A suspected prowler was shot in the right leg at around 4:15 a.m. this morning after he tried to smash his way into a home in the 900 block of West Pedregosa Street.
Santa Barbara police, said spokesperson Sgt. Riley Harwood, received numerous calls that the suspect — a 33-year-old white male — was rampaging around the neighborhood, damaging houses and acting wildly. The callers speculated he was in some altered state of mind.
As officers were responding, the suspect began breaking through the French doors on the back porch of a nearby home. The 54-year-old owner, said Harwood, told the man to leave, but he continued trying to get in. The homeowner grabbed a WWII-era M1 carbine and fired a warning shot into the ground near the suspect. It had no effect. Approximately 10 seconds later he fired through the door at the suspect, striking him in the leg.
The suspect dropped out of sight, said Harwood, and police soon arrived to arrest him. He was taken to Cottage Hospital for treatment, and charged with burglary, vandalism, and prowling. He recently started living with his parents in the area, but his name is not being released at this time as the investigation into the incident continues.
Comments
M1 carbine, made by Sprinfield & Universal (in my hometown of Hialeah, FL), the American AK-47, .30 caliber, affective range of accuracy 100-200 yards, scope mountable, available w/ 5, 15 & 30 round clips, wood stock & body, available in the paratrooper version w/ a folding stock, the auto version is the M2. AWESOME FIREARM! It was my mom's favorite weapon of choice.
Good for the homeowner, defending his family & property the way any decent person should. So how much do any of you want to bet that:
1) The suspect & his parents try to sue the homeowner he was trying to hurt.
2) A "social activist" lawyer takes the case pro-bono.
Good job by the homeowner, controlled firing against a moving & unstable target :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
April 11, 2012 at 11:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Good job, homeowner. The one time I picked up an M1 it seemed WAY too heavy to control. I don't know how the GI's did it.
LegendaryYeti (anonymous profile)
April 11, 2012 at 3:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Good for the vet! Don't mess with those WWII guys! And Henry I wouldn't be surprised if either of those things happened, but based on California Penal code 198.5 I doubt they would have much of a case in this instance. In California a home resident has a right to use bodily harm or deadly force against an intruder who has forcibly or is attempting to forcibly enter the residence. The forcible entry is considered reasonable fear of imminent danger. The appellate court has consistently upheld this standard.
Num1UofAn (anonymous profile)
April 11, 2012 at 3:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yeti: "The one time I picked up an M1 it seemed WAY too heavy to control. I don't know how the GI's did it."
I could be wrong, but I think you're probably thinking the M1 Garand, it is a .30-06 w/ a 8 round box clip, is pretty darn long & packs a hell of a punch. It became the infantry weapon of choice for sniping during the Korean War due to it's ruggedness & durability as well as the ease of mounting a scope.
If the homeowner in this case used 1 of those he would've amputated the crook's leg w/ 1 shot easily.
The M1 carbine is a MUCH smaller rifle meant for trrops on the move, it was replaced w/ the M14 (.308 caliber, 14 round box clip & the thing weighed 14 lbs. fully loaded) & eventually the M16 (crap). I'll take the M1 (or M2 variant) carbine ANY day.
Num1UofA: "I wouldn't be surprised if either of those things happened, but based on California Penal code 198.5 I doubt they would have much of a case in this instance."
I hear you, but in an age & place that thrives on frivolous lawsuits & an atmosphere of making the victim the criminal, especially when said victim turns the tables on the attacker, you just KNOW the attempt is going to be made.
But you're DEFINITELY right, the penal code does stand as written & they can try all they want :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
April 11, 2012 at 6:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
IF (big IF) the prowler would have been black or hispanic and the homeowner white would the reaction have been the same? Ahem, Zimmerman, Trayvon.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 11, 2012 at 7:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Noozhawk says the homeowner is 54 yrs old, not old enough to be a WW2 or Vietnam vet, perhaps it was his dad's or he's just a collector.
Even with all that wood, I'm told the M1 is lighter than the current M4 carbine (which I've handled a few times @work). So probably less than 7 pounds or so.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
April 11, 2012 at 7:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
EastBeach: "Even with all that wood, I'm told the M1 is lighter than the current M4 carbine (which I've handled a few times @work). So probably less than 7 pounds or so."
They're kind of around the same weight, but the M1 is sturdier than the M4 & packs a hell of a round (.30 vs. .223). It is also a very stable system due to the construction.
When people see all that wood they instantly assume HEAVY, but that's far from true. If you ever get to fire an M1 you'll be pleasantly surprised.
AZ2SB: "IF (big IF) the prowler would have been black or hispanic and the homeowner white would the reaction have been the same? Ahem, Zimmerman, Trayvon."
Was going to say that as well, kind of was going that direction w/ the comment about the perp potentially filing charges against the homeowner. But you're absolutely on to something valid there :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
April 11, 2012 at 11:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If the DA files charges against the shooter (unlikely), I'll move back to Texas.
Adonis_Tate (anonymous profile)
April 11, 2012 at 11:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Not sure about the comparative field reliability of the M1 vs M4, maybe older is better. Army arsenal reps have told me they prefer the 5.56mm (.22) cartridge to the 7.62mm (.30) because the former's bullet has a tendency to tumble and cause a lot of damage.
The 5.56mm round is produced in much larger quantities for the US & NATO. So many light arms use that round (M16, M4, M249, etc). I forget what the production ratio in the factory is, but its pretty high. 7.62mm is still common for sniper rifles.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
April 12, 2012 at 12:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FxMig...
fivedolphins (anonymous profile)
April 12, 2012 at 2:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
EastBeach: "Army arsenal reps have told me they prefer the 5.56mm (.22) cartridge to the 7.62mm (.30) because the former's bullet has a tendency to tumble and cause a lot of damage."
The .223 is a "tumbler round" that has a corkscrew effect when it hits. The only problem is the smaller the caliber, the tighter the tolerances so a grain of grit could lead to issues. I'm sticking w/ the M1. Seriously, that was my mom's favorite system, got to keep it in the family :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
April 12, 2012 at 7 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If the DA files charges against the shooter (unlikely), I'll move back to Texas.
Adonis_Tate (anonymous profile)
April 11, 2012 at 11:33 p.m.
Adonis, here is my response to you're comment, turn up the volume.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dpzxsb...
fivedolphins (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2012 at 6:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Have fun storming the dungeon, prowling moron!
Draxor (anonymous profile)
April 15, 2012 at 8:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
http://www.christian-louboutin.us.com christian louboutin
http://www.christianlouboutin.uk.com christian louboutin
http://www.christianlouboutins.org christian louboutin
http://www.christianlouboutin-shoes.net christian louboutin shoes
http://www.louboutin-outlet.info louboutin outlet
http://www.christianlouboutinoutlet.us christian louboutin outlet
http://www.outlet-louisvuitton.de louis vuitton outlet
http://www.louisvuitton2014.us louis vuitton 2014
http://www.louis-vuitton.us.com louis vuitton
http://www.louisvuittoneluxury.com louis vuitton luxury
http://www.louisvuittonhandbags-2014.com louis vuitton handbags
http://www.louisvuittonoutlets-2014.com louis vuitton outlet
http://www.outlet-louisvuitton.org louis vuitton outlet
http://www.michaelkors-outlet.co.uk michael kors outlet
http://www.michael-kors.us.com michael kors
http://www.michael-kors.org michael kors
http://www.christian-louboutin.us.com christian louboutin shoes
http://www.christianlouboutin.uk.com christian louboutin sale
http://www.christianlouboutins.org christian louboutin outlet
http://www.christianlouboutin-shoes.net christian louboutin
http://www.louboutin-outlet.info christian louboutin outlet
http://www.christianlouboutinoutlet.us christian louboutin
http://www.outlet-louisvuitton.de louis vuitton outlet online
http://www.louisvuitton2014.us louis vuitton outlet
http://www.louis-vuitton.us.com louis vuitton outlet
http://www.louisvuittoneluxury.com louis vuitton handbags
http://www.louisvuittonhandbags-2014.com louis vuitton 2014
http://www.louisvuittonoutlets-2014.com louis vuitton
http://www.outlet-louisvuitton.org louis vuitton
http://www.michaelkors-outlet.co.uk michael kors outlet online
http://www.michael-kors.us.com michael kors outlet
http://www.michael-kors.org michael kors outlet
skyxxxxx (anonymous profile)
February 20, 2014 at 1:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)