In my 85 years, I have seen many presidents and their families occupy the White House, but I feel most fortunate to have lived to see the Obama family living there. There are a “typical” American family of four, plus grandmother and dog.
The Obamas are more than a president and a first lady; they are a National Treasure. Being from immigrant ancestors and mixed races, they personify the Unite states. They are from middle class background and have achieved the ultimate American Dream.
Because of the media, their lives have become a showcase for the world: We see a happy marriage, President Obama’s cool and discerning demeanor, his youthful athletic love for basketball. We watch Michelle as she promotes healthy living for kids by planting a vegetable garden on the White House grounds. They are a committed couple, well educated, and good-ethics role models.
We see two little girls growing into young women and a grandmother helps keep an eye on them. And, finally, the family dog, Bo, whom we watched as a puppy that grows into a healthy dog, well loved by his family.
I’m always filled with pride when world leaders visit the White House for an elegant reception and dinner or when the Obamas put on elaborate music concerts. I am filled with joy at the holidays when children are invited to the White House for an Easter egg hunt, a Thanksgiving turkey reprieve, and, especially, for Christmas, with the big tree decorated that lights up the White House’s snow-covered lawn.
When children fill the halls with life and laughter, I’m reminded of the Kennedy’s, Caroline and John-John, the Bush’s teenage girls and the Clintons with Chelsea. It lightens the heavy load of government and politics.
To me, the Obamas represent a strong, loving family with good values. In fact, they have become models for this country and beyond. They inspire me. And I, for one, want to see them occupying out White House for four more years!


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Well, to each his own. Maybe we should have the Cleavers in the White House then. Obama is a likable guy and has a wonderful family.
However,
Given the choice between this wonderful family man and the womanizer Bill Clinton, most people would go with Bill Clinton. Sorry, being a likable family man just isn't enough. You have to be able to get the job done. Clinton had that ability, Obama does not, that's all there is to it.
Botany (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2012 at 5:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Bud Bottoms - well said, thank you! Your words paint a positive picture that is refreshing. I hope they help to defuse the current political atmosphere which has become dangerously polarized, negative and uninformed. You, at least, are keeping your eye on the ball!
hodgmo (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2012 at 7:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I only look at two things when I decide on a political candidate: Their policies and track record.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2012 at 10:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"I only look at two things when I decide on a political candidate: Their policies and track record." @billclausen
I believe that you believe your above statement to be true. Research suggests otherwise.
Google Search: perception of political competency, voter behavior, voter perception, factors that influence voters
I know we're all unique snowflakes and you're a special unique person, Bill, but to believe that you are not influenced by the same things that everyone is influenced by is silly.
Kingprawn (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2012 at 12:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
But Kingprawn, I'm a cyborg, I'm like Mr. Spock.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2012 at 8:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Live long and prosper, Bill.
Kingprawn (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 8:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
With all due respect to Mr. Bottoms longevity, the article was pure blather. The current first family spends more time either campaigning, vacationing in some plush foreign hotel, or visiting late night talk shows than they do in the White House.
I am sure that the family of Ambassador Stevens is really impressed with Easter egg hunts and concerts at the White House.
An article regarding the lack of honesty and integrity of the current President would be more appropriate.
joeinsb (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Are we talking about the same President who found "My Pet Goat" a more fascinating read than the country being under attack; and who let New Orleans drown while he partied Mr.Joeinsb?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 10:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@joeinsb: Your comment re: Ambassador Stevens' tragic death is inappropriate and says more about your lack of understanding of the risks inherent in certain foreign deployments than anything else. And, most importantly, the implications of what you say are at odds with what Stevens' family has said:
""Mary Commaday, the mother of slain U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, on Thursday again dismissed the politicization of her son's death during the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya.
"I don't think it is productive to lay blame on people," Commaday said during a segment aired on CBS News.
The sentiment echoes her response to a San Francisco television station two weeks ago. In her first in-depth interview after Stevens' death, Commaday refused to point fingers.
"How can anyone place blame for his death -- these were circumstances beyond our government’s control," Commaday told NBC Bay Area. "I am perfectly aware that there was danger. But he was a grown man, well-educated and careful. I knew he was out there doing good work.”"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10...
I’m guessing your concerns about “honesty and integrity” reflect a similar quality of thought.
hodgmo (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 10:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Remember Ann Romney's "Leave me Mitt alone, stop criticizing him" moment? What a buncha crybabies. That whole branch of the GOP are just basically scaredy cats. I don't think anyone that easily cracked is good to have in the White House.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 12:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"The current first family spends more time either campaigning, vacationing in some plush foreign hotel, or visiting late night talk shows than they do in the White House." @joeinsb
I'm almost certain Joe is a troll but, what the hell...
The comment I've quoted above is giggle-inspiring because it's what people said about G.W. and Clinton and H.W. and Reagan and...well, you get the idea. It has become a cliche. Joe's comment is just a mash-up of words other people have said so at the very least we know he could be a parrot with access to a computer.
Kingprawn (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 12:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We should mash up his posts and repost'em.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 12:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
That's real class Ken, trash-talking the candidate's wife.
Botany (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 1:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey Botany, the trash keeps coming out of her mouth- blame her. If they didn't say weird and silly things I wouldn't have quotes from them.
But thank you for the opportunity to point out that Paul Ryan's home state is rejecting him, Romney's home state is rejecting him, and Massachusetts the state Romney selfserved as governor is rejecting him. Why should the rest of the country support them?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 1:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What I've seen is not a family on tv, but a husband and wife on talk shows and debates. Where were their children? Probably asleep so they could attend school the next day. Where was Mitt's fam? the whole pod was at these debates, even watching the vp debate with him at a 'plush' hotel. Like those children don't have to go to school in the morning ...
Joeisnotinsb, infact I think I saw him orbiting Uranus on my flyby. Criticize the monarchy for being what, rich? Like the other guy isn't? It's a political campaign for president, 2012, wake up! If joe wants honesty and integrity, the other guy is more than happy to fool him in the voting booth. Maybe he'll be honest about area 51 if elected.
spacey (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 1:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Remember when the Palins let their newborn be passed around the audience at the 08 GOP convention? That was creepy.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 1:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'd be surprised if real Republicans aren't supporting Gary Johnston. Face it, neither candidate or Party gives much a fig for us "nonbattleground" states in the Presidential race, and it's easier for the media to play along. Why not vote for the candidate you really like and send a message. California has a huge number of electoral votes. Why should our concerns be ignored?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 2:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Meanwhile, back the issues which affect our day-to-day lives.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2012 at 3:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)