During an emotional sentencing hearing Friday morning, Judge Clifford Anderson sat and listened to the pain of families whose lives were forever changed the morning of August 24, 2010. On one side, family members of Joaquin Morales — the driver whose out-of-control truck plowed into a home after descending Highway 154, killing three people — told of a man who no longer slept. Morales’s son said he has seen him “deteriorate as a person.”
On the other, family members of Leon Leonel, Lorena Tellez Pacheco, and 8-year-old Jaciel Tellez — the three who perished inside the small house — told of the devastating toll the incident had had on their life. “We would do anything to take this pain away,” Leonel’s family said in a statement read to the court.
Ultimately, Anderson took a sort of middle ground, sentencing Morales to 180 days in county jail — less than the 365 days prosecutor Arnie Tolks was asking for, but more than defense attorney Mark Pachowicz thought was appropriate. The judge also said Morales could seek electronic monitoring, and if he had intended to renew his license, he would’ve suspended it.
Morales had a history of traffic infractions, having been cited 17 times for vehicle code infractions since 2001, including twice for brake maintenance. “While he may not be an evil man,” Tolks told the court, “he’s careless, reckless, and he is not a good driver.”
According to officials, Morales had loaded his rig with two full loads of gravel at the Bee Rock Quarry in the Santa Ynez Valley shortly after 6 a.m. and headed eastbound on Highway 154. It was the first of three planned trips from the quarry to Santa Paula. He thought he had fixed the brake issues he had been having before getting on the highway. He didn’t do a thorough inspection, Tolks argued, or he might have caught the problems. “These deaths simply should not have occurred,” Tolks said.
As his truck made its way down 154, witnesses reported seeing smoke from underneath the vehicle. Morales somehow managed to navigate the truck through the Highway 101 intersection and into a parking lot off State Street past Palapa restaurant, before it eventually plunged into a the home that sat at the end of the parking lot.
Originally facing three felony vehicular manslaughter charges, Morales pleaded to three misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter charges in July, after his preliminary hearing. There, officers testified the truck’s brakes were out of adjustment and had an undersized brake lining. As well, a compression release engine brake, known as a Jake brake system, was “at least faulty and maybe not in operation,” Tolks said.
“The pain that I’m feeling now will never be remedied,” Pacheco’s brother, Javier Vasquez, told the court Friday. “May God forgive him, because I won’t.”
Morales didn’t address the court Friday, but his family did. They told of an “exemplary” father and husband who has worked hard for his family. But the accident has changed him. “He cannot sleep, he just walks,” his wife told the court through an interpreter. “Your honor, the only thing I ask you is to be compassionate to this family. We have been in a depression.” His son said he has seen his father “deteriorate as a person” since the crash. His daughter told the court he has said that he wished it had been him who had died, and not the others. “His sentence began when he got pulled out of the truck and learned that three people had died,” she said.
Pachowicz, in asking the court to keep Morales out of jail, said Morales performed well under the circumstances. “He was in amazing control for what was going on,” Pachowicz said. Based on sentencing criteria — which includes protecting society and punishment — Pachowicz said Morales didn’t deserve jail time. “Mr. Morales doesn’t want to get in a car and is certainly never driving a truck again,” Pachowicz said. “That’s the only way he has ever hurt anyone.”
Since that tragic day, officials from local and state agencies have tried to make Highway 154 — a windy, twisty downhill route — safer. Assemblymember Das Williams has introduced legislation that would ban — with exemptions — the operation of commercial vehicles with three or more axles or weighing 9,000 pounds or more. That two-year bill is currently in the Assembly Committee on Transportation and is expected to be up for a hearing in early January.
Caltrans has installed signs asking large trucks to use Highway 101 rather than the 154, repaved the road, and put in rumble strips on the shoulders and between the yellow lines, spokesperson Jim Shivers said.
The California Highway Patrol has increased the number of regular officers present, said spokesperson Jeremy Wayland, and also the amount of enforcement coming from commercial vehicle officers.
Morales, meanwhile, still has a series of lawsuits to answer, from wrongful death claims by the family of the deceased to insurance claims for his truck driving. A civil attorney for the families called the judge’s decision “insulting.” “You can be a reckless driver and not be harshly punished,” said Jesus Arias, attorney for the families.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace








Previous Month



Comments
They should have charged this idiot with criminally negligent homicide. He had a long history of negligence when it came to operating that truck, until he finally wiped-out a family. 180 days? Really?
waz (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2011 at 9:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Michael Jackson's former doctor being deliciously pilloried by torch-wielding angry villagers embalmed in deep denial while criminal banksters and Wall Street con-men get bailed out and a killer of three innocent people gets a rubberband snap on the back of his wrist.
And people think justice doesn't work in America.
Draxor (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2011 at 10:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
180 days in jail or eternity in a pine box, who was punished?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2011 at 11:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
A history of traffic infractions, KNOWINGLY driving a vehicle with faulty brakes, killing 3 innocent people and he gets 180 days, WTH! I have no sympathy for his sleepless nights, his endless walking and his deterioration as a person, who cares? My sympathy is for Jaciel, Leon and Lorena and the family they left behind. Lost in this tragedy was a little boy who didn't get a chance at life, a child who, for all we know had great potential in this world and it was taken away with one selfish, reckless act. My sympathy is for the family who has lost their loved ones and are now left wondering why the justice system didn't work.
Ros (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2011 at 11:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"cited 17 times for vehicle code infractions"
An infraction is not negligence.
I don't agree with the sentence either, but he was charged with what the legal system would allow.
sbpaddy (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2011 at 11:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"An infraction is not negligence."
Depending on the citation, an infraction IS negligence. The vehicle code in CA is vast and covers a multitude of things. If he was cited for low/high tire pressure and drove without rectifying the problem, he could have experienced a blow out and caused an accident, if he was at truck inspection and was cited for faulty brakes and didn't fix them properly, that's negligent and irresponsible behavior.
As a professional that drove for a living, he had a responsbility to abide by the law, up to and including assuring that his vehicle was properly maintained at all times, not doing so is negligent.
Our legal system certainly failed this time, miserably so.
Ros (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2011 at 4:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"An infraction is not negligence."
- sbpaddy
Where in the wide, wide world of sports did you get that little nugget of legal knowledge?! An infraction, less serious than a misdemeanor, would include such things as speeding, failure to yield, illegal passing, open container, failure to maintain equipment properly, etc. In tort law, infractions are used to establish a prima facie case for negligence. In criminal law, multiple and habitual infractions can be used to establish a wanton and willful disregard. Wanton and willful disregard is an element of criminal negligence. Criminal negligence is a misfeasance or nonfeasance, where the fault lies in the failure to foresee and so allow otherwise avoidable dangers to manifest. He did just that. When you drive, over and over again, a heavily laden gravel truck with inadequate equipment down San Marcos Pass, you know, or should know that something bad is potentially going to happen. This jerk got off easy.
waz (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2011 at 5:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lorena, her husband, and son did nothing wrong. Every decision that culminated in this terrible tragedy was made by Morales. The punishment in no way whatsoever fits the crime. The prosecutor should have requested decades in prison, not a slap on the wrist.
This "sentencing" sets a great example; break laws and make terrible decisions that subsequently kill innocent people, and walk away with less time served than if you stole a tomato at the supermarket. What a joke!
Lars (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2011 at 6:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Draxor: Have you been following the case against Jackson's doctor? Have you taken into account that as of last week three expert witnesses have said that his administration of propofol was against medical ethics? That his not calling 9-1-1 right after Jackson wasn't breathing was also a breach of ethics?
I know you're in love with your flamboyant writing style but at least get your facts straight before your heart bleeds for Conrad Murray.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2011 at 8:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Even better, the government will continue to put restrictions on the use of 154 to protect us from ourselves and fellow residents instead of creating a system that recognizes and does not reward miscreants.
How in the hell does a guy like this continue to qualify for a commercial license with this many infractions?
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2011 at 5:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You hit the nail on the head Italiansurg. People are focused on Morales while failing to see that he's a symptom of a systemic problem.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2011 at 3:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It's kind of like allowing a habitual drunk driver to maintain a license. You know they're gonna break the law once again.
Worse yet, in my home state of FL it's old folks wreaking traffic havoc from a disorder we call "Cadillacs & cateracts."
Nothing wrong w/ getting old, but the problem lies in a person's lack of ability to drive a vehicle safely.
Thing is, no matter how many accidents these folks create, their insurance always renews their policy & the state reinstates their licenses. Why? FOLLOW THE $$$.
In the case of this guy he was negligent to the point where criminal applies & 180 days ain't enough.
Worse yet is that when he gets out he can re-apply for his commercial trucking license & chances are he'll get it :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2011 at 3:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Are you serious? Are you damn serious? our justices system is a fraud! this is insane... the guy only gets 180 days in jail! I hope i dont ever bump into this idiot
killuminati (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2011 at 5:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
180 days does seem too light of a sentence.
The removal (and subsequent denial it was ever there) of the runaway truck ramp on 154 needs to be looked at too.
cartoonz (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2011 at 6:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
To Chris Meagher:
Does the sentence include time served?
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2011 at 6:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hank: It's bad enough when those old Floridians drive around and cause accidents, but even worse when their parents get behind the wheel.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2011 at 10:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Worse yet is that when he gets out he can re-apply for his commercial trucking license & chances are he'll get it."
-- hank
"chances are"? You have evidence for that? No? I didn't think so.
Look out, everyone, hank is afraid of what might happen in his fantasy world. "Chances are" sunrise tomorrow will happen in the west.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2011 at 1:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I present this musical tribute to the SezMe/Hank rift.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEH3uq...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2011 at 2:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Leave it to Bill to add just a dash of levity at the right time. Thanks Bill!
waz (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2011 at 8:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
BillClausen: Let's get this straight so everybody knows and you can lighten your admiration load---YOU love my flamboyant writing style. There. And that's okay. You're not alone. I've been doing it for a very long time and am much better at it than you.
As to the dead pedophile's (Jacko) trial, no, I don't follow it and could not care less. But enough peripheral media-infected information has pisstrickled down the loo to deduce that HE, not the doctor, was responsible for his own death and the years of drug-induced circumstances leading up to it long before this doctor arrived on the scene. Should he lose his license? No doubt. But Jacko did it to himself. Period. Are we clear? Good.
Now send me your address and I'll have my secretary send you an autographed picture along with a personalized note suitable for framing. Have a day, now!
Draxor (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2011 at 8:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why should this be a surprise? Courts are notorious for failing to punish driving behavior that results in a fatality. Even calling such incidents an "accident" builds in a notion that nobody was at fault. Just look at the Jake Boysel case. Driver with history of reckless driving behavior plows into a boy legally riding in a bike lane and kills him. The maximum he could have even been sentenced to is a year, and that's assuming he was convicted.
The only thing to learn from all of this is that if someone kills you due to their own "negligence" they'd better be using a gun because if they're driving a vehicle they're going to get off scott free.
DarkMarcsun (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2011 at 8:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey Sez, the term "chances are" is used when the potential possibility exists, which it does.
Go back top your remedial English & brush up on this thing called "potential" some time. Can you say that? P-o-t-e-n-t-i-a-l? I knew that you couldn't.
As for fantasy land, no buddy, just another day in paradise for me, making my $$$ the old fashioned way (working) & getting a HUGE laugh out of silly willys like you, you big lug.
By the way, just checked Weather Underground, yes, the sun WILL rise tomorrow in the west, no chances there, just the way it is, you silly goon, err, meant goose :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2011 at 11:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"YOU love my flamboyant writing style. There. And that's okay. You're not alone. I've been doing it for a very long time and am much better at it than you..."
No argument there but let's get back on track: You are correct in stating that Jackson screwed up his life, but this does not mean Conrad Murray isn't also a participant in this. It takes two to tango, and I never said Jackson wasn't a willing participant and while you may be good at comical and entertaining writing, you can't pull the wool over my eyes by trying to shift attention away from the subject at hand.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2011 at 9:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Now send me your address and I'll have my secretary send you an autographed picture along with a personalized note suitable for framing."
Sounds good! Send it to Bill Clausen, c/o Arne Claighborne Productions, 101 S. State Street, Santa Barbara, 93-Indy.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 27, 2011 at 1:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
By the way Draxor, you told me on another blog to "release your inner Draxor". I've been trying to do this but my outer Waz is getting in the way.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 27, 2011 at 3:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I hate when that happens!
waz (anonymous profile)
October 27, 2011 at 7:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
1 FiNgEr Up HoMiE! :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
October 27, 2011 at 4:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
My inner Draxor sends this musical tribute to my outer Waz:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PLRoI...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 28, 2011 at 3:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)