There are about 5,200 miles separating Fukushima, Japan — site of last year’s massive meltdown at the Daiichi nuclear power plant — and Avila Beach, California, home of the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant, but for Chieko Shiina, a prematurely retired organic farmer from Fukushima turned anti-nuke activist, the message remains the same. “Please learn from our experience,” she told a small gathering clustered in an airless room Tuesday afternoon. “Stop the nuclear power plants right now.”
Shiina, who spoke through as many as four interpreters, is attempting to raise money to open an independent medical clinic, she explained, so the doctors won’t insist so adamantly there’s no connection between the symptoms they witness and the massive quantities of radiation released last year. In fact, she said, they won’t even talk about it. “To talk about radioactive stuff,” she said, “is taboo.” Nurses, she said, will shush patients who suggest there might be a connection. And a high-ranking government medical official, she said, was dispatched to Fukushima in the wake of the disaster to affirmatively dispel concerns about radiation exposure. “The doctor tells them there’s no relationship with radiation at all,” Shiina said. “He said, ‘If you keep laughing, you’re not going to get sick.’”
The clinic Shiina has in mind is modeled on community clinics that popped up in Hiroshima after the United States dropped an atom bomb on that city in 1945. “People don’t have a place to go to take their worries,” she said, “not a place where the doctor hides all the information.” To date, she said, she’s raised $200,000 and has commitments from seven doctors to staff it. Her goal is $3 million.
While it remains too soon to determine the health impacts of the Fukushima disaster, Shiina said it’s common to see people with persistent coughs, bloody noses, dark circles under their eyes, chronic headaches, and lumps on their thyroid glands. Because the soil remains contaminated, Shiina said she was forced to move, giving up her farming operation as well as the inn she ran. But she has daughters and grandchildren who could not leave. There have been 30,000 children evacuated, she reported, but another 300,000 still remain. Although children are more susceptible to radiation’s effects, she said, government health officials responded early to the crisis by increasing acceptable exposure levels by 20 times.
“The nuclear power plant is like an apartment without toilets,” she said. “Radioactive waste — no place to go with it.” It was that accumulated waste — stored in vast industrial cooling ponds — that caught fire three days after the massive earthquake and accompanying tsunami hit the Daiichi plant with a lethal one-two punch. It was that fire that made Fukushima the worst nuclear disaster since the Chernobyl meltdown of 1986. A recent report commissioned by the Japanese Parliament concluded that “ignorance and arrogance” caused the disaster, not violent acts of nature.
The report found that government oversight of the nuclear power industry was toothless and cozy. It also concluded that the earthquake itself — and not the tsunami it unleashed — may have damaged the plant’s protective infrastructure, the first of four major investigations to make that finding. If borne out, this conclusion would likely raise the design-safety threshold required of all Japanese nuclear power plants — which typically supply one-third of that nation’s energy needs — requiring retrofits estimated in the billions of dollars.
Since last year’s March 11 catastrophe all nuclear power plants have been shut down to ensure their safety. But with the summer’s hot season fast approaching, one of Japan’s nuclear power plants was just refired and is now operating at full throttle. In anticipation, Shiina said, antinuclear protesters began assembling outside the house of Japan’s prime minister. First, she said, there were a few hundred, then a few thousand. But by June 29, she stated, there were 200,000 — the most anywhere since 1960 — and another 1,500 stationed in front of the nuclear power plant itself. (Such crowds notwithstanding, voters in one Japanese prefecture voted two-to-one to reelect an adamantly pro-nuke governor, indicating that the political debate over one of Japan’s energy mainstays is far from resolved.)
Shiina was on her way to San Luis Obispo to speak before a crowd of longtime critics of Diablo Canyon, a nuclear power plant dogged by recurring questions of seismic impregnability. Such issues are currently the focus of high-tech tests, but the plant is currently operating at full bore. The same cannot be said of California’s other nuclear power installation at San Onofre, shut down since last winter because of serious corrosion afflicting hundreds of its steam pipes



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Fukushima remains a threat to us all, as does nuclear power.
See Three Ticking Time Bombs at www.aesopinstitute.org
Much can be done to prevent pending nuclear nightmares.
MarkGoldes (anonymous profile)
July 12, 2012 at 7:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Greetings from Berlin Germany- So refreshing to see an entire nation commit to ending nuclear power. It CAN be done! They need to work out the kinks such as resorting to coal-based powerplants, but by increasing wind and solar power they will fill the energy gap in a few decades. Solar growing here exponentially even though much less sunlight than in California. Hmmm... what's wrong with that picture? Wake up, California, and shut down Diablo as a start!!!!!!!
peterlackner (anonymous profile)
July 12, 2012 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If for any reason Diablo Canyon did leak a lot of radiation like fukushima did, prevailing winds would literally spread the radiation for thousands of miles. Oh, and it's not just an earthquake we must fear, there is a potential of human error and also we must consider; that in any future war, those as a target would benefit the enemy in two ways, depriving electricity to the masses and laying waste to agriculture and cities down wind. we should seriously reconsider such a dangerous way to make steam for turbines. the downside far outweighs any benefit if a meltdown or nuclear fuel storage fire happens.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
July 12, 2012 at 7:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nuclear power is dangerous and uneconomical. But since the U.S. federal Govt. has a monoply on nuclear regulation the people are fooled into dealing with the NRC (No Regulation Commission). Obama is clueless about nuclear power and even signed off on a new plant in the U.S.
Anti-nuclear groups wear themselves out dealing with this industry-owned, phony, regulator (NRC).
California needs to take back control of it's own health and well-being and close Diablo and San Onofre permanently by creating new laws that will undermine the NRC's authority. It would be nice if anti-nuclear groups would focus their energy in a pro-active stratedgy rather than a defensive manner appealling to the corrupt NRC.
Georgy (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2012 at 12:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So what's your solution guys? Replace it with Coal and Gas. There is no such thing as clean coal, that is total bs. Gas is great, just don't wine about fracking cause that is the only way to get it out of shale. Both put millions of tons of CO2 to atmosphere (coal is much worse than gas but gas still puts it out there too) .
I'm not going to say nuclear is great, it has it's downsides as we all see. But it is still the only non green house gas producing way of creating energy on that scale (If you are about to rebut me with some argument for wind or solar, just stop right now, you clearly have no idea how many gigawatts of energy are demanded and how many are produced via wind and solar and how that could compare to our current production layout.
As far as being expensive, as it is now, hell yes. But we should look at the possibility of small scale reactors that have much lower radiation levels. Also the red tape makes the cost huge.
The industry has come along way since Chernobyl and three mile island, take a look at France's power info-structure for instance.
I'm not saying nuclear is the answer i'm saying that we MUST have a diversified power production philosophy in this country and that you can out engineer most everything most of the time...just wish they built those sea walls higher, we wouldn't be talking right now.
cmetzenberg (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2012 at 6:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Solar and wind. Why is the new ice skating rink in Goleta par examplar not have a roof made of solar panels? Why don't all these box stores have solar panelling? There's A LOT of wasted space in which solar panels could go.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2012 at 6:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Short-term natural gas, long-term solar.
America has a glut of inland natural gas which is much cleaner than coal and oil. Cheap natuaral gas is actually putting coal out of business. Coal can't compete. Solar is getting more efficient each year.
Germany is doing the smart thing because solar efficiency is only going to get better. With better efficiency the economics start to make sense for solar.
Americans also need to learn to turn of their lights, computers, and tv's when they're not using them as well.
Georgy (anonymous profile)
July 15, 2012 at 10:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
solar is no where near where it needs to be. further more what about when the wind is not blowing and the sun is not out.... If you build a mega watt of wind/solar you will have to build a mega watt of conventional just to stand by when your renewable is not available.
cmetzenberg (anonymous profile)
July 15, 2012 at 8:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You don't need bright sunlight for solar to operate. the technology is there, the will isn't. Excess can be batterized. And we do live in a pretty windy area.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
July 15, 2012 at 8:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Existing solar panel technology already produces even without seemingly having any direct sunlight, very early in the day and even on overcast days. No need to wait because costs have come down and many homeowners may now want to consider adding solar panels to augment our socialized grid or lower bills or even just in case you believe in all the scientific 'hooey' of the negative impacts of too much carbon in the air. Don't delay, install now because even though technology evolves all the time it may be a while before production of new generation panels are available. http://www.independent.com/news/2012/...
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
July 16, 2012 at 6:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Batterized!!!!! there is NO way to store electricity on that big a scale. The battery technology is not there.
cmetzenberg (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2012 at 8:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There are dire problems with the existing nuclear and CO2 based generators. Electron storage or battery technology could improve making solar, wind, etc safer and cleaner generators.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2012 at 9:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Batteries are getting better,
http://www.sustainablebusinessoregon....
Georgy (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2012 at 10 p.m. (Suggest removal)