Lindsay Lohan has again been brought before the courts to answer for her driving-under-the-influence activity and other alleged lawbreaking. I, like most, believe people should be given a second chance but third and forth are two too many when it comes to public safety. If the star-struck legal system wants to give her probation, a day or two in jail, or other minor slaps on the wrists then fine; but if this poor little star should just happen to have a few drinks or hits of whatever and drive her car into someone or their child or other loved one then I think the judges need to be held accountable. I mean they should be removed from the bench, fined, or even do their Little Miss Muffet’s time for her. Don’t play with my safety just get her autograph. Give her the proper treatment: jail time, or whatever other activity is appropriate for those that cannot honor and respect the law.
Stars get enough special treatment: high salaries, adoration, best seats in the restaurants. They get perks and more perks, but I don’t think a Get out of Jail Free card should be one of them. From a former Hollywood talent agent who knows just how “special” they are not.
Bernard Sandler is the former CEO of CTA, Inc.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Mr. Sandler, good points sir & dead on the mark. The problem is PEOPLE. That's who adores "Lilo" & her ilk.
They crave to be like her (along w/ Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, et al) & it all comes down to that TMZ/entourage mentality.
Got to hand it to TMZ, they know how to cash in on the sheep & they do it well. Capitalism 101: Provide the pasture, the sheep are sure to follow.
Look @ the recent Kardashian wedding in lovely Montecito. FREAK SHOW! But the TMZ/entourage set made their showing just to be part of that "special" event, even if they weren't on the guest list.
The only word that comes to mind is JOKE! That marriage only lasted 72 days (which by the way, hank called it on a post a day or 2 after that farce of a marriage, I said 90 days).
My particular favorite post on a blog site was the person who answered to the criticism of that freak show by saying the following: "All you haters need to understand that KimK is a true American Princess!" Now these not-so-special people are royalty all of a sudden? Huh?
So maybe therein lies the problem, how the average people are enamored w/ the suckerings of these mere people who get celeb status.
When it starts affecting how punishment for breaking the law is meted, well kind sir, we're @ the point of Idiocracy (Mike Judge's 2006 movie after Office Space).
Look @ the recent debacle w/ Randy & Evi Quaid. Star whackers were out to get them? Only a celeb can use that defense. Again, good points made sir :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 18, 2011 at 12:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lohan isn't even a resident of SB County and none of the offenses she's been convicted of occured here. All that has been accomplished with this letter is to give LiLo (who when sober is extremely talented and a very sweet girl) more publicity.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
November 18, 2011 at 12:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ken, I know what you're saying, but the point of the article wasn't just focused on Lohan.
True, her wrongs weren't done here, but guess what? Randy & Evi Quaid are costing the SB courts $$$ by failing to appear for their dealings here in town, not to mention the $$$ they still owe to the hotel they ripped off.
If you or me did ANYTHING remotely close to what these celebs do, you can rest assured it's Hotel Graybar & "pay restitution to plaintiff" for us :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 19, 2011 at 10:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey hank,
I think @2&$$$ but also w/:) Don't you agree?
SezMe (anonymous profile)
November 21, 2011 at 1:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sez, are you using twitterspeak? Shame on you! HAHAHA! :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 21, 2011 at 11:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Lohan has not been continuing to put anyone at risk due to her driving. She has not put anyone at risk due to any of her behaviors. What she has done is violate the terms of her probation. The judge who sentences her isn't doing the taxpayers any favors since it costs all of us to keep her in the legal system. Why not focus on her real problem which is driving under the influence. If she gets caught doing that than throw the book at her. Otherwise, leave her alone!
buckwheat (anonymous profile)
November 21, 2011 at 3:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Buckwheat, I think you're missing the point. yeah, her REAL problem is DUI, no doubt.
But here's the clincher: If you or me do that it's gonna cost us dearly in legal fees, fines, all that neat stuff & if we screw up on probie, off to the hoosegow we go.
What Mr. Sandler's points out is that she gets off the hook because of the celebrity status, you or me won't.
Regardless of how great an actress she is, she still has to flush the toilet after using it just like you or me do.
If she breaks the law, she deserves the same & equal treatment under the laws of the state, regardless of who she is. That's the main point.
By the way, it ain't the judge who keeps her in the legal system, it's her audience by glorifying her behavior, that's what keeps putting her in front of a judge in the 1st place :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 21, 2011 at 5:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
rabbitrun (anonymous profile)
November 22, 2011 at 4:03 p.m.
Rabbit, great point. I think Mr. Sandler may be having a bit of "buyer's remorse" seeing what some of his product is doing these days.
But crappy behavior by celebs ain't anything new. I think the new twist is those doing it are younger :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 22, 2011 at 7:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oops, rabbit got skinned! :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
November 22, 2011 at 9:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I heard that she was released due to overcrowding of the jail. Nonetheless, I agree she should be behind bars.
Question: What is CTA inc?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 23, 2011 at 5:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Who cares about these spoiled brats? Can't they afford limos? Aren't the limo drivers cheaper than the crappy Hollywood lawyers like Weitzman?
Maybe if they hired Genis, they could have faired as well as Lance.
GYoung (anonymous profile)
November 26, 2011 at 9:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)