Santa Barbara County Sheriff Bill Brown received $60 million from the state Thursday to build a new North County jail, a big step in the slow walk toward a much-needed custody facility.
While Brown had asked the state for $80 million, the Corrections Standards Authority (CSA) gave him only $60 million. The money comes to the county under the second phase of Assembly Bill 900. Thus far under the two phases, the state has passed out $1.2 billion to 22 counties for jails.
In order to make itself eligible for this new award, Santa Barbara had to relinquish a $56 million amount it received under phase one of AB 900. So, the county currently sits with $4 million more than it did at the beginning of the week. And it could still very well receive the full $80 million it requested. (The $56 million phase one money the county gave up could also be shifted and become phase two funding, and then potentially be applied to the county’s full $80 million request.)
Last year, Brown and his staff weighed their options and decided to drop the phase one award to pursue phase two money. As part of the deal under phase two, the amount the county would have to match would go down (the county now only has to match 10 percent instead of 25 percent), and the sheriff could increase the scope of his proposed project. (He did so, recommending a 376-bed project instead of 304.)
With a decades-long jail overcrowding issue, coupled with recent realignment putting more pressure on local governments to find space for state prisoners, the announcement of the award was a big one. Brown called Thursday’s state action “an important milestone” toward a new jail, though many challenges remain.
The biggest issue is how to fund new jail operations on an ongoing basis. It will take an estimated $17 million or so a year to run the facility — money the county doesn’t currently have budgeted. One of the eligibility requirements was to show the county is serious about opening the jail once it’s built. The county is still working out the details on how to get that money in place by the time a potential jail opens in 2018. To that end, the supervisors have approved a conceptual plan in which they would set aside funds each year over a period of 10 years to build up to the $17 million.
But the news out of Sacramento Thursday was important. The award was one of 11 given out today totaling $602 million. “This provides a major boost for California counties to house local inmates safely and effectively,” said Matthew Cate, CSA chairman, in a statement.
Santa Barbara County fell into the medium county group, along with seven others. The CSA board voted to give Stanislaus County the $80 million it was requesting, and Tulare County the $60 million it was requesting. Santa Barbara County only received three-quarters of the amount it asked for. Los Angeles, Riverside, and Orange counties were awarded $100 million each.
“Ultimately, this means more bed space and better services at a lower cost to Santa Barbara County,” Brown said in a statement.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
In the world of public sector financing, finding one-time money to pay for the construction of some kind of infrastructure project like a road, a school, or a jail is a whole lot easier than finding the ongoing funding to run the institution or keep the infrastructure improvement in good repair and functioning. The real challenge in building the North County jail is not the cost of constructing the building. The real challenge is finding the funding to staff the facility - forever. It could easily cost over $10 million a year to keep a North County jail staffed and maintained. From where is that money going to come?
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 8:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Great that we received money the State doesn't have and what it is going to cost to run this new jail. It should have been built 30 years ago when it would only have cost $15 million. Just wondering how long it will take him to have his name placed on the side of this facility.
Priceless (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 8:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
$60M for a new jail with money that we don't have. Wow. Keep voting lib-dem!
willy88 (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 9:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
North county arrestees will lose out on the relaxing ride to Noleta. But on the other hand, because of increased jail capacity, police will be more inclined to arrest ne'er-do-wells, keeping them off the streets for a bit.
Most criminal offences are committed by habitual offenders. And those guys pride themselves in their ability to shrug off punishments. Should they be love-bombed instead? Should free speech exclude glorification of infantile rebels? Can most of us resist the glorification of infantile rebels?
Or do Singapore & Saudi offer models for the besieged taxpayer?
Adonis_Tate (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 9:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Or do Singapore & Saudi offer models for the besieged taxpayer?"
Singapore's streets are safer to walk at night, but there area drawbacks. I'd say somewhere between glorification and statism lies the answer.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 8:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I wish they could have gave the Westside Boys and Girls Club just $200,000 of that so they can pay their bills and keep their programs going.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 10:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
AZ2SB: That would be too logical. We must remember that building jails and getting into wars should be our first priority.
Hmm...give kids some direction in life so they don't end up going to jail...?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 1:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You are right, lets start the Early Inmate Program, and get them adjusted to what life is going to be like in a few years.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 10:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"$60M for a new jail with money that we don't have. Wow. Keep voting lib-dem!"
-- willy88
Right. Keep voting con-rep to support draconian drug/sentencing laws that swell our prison population then blame the lib-dems for the cost. Well done, willy88.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2012 at 3:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
For students who are already showing signs of social failure in schools around the country, the 'Scared Straight' program is given to them.
This program is to take the student youth into the jail environment and let them experience what their lives will be like if they continue down the path of the older siblings or even parents.
School's are also passing student youths who have also failed the scared straight program because fear to these students is not an option or that they aready know (from their older siblings and/or parents) that jail or prison is not so bad, and have gauged these youths as becoming adult offenders in their near future; thus a new, larger jail in addition to the South County facility will benefit these new criminal recruits.
dou4now (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2012 at 7:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
We don't need a new jail that neither the state or county can afford. Let non-violent drug offenders out, or at least require alternative sentencing methods such as SWAP (put them to work, but they live at home) or Electronic Monitoring for those drug offenders and the overcrowding issue is solved. The drug war is a joke, people. Only the amount we pay for it--both in financial and social cost--is NOT funny.
3domfighter (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2012 at 9:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
SezMe: Keep in mind that mainstream Democrats are just as guilty of supporting the insane "war on drugs" as sanctimonius Republicans.
On the bright side, I like the color scheme of the cell doors; it's very relaxing.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2012 at 6:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The prison and incarceration business is supported by both political parties.
Both parties in the State legislature are well-funded by the CCPOA California Correctional Peace Officers Association as well as the California Peace Officers Association.
If California housed the mentally ill prison population in mental healthi facilities and put G.P.S. collars on non-violent prisnors, would we still need more prison beds to house strictly violent offenders?
Georgy (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2012 at 10:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I have mentioned before about the influence the CCPOA has on politicians in this state and people don't believe it. It is one of the largest and most influential unions in the state, and the reason is because they are what keeps the biggest human dangers in our society at bay. Kind of.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
March 19, 2012 at 12:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)