The Santa Barbara City Council is giving serious thought to naming the airport terminal after a former mayor at the behest of a well-heeled, very active group of proponents. We have 90 days from the City Council meeting of July 31 to come to a conclusion.
Why is it that people with property, power, and prestige want to name buildings after people with property, power, and prestige?
Some of the points made to support naming the airport terminal building, not the whole airport they were quick to point out, after the former mayor, whose name is not known to many these-a-days they say, especially the younglings, is that these latter may be motivated to find out who this is and, thus, study Santa Barbara’s history. If that is a good reason, then why not name it after one of the homeless people who died of exposure? Studying the history of how the homeless are treated, especially in Santa Barbara, would be a worthy pursuit. Perhaps a specialty in homeless veterans suffering from fear and trembling could become a thesis.
A lawyer propounded naming the building after the former mayor because he was a good lawyer. A lawyer advocating a building be named after a lawyer.
Why not have someone stand at the lectern before the council who is a garbageman, a baker, butcher, candlestick maker to advocate one of their own kind? Everybody eats cake. And, what of all those used-up memos and past reports, could the policy-makers survive and sally forth if their office were filled to the brim with papers wanting to be garbage bound? Ron Kalowski, now there is a working name – paper hauler, slurry swinger, shoulders for a city to be carried on.
Wherever there are 11 or 12 actors assembled, there shall emerge a self-gratulating awards show. Wherever there are people of prominence wanting to be prominated, there is a blank wall on a building waiting for them. Let us, instead, acknowledge the people who made them prominent.
The advocates made clear that only a portion of the airport, the terminal building, would receive the name. In Sion, Switzerland, in the main train station, there is a sign with three-foot letters over the comfort station that says, in screaming, bleached white letters: Pissoir. I want my vanity noted for a singular portion in our building. I kindly request a sign over the gentleman’s quarter state: Bob’s Pissoir.
No president, general, mayor, corporate head, or any leader anywhere ever did anything without the support of others, the typers, the planners, the constructioners, the road repairers, the park-tidiers, the mass and myriad of people who carry out the will of the leader. How about if we celebrate the people who drove the nails, covered the walls, and ran the electrical wires in the new airport – the people. How about if we celebrate the people who wanted it, planned for it, and paid for it – the people. How about if we keep this simple and celebrate the people who use the building, pay for the upkeep, and fly on the planes to and from the airport – the reason for the airport, the source of almost all the revenue – the people. So, how about a sign over the front door that says: Passenger’s Terminal. The People.
The Airport Commission recommended that nobody’s name be given to the building. To that I say: Hurray!


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Burke here finally wrote something that makes sense.
No one even acknowledges that the name of the terminal building will not change anything and it always will be known as a building and not a name.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
September 10, 2012 at 12:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree that leaving it without a name makes sense
wsburns (anonymous profile)
September 10, 2012 at 12:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How about if we put the name of the building up for auction. The highest bid takes it and money goes to the city?
Botany (anonymous profile)
September 10, 2012 at 1:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Name it after the great German film director F.W. Murnau, who died of injuries from an auto accident in SB- someone who actually accomplished something.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 10, 2012 at 1:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"I'm flying out of Bob Hope Airport". When has anyone said that? Stop naming things that shouldn't be.
Ryansbca (anonymous profile)
September 10, 2012 at 2:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The Good Land airport. "Goleta, the good land".
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 10, 2012 at 4:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let's name it after some common folk:
"The Bums That Should Be Working But Instead Harass Tourists by Hamburger Habit on State Street Municipal Airport".
We can have a dog walking area for pit bulls.
We can decorate the outside of the terminal with festive tattoo "art".
On a serious note:
Robert, the reason people with "property, power, and prestige" are at the inside of these processes is because they are the people that make projects happen due to their "p,p and p". It was not a bunch of hobos that got the SB airport going in the first place
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 12, 2012 at 6:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Property and power do not equal prestige! You can't force people to love or respect you.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 12, 2012 at 10:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You and I agree KV but many folks confuse the two and we definitely reward folks with power and property when they don't deserve it. Likewise I find that certain people want to criticize people with property and power just because they have those things. (nearly illiterate grammatical stream...)
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 12, 2012 at 1:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Santa Barbara Municipal Airport sounds good to me.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
September 14, 2012 at 11:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)