I moved to Santa Barbara two years ago after living on the Upper East Side of Manhattan for twenty years. The only concern I had when I was leaving New York City was this: will we be safe enough in Santa Barbara?
Within two months of landing here, a young Syrian man named George Ied was beaten to death while walking home from his late-night job. He was apparently mugged by gang members while talking to his brother on his cell phone.
What stunned me most about this unspeakable crime (which, had it happened in my old neighborhood, would have made the national news as a horrific hate crime) was how little the people who lived here cared that this had happened. [Ed.’s note: Ied’s murder is not being prosecuted as a hate crime.]
There was never a formal obituary published about Mr. Ied, though, interestingly, every unhoused person who dies here is usually eulogized on the front pages of every newspaper by “activists” who are, not coincidentally, on city or county payrolls. (The lack of real, objective journalism for a city this size is a whole other problematic issue.)
The point is that no one seemed to care that this young man’s life had been cut short, except his family, his nearest neighbors, and one local community activist – a woman named Sharon Byrne.
Sharon Byrne is not your typical Santa Barbaran. She’s middle class, a single mother, someone who, like the vast silent majority here, struggles to make ends meet. She’s got a set of values that is surprisingly rare here: she’s direct, she’s kind, she’s extremely compassionate and she’s, smart as a whip. She also cares about her neighbors – even when she doesn’t know their names.
As the head of the Milpas Community Association (her full-time job), she’s made it her mission to make sure that there is never another George Ied on the lower east side – or in any other neighborhood in this town.
Here are some things about Sharon Byrne you may not know:
She’s not anti-homeless, she’s anti-homelessness. She understands the problems associated with widespread homelessness – vagrancy, public drunkenness, desecration of property, loitering, disrupting business and social interactions, etc. – have to be addressed directly and firmly. This is, quite radically, a compassionate approach to addressing this problem and one that will bring a much-needed sense of civility and integrity to this town. She understands the “Broken Window” theory of crime reduction, which turned NYC around, both in terms of crime and homelessness. By making our lives more livable on a daily basis, everyone’s quality of life will be elevated – including the lives of those without homes.
She’s begun by cleaning up the Cabrillo Ball Field, empowering Milpas business owners to take back their sidewalks and storefronts, and energizing the neighborhoods on the lower east side (including the one Mr. Ied lived in) to take care of their streets and to help each other in times of need.
She’s against wasteful government spending. Even if it’s packaged to look like it’s for the greater good. Sharon has a laser-quick intelligence and is able to discern what’s at the heart of an issue – and to stay on task – even when everyone else around her is dozing off into a kind of passive mental fugue-state that is often labeled as “progressive” thinking here.
She’s pro police on the street. As she should be. There is just far too much serious violent crime here and the reason? There are no beat cops (Yes, I knew the policemen who patrolled my neighborhood in New York by first name.) Santa Barbarans don’t seem to respect cops, which just baffles this New Yorker who knows that beat cops are, hands down, the very best neighbors one could ever have.
She’s on the street making things happen while other candidates are…? I still have no idea how any of the other candidates are actually, tangibly working to improve the quality of life in this city on a day to day basis the way Sharon is. Do you? One example: she restored a trick-or-treating event to the Milpas corridor even though the election was just days off.
Here’s the thing. Sharon Byrne is more than just an independent woman. She is a person capable of deep, meaningful, critical thinking, which seems to be a rare trait in this town. She’s a person who cares so deeply and honestly for this city that it actually makes some people uncomfortable. Except, of course, those people she’s actually trying to help. Like me.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Nice points, but you sound like, no matter what happens, you would be happier elsewhere. Many of us have spent time in New York City, and actually prefer living here.
hopeful (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 12:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well said, 'hopeful.'
First red flag for Ms. Heckman's hypervigilant priorities:
-- "The only concern I had when I was leaving New York City was this: will we be safe enough in Santa Barbara?"
The ONLY concern?
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 1:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am very happy for Sharon Byrne in that she was finally propelled into action after finding someone dead on her doorstep. But there are smarter people who have been working on these dire conditions for a very long time and often with little support. There is no need to be scapegoating and conflating issues while on the payroll of a lobbying firm the MCA.
Developed and groomed in same the kitchen of the same pro-car extremist that groomed Dale Francisco and Michael Self, by promoting irrational phobias and fears is a political strategy, but not a strategy for really good representation. Even prior, Sharon Brynes' earlier public Facebook indicates that she associates mostly with the petty issues and candidates of the extreme far right.
And Ms. Heckman the number one threat to your safety is possibly the threat of being run over by a car. Sharon Bryne was groomed by the same people who continue to downplay or deride efforts to make Santa Barbaras' original neighborhoods safer with street lighting, tree replacement, traffic calming and so much more. I am still waiting for Sharon Byrne to lead the March on her beloved Milpas Street after yet another brutal death has recently occurred on that corridor.
I don't think Ms Byrne has it in her to take up a fight against a good portion of our population who don't care about real safety (yes we do have that status quo lobbying here.) Sharon Byrne it seems would rather scapegoat others, strategize and conflate issues while collecting a paycheck and lobbying as the MCA director, perhaps even for her own political and financial gain.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 2:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Actually, Chester: it was my only concern. Wasn't encouraging that a kid was stabbed to death on State Street in broad daylight and another young man had been stabbed to death on the lower west side in a short span of time. I didn't want to raise my young son in that kind of environment. The good news is that Sharon Byrne is one of those actively working to make this a safer place to live.
And the hypervigilance? That comes from other serious issues of safety we've had to face out here, but that's another story....
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 2:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I've never known any New Yorker to be afraid of anything, much less the savage streets of Santa Barbara which no doubt make the Bronx look like DisneyLand.
Homeless people are by nature afflicted with homelessness. Persecuting them and removing their few available options is not a solution but an enhancer of the problem.
"She's against wasteful government spending" but wants to waste law enforcement dollars on persecuting medicinal cannabis dispensaries, which also puts less police "on the beat". It also throws people out of legitimate work.
As for integrity, why is the "independent" and her team purposefully giving voters they meet the impression that Byrne is endorsed by the Dems when in fact she is not?
At the time of Mr. ied's murder, the whole town was angry and upset, so to paint her fellow citizens as noncaring shows just about how much this letter writer is really in touch with this community.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 3:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hi Ken,
As you pointed out, we New Yorkers aren't afraid of anything.
But we are concerned about violent crime--especially when it's so high, relative to population. And we support/endorse politician who share that concern.
I'm glad that you, too, were affected by Mr. Ied's murder. You are the first person to indicate this and it heartens me.
And just an FYI, I'm a registered Dem who supports Byrne precisely because she's non-partisan.
With thanks,
Emily
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 4:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nobody cares about George Ied because he doesn't fall into one of the designated victim groups. He was from Syria but not a Muslim. He wasn't Latino, he wasn't gay as far as we know.
The murderers of George Ied are Latino gang members who in the minds of right-thinking progressives can do no wrong and are merely victims of colonialism and white privilege.
revisionist (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 4:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
When a polemic starts out with a ridiculously overblown claim ("had it happened in my old neighborhood, [it] would have made the national news"-- in fact, there's been well more than a murder a day in NYC since our fearful correspondent moved to this town-- how many made the national news?), you know that truth and reality aren't especially important to the writer.
pk (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 5:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Dear PK,
With 201 murders in a city of 8.2 million so far this year, I think you're contention that this kind of hate crime wouldn't make the national news had it happened in NYC is just... very naive.
NYC just happens to be way less tolerant of this kind of violence than many other places in this country (and just another factual fyi: NYC doesn't even make the top 100 most dangerous cities (over 25k population in the US list), including SB.
I sense a touch of NY envy in many of these responses, but we're way off point.
Hopeful, Don PK, revisionist--which city council candidate energizes and inspires you? Anyone else care to speak up on the topic, as I did?
I would love to know.
With thanks,
Emily
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 8:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Actually Mr. Ied was Middle Eastern, Syrian to be specific I believe. If you don't think people from the ME experience bias you've not been awake since 2001.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 9:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
kinda funny when all the political shills come out to play their game the night before the election. that's what you folks commenting above are doing right?
mesamike (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 10:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Emily
I merely asked how many of NYC's daily murders you've seen reported on the national news over the last 2 years. Sorry if it was naive to follow the logic of the original letter, but if it's claims were true, then there should have been a few hundred such stories.
I don't see how the fact that the election was only days away relates to praise for Byrne's actions on Halloween, but I guess I lack your ability to grasp her "laser-quick intelligence."
pk (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 10:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"I think you're contention that this kind of hate crime wouldn't make the national news had it happened in NYC is just... very naive." - Emily
when did they charge anyone with a hate crime?
mesamike (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 10:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
ps. I agree with the positions and attitudes of the candidates supported by this paper, although I imagine that you don't think it practices "real, objective journalism," a claim it would be interesting to see you support on real, objective grounds.
pk (anonymous profile)
November 7, 2011 at 10:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Sharon Byrne is not your typical Santa Barbaran. She’s middle class, a single mother, someone who, like the vast silent majority here, struggles to make ends meet."
There are lots of single mothers in S.B., and the sentence contradicts itself when it says the she is not your typical Santa Barbaran yet says "like the vast silent majority here". Moreover, her financial and marital status are irrelevant to whether she is suited for the position she seeks.
Now folks, turn up your volume and listen to this musical tribute to Emily Heckman: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqlJl1...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 1:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
And so all of you are supporting/voting for ???? for City Council?
What most rankles about Santa Barbara is this kind of "editorial" curmudgeonliness that pervades the responses to my letter. It's incredibly immature and shows a lacking inability to think critically and is, frankly, what I find so unattractive about SB.
Every single poster (except a few who do note that Mr. Ied, a Syrian, was beaten to death by four latinos) felt compelled to attack me--rather than have the balls to speak up about whom they are supporting for City Council. Says a lot about this place.
Most seem compelled to try to attack me for having a solid conviction.
So come on, brave Santa Barbarans--who are you voting for for City Council? Who inspires you that's running?
See? Easy to criticize--harder to have real conviction. Grow some balls, SB.
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 6:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hi Bill Clausen,
I meant Sharon Byrne is atypical in that she's open, direct, and very willing to put herself out there. She's a breath of fresh air, isn't she? New Yorkers like this kind of moxie. We like smart, independent women. A lot.
Also, how many other single working mothers beside Byrne do you know who are working to improve this city's streets? I'd love to know them!
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 6:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Cathy Murillo!
hopeful (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 6:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Emily, every candidate, not just your favorite, is open, direct, and willing to put themselves out there-- as in, running for office-- for example, the ones I was brave enough to tell you I preferred.
If you could set aside your obsession with balls, you might realize how condescending it is to dismiss everyone who disagrees with you as being incredibly immature and showing a lack of critical thinking, things strikingly missing in your own rambles. You aren't being attacked for having a solid conviction, but for having a solid conviction that most of us find unsupported.
You find us unattractive and lacking in bravery because we disagree with you. I guess our problem is that we also like smart, independent women.
pk (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 7:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yay!!
Good for you, Hopeful! (Now, if only you didn't feel the need to hide behind an alias when posting.)
So, PK--which candidate inspires your vote?
And also--care to reveal your full name?
Something making those who can't speak up feel unsafe here?
Hhmmmm....
Best to all,
Emily
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 8:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
PK: Well, Deborah Schwartz was not very forthcoming about her tax problems. I think that shows a lack of directness and honesty. A problem for me as a voter.
So...who is it that inspires your vote?
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 8:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Shill is such a harsh word.
As evidenced on her Facebook page Sharon Byrne is a disciple of social values extremist Dale Francisco, gives a shout-out to the candidate Mike Stoker who is aligned with extremists in his own party, used McCarthyesque type language to scapegoat another cause, measure T, as funded with "drug money" "they'll control the airwaves with pro-pot messages."
It is all about fear, scapegoating, conflation for this self described buddhist candidate.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 8:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So, DonMcDermott--who are you inspired to vote for?
So far, given this thread, the race belongs to Byrne and Murillo. The ladies are rockin' it!
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 8:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"The point is that no one seemed to care that this young man’s life had been cut short, except his family, his nearest neighbors, and one local community activist – a woman named Sharon Byrne."
That's because in Santa Barbara, these little gang banging idiot thugs are looked upon as victims, not the little criminals they are. To say anything to the contrary would be considered racist. Right, DonMcDermott?
waz (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 9:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Which part of "I agree with the positions and attitudes of the candidates supported by this paper" can't you understand? Or are you having a problem navigating the Endorsements on the Home Page?
Your cheerful ignorance and incoherence (I've given up trying to understand your point about murders in NYC and national news coverage) isn't very inspiring.
If my opinions aren't good enough for you, I don't see why posting my full name would make much difference. You seem to see this as a question of "bravery" rather than intelligence. Giving us your Social Security number wouldn't make your arguments any more convincing.
pk (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 9:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm for any candidate that will continue to fuel DonMcDermott and Ken_Volok's lefty hatred of the right.
waz (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 9:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Awww...PK: such a coward! But duly noted that you support the Dem Slate.
Anyone else?
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 9:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Waz: not fair! No making this personal, re: other posters.
Who inspires your vote, really?
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 9:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@DonMcDermott (if this is your real name, bless you!). When you use the word "shill" to describe Sharon Byrne, as you using it in this context: "when she's scrubbing graffiti off the stop signs and walls on the lower east side, she sprays them with "shill?" Is that what you mean?
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 9:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sorry Emily, I'm neither shamed nor impressed by your willingness to put your name to your addled opinions, and I'm especially not impressed by your preference for using personal slurs rather than rational arguments against people who disagree with you. Now, if you could explain your meandering nonsense about news reports and murders, or why your candidate's actions on Halloween being so close to the election are supposed to impress us, it might be possible to respond to your views as though they were something more than mindless partisan noise.
pk (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 10:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Okay knuckleheads--get out there and vote! And remind your friendly SB neighbors to do the same.
This was a BLAST. Thanks, all.
Emily
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 10:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
DonMcD: "But there are smarter people who have been working on these dire conditions for a very long time and often with little support."
DonMcD: "Shill is such a harsh word."
Aw, what's the matter Donny? Oh, I know, you, as a "progressive" can question somebody's intelligence simply because their point of view differs.
But when you even suspect you're being called something like "shill" your thong gets bunched up.
Aw, poor baby! Well, @ least we know that it is typically "progressive" of you to be such & hateful too :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 12:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Sharon Byrne is a fraud, pure and simple.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 1:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So much mean-spiritedness! Ouch!
I found this exchange incredibly amusing. Thanks for the laughs, boys! (Although it's not a very high form of humor, but alas--that's what you get with such low levels of testosterone.) And thanks for making me so proud to be a New Yorker!
Cheers!
Emily
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 1:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"And thanks for making me so proud to be a New Yorker!"
- Emily
When are you going back (for good)?
waz (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 2:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr. Waz--please don't forget to vote!
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 2:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This whole thread is unable to escape mincing sentimentality despite the best efforts of both sides. Why was Byrne leading people to believe that the Dems endorsed her when they did not. The latter might be a selling point for some but the dishonesty I would think would negate that.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 3:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I get to vote on whether you're leaving?!
waz (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 3:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Boys! Boys! (or old men?). Please try to play nice. (A tip: girls like guys who are intelligent--and kind.)
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 3:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh! And don't forget to vote! You can drop off your ballot until 8pm tonight.
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 3:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
She says that Santa Barbarans are uncaring when innocent people are murdered; they don’t respect cops, are incredibly immature, and have “a lacking inability to think critically.” When they see no point in responding to her irrelevant challenge to give their names, she calls them cowards. But Emily thinks other people are the ones being mean spirited!
She seems to believe that mocking and verbally abusing people is an intelligent way to deflect attention from her inability to explain her confused thinking, but her childish performance only makes it easier to dismiss her.
Thanks for making me so proud to be a New Yorker who knows a self-delusional fraud when he sees one. Ouch, cheers, and thanks for the laughs, child!
pk (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 3:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Also, how many other single working mothers beside Byrne do you know who are working to improve this city's streets? I'd love to know them!" -Emily-
Emily: I don't know if I speak for anyone else here but I'll speak at least for myself in saying (perhaps to the chagrin of many of your opponents on this thread) that it's a big turn-off to my when someone plays the race or gender card. Whenever I hear that "as a single mother" or "Latino" "African-American" the inference is that these immutable life circumstances preclude those of us who do not fit these categories as being qualified.
What especially is irrelevant is when people play the "children" card by saying "as a mother" or "as a parent". Performing the biological function does not give one special abilities per being a political functionary.
Using race and gender as a wedge is offensive to those of us who truly are committed to equality, although in all fairness to yourself doing so has become so prevalent that perhaps you don't realize the damage you do in doing so.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 3:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Correction: "turn off to *me*"
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 3:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
OMG: I just realized the same curmudgeons post THE SAME nasty comments on every letter written to the Indy.
And here I thought I was special!
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 5:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Emily: "OMG: I just realized the same curmudgeons post THE SAME nasty comments on every letter written to the Indy.
And here I thought I was special!"
HEY! Who YOU callin' a curmudgeon? HAHAHA! :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 5:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Dear Emily; Regarding 'shill', I was referring to comments by mesamike.
I appreciate your opinion and your post. But I respond contrarily with the best intent. I do not find Sharon Byrne to be an acceptable candidate or representative. What I have determined is that Ms. Byrne is groomed by this cabal of right wing extremist because she seemingly has the propensity. I do not trust Ms Byrne to be fair.
The far-right would love nothing more than to unseat the long-standing thoughtful, independent and sometimes contentious but still deliberative body politic of the south county liberal majority. Stirring up the discontent with divisive push button issues serves the 'conservative' operatives' agenda well.
Again conservatives don't really care about the issues. They care about changing the Santa Barbara political seat to republican. You know this because Santa Barbara is not the only community experiencing these problems. Nearby communities such as Carpinteria, Ventura, Santa Maria, etc are all experiencing similar problems.
Yet for some reason it is only Santa Barbaras' leadership that is scapegoated for change or replacement. The start of that was with Dale Francisco and his convincing and yet fraudulent issues, with no solutions for traffic problems, or his suggestions such as electro-shock therapy for homeless which of course is only solvable by a totalitarian state.
Conservatives just keep finding hot-button superficial issues rather than focusing on broader issues of inequality and opportunity that are the cause of the hot button issues. They do the same thing at the national level. You may have heard conservative hot button issues paraphrased as 'gays, guns and god.' Here it is bulbouts, homeless, gangs and medical marijuana.
Yes, indeed everyone vote, but vote intelligently and fairly. Remember you're in America.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 6:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow. Thank you Don McDermott for writing a civilized and well-crafted counter-opinion. It is appreciated.
Yes. Voting intelligently is key.
And Henry....well!
Emily (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 7:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
OK Emily, I might as well tell you, I'm originally from Chicago and now I'm taking off the gloves by posting this video in protest. (More bad news for you: Barney Brantingham is a Chicago native)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8BjEc...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 8:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
...as is Marty Blum.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 8:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Emily: "And Henry....well!"
HAHAHA! Easy there cowgirl, friends call me hank, you can too, guess that makes you a friend.
DonMcD: "What I have determined is that Ms. Byrne is groomed by this cabal of right wing extremist because she seemingly has the propensity. "
"The far-right would love nothing more than to unseat the long-standing thoughtful, independent and sometimes contentious but still deliberative body politic of the south county liberal majority."
"Stirring up the discontent with divisive push button issues serves the 'conservative' operatives' agenda well."
"Again conservatives don't really care about the issues."
"They care about changing the Santa Barbara political seat to republican." .
"Conservatives just keep finding hot-button superficial issues rather than focusing on broader issues of inequality and opportunity that are the cause of the hot button issues."
"You may have heard conservative hot button issues paraphrased as 'gays, guns and god." MY GOD!
OH MY GOD. I think the guy has broken the world record for the use of the words "right wing" & "conservative"!
Jeez Don, w/ all your hatred toward this imaginary foe I'm starting to think YOU ARE A CONSERVATIVE YOURSELF! Or @ least want to be 1. So much spewage of hatred based on a label. AWESOME!
Then there's this pearl of wisdom:
"Yes, indeed everyone vote, but vote intelligently and fairly. Remember you're in America."
Translation:
" Yep ya'll, everybody better vote, but if you don't vote for MY candidate of choice you can get the hell outta MY country. Remember, you're in MY America & you need to do as I say, not as I do! NOW GIT!"
Always fun to see Don's views, as warped as they are. Also love his paranoia about those "conservatives" he keeps whining about.
Hey Don, THEY'VE GOT A FILE ON YOU! There, that ought to keep him busy for a while :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 9:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Emily Emily Emily, not all boys care if the girls like them. Come girls like girls who are sweet but even better smart. And looks like Sharon was roundly rebuffed tonight, so you can now also be proud to live in SB.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 10:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
That's true, even better, FRANCISCO & ROWSE REMAIN! Good for a vast # of reasons, 1 being DonMcD is GONNA HAVE A FIT! :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2011 at 11:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Rowse may be remaining, but he will have no more incentive to get into bed with Francisco and Hotchkiss any more like he has because he had no other club to join.
Elections have consequences, dudes.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
November 10, 2011 at 12:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
John_A: "Elections have consequences, dudes."
Yeah they do & SB avoided a HUGE consequence by not voting in Falcone & Schwartz. Dodged that bullet! :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 10, 2011 at 4:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Looking at the details of the election result and reflecting on elections past, it seems the only way any Conservatives are voted in at all is because there's usually 3 tops on the ballot and everyone else is Liberal/Progressive thus dilluting the vote, and most Conservative candidates in essence win only by default.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
November 10, 2011 at 6:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Actually it's the "progressives" that win by default. That's what happens when you have a bastion of "progressivism" like Santa Barbara, the dilution is truly in their ranks.
But common sense prevailed in the sense that the only candidate on the "progressive" slate voted in was Cathy Murillo.
I think Santa Barbarans wanted some new blood in there, something much needed in many palces, but didn't want to eliminate the coalition of reason for the sake of "progressivism."
Santa Barbarans also got fed up w/ the "progressive mouthpiece" Daraka & Cathy Murillo did the right thing by distancing herself from him & his whiny rhetoric. Smart move on her part, it paid off, not so for the other 2.
Nobody knows what Cathy Murillo will do, let's see what happens during her tenure, she earned it :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 10, 2011 at 8:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I do think we owe Emily Heckman a big round of applause for instigating 58 comments. I think that may be more votes than her candidate received.
I do think everyone will be impressed and pleased with Murillo.
One hopes the new Council can start off with no acrimony and in good faith.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
November 10, 2011 at 8:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
KenV: I do think we owe Emily Heckman a big round of applause for instigating 58 comments."
Yeah, mostly from you & me. But hey, she earned the right to call me hank so... :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 10, 2011 at 9:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It was nice to see so many comments around a post for a fatally flawed candidate and to have Emily post that DonM's response was "intelligent"...
EnReKay-If she earned the right to call you Hank you have lowered your standards. When she stated Sharon is "...more than just an independent woman." you and I both knew what kind of self actualized point of view she was espousing. What, is Sharon Byrne hot and well built too? Now I'm listening...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
November 11, 2011 at 6:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
They say Byrne speaks seven languages (none of which are spoken on earth.)
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
November 11, 2011 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
KV-I hate it when people I disagree with are hysterical. As I say when people are speaking gibberish: "Is that ancient Greek you're speaking? Oh, that's right, there's no one left on earth that speaks ancient Greek".
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
November 11, 2011 at 11:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Italiansurg: "What, is Sharon Byrne hot and well built too? Now I'm listening..."
I'm not about to start quoting Sir-Mix-Alot songs of past, but... After all, I am Latino &...
By the way, you're my friend too, now stop calling me EnReeKay! HAHAHA! Call me anything, you're a friend :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 11, 2011 at 2:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
El olor de sangre caliente me empieza abrumar.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 11, 2011 at 6:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I hope it's not mine...
Thanks Hank
The next thing you know DM will be inviting me over for a bong hit and thorazine(just to take the edge off) so we can listen to some Streisand...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
November 12, 2011 at 6:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Italiansurg we agree as much as we disagree! I guess you prefer to focus on the disagreements :?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
November 12, 2011 at 10:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Italiansurg: I love the sound of Streisand's voice--just as long as she isn't opining about politics.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 12, 2011 at 3:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
BillC: "I love the sound of Streisand's voice"
I'm sure it'll sound better coming from Canada :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 12, 2011 at 5:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
KV-don't confuse me with the facts about our theoretical agreement on some issues, my mind is made up...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
November 13, 2011 at 7:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)