Santa Barbara County will move forward with drafting an ordinance that would allow luxury hotel developers to apply for a tax rebate, potentially saving the developers millions over time and providing them an incentive to build. Rick Caruso, Los Angeles developer and Miramar Hotel owner, hopes the ordinance, if adopted, would let him recoup $18 million or so on the Montecito property over the span of a decade.
The legislation would benefit not just Caruso but also the county, he said. His project would become more attractive to financiers, and Santa Barbara would see income from other taxes — like sales tax and increased property tax — when the hotel is built. “It’s an interesting concept,” 5th District Supervisor Steve Lavagnino said.
While the ordinance would apply countywide and not just to the Miramar, it was Caruso who approached county officials with the idea. Similar concepts have worked in places like Palm Springs, downtown L.A., and Orange County, he said. As county officials looked into the proposal, CEO Chandra Wallar said, they became “more and more convinced” it could work in Santa Barbara.
One person not convinced is 2nd District Supervisor Janet Wolf. She said she was concerned the move would not be fiscally beneficial for the community, that it was bad public policy, and that it could be setting a bad precedent. “We’re throwing things on the wall to see what might stick,” she said. She also took note of Measure K, a 2010 ballot measure to keep the transient occupancy tax (TOT) — which is charged to everyone who stays at a hotel in the unincorporated parts of the county — at 10 percent, which was passed by the voters. The hotel tax would have been lowered had it not been approved. “That’s what the voters voted for,” Wolf explained. To take that money away from the taxpayer is “not fair,” she said.
Third District Supervisor Doreen Farr, however, noted that the board wasn’t voting to give any developers the rebate just yet, but only deciding whether to move forward with the concept. Once presented with the proposed ordinance, the board will have to vote to adopt it, and even then will have to decide on a case-by-case basis whether to award the rebate to developers. The board voted 4-1 (with Wolf dissenting) for county staff to draft a proposed ordinance, which staff will bring back to the supes in May or June.
The tax rebate would apply to new four- or five-star hotels that cost $50 million or more to build, as well as existing hotels that renovate at a rate of $50,000 per room, or ancillary development in excess of $1 million. If no TOT is generated, no money is paid, and each project must be approved by the Board of Supervisors. The county would return TOT for 10 years, though county staff will also be looking into other options, as well.
So, for the Miramar, a planned 259,000-square-foot resort with 186 rooms, a 500-person ballroom, a beach club, and spa, that means a savings of $18 million over 10 years. Currently, the county brings in no sales tax and no TOT on the Miramar site, which has sat vacant and dilapidated over the last decade. It generates $568,000 in property tax per year. The county auditor-controller anticipates bringing in $1.5 million sales tax and $1.7 million in property tax each year once the property is reassessed.
Caruso is also quick to point out that building the Miramar would bring 1,000 construction jobs to the area and, once the hotel is open for business, would have a $10-million annual payroll. In exchange for an approved rebate, he has promised to demolish the buildings currently sitting on the property, an eyesore to Montecito residents and everyone who drives by.
Caruso also received permit extensions for his project on Tuesday, again with Wolf dissenting. Fourth District Supervisor Joni Gray abstained. Caruso’s Coastal Development Permit for the Miramar was set to expire on March 15. If it had, Caruso would have no longer had approval for the project. Caruso has said he is not able to get financing for his $170-million project because of the unhealthy economy.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Oh super. What next. If Caruso tells the Sups they need to set up a big fan and blow $100 dollar bills at him, then maybe, perhaps, perchance, weather permitting..... if enough millions come his way someday if he feels like it he might begin to deal with his giant ugly hole in the ground? Caruso really has stumbled onto an amazing new development model. He doesn't actually build anything. Instead he threatens NOT to develop! He threatens merely to maintain a public nuisance. And we respond by throwing public money at him. At this rate he'll never build anything, but all that money sure will finance a great run for LA Mayor. Gosh, with leaders like these, SB is in really good hands.... right?
4Oceans (anonymous profile)
March 7, 2012 at 4:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Is it really a surprise that a rich guy is adept at raiding the public's treasure in order to increase his own wealth? This is the way of crony capitalism. Caruso has successfully extorted millions of dollars from the people of Santa Barbara by holding the Miramar reconstruction for ransom. We have forgotten the admonition that you never pay the kidnappers. Otherwise they will continue to kidnap again and again and again. The citizens of Santa Barbara County have not seen the end to paying off this pirate. I predict that the next thing we will see from Caruso will be changes to the project that make more Orange County and less Santa Barbara and a demand to bow down to his project or he will walk away. Maybe if he kisses us we will feel as if he is making love rather than what he is really doing.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
March 7, 2012 at 8:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Fiscally Beneficial forthe community? Did Janet Wolf actually use those words. She's the last one on the planet, well, maybe not last, but in line behind the crooks of the City of Bell, City of Vernon and Hawthorne where understanding of Fiscal matters is non-existent. As part of this Board majority, we are already fiscally broke. And this disaster has happened on her watch. Any revenues this project generates would be welcome as would a project that would clean up this site. Let's remember folks, big picture, booked hotel rooms mean visitors that eat at our restaurants, shop in our stores and go to our many splended tourist sites and BUY stuff. Who loses?
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
March 8, 2012 at 12:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Corporate Welfare by any other name.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
March 8, 2012 at 12:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The really bad part of this concept is that each project requires approval by the supes. What could be more designed to increase the bribes that are made. Before every election another fat cat will propose a project and tell (behind the scenes) those up for a vote that $X millions will suddenly appear if a yes vote happens.
Both sides of the aisle constantly talk about incentives. This concept is a huge incentive for bought government.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 7:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree, SezMe, IF they were to do this, they'd better just create guidelines, and if you meet them, you're in. Why would each case require approval? I mean, other than to create an oppty for corruption.
But this is a stinkin' idea anyway. Whom does it benefit? All those people on the waiting list for luxury hotel rooms in Santa Barbara?
San Ysidro Ranch, Biltmore, Bacara, Doubletree, etc. will love this plan: lets give an $18 million incentive to our competitor! Now he can build his resort and lure away our customers! Works for me!
This is no longer about saving jobs or a classic SB hotel--the old Miramar is gone, buried under years of gambling and vanity. Now it's just about abatement of an eyesore. If Caruso can't get financing, that's because no one sees a long term upside to investing in more luxury hotel rooms. Maybe he should just apply for a zoning change to residential and build condos. Hey MPA, what would you think of that?
Nitz (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 8:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Kudos to Janet Wolf for voting not to spend any more time and public money on pursuing this corrupt concept of tax rebates for multi-millionaires who choose to develop projects where they and other multi-millionaires may frolic, cavort and maybe trickle down a little something upon us pee-ons. And brickbats to the three who voted for the time extension without a condition that the site immediately be razed and cleaned up, and that provisions be made for public access to the public beach while financing for the project is arranged (don't hold your breath).
GregMohr (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 1:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The ghost of Jacques,the long time beach lifeguard at the Miramar still makes the rounds on his bicycle on nights when there is no moon.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 5:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So what did SB get out of this? Did Caruso set a date to start demo and have it finished by a set date? Did he set a date to start construction? You know, one guy with a sledgehammer could demo that place in, I don't know, 7-8 years. Don't be surprised if he tries to get a property tax reduction when all that's left is dirt.
Carpreader (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 10:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I promise that if Santa Barbara County excuses me from sales and property tax that it will help. Something. Let's commission a study by County Staff, on that!
sevendolphins (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2012 at 6:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
They paved paradise and put in a parking lot...
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
March 17, 2012 at 7:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)