The two candidates running to be the county’s 1st District Supervisor — incumbent Salud Carbajal and challenger Carole Lieff — debated Monday night about a variety of issues including pension reform and services for the homeless.
Hosted by Santa Barbara’s League of Women Voters at the Louise Lowry Davis Center, the debate got heated at times but presented voters with clear pictures of their candidates.
Lieff, a self-proclaimed “economist,” “financial expert,” and “turnaround specialist” who assured voters that she will not be accepting any campaign contributions, called the current Board of Supervisors “amateurs” and a “dog and pony show,” saying that if policies for high-density housing continue, Santa Barbara will drastically change.
“They’re going to Los Angeles-ize this place,” she said, noting that she might move to Montana if she loses the election. “We cannot support more housing of any kind. I don’t believe in forcing a shoe that doesn’t fit.”
Supervisor Carbajal, though, called for balance in regard to affordable housing, saying that “we need to look at how we can be creative.” Doing that, he said, can result in a “win-win.”
When questioned on what they believed to be the most pressing issues facing the county, Lieff and Carbajal again diverged, with Carbajal stressing the need for a new jail and the importance of looking after the homeless and mentally ill populations and Lieff lampooning what she believed to be too much growth.
When there are too many people, she said, “people start to kill each other. Rats kill each other. They get violent.”
Lieff also criticized the fiscal actions taken by her opponent and the board, complaining about disability payments for county employees who are obese or get cancer. “That’s not from their job,” she said.
Narrowing down their concerns to the 1st District — which includes Carpinteria, Summerland, Montecito, Cuyama, and much of Santa Barbara — Supervisor Carbajal and Lieff again could not find common ground. For Lieff, employee pensions and oil fracking made the list. For Carbajal, water-quality testing, Highway 101 changes, and the hiking trails were important, he said, to “just make life a little better for the residents of Santa Barbara County and my district.”
When questioned by members of the public on their prospective financial policies, Carbajal and Lieff agreed that some spending changes had to be made, but still took different stances.
Calling the deal reached with hotel developer Rick Caruso a “bailout to a billionaire,” Lieff stressed the importance of small businesses to the middle class. “We need to think about people and not about things, about money,” she said.
Her opponent took a different tack, mentioning the actions that the county has taken given the current economy, including instituting a hiring freeze, getting rid of retiree medical benefits for future employees, and implementing a new two-tier retirement system. Lieff was quick to criticize that system, though. “We’re reducing a workforce to pay people who don’t work,” she said, sharing an anecdote of how she was once briefly put in jail for getting “testy” with a sales clerk.
In regard to their views on the homeless, Carbajal stressed his commitment to providing “basic essential needs” to those who are mentally ill and/or have drug and alcohol issues. “We could always do more,” he said.
Lieff, however, felt that homelessness need not be addressed by the county, saying that “people should go home to their families like they did in the olden days.”
Addressing the attendees asking the candidates for their plans to balance the interests of farmers, environmentalists, and real estate developers, Carbajal cautioned against class warfare while Lieff criticized the “chess games” played by politicians.
At the end of the debate, Supervisor Carbajal kept his closing remarks short — saying that he was “very privileged” to represent his constituents — but Lieff stayed critical of her opponent and the Board of Supervisors.
“There’s going to be insurrection in the police department, in the fire department,” she said. “Young people who work aren’t going to support retired people who don’t. I blame the elected officials.”
The primary will be held on June 5.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Always interesting to see who these people are who aspire to local office, who we have never heard of before. Sounds like Lieff is another in the line of goofball, non-serious candidates. She is not raising any money? She does not know what issues she is interested in that are currently before the Board? She is running against one of the most secure local politicians? Salud is supported by the wealthy conservatives and liberals of Montecito, as well as his hispanic constituents. No contest!
sbreader (anonymous profile)
April 17, 2012 at 11:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
In the "olden days", there was segregation in the South, women couldn't vote, and spitting in public was common.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
April 17, 2012 at 11:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"The olden days".. heh! Which old days? That remark alone is symptomatic of a common delusion that the past was somehow more authentic then the present we are living in now. True, there were some great things in the past we should bring back: Glass-Stegall comes to mind, privacy and freedom from indefinite detainment another.. But that kind of nostalgia for "the olden days" which never really exists except in our imaginations and the good memories we cling to if we actually experienced them has historically been used by Extremists groups (Left and Right) to take power.
We live in the here and now, not the olden days.
I almost changed my opinion of her when she criticized the Caruso deal but she had to keep yapping. If you've seen her webpage.. well..
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 17, 2012 at 2:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
While it is not reported here, Salud said another one of his 'half truths' -- "A far cry from some of the extreme examples that are used by some individuals, our general retiree makes $1,900 per month,"
Well Salud this might be true for all SB County pensions when you include people that worked as little as 5 years but when you look at the ones that retired with a full 30+ year career particularly ones that retired in the last 5 years you will see they are closer to $8K/month on average and then comes the medical cost.
I am so tired of his over spending and pandering to the unions I will vote for anyone other than him.
loneranger (anonymous profile)
April 17, 2012 at 4:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What job positions make 8k? Its not every job position. Where exactly is this data?
If we want quality people in public service they deserve to be compensated is my overall philosophy.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 17, 2012 at 5:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
That's why he calls himself the loneranger. I expect Lieff to get less than 10% of the vote.
sbreader (anonymous profile)
April 17, 2012 at 5:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So is Leiff for or against fracking and water pollution?
I would not assume a particular position based upon everything else.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
April 17, 2012 at 6:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This comment alone demonstrates complete ignorance of how the system works, and makes are police and fire personnel sounds like mere mercenaries: "“There’s going to be insurrection in the police department, in the fire department,” she said. “Young people who work aren’t going to support retired people who don’t. I blame the elected officials:
”“There’s going to be insurrection in the police department, in the fire department,” she said. “Young people who work aren’t going to support retired people who don’t. I blame the elected officials.”
Does she not realize those retirees paid into the system? An "insurrection"? Really? When? Right after Christmas?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 17, 2012 at 9:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lieff has proven herself to be paranoid and delusional with her attack on The Independent in her letter a few weeks ago. (She alleged that they didn't have women represented among their staff)
Having said that, Lieff has the guts and common sense to point out the obvious: You can't shove ten pounds of sand into a five-pound sack. Simply put, overcrowding IS an issue and high density housing means more rats in the cage. (How will they cope with this--by some ambitions five-year-plan?)
As for cutting benifits for future employees? Maybe the current ones are getting too many benefits. (?)
I'm not saying I'd vote for Lieff, but her other antics should not be cause to dismiss everything she says--especially given the basic truth of at least one of her statements.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
April 17, 2012 at 10:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Montana here you come?? Start packing.
chainsaw (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 6:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
We do not have a good candidate for this position.
I woul vote for Lieff to vote against Salud. Even though she apears a bit crazy, she says more things that are right than Salud.
It is way past time to get him out...
loneranger (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 8:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm no fan of Cabrajal, but as Ken V mentioned, take a look at her webpage if you're considering even a "protest" vote. I'm guessing that the delusion is nurtured by some sort of trust fund.
Seems to be this year's JMike--hey speaking of....
Just an attention-grabbing ploy, the ultimate aim being to sell or promote something else (viz. herself) , I suspect.
what a shame that the choices are so limited/non existent.
zappa (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 8:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yo Ken. Pension system works this way. 2% of your salary per year after vesting at 5 years and retiring at 57. Say the average county employee makes $60K per year, works 15 years with the county. Their retire annual pension would be $20K. Now, middle managers average around $90K, there pension $30K. Dept Senior staff average $120K or $40K. You have hundreds of employees on pending retirement under the old rules. The structural deficit is in the millions for retirees. The steps taken will help, but are a drop in the bucket without a huge change in the way they do business.
Ethics and sound fiscal management are definitely not Salud's strong points. He, Janet and Dorreen, (not Mike Brown) voted to keep expending reserves and using one time moneys to paper balance some questionable budgets and continue to spend money that they dont have. Janet and Salud were on the Board 5 years ago when the Finance Officer Jason Stillwell told them (they even made it simple and had pretty pictures and graphs a chimp could understand) what was coming and did nothing. Now, again, $17 million upside down.
I'm more than happy with a protest vote. I'd write in Zippy the Chimp if I could.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 9:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks BeachFan for the briefing :)
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 12:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Notice that Beachfan used 15 years as the average length of working time. A Career is typically 40 years. A very few people at the county make $60 or less a year, even if their position states $60 as the high end of the range they make more.
I think I remember reading the average wage at the county is now over $100K. $100K retire after 40 years you get $80K a year. throw in some overtime and saved up vacation and buy five years of airtime you can get to $80+ K at 30 years and $100K at 40. the 2% is only for the admin people, fire and safety get 3%.
I second a write in vote for Zippy!
loneranger (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 1:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Leiff is, to some extent, entertaining with her ridiculous comments and pronouncements...She pretty clearly has issues with reality even though it's important to look at a couple of issues she brings up.
Could she be skipping her medication?
mangomamma (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 1:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Loneranger. Thanks for expanding the point that Salud doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to retiree pensions and average distributions. I forgot the Sheriffs and Fire are on a different, higher compensated plan.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 1:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I suppose you ("loneranger," "BeachFan") can angrily toss around unsupported statements based on what you "think you remember," and from there rough out a bunch of wild guesses.
But another way to discuss this is to look at some published statistics.
For 2011, the average retirement benefit for the County's Retirement Employment System was $32,542, which includes General, Safety, and Air Pollution Control District members.
And if what "loneranger" reports is accurate, you will find Carbajal is pretty darn close when he says: "A far cry from some of the extreme examples that are used by some individuals, our general retiree makes $1,900 per month."
The General category of benefits average is $24,783.
You can find more info here, (don't worry, there's plenty of info in here to be angry about):
http://countyofsb.org/uploadedFiles/s...
And the main page to get other info and previous years is here:
http://countyofsb.org/sbcers/default....
binky (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 3:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Blinky. Does your estimate include retiree medical? Calculate that into the equation. While the cash payment may be closer to $2,050 per month (assuming the low ball numbers), retiree medical raises that to closer to $2,700 in actual $$$ compensation. That is of course, using the low ball average.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 4:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
As I said before, talking about the average that a retiree makes is misleading. A retiree can be someone that worked for the county for as little as 5 years.
The important number is what does someone that retired last year with 30+ years with the county get for a pension.
Salud's average retirement benefit is misleading, and he meant it to be.
loneranger (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 4:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I thought I had the market on insane, silly comments, but now I have to take a back seat to Lieff.
fivedolphins (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 7:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
And the average cost of living a nonfancy lifestyle in SB is?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2012 at 7:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Is it a 'right' to be able to retire in SB?
loneranger (anonymous profile)
April 19, 2012 at 9:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Zappa, you didn't even quote your own song: "Movin' to Montana soon, gonna be a dental floss tycoon..."
GregMohr (anonymous profile)
April 27, 2012 at 3:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)