Rep. Lois Capps — whose campaign spends a lot of time talking about her opponent Abel Maldonado’s issues with the Internal Revenue Service — didn’t report more than $40,000 in income from a rental unit on her property until earlier this year, more than a decade after she first started to receive the revenue, and six years after her accountant publicly acknowledged the income.
In 2006, accountant David Powdrell sent a letter to the Legislature Resource Center — which is home to all public disclosure information filed by members of the House of Representatives — informing them he had just been made aware Capps received income from a studio she rented on her property from 2001 through 2005. She previously had not reported that income on Congressional Financial Disclosure forms.
During the five-year period, Capps received $41,480 in rent money from one of her staffers, Jeremy Tittle, who now works for 1st District County Supervisor Salud Carbajal. Powdrell, in his letter to the center, said there was “never an intentional misstatement of facts, simply an oversight by Congresswoman Capps.”
But that income was not reported to the IRS in 2006, and an amended return was only filed earlier this year. The Capps campaign said in a statement late Wednesday that “as soon as we became aware of this, Lois immediately filed an amended return and cleared it up right away.” She has also paid the money, the spokesman said.
In an amendment to her 2002 tax return statements posted on her website, it says in handwriting, “Taxpayer omitted rental income on single room at residence. Tax preparer neglected to file amended returns when omission was discovered on February 13, 2006.” A similar statement was made for 2001, 2003 and 2004, though the wording was a bit different.
The news was first reported by a Washington, D.C., conservative-leaning newspaper, the Daily Caller, where Maldonado spokesman Kurt Bardella used to be employed.
“At first, it appeared as if Congresswoman Capps was pointing fingers at Abel Maldonado in an attempt to avoid talking about issues like jobs and the economy,” the Maldonado campaign spokesperson said in a statement. “Now it’s clear that Congresswoman Capps, who at this very moment is running a campaign commercial called ‘trust,’ was really playing a game of misdirection, hoping that her financial arrangement with a member of her own staff would not come to light. The fact of the matter is that Congresswoman Capps failed to report income she was receiving from a member of her own staff, who was being paid both by her campaign and her congressional office, [and who] was renting a room in her own house. How does 10 years go by before you get around to disclosing that to the IRS?”
The National Republican Congressional Committee was also quick to seize the chance to chide Capps. “Lois Capps is currently running an ad called ‘Trust,’ but how can she expect Californians to trust her when she spent a decade hiding portions of her income and hoping it never came to light?” said NRCC spokesman Daniel Scarpinato in a statement.
Just before the primary election, reports surfaced that Maldonado was disputing what could be up to $4.2 million in tax deductions his family farming business reported. The Los Angeles Times reported that the IRS had challenged deduction by the farming business that didn’t appear to benefit the business, including memberships at a golf club and the cost of horses on the farm. Parties at the Maldonado house and bathroom tile and outdoor deck work were also questioned as improper business deductions.
In June, Capps posted on her website all of her tax returns for every year she’s been in office, challenging Maldonado to do the same. Maldonado agreed to release his 2011 return, but later said he could not because he had filed an extension for his 2011 return pending the resolution of his ongoing dispute with the IRS.
Capps spokesperson Jeff Millman, noting that Capps caught her unreported income and paid it on her own, while Maldonado still hasn’t resolved his case, said this recent news is “exactly why it’s so important for Maldonado to publicly release his taxes for every year he’s been in public office, to make sure that he has properly paid what he owes. Unfortunately, we already know he owes $4.2 million in back taxes for 2006-08, and refuses to pay it, and now has been sued by the IRS for making improper deductions for his country-club membership, home remodeling, and other personal expenses.”
Friday morning, the Capps team fired another shot, releasing Maldonado’s own filings from 2006-2008, which were public records from the U.S. Federal Tax Court. In a statement Friday, the campaign said they felt “compelled” to release the records, since Maldonado wouldn’t.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
I guess this means they'll both have to refocus on the issues, as old fashioned as that might be.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2012 at 3:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Once again, the election will come down to who can sling the most mud on the other.
People don't care how bad their parties' candidate is, as long as the other person wins so no matter how corrupt or incompetent these two may turn out to be, one of them is guaranteed to win.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2012 at 3:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Both political parties are dead.
Georgy (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2012 at 10:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
To make a big deal out of this must mean that Maldonado has already paid the $400 thousand in taxes he owes to the American people? He did finally pay, right?
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 7:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
By far, as typical with the republican mantra that the rich should keep their money, not pay taxes, and create jobs misconstruction, Maldonados transgression seems much more obstinate. No wonder the republicans have finally fallen in line with his obscure campaign.
Still it would be nice to have a little more detail as to how it was that Capps tax preparer failed. This isn't just a little under-reported lemonade stand income. Perhaps just an oversight but on the other hand is typical of how every other household operates, cash transactions renting rooms, under-the table businesses, etc.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 8:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Maldonado is in court with the IRS challenging a tax bill. Capps simply "forgot" to declare income. HUGE difference.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 9:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
i heard that lois said that she was just way too busy representing her "people" to worry about some cash income that came from "helping" one of her staffer's ..... in another quote, Lois said that Harry Reid told her not to worry about it .....
iwasbornherethankyouverymuch (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 9:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I have met Lois before she is a very nice woman. I am sure this was an oversight on her part. I would like to see them focus on the issues instead.
deniseL (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 10:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Lois is one of our few "clean" legislators and this 'transgression' is laughable...to my knowledge Maldonado hasn't paid up yet. Yes, let's get them both to focus on the issues and let the ad hominem attacks go away.
Denise, you are correct, she is a "nice woman", but really that's not very important, nor that she's a female. We need incorruptible legislators [contradiction in terms today??] who know how to get laws passed a la Lyndon Johnson. He was definitely not a very nice man.
DrDan (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 12:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Jimmy Carter is eligible for another term.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 1:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Here the deal: If both candidates *knowingly* did something wrong, than neither should be elected. Grading morality on a curve--also know as "situational ethics" will surely destroy what hasn't been chewed up of our country.
This is like saying "he/she robbed ten banks this month, but I only robbed five; vote for me".
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 1:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Is protesting the IRS' claims about your tax bill doing something wrong? As opposed to failing to report income in the first place?
Yes, Lois is a nice woman. But a liar ("only 2 terms, I promise"). And totally unqualified to be in Congress.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 10:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow, she always votes for us to pay more taxes, but she forgets to pay her own taxes.
I bet if all the forgetful people just paid their taxes there would be a huge surplus. The surplus would last about 2 years and then the politicians would want more.
loneranger (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 3:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Anyone who knows Congresswoman Capps, knows how honest and committed she is to helping the people of our area. She is busy fighting for our right to have better health care and better education for our kids and I'm sure she occasionally forgets something as we all do. Making a big deal out of this is typical of a candidate who has nothing else to pin on her, because she is very loved and appreciated on the South Coast.
Shira (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2012 at 12:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
JohnLocke claims Capps is "totally unqualified to be in Congress". Wrong. She meets all the qualifications for holding that office. You may not like her (I certainly don't have any warm and fuzzes for her) but that is irrelevant to your assertion. You should have been more precise (in honor to your namesake) and said that "she does not meet my standards for a Congresswoman".
SezMe (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2012 at 3:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"SezMe" "sez_me" "JohnLocke" "John_Locke"; it's all giving me a headache.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2012 at 3:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Good point, SezMe, she doesn't meet my qualifications. Why? Well, she is a demonstrated, on public record, liar. And even though she touts her health care bona fides was totally unable (or unwilling) to explain or answer any questions on Obamacare. And seems to have no capacity of independent thought - just a mouthpiece for Pelosi.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2012 at 10:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The moral of this story must be.... Find and correct your own "oversights" before you start demanding it of others.
I for one am glad to see the biggest issue of this race is whose the greediest between the two. I know Capps feeds the homeless at the shelters from time to time.... Could this bring serious consequences to her campaign!?!
BBOY (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2012 at 11:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If it was Maldonado the Dem's would be shrieking...
There is no way to act like poor Lois had no idea this was happening unless she is as braindead as she seems every time she opens her mouth.
Once again we have a race between two people that while technically qualified to run are both unworthy of representing us.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
August 7, 2012 at 1:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
She should've bought the Miramar.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 7, 2012 at 2:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Once again we have a race between two people that while technically qualified to run are both unworthy of representing us."
Amen. Moreover, it's indicative of what is wrong with the people of this country. It almost always seems to be the "lesser of two evils" yet people wonder why the country is wallowing in debt and why we are in endless wars. Good job people!
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 7, 2012 at 3:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There should be incumbent challengers in every primary, regardless.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 7, 2012 at 4:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hell, she should have bought the Miramar AND developed La Entrada. Her accounting, while not as grandiose as the esteemed Mr Levy, was equally creative.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
August 7, 2012 at 5:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It is understandable to question this lapse or oversight but Congresswoman Capps has done a pretty good job representing us all. Perhaps Capps is just far too busy and dropped the ball on this. It must be very hectic responding to this rabble. I wouldn't throw the baby out with the bath water over this issue unless there is a crime revealed.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
August 8, 2012 at 6:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yeah, we know Don. Capps and Tim Geithner get a pass. Romney should be hung out to dry for not releasing his returns and Maldonado should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I admire your objectivity.
Botany (anonymous profile)
August 8, 2012 at 7:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
yea, she was too busy giving vacuous statements written by someone else to take care of her own finances...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
August 8, 2012 at 1:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act are part of the legacy of this "progressive" politician yet she is an icon to those who claim they are worried about the effects of the ongoing and neverending war in the Middle East. I don't know if Maldonado would be any better but I'm amazed at how so many people are letting their freedoms get sacrificed by politicians such as Capps.
Scary stuff.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 8, 2012 at 3 p.m. (Suggest removal)