In an effort to keep ahead of statewide goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to a 1990 level by 2020, and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, Santa Barbara County is moving forward with the development of a Climate Action Strategy. While there is currently no direct mandate for local governments to participate, the state has encouraged it and the county is hoping to spend money on such a plan today in order to save cash down the road.
County staff is now onto the second part of a climate action plan phase, where they will look at the numbers and data and actually set greenhouse gas reduction goals and choose emission abatement measures to implement. The second phase follows the publishing of a 335-page study that sets the framework to establish these targets. Among other things, the report pointed out area organizations that have made a commitment to reducing their own carbon footprint. Like waste management company MarBorg, for instance, which installed solar panels to offset electricity usage, switched to a fleet that uses compressed natural gas, and has led the way in high recycling and diversion rates. In total, MarBorg has achieved a 19 percent reduction in emissions since 2007. In addition to Tuesday’s progress, at least two local agencies, the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments and the Air Pollution Control District, have been working on plans to reduce emissions levels in their respective areas of oversight.
The two North County supervisors who voted against moving forward with the plan, 4th District Supervisor Joni Gray and 5th District Supervisor Steve Lavagnino, cited money spent by the county so far on climate studies, especially when compared with how much pollution the county contributes to the state’s total. (Lavagnino said it was 1/10 of one percent). The county spent $379,000 in 2009 and 2010, and is expected to spend $111,000 this year and next, a number boosted by grants. “I’m deeply concerned about spending money,” Gray said. “It’s a great goal, but we have many more problems and virtually no control.”


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
$111,000 would pay for 1 cop or one social worker to deal with domestic violence or one health care nurse or one park maintenance worker.
Let's keep spending money on project like these that will have absolutely no global impact on greenhouse emissions when we are literally bleeding millions in our county government. Again, lame leadership at it's finest
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 8:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
More wasteful expense of time and money by our leftwing Board of Supervisors. Can we please get some intelligent, fiscally conservative people in office here?
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 8:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow! What a surprise! The Board of Supervisors are trying to figure out a new way to waste money in the middle of a budget crisis! How do they talk about these things, and still keep a straight face? Well, there is at least one thing that really does surprise me; They're finally looking to the private sector to see how things should really be run. It's just too bad that they'll take what they learn from the private sector, and just twist it into yet another public sector money pit of a bureaucracy. But, if they really do learn something from the private sector, it should be not to spend money on stupid projects like this one.
waz (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 9:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
More of the same from the same & none of us are surprised. Business as usual by the supes, nothing new to see here folks, move along :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 11:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Meahwhile all you bozos just bury your head in the sand while Rome burns.
Riceman (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 2:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow....such logic in an argument Riceman. Fiscal management, budgeting and resource management I take are not your strongsuits.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 3:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Riceman, hate to tell you this, but many of us on here actually DO things to help the environment & on our own penny as well. The supes, well, let's jjst say they have OUR pennies to pay for what they do. That's the issue here, not really the "environment" as they claim it to be.
By the way, if you're referring to Emperor Nero, he was fiddling while Rome burned, not sticking his head in the sand :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 5:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Meahwhile all you bozos just bury your head in the sand while Rome burns."
Riceman is really Janet Wollf in disguise. Just what is burning Riceman??? We "Calif." already has the strongest EPA regulations in world and what are we getting from it?? We have no control over what anybody else does. The only head buried in the sand is yours Riceman. You are nothing but a "Follower" with no real solutions other than to keep us tax-payers paying for more ridiculous legislation that never pays for itself or does anything to protect the environment..
Priceless (anonymous profile)
September 8, 2011 at 7:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Priceless. Don't forget about all of those horrible businesses that we're driving out of the state with our idiotic feel-good "green" garbage. Who needs those jobs anyway?
waz (anonymous profile)
September 8, 2011 at 7:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
There are notable similarities between hardcore environmentalists and radical Muslims. Both are groups of religious extremists. Hey, Riceman: is anything with the word "environmental" attached worthy of spending money on? I've got my eye on a nice "green" environmental Ferrari, please send money.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
September 8, 2011 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Looks like they've done a very thorough job on this plan. It's a great piece of work, and precisely why we have a County government. I'm impressed.
bcaron (anonymous profile)
September 8, 2011 at 8:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow! You're easily impressed! Would you be equally as impressed if these gerbils would finally get off the wheel, and get the county budget squared away? Or, is this tremendous waste of time, money and resources enough for you? As JohnLocke alluded to; ANYTHING with the word "environmental" attached is worthy of spending money on. I guess that's a good thing; as long as you're a mind-numbed enviro-nazi.
waz (anonymous profile)
September 8, 2011 at 11:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why is everyone is so sardonic?
chard (anonymous profile)
September 8, 2011 at 5:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Because everyone thinks the other guys are idiots.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
September 8, 2011 at 5:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Because anonymity bring out the snark in some people.
bcaron (anonymous profile)
September 8, 2011 at 8:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"There are notable similarities between hardcore environmentalists and radical Muslims."
-- JohnLocke
That is the most heinous comment I've read on the Indy. You're sick, JohnLocke.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
September 9, 2011 at 12:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I like John Locke's statement. Both groups are against individual freedom. I don't understand how that comment could be heinous.
DanVac (anonymous profile)
September 9, 2011 at 2:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
bcaron...You're about the 100th person to say that people will only give their opinions under the cloak of anonymity. Not true. When an idea is stupid, it's stupid. When I give an opinion, I have no compunction about doing so, or attaching my name to it. What the supervisors are doing with this "Cleaner Climate Plan" is just another lame revenue wasting idea in a long tradition of lame revenue wasting ideas. They really need to focus on the real problems of this county.
Carlos Wazny
waz (anonymous profile)
September 9, 2011 at 8:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
J_L: "There are notable similarities between hardcore environmentalists and radical Muslims."
SezMe: "That is the most heinous comment I've read on the Indy. You're sick, JohnLocke."
So, would it have been more acceptable/less heineous if he said Christian fundementalists?
But I digress here. The issue lies on what the county supes spend OUR tax $$$ on.
Like Priceless said: "We "Calif." already has the strongest EPA regulations in world"
The thing that sticks out like the proverbial sore thumb is the fact that this reeks of PET PROJECT/re-election ploy.
Some county supe needs to bolster their re-election creds so why not "create" some "green" mandate, regardless of how much it'll cost because after all, THEY'RE getting paid to spend OUR tax $$$ how THEY deem fit for US.
Face it people, it has NOTHING to do w/ the environment & everything to do w/ feel good gestures that pile up redundantly in the name of re-election for some :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
September 9, 2011 at 9:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
some will poison their own mother as long as there is profit in it. Shame government has to do these kinds of things so the sick and twisted have to pretend like they play nice. Maybe if we valued our air and water as much as that ferrari....
spacey (anonymous profile)
September 9, 2011 at 1:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Spacey: "Maybe if we valued our air and water as much as that ferrari..."
I drive a 1990 Honda Civic wagon w/ 343,200 miles which still passes smog & gets 35 mpg. What do you drive? :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
September 9, 2011 at 3:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hank. It sounds like spacey tools around in a spaceship.
waz (anonymous profile)
September 9, 2011 at 4:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It's the little lies that get you, Hank:
> > > Best mileage for 1990 Civic Wagon, back in the day:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/nofram...
God (anonymous profile)
September 9, 2011 at 4:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
God, w/ all due respect to your holiness, there are things, many things, you can do to improve mileage, especially in this age of technology w/ all the available data. But hey, you should know that, you're God after all huh?
Can't be God, he's relying on a link that can easily be refuted, the REAL God knows better :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
September 9, 2011 at 5:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@Sezme: I'll be happy to include Christian fundamentalists and all members of the extremes of both political parties and of "faith" based organizations. In other words, all those whose "religious" convictions subvert their power of observation, reason, and logic, whether their "religion" is God, Allah, Environmentalism, extreme liberalism, or extreme conservatism. Get it now?
@spacey: you miss my point. As @waz put it: "As JohnLocke alluded to; ANYTHING with the word "environmental" attached is worthy of spending money on". I was being sarcastic.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
September 10, 2011 at 9:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)