The Democratic Central Committee has asked Santa Barbara’s Democratic mayor, Helene Schneider, to withdraw her ambitious package of ballot initiatives that combined, the mayor says, could ease City Hall’s budget burden to the tune of $8 million a year. Most objectionable to the group was the initiative that would require public employees to pay the maximum employee contribution to their pensions allowed by law. Traditionally, retirement benefits are hashed out at the bargaining table. Longtime party activist Mickey Flacks said she would have expected such an “anti-labor” proposal to come from Wisconsin’s union-busting governor Scott Walker, but not a solid liberal Democrat like Schneider.
Schneider, who did not attend the meeting due to a prior personal commitment, said she found it “dispiriting things got so vitriolic.” But Tony Pighetti, president of the city firefighters’ union, disputed that Schneider — whom the union has endorsed in the past — is “anti-union.” He did express serious concern, however, that her pension initiative was “anti-labor” and said that it set a bad precedent. “What’s next, an election on what health benefits we should get? What our salary should be?” he asked.
Pighetti added that the firefighters have proven more than accommodating in response to City Hall’s budget woes, agreeing mid-contract to concessions that helped keep one of the fire stations from being blacked out. (If police and firefighters paid the maximum employee contribution to their retirements, it would cost them on average $8,000 a year, saving City Hall roughly $2 million annually. City workers represented by the Service Employees International Union already pay their maximum contribution.)
Schneider said she understood that including some version of pension reform in her package would prove “provocative” to many die-hard Democrats, but said she’s been applauded by some longtime progressives for including it. Public antipathy toward public employee retirement is mounting, she warned, and there are far more draconian reforms under discussion. “I understand there’s something for everyone to dislike in this package, but taken as a whole, it will bring great dividends to the city,” she said. “If everyone just sticks to the status quo, we won’t solve anything.”
When Schneider first unveiled her plan on February 7, it included four separate measures slated for the November election: one to increase the sales tax by half a cent, which would generate $10 million a year; one to split the proceeds of that with the Santa Barbara Unified School District; the pension reform provision; and a quarter percent increase on the business tax charged to downtown bar owners. By including the schools and pension reform — and both would have to pass for one to fly — Schneider hoped to unify tax-and-spend liberals with cost-cutting conservatives.
But in response to heated and immediate criticism from the Santa Barbara Education Foundation, Schneider agreed to drop the initiative to split the sales tax increase with the schools, which is only advisory. The Education Foundation is pushing two parcel tax measures for the June ballot which will generate $3.5 million a year for four years, and its members worried that the presence of another school-related tax, even if in November, could cost them crucial votes. They were also angry that Schneider — who’d kept the details of her package an exceptionally well-guarded secret until the last minute — had failed to consult with them. Schneider said she remains committed to splitting the increased sales taxes with the schools, but instead of collecting signatures now, will ask her fellow city councilmembers to place an advisory ballot measure before voters in November.
To date, Schneider’s gambit, however creative and bold, has attracted more criticism than praise from Santa Barbara’s established political players. Leaders of the teachers union and the retired teachers union — who presumably would want the $5 million Schneider is offering in educational funding — are leery. While the Police Officers Association — like the firefighters — has not yet officially weighed in, its leaders are stunned and apoplectic. Anti-tax crusader Lanny Ebenstein, now pushing a statewide plan to outright ban collective bargaining by public employee unions, complained Schneider’s plan had not been properly vetted. Ironically, Schnieder’s most enthusiastic supporter to date has been Santa Barbara Councilmember Frank Hotchkiss, a conservative Republican often at odds with the mayor’s positions.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
We are witnessing the breakdown of a self reinforcing process. The unions elected a bureaucrat and expect special treatment in return. But the mayor has had her allowance revoked by the state and expects someone else to fill the gap. This is the entitlement system self-destructing. It works as long as the money is flowing, but when the music stops the fingers get pointed. I'm sure it was fun running a town, but maybe the mayor should go home now.
Let's give Lanny Ebenstein a shot at it.
native2sb (anonymous profile)
March 7, 2012 at 1:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
That was really a brilliant move by the Democratic Central Committee and Daraka to put on a charade of attempting to oppose these ballot initiative proposals as a way to get attention for them. Just look at the full photo cover of the Daily Sound yesterday. The political buzz going around town is that after the vote failed for an outright opposition by the Dem Committee, they then settled on an anemic resolution that merely whines about these initiatives but still gets plenty of attention, like in this Indy article.
As a result, the Mayor and Daraka received a tremendous volume of free publicity about what this is all about, all educating the voters and broader public and making the Mayor look like a fiscally prudent moderate realist and leader
Now we know from this Indy article:
"If police and firefighters paid the maximum employee contribution to their retirements, it would cost them on average $8,000 a year, saving City Hall roughly $2 million annually. City workers represented by the Service Employees International Union [SEIU] already pay their maximum contribution."
The debate now should be about what the city could do with an extra $2 million in the general fund. Keep fire stations and libraries open? Clean up the parks? End the furloughs for the employees who are SEIU members? Install more street lighting? Fix potholes? Install sidewalks? Hire crossing guards? Hire more cops to catch crooks who steal and cite speeders who often hit and kill pedestrians? Enforce against noisy helicopters? Sink the money into the black hole of the gang injunction?
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
March 7, 2012 at 6:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Let's give Lanny Ebenstein a shot at it." -- "native2sb"
Mr. Ebensten recently experienced the "music" stopping as well.
http://www.contracostatimes.com/calif...
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
March 7, 2012 at 7:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Police and firefighters will pay an extra $8k a year to retirement but will get a raise of $10k plus in the next negotiations.
Let's hope the state passes Brown's reform package, at least it is a good start toward real reform.
loneranger (anonymous profile)
March 7, 2012 at 8:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It costs something to keep Santa Barbara special. I'm willing to pay a little more. But If I'm going to do that then City employees can too. And what they are doing will help save their pension system. Not to mention If Daraka and Lanny are both against it there must be something to consider.
local (anonymous profile)
March 7, 2012 at 9:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
With 29 city employees already in the 100K+ club (Joan Kent in the lead @ $191,94/ yr) the public employees seem to be elevating themselves from public `servants' to a new form of `welfare' for the elite.
My sympathy is for the middle class private sector worker who now has to pay half of their income in taxes (sales, property, income, and “hidden taxes” buried in every utility and telecom bill) so that middle class government employees can earn twice what they make, then retire to a life of relative luxury.
Public employee compensation should be no better, and no worse, than what is available to other employees in the community.
TheBeachBum (anonymous profile)
March 7, 2012 at 10:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
We'll need that 2 million in concessions just to pay for the On Patrol/On Duty lawsuits.... and where's McGruff McGrew's lecture on the Mayor's integrity? You're really slacking on this one Indy!
BBOY (anonymous profile)
March 7, 2012 at 11:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The Daily Sound article covered a little more than the ballot measures put forth by Mayor Schneider & the stink they created w/ a select, elitist group of politicos.
Apparently there's been trouble brewing for quite some time between Daraka & the DCC versus Schneider's political advisor.
If Mayor Schneider's political advisor was the person who advised her to keep a safe distance from DCC, DL-H & all the other whackos that make up what is misinterpreted as Progressive, that was a brilliant & gutsy move that can only be expressed w/ 1 word: CHUTZPAH!
The ONLY problem the DCC & DL-H are having w/ the proposal is that they too are going to have to pay into the system, just like anybody else. How dare they have to be common?!
HOWEVER, if the proposal was only intended to tax the bars & restaurants, well, that'd be alright, as they're businesses & therefore capitalists & therefore evil & should be taxed.
Face it kids, there's no more money left, it is gone, it is drained, time to start bringing in revenue the old fashioned way: BY PAYING INTO IT!
There's more to this issue than meets the eye, look for more drama to come in the not-so-distant future, the battle is only going to heat up.
Kudos to the Honorable Helene Schneider for stepping up & speaking out & pointing to the fact that something, anything, needs to be done to keep the city solvent.
It involves thinking out of the box, accepting something new & accepting the stark financial reality, something the DCC, DL-H & their cronies seem to have a problem doing.
Then again, they've always had a problem w/ that, what do you think got the City of Santa Barbara in such dire straits? :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
March 7, 2012 at 5:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Politicians have long enjoyed giving out these lucrative pensions like candy and not have to worry about it because by the time the bill comes due, they will be long gone. Well that time has ended, because now the bills are coming due. The piper needs to be paid and now is the time to do it.
End the pension system as it exists and use defined contribution plans instead. If a politician gives something to the unions in exchange for votes, at least the bill will come due on their watch.
Botany (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 3:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
No one has mentioned how friggin H-O-T the Mayor is. I saw her in person this last Saturday and was Star Struck. Anyone know if she's single? I wonder if she'd consider a date with a distinguished older (I'm only a year older...)active duty Marine. Helene: If you are reading this, send me an e-mail...I'd love to take you out for coffee.
Marine0369 (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 4:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
When did the Marines drop integrity as a defining characteristic?
SezMe (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 7:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@Marine0369: I've read that she's married.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 8:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I applaud Mayor Schneider for her independence and initiative.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 11:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I was going to make a brilliant comment about the entire pyramid scheme of public funding and unions; unfortunately the thought of our Mayor being "hot" has left me feeling a little ill. Please bring back some pictures of hot gang chicks to make me well again...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 8:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hot??? OMG I just lost my dinner from last night. I too am a marine from long ago and there is nothing "hot" about this women. Excuse me while I run to the restroom again..........
Priceless (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 8:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Most of these comments are inappropriate if coming from adults.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 11:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I have to confess that I am not sufficiently informed to comment on the merits of the mayor's proposal (my own fault), but I have to commend any political figure willing to make hard decisions to fix real problems, regardless of the personal backlash (and personal attacks, good job there guys).
This is an age where one's merit is determined solely by party affiliation, rather than individual qualification, where rhetoric overrides reality (" tax-and-spend liberals... cost-cutting conservatives", really, Mr Welsh? I hope you meant those tongue-in-cheek; neither term is accurate nor appropriate in a 'news' article.)
As said above, it takes guts to try to fix chronic problems on your watch. You didn't cause it, and it's too easy to pass it off to the next shift. If it doesn't work you'll get lambasted, and if it does work, that next guy gets credit.
Sothep (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 11:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Since being "hot" is so important, I suggest you take four minutes out of your life and watch this very educational video. "Some of you older kids may remember it".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrhf_z...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 1:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sothep: "where rhetoric overrides reality (" tax-and-spend liberals... cost-cutting conservatives", really, Mr Welsh? I hope you meant those tongue-in-cheek; neither term is accurate nor appropriate in a 'news' article.)"
This is also an age where supposed "news" gets peppered w/ opinion on a daily basis.
Funny how the same people who lambast FOX News (not liked by me) as an "opinion bureau for the right" are the same ones quick to use the same opinionist tactics in their "news" reporting. Do as we say, not as we do.
Most of the people in Santa Barbara wouldn't know what a REAL conservative is if he/she came up & bit them on the butt.
Of course, the local favoritists (many who belong to media outlets) of the failed tax & spend so-called "progressives" bank on this lack of knowledge.
What does this leave? The opportunity to throw out a "nasty title" (conservative) that imposes a negative light on a certain group or individual in order to further the agendas of the favored group (so-called "progressives"). The bully puplit in action.
Well, it worked for George H. Bush in 1998 against Dukakis when George threw the "liberal" title out there against Dukakis, but George wasn't a "journalist" as he was a politician.
Then again, would anyone of rational & realistic mind consider what we see as "reporting" these days as "journalism"? I seriously doubt it :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 9:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Good diversion, billclausen! Buster was a hoot.
As for Helene's initiative package:
1. The terms of the police officers' contractual obligations are a matter better left to meet-and-confer, not the meat-ax of a ballot initiative;
2. Tax measures to help schools probably will be on the statewide ballot, and any competing local measure would be doomed to failure. Besides, the sales tax is terribly regressive;
3. The bar tax can and should be dealt with by the City Council, as they are elected to do.
GregMohr (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 1:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Interesting points Greg, gonna watch for those negotiation statuses you mention.
By the way, this article's title ("Mayor takes it on the chin") should be named differently.
It should be called "Special interest groups, conflict of interest politico & tax & spend so-called "progressives" throw a hissy fit." Would've been more appropriate :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 9:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Santa Barbara's "established political players" are the ones who grew the government over a period of ten years to twice it's former size while the population did not grow at all. They, specifically the liberal/Progressive/Democrat/Socialist machine, are throwing a tantrum because the Mayor actually is trying for a small d democratic solution instead of a big D Democrat machine mandate. But they are the ones who handed out compensation and pension benefits without regard to the future need for payment. In short, they got us here and anyone who tries to move us forward without their approval gets a gold star from me.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
April 6, 2012 at 6:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)