Nobody dragged out the guillotine, but the SBCC Board of Trustees did vote to revoke a two-year contract renewal for three Continuing Education (CE) administrators whose salaries total more than $400,000 and instead grant a one-year contract.
During public comment, supporters of the vice president of Continuing Education, Dr. Ofelia Arellano, questioned why the board chose to review only the contracts of the CE administrators. And a few of the adult education instructors worried that their workload would increase without administrators, who include Kendall Harris, director of CE, and Bonita Schaffner, the dean.
Several adult education students also spoke in favor of keeping the administration in place. They feared, somewhat erroneously, that the fate of their classes was tied to that of the CE administrators. Martin Caballero, a Vietnam veteran, explained how SBCC helped him fulfill his dream of becoming a drug and alcohol counselor. Rafael Santayana read from a document that he said that just a few weeks ago he would not have been able to create if it weren’t for the basic computer skills class where he learned to use Microsoft Word. And Tim Mohammed explained that, since he was laid off, the Community Technology Centers have been crucial in preparing him to rejoin the workforce.
In fact, while the state is not funding personal enrichment classes, it does — to the extent that it supports any education — support noncredit classes related to career skills. Jack Friedlander, acting superintendent/president of SBCC, said at the meeting that there was a “misconception” that certain classes were being cut. But the public commenters did crystallize the vital role that SBCC plays in the local economy.
Another constituency, which is very protective of the noncredit enrichment courses and was responsible for voting in four new trustees last year, advocated for the termination of the three CE adminstrators’ contracts. One such activist, Charmaine Jacobs, a former city planning commissioner, said that the administration would need to be streamlined in order for the college to deal with budget cuts. “Everyone enjoys a good cheerleading session,” she said, “but I thought I would offer some balance.”
Behind the turmoil at SBCC are crushing cuts by the state. Two midyear cuts in January and February—the first due to “triggers” when state revenues did not meet targets built into the budget, and the second due to an unexpected drop in enrollment fees—put the total reduction in SBCC’s budget at $7,635,000 for the 2011-2012 year. When discussing future cuts, trustees and staff last night tossed around million-dollar figures like they were baseballs. If the governor’s ballot propositions for sales and income tax increases fail in November, SBCC is looking at an additional $7 million in cuts next year.
To shield the enrichment CE classes that are so dear to the community, Friedlander has proposed an independent unit called the Center for Lifelong Learning that would rely on private funding and sustain itself without the expectation of any state aid. He has held public forums and created a task force to gather ideas on how exactly to structure this entity.
The new trustees worried that it made no sense to lock in contracts for two years when CE might be radically changed before then. Trustee Marsha Croninger even wanted to add language that would enable a termination of the contracts “in the event of a reorganization of the Continuing Education” division. Trustee Morris Jurkowitz, who kept quiet most of the night, spoke up to say that what Croninger proposed was a slippery slope and that such contingencies could then be added to any contract. Friedlander said the point was moot because changes would not be implemented within the next year. The board voted down that amendment, but they did opt out of a two-year extension in favor of granting one more year to the administrators.
The only non-consenting vote on that decision was Luis Villegas, who believed the board had created an unnecessary panic among SBCC faculty and students by choosing to review the contracts in the first place. He sparred with the four new trustees on both substance and procedure throughout the meeting. Trustee Joan Livingston did not attend.
Meanwhile, SBCC just released its spring semester CE catalogue, and many advanced arts courses now cost close to $200 for fees and materials, with fewer offerings during after-work hours.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
The Board of Trustees did the right thing. Dr. Friedlander is in a tough place as the acting President of the college. Even if he wanted to let go of one or any of these highly paid employees of the college, as someone who is in the position temporarily he probably didn't want to make that decision.
CE has been top heavy for many years, especially since they added 2 new positions recently (a new director and a new dean). The program is shrinking and will shrink even more so in the next year. It needs to be restructured, starting NOW.
What I didn't get was, why did some of those people who spoke think that their classes were in jeopardy? I couldn't make the connection, since those types of classes are and will be funded by the state.
whatsername (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 8:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
In answer to whatsername's question "why did some of these people think their classes were in jepordy?" The answer is simple and frightening. Dr. Arellano held a meeting last Monday for her staff and faculty. Many of them privately reported that they felt threatened and bullied to support her contract renewal when they were told at the meeting (and two subsequent meetings) that if she was fired then their jobs were in jeopardy and they needed to come and show their support for her at the college . I spoke after the meeting to a man who attended and asked him if he knew that his classes (non enhanced non credit/ ESL/ vocational programs) were in no way threatened no matter who was the administrator. He had no idea. He simply had received a phone call from friends telling him to attend and show support. He was told that if Dr. Arellano was fired he would lose his classes. I have since learned that Jose Martinez,the citizenship services coordinator working under Dr. Arellano , organized a student phone bank to spread the word that if Dr. Arellano's contract was not renewed students would lose their programs. We should all be alarmed when the school hires an administrator who resorts to lies and bullying to keep her job!
alscook (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 9:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow, alscook, if what you said is true, it sounds illegal or at least unethical to me.
whatsername (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 2:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Sorry to disagree with the last comments. Dr Arellano has been instrumental getting the program of CE back in compliance from the State in the midst of a huge budget cut that was not foreseen years ago. I was in attendance of the board meeting as a citizen on my own time and was angry that it was assumed to have come during "work" and "getting paid". To say classes enhanced are non threatened is a joke. Seriously they have been under the attack from the beginning. Also give me a break about a threat that was given in any meeting of sorts. Seriously Dr Arellano is a professional well educated Lady and to say these things its just lack of respect and its appalling. Yes its because the campus is divided and yes its hard to come and see that what has been happening. Its so sad and embarrassing. What once was an institution of working together to make education possible to everyone has become a lair of secrets and manipulative discussions. I just wish that everyone remembers that the Board is causing issues with Accreditation and we might be in big trouble as a college. This is going to affect your children's future transfers. Seriously...priorities.
myopinion (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2012 at 9:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sorry "my opinion" but the Chancellors office AND the Governor have both said that the priority of community colleges in California needs to be programs that provide jobs,ESL and college preparedness (on top of the usual focus on the existing credit classes.) This has NOTHING to do with any administrative choices from Dr, Arellano or any other administrator. This is where the state will be providing money.
The only thing you have to blame for your children's classes being cut is the terrible economy. Less money coming in from the State and more students than ever before using the community college. For those worried about their children's future at SBCC, I would suggest voting for more taxes in November or the school will be hit with a 3.9 million dollar loss on top of the other catastrophic cuts it has already received this year.
Classes being offered at the college are not out of compliance. That is a misconception. The college continually has to bring classes into compliance as policies change at the state level. This is an on going process.
As to problems with accreditation,the problem is with those who are so angry with the old board loosing the last election they wrote to the ACCJC just to discredit the new board. Dr. Beno and the Accreditation Committee have come under heavy fire from the State Chancellors Office and the CCCI . (California Community College Independents ) Articles can be viewed at http://www.cccco.edu/Portals/4/Execut... and at http://www.cccco.edu/Portals/4/Execut....
The Chronicle of Higher Ed. had an article August 26 2010 with the headline "Accreditor of California Colleges Lacks Conflict-of-Interest Protection, Federal Review Says". Part of the CCCI findings were
"Whereas the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC) interpretation and implementation of accreditation standards are no longer serving our colleges, faculty and especially students; and
Whereas the ACCJC under current leadership has overstepped its authority and undermined its own mission by sanctioning college districts inappropriately and with disproportionate severity; and Whereas the ACCJC has too often ignored or dismissed the recommendations of its own accrediting site-visit teams; and
Whereas accreditation under the ACCJC has become an instrument of punishment rather than improvement; and
Whereas sanctions have too often been imposed by the ACCJC over issues not directly related to student benefit or improved instruction; and
Whereas the ACCJC’s actions are now distracting college districts from their mission to serve students; and."...it continues along these lines.
The one thing I do agree with you is that we all need to work together during these difficult times. That can start when the group who complained to the ACCJC will stop trying to recall the elected board and move on.
alscook (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2012 at 12:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Alscook, I do agree I watch the news yes the priorities from the State have been given to the Colleges for these types of programs, this makes me happy. Just wish a budget would show that and match that.
However, if you look in the past and compliance. It has been an issue. See previous articles. You can't disagree that Dr Arellano has brought CE back into compliance, unfortunately having to do what she did with elimination of some classes that are not fundable made some people mad and mean. I am just tired of the division of an institution that should be out for the #1 the student regardless of them being in Basic Skills or Older Adult life long learning classes. There has been fighting and negativity to a college that was once one of the top of the list as being one of the best Community Colleges out there, so much negativity to the point of name calling and bashing each other, these are all well educated people too. As for the Accreditation- it is what it is and that what we have ..as shown in the pdf provided by the Independent they found that the Board has overstepped and well you read the letter. Accreditation is all we have and we need to keep it strong, especially for the future of our children. This Board has made it that the school is going to be sanctioned for their misconduct, this is BAD. Its a scary time for all. Being here as long and loving working with students and their goals spending countless hours above an beyond the call of duty I find it difficult because at the end I am nobody but a cost without a face and a life just disposable. I believe we need as you say move on and deal with the real issues in hand.
myopinion (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2012 at 9:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)