Carole Lieff, who was taking on Salud Carbajal in his quest for reelection as 1st District Supervisor, called it quits last week. The Montecito resident who made pension liability and government worker salaries her main rallying cries, said she had enough of going it alone.
“I’d expected that when the citizenry understood what was happening — the graft, nepotism, cronyism, corruption — there’d have been a call to arms,” Lieff said in an email. “That did not happen.” She called Santa Barbara a peculiar place. “All of these rich people,” she wrote, “rich, many through mere luck with no social conscience. Now knowing that makes it a much less interesting place to me.”
At a recent candidates forum, Lieff, a self-proclaimed “economist,” “financial expert,” and “turnaround specialist,” assured voters that she would not be accepting any campaign contributions, and called the current Board of Supervisors “amateurs” and a “dog and pony show.”
Carbajal, who even with Lieff’s candidacy was considered a shoo-in to win his third term in office, said having Lieff as an opponent was a “great democratic exercise.”
“I appreciate Carole’s candidacy, which provided an opportunity to go before the voters,” he said.
Lieff’s withdrawal was too late to keep her name off the ballot, so Carbajal is keeping his campaign in motion. “I’ve never taken this for granted,” said Carbajal, who ran unopposed in 2008.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
..."rich, many through mere luck with no social conscience..... And this is a surprise?
dou4now (anonymous profile)
May 7, 2012 at 11:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Per the above quote: She hits the nail right on the head. I would actually take her quote a step further by saying that any good thing we have (health, not living in a war-torn dictatorship, wealth) is in part due to luck.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 7, 2012 at 5:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What happens if she actually wins now? She might be crazy like a fox.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
May 7, 2012 at 6:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I plan to vote for her instead of Mickey Mouse (who I voted for last time). Since I personally have observed Salud's sneaky lying ways, I would never vote for him.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
May 8, 2012 at 9:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Can anyone say "term limits"?
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
May 8, 2012 at 9:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I too with vote for Lieff. Better no one instead of Salud.
loneranger (anonymous profile)
May 11, 2012 at 9:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)