In a showdown that pit antinuclear activists against marine-mammal supporters, the California State Lands Commission approved PG&E’s plans to begin conducting high-energy 3-d offshore seismic tests to determine the extent to which the faults offshore from the Diablo Canyon Power Plant in Avila Beach connect. That information, in turn, will be used to determine more precisely the seismic threat posed by a new fault line — the Shoreline Fault — discovered in 2008 about 100 meters away from the nuclear plant and whether additional safeguards are need to prevent a Fukushima-type disaster in the event of an earthquake.
Opposing PG&E at the State Lands Commission 10-hour hearing was a coalition of environmentalists concerned that the high-pressure sound guns PG&E will be blasting into the waters off its nuclear plant — 24 hours a day for 33 days — could prove damaging, if not fatal, to blue whales, fin whales, humpback whales, California sea otters, and harbor porpoises in the area. The Natural Resources Defense Council warned that the loud blasts could deafen the porpoises, which rely heavily upon their sense of hearing for their survival. Native American activists worried that the testing equipment could disrupt ancient villages now located underwater. Fishermen said the blasting could put them out of business. And San Luis Obispo County Supervisor Bruce Gibson, a research geophysicist, objected that PG&E was not using the very best equipment possible.
By leasing a seismic testing boat from the oil industry rather than a research vessel from Columbia University, Gibson suggested PG&E could get better resolution images — as deep as 15 kilometers below the surface — and in less time with less adverse impact to the marine environment. Because this issue was not raised until just recently, the State Lands Commission staff ruled it came too late to be considered in the Environmental Impact Report just approved. But in defense to the environmental concerns, the State Lands Commission voted to delay the time the testing could begin — moving it from September 15 to November 1. This delay will soften some of the impact on sea life. And the testing will be accompanied by monitors in boats and aircraft; if sea mammals are spotted, the testing will be stopped.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Maybe the title should have read: Plan ok'd to find OIL, since the San Luis Obispo Supervisors are fighting to switch the testing ship from one who flies the flag of a University to one that flies that of big oil.
The State Lands Commission actually did not even vote; by the time the vote came, all three were replaced by shadowy alternates who got caught lying and had to publicly apologize later in the meeting! Just when unprecedented numbers of whales show up in force, these 260db blasts threaten to wipe them out with a hideous death, and there is growing outrage *on facebook visit Stop the Diablo Canyon Seismic Testing).
Seismic testing is putting us all in danger because it allows PG and E to delay removal of the nuclear plant sitting on several earthquake faults!
Joey Racano, Director
California Ocean Outfall Group
spiritpen (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2012 at 2:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It would be nice to know who is conducting the tests? Often the scientist conducting the test has an influence on the results. Who appoints the scientific team?
Georgy (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2012 at 8:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Dry Labbing" is a very common occurrence in scientific tests where corporate profits are concerned.
bloggulator (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2012 at 9:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Of the known faults in and around Diablo Canyon, based on their seismic "speed limits" they hardly have the potential to generate an earthquake greater than what the station was built to withstand. I get the precautionary measures, but Diablo Canyon is by no means "unsafe".
This is unfortunately environmentalism at its best. What's ironic is that the testing demanded by those environmentalist also raise their ire with respect to marine animals. So you're damned if you do, and damned if you don't.
Perhaps we should build four more coal, oil, or natural gas plants to replace Diablo Canyon, thereby quadrupling the greenhouse gas emissions the plant doesn't produce?
sbdude (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2012 at 11:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I was one of the first few who committed civil disobedience to try and stop the building and licensing of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power plant so many decades ago. This seismic plan is not acceptable. The people need to do something before more destruction occurs. We already do not know what impact the radiation leakage from the cooling water is doing to marine life in the surroundings. Do we really need dead bodies of marine mammals to be ending up on our beaches? Has any benefit we might have gotten from Diablo been worth the costs over the years? I think not. We could have answered needs filled by Diablo with alternatives (and cheaper, too). When will we learn?
pjd
Big Sur
pjd93920 (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2012 at 12:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
SB DUDE, Let me educate you about the faults beneath Diablo. There are 2 that go right underneath and the shoreline runs right out in front. But the real danger comes from the Hosgri, the San Simeon and the San Gorgonio faults, which all line up to make one big 250 mile long fault capable of generating an earthquake bigger than the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant can ever be retrofitted to withstand.
Seismic testing is putting us all in danger because it allows PG and E to delay removal of the nuclear plant sitting on several earthquake faults!
Joey Racano
spiritpen (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2012 at 9:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Common Sense? What happened to "Common sense"?
The "seismic testing" boat from the "oil industry" instead of the "research vessel from Columbia! Why would anyone with a "brain" trust one over the other?
Is that the problem?
This is serious!
Penelope
penelopeb (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2012 at 12:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I totally agree with JR (if he's being serious-hard to tell these days). Why test? Shut the stupid thing down. Even if we don't have an earthquake, the BWR Mark I has serious design flaws and is constantly being vented. In other words, unbeknownst to the public, we are being doused in radioactive isotopes when pressure dictates the need for venting. The design is faulty, the thinking is faulty, there is no design protocol in the US and no effective emergency plan in place. There is a tremendous amount of waste of precious fresh water to constantly cool these reactors-this is part of the design. There is no private insurance policy allowed on reactors, instead there is a law which mandates that we the people are responsible for any accidents the companies suffer-yet our health insurance doesn't cover nuclear accidents and/or nuclear war. All Uranium becomes Plutonium after the nuclear reaction and then it is EXtremely deadly and abundant-yet impossible to contain. We don't need any more nuclear weapons-which are produced from the bi-product of the power plants. It is an unmitigated disaster AND by the way NO ONE can ever predict seismic activity no matter what.
therailer (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2012 at 9:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Say "Thank you" to the whales, and "No Way" to the
seismic testing; per JR, go to Avila Saturday, 09/01/12.
jet (anonymous profile)
August 31, 2012 at 3:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)