enjoyed your experience at SPWW. Being the producer of the Wine Bloggers Conference I picked up on this sentiment in your article:
"This means that wine writers can move forth, assured that even thousands of poorly written wine blogs couldn’t replace one well-written article; readers can feel good about subscribing to wine magazines, knowing that paying for well-written articles is well worth avoiding sifting through thousands of amateur blogs for a fleck of decent material."
The common thread among blogs is the passion of the writers as you point out. "Decent material" is a relative measurement and to poo poo the material out there like that is akin to saying people are wasting their time trying XYZ wines - thats how you view XYZ wines, doesn't mean its the same for everyone.
Thats what bloggers are beginning to understand - find your voice, find your audience, and write for them. As people search out for what resonates with them they will stick with your blog if it aligns with their values. Some value humor, some "serious" wine writing, some wine tasting notes, some about the experience of tasting wine on tropical islands (or whatever).
At the end of the day, blogs are the medium, not the message.
In this case, the medium allows anyone to try it (publishing) with low cost to zero cost. This puts the burden on you to do two things:
1. Write very well.
2. Find your unique voice and be true to it. If you're not, people will know.
I've spoken on panels at SPWW on this very topic. Its a struggle for wine writers to understand that blogging is just the medium and if they're confident in their writing then that will come across in their art.
Its worth repeating - Blogs are the medium, not the message. So as you start out, find your voice and I encourage you to use that medium to find fans of your voice.
Paying for magazines does not ensure you'll get the message you need from that medium.
joelvincent (anonymous profile)
March 23, 2011 at 10:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I enjoyed reading your thoughts on the conference Chelsea. I write about food, travel, and weddings - quit a full-time job to do it too! - and I understand what you're saying about writing the happy things versus the earth-altering ones. Part of me will always want to cover the BIG story, and if one happens to walk by, I follow it like a dog sniffing bacon. But ultimately, I'm happy writing happy - and it makes other people happy too.
LV (anonymous profile)
March 24, 2011 at 11:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)