Do you have health insurance here in California?
If so, there’s a good chance you’re insured by one of WellPoint’s subsidiaries – Anthem Blue Cross ring any bells? It is the largest single private health insurer in the state of California.
Own a mutual fund? Got a pension?
If so, there’s a pretty good chance that you are an owner of WellPoint stock.
And if you are insured by and/or invested in WellPoint, that means that you are a major benefactor of some of our country’s most influential politicians, folks like President Obama and House Speaker Boehner.
Congratulations, I bet you didn’t consider yourself a Washington DC power player.
In the 2012 election cycle so far, WellPoint has reported giving upwards of $2 million to political candidates, political action committees (PACs), and organizations. Unfortunately, we may never know precisely how much more, because the above figures come from information that we have access to because federal law mandates its disclosure. Incidentally, the disclosed donations went to Republicans over Democrats at a ratio of more than 2-1. And WellPoint subsidiaries spent more than $21.5 million on lobbying during 2011. They will likely spend even more this year.
After the Citizens United ruling, there is a lot of money corrupting our political system that we can’t trace or quantify because large donors such as WellPoint are not forced to disclose it. We know little, for example, about WellPoint’s use of the popular trick of funneling money into the political system via third party organizations such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce or the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). We do know that one of WellPoint’s directors gave $10,000 to ALEC earlier this year, but we don’t know how much more the company itself has given.
The majority of Americans believe that secret corporate money in politics is a bad thing for democracy, but what about the real life (and death) impacts on the millions of people who passively own part of the company or purchase its services?
While WellPoint is hurtling money into our political system, it is hurting its own customers by raising insurance premiums, canceling the policies of customers who become ill, and enlisting employees to fight proposals for health reform. These sorts of strategies to boost the bottom line endanger the company’s brand, but WellPoint keeps doing this kind of stuff because – so far – they have enough political and market power to maintain market share nonetheless.
Last year my firm filed a shareholder resolution requesting that WellPoint’s management fully disclose all corporate politicking, and the process by which those decisions were made within the corporation. The resolution received substantial support, but not enough to force them to change their ways – yet. Unless WellPoint cleans up its act, we plan to re-file the resolution this year.
If you are sick of your health insurer spending your money to lobby for causes that hurt your well-being, consider signing our petition and/or writing a letter to your legislators telling them that we need to close the campaign finance loopholes that allow for untraceable corporate money to flow into our political system.
How’s this?
Jack Ucciferri is Research and Advocacy Director and Associate Portfolio manager of Harrington Investments, Inc., a socially responsible investment advisory firm in downtown Santa Barbara. He serves as the Board Treasurer of the Fund for Santa Barbara and loves lawn bowling.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
So your really saying that when the Insurance Premium increase, that's to line the pocket of a BOUGHT politician?
Makes perfect sense to me; NOT!
dou4now (anonymous profile)
August 14, 2012 at 6:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
An interesting intersection of two important national issues ... campaign finance reform and health care reform.
It's pretty simple. Corporations should reveal the "who" & "how much" of all their political contribution & lobbying dollars. Insurance companies should spend more of their customer premiums on health care services.
I found Ucciferri's original post with the petition link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jack-uc...
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
August 14, 2012 at 11:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Here's the latest example of why we need campaign finance reform:
http://news.yahoo.com/special-ops-gro...
The public has a right to know who's hiding behind these 501(c)4 hit squads.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
August 14, 2012 at 9:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I appreciate this engagement and activism. And recall that it is the Republican political platform that is born from the austere Ayn Rand philosophy, the narrow Milton Friedman economic model and the tax no-one under any circumstances (especially the top 2%) intimidator and pledge maker Grover Norquist.
It is important, this activism and opinion by Jack Ucciferri. He makes the point that we are all compelled and are intertwined in this elective Laissez-Faire Capitalist economic system. We all depend on it. And if successful this push for openness and transparency is an advocacy that will benefit us all and place everyone on a fair and level field.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
August 18, 2012 at 6:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Recent article by Jane Mayer in the New Yorker about Obama's reluctance to schmooze with billionaires also discussing the effect of SuperPacs and these 501-c4 organizations that don't have to reveal who their donors are: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/20...
Author Mayer was also interviewed on Fresh Air last week. Frightening. Bravo to Jack Ucciferri.
mtndriver (anonymous profile)
August 31, 2012 at 10:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)