Will Arnold Move Here?
The Arnold Show
Thursday, May 26, 2011
OWNS A CARP LOT: Ex-gov and soon-to-be ex-husband Arnold Schwarzenegger just might become our neighbor here on the South Coast. But I kinda doubt it.
The other day I drove up to look for the 25-acre plot he and Maria bought in Carpinteria’s Rancho Monte Alegre development in 2008 for a cool $4.7 million. That’s just for the dirt, you understand, but beautiful dirt it is, and the sweeping ocean views from the foothills off Foothill Road.
Barney Brantingham
It’s part of a 2,800-acre development where he wouldn’t be allowed to build a home any smaller than 4,500 square feet or any larger than 8,500 square feet — roughly the size of the Santa Barbara Mission (just kidding).
Why he and Maria wanted to be so far from their jet-setting L.A. lifestyle I can’t imagine. Now it’s moot. With the secret-son scandal, California’s former First Couple going splitsville, and the former gov’s resumption of his movie career on hiatus, it’s likely that the Schwarzenegger property will soon be flying a for-sale sign.
Stogie-puffing, Hummer-driving Schwarzenegger was a rotten governor. But he was a master of the sound bite, the quip, and the staged event, according to Indy columnist Jerry Roberts, the longtime political editor and managing editor of the San Francisco Chronicle who now runs the political Web site Calbuzz.com with Phil Trounstine.
“I never succeeded in getting an interview with him,” Roberts told CNN. “He was always surrounded by an entourage, always had a lot of black SUVs, like, ‘Make way for the king!’ But he didn’t really engage people, and the legislators got furious with him. They were just props in ‘The Arnold Show.’
“As a practical matter, [the secret-son affair] doesn’t have a lot of effect, but among California voters and people in politics, it was just a huge ‘F-you’ from him.”
HUGUETTE’S HOME: With Huguette Clark dying at 104 in New York on Tuesday, the question is what will happen to her estate on East Cabrillo Boulevard. A few years ago, there were unverified reports that Ty Warner had offered her $100 million for the hilltop property but was turned down, or that he looked into it and decided against it. For years there has been speculation that her father, the late U.S. Senator William A. Clark, and her mother were never wed, as he claimed they were.
NEVER MIND: We gave an end-of-the-world party and no one came. The end of the world didn’t come either. So Sue and I just uncorked a bottle of French sparkling wine (not from the holy Champagne region and therefore not worthy of the capital “C” Champagne). We sat on our deck, munched chips, watched the (last?) sunset, and talked about how much good that wacko telepreacher Harold Camping could have done with the estimated $100 million he spent spreading word of The Rapture and Second Coming of Jesus, etc. With that kind of money, you can sell hamburgers, religion, or anything else, apparently.
BALLOT CLASH: Next November’s Santa Barbara City Council election figures to be the most incendiary one in years, a clash between ideological forces battling for council control.
Saturday night the Democrats threw a fundraiser for their anointed trio, who’ll take on three conservative incumbents expected to announce soon. If they do, Demo-endorsed Iya Falcone, Deborah Schwartz, and Cathy Murillo will be lined up against incumbents Dale Francisco, Michael Self, and Randy Rowse, plus any others joining the field. Figures to be intense. Got to wonder if Texan Randall Van Wolfswinkel, who spent $750,000 in the 2009 city election, will be back with his Tex-bucks. The former Montecitan backed Francisco for mayor and the building height-limit measure but both lost. He also supported Frank Hotchkiss and Self for council seats, who won, and Cathie McCammon, who lost.
Self just got her knuckles rapped when California’s Fair Political Practices Commission issued a conflict-of-interest warning because she voted in favor of a traffic study that might work to her benefit by diverting traffic from the street where she lives, Tallant Road, to other streets.
It’s way too early to handicap this race, but liberals are determined to win back a council they held for a generation or more. Complicating the election is the issue of downtown housing density: Even though Democrats hold a registration lead over Republicans, will Democrat status-quo homeowners rebel against liberals who seek density hikes in order to provide affordable housing downtown? Will they (gasp!) cross over and vote for the slow-growth conservatives?
Even though all three of the endorsed women were introduced to hearty applause at the annual Santa Barbara County Dems’ Roosevelt-Hamer fundraiser at the Rockwood Women’s Club Saturday night, it was less a pre-election pep rally than a gang’s-all-here schmooze-fest.
Rep. Lois Capps was there to hand out awards to 1st District Supervisor Salud Carbajal and leadership awards to Jim and Charlotte MacMillan, county Democratic Party chair Daraka Larimore-Hall, and the California Labor Federation. Larimore-Hall, recently defeated as $37,000-a-year head of the statewide union representing University of California graduate students, gave a barn-burner of a go-Democrats pep-rally speech.
Related Links
Comments
Regarding: "will Democrat status-quo homeowners rebel against liberals who seek density hikes in order to provide affordable housing downtown? "
Those status-quo homeowners need to close the loop and understand that the more "affordable" housing that goes downtown is all the less "affordable housing" that will go in their own status-quo neighborhood. Housing downtown should be all the fewer garage conversions, condo density bonuses, and second unit, second floors that have real impacts to the Golden Triangle neighborhoods.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2011 at 9:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Maybe Arnie will plunk down bones in that beautiful dirt. One can only hope.
Draxor (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2011 at 1:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What I want to know is will there be photographers running around the neighborhood?
EmerentQuality (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2011 at 8:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm sure Gregory Gandrud will be there to welcome the failed governor to Carpinteria and with muscular arms. The Where's Waldo of 'Schwarzenner for Governor' photo-ops has no sense of contrition. http://www.santabarbararepublicanclub...
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2011 at 8:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Gandrud is a total joke, as a leader and an accountant. An elderly friend of mine had him do their taxes one year and they were going to end up oweing hundreds, tho nothing had changed from years previous. On the advice of another friend, the elderly tax payer went to AARP's annual tax filing service and it turned out he was once again owed a refund.
In addition, while vetoing approx $50,000 for afterschool arts classes that same council session approved $100,000 for audio/video equipment for the Council Chambers.
EZK (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2011 at 2:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm all for bringing the governmental process into the light of the LED/LCD and usually consider it a good show. But the competition, reality and housewife shows seem to be more interesting to most. Gandruds voting priorities for the cameras above after-school activities may have been a conflict of interest since he probably just wanted to get his mug on camera, again. What we do know is that typically these tea party republican priorities are askew.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
May 29, 2011 at 5:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The thing about the hypocritical council member Michael Kathleen Self is that she is the pro-car zealot, who doesn't want traffic on her very own street. Tallant Road unfortunately is a through street and a direct connect to Cottage Hospital emergency room. If Self, Hotchkiss and Francisco are going to have a pro-car-less-transit-bike-walk agenda then surely Tallant Road should be considered in any plan to improve access to Cottage Hospital.
And not only did Self vote to advance the project and greatly tax the public to make her street a private lane, Self, in the same hearing along with Francisco, and with Hotchkiss leading the charge, put a stop to all other improvements to access Cottage Hospital as well as improve safety for the Oak Park neighborhood from the Mission Street direction. The trio really exemplify very crazy, narrow and selfish leadership.
Remember now, Self and Francisco were both part of a self appointed Safe Streets "group" that ran around town in a self-promoting, one-sided crazier than Sarah Palin demeanor all the while making numerous accusations of favors by staff and previous council members.
You wouldn't vote for Sarah Palin so you should ask yourself; why would I vote for these one-sided self absorbed tea party types. And after a few months of Rowse, and all of his conflicts of interests I would not consider voting for him either.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
May 29, 2011 at 6:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)