Last week marked a tremendous victory for women’s health as the Obama administration announced new rules that improve insurance coverage of preventive health services for women. These new rules, based on recommendations from the Institute of Medicine’s expert panel (IOM) and initiated by the new health care law, will ensure all women have access to quality affordable care that has been proven to improve their health.
Currently, far too many women go without the basic preventive services needed to keep them healthy. But these new rules require all health insurance plans to cover basic preventive care services and to cover them without additional out-of-pocket costs. The new benefits include coverage for an annual well-woman preventive care visit, screening for gestational diabetes, counseling and screening for sexually transmitted infections and domestic violence, lactation support, and contraceptive coverage. All of these benefits will be covered without the patient co-pays that have been shown to be a barrier to the widespread use of many of these preventive services.
While all of the services covered by the new guidelines are important for women’s health, the inclusion of contraceptive coverage has garnered most of the attention. The IOM’s thorough analysis, upon which its recommendations were based, clearly illustrates the important preventive benefits of proper birth spacing and planning pregnancies on the health of not only women but their children. And even though the new rule provides a conscience clause that exempts religious groups, like churches, from having to provide contraceptive coverage a small but vocal minority of conservative groups that do not support the use of birth control have done their best to polarize this issue.
I’m pleased that the Obama administration stood its ground and relied on the science to make this decision. By empowering women to take control over their health care, this rule will benefit millions of women and their families. This is another important step in the effort to shift our health care system from one focused on “sick care” to one focused on prevention, which will save lives and valuable health care dollars.
Lois Capps represents California's 23rd District, including Santa Barbara, in the United States Congress.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
Wow Lois - Amazing. No recognition at all that pregnancy is a normal function of the body, not a disease or malady that needs treatment. Health care is supposed to cover the prevention or treatment of diseases. Pregnancy is not a disease. This is a principled position, not a practical one. If we erode this principle, there is no end to what the government can require, charge, force, manipulate, etc. --- all in the name of what most readers' here will agree is "practical". It costs $10/month for birth control for women (the pill).
willy88 (anonymous profile)
February 6, 2012 at 3:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
How exactly is contraception a preventative health service?
Are babies a disease?
You can have all the contraception you wwant, that's your choice. Asking me to pay for it is not OK.
Only far left Liberals think that this is being FREEEEEEEEEE!!!111!!!eleventy. Someone is paying for it, so it is just another form of welfare.
Since 0bama HellCare has passed my premiums have gone up 60%. This is logical as 0bama is putting more people with more freeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!1111!!!eleventy services.
Sorry worlds smartest president in the history of the universe, I will not believe that 1+1=POTATO. No matter how may times you lie to me that it is.
jukin (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You can already get free/low cost contraception at the clinics.
As a woman, I am insulted to think that this is some sort of "victory" for women's health. A victory in my book for women's health, would be figuring out how to get rid of fibroids or breast cancer. contraception is inexpensive and sometimes "free" already. Aren't free condoms being handed out at some schools of higher learning? (That I help subsidize with my tax dollars) NOTHING is free, someone is paying for someone else's "free" stuff.
Even with a "good" gov. employee health care plan, we were paying over $500 a month for two people, then we added one (older) "child" and it went up another $636. So $1136 for 3 people a month. That's a lot of money, but we pay it. Now if you have 5 kids, it is the same price! How is that fair? Seems I'm subsidizing the bigger families. And it goes up every year. This whole issue is such a huge distraction from the real issues facing our country, but I think that is exactly what it is meant to be. "Divide and conquer"
narcissus14 (anonymous profile)
February 28, 2012 at 11:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)