One of the big surprises to emerge out of the most dramatic oil spill to hit the South Coast this century is that the pipeline owned by Plains All American Pipeline is the only one in all of Santa Barbara County not to have an automatic shut-off valve. Not coincidentally, it happens to be the only pipeline over which the county Energy Division has no safety and inspection oversight authority.
“We’re flying blind,” said county Energy Division czar Kevin Drude. That’s because more than 20 years ago, All American Pipeline (Plains hadn’t bought it yet) took Santa Barbara County to court to restrict the county’s legal authority to inspect X-rays of the pipeline welds. It won. The consequences of that victory appear to be bearing bitter fruit. Because the county was denied the regulatory authority to require that Plains equip its pipeline with an automatic shut-down valve in case of a rupture, The Santa Barbara Independent has discovered, the Plains pipeline is the only pipeline in the county without this key safety feature. Instead, the Plains pipeline must be shut down manually in case of such emergencies.
According to Drude, the equipment the county requires — known as SCADA — of other pipeline operators is so sensitive it can detect the loss of 20 barrels of oil over a 20-hour period. By contrast, the Plains pipeline leaked about 2,500 barrels worth of oil in a matter of a few hours before the company’s crew manually shut it down.
SCADA stands for supervisory control and data acquisition. It’s a very expensive, high-tech, computerized feature that continuously monitors the temperature, velocity, and pressure conditions inside a crude-oil pipeline. If there are changes above and beyond normal expectations, the SCADA is programmed to issue an automatic warning. If the problem persists or exceeds certain safety thresholds, it’s programmed to shut the pipeline down automatically. Moreover, such systems are programmed to resist operator efforts to restart the pipeline until proper protocols have been followed.
Exactly how and why the All American Pipeline — by far the biggest in the county — was built without this critical safety feature remains uncertain. The few people still on the scene who were involved back then have, at best, hazy recollections. What is clear is the vehemence with which All American Pipeline fought any intrusion of county oversight.
This isn’t to say the Plains pipeline has operated free of regulatory oversight. Since its inception in 1987, the pipeline has been subject to federal inspections. The feds farmed this function — via contract — out to the California Office of the State Fire Marshal, but in 2013, The Santa Barbara Independent has learned, the Fire Marshal’s office informed the Department of Transportation it would not renew its contract. Increasingly, the Fire Marshal’s office reported that it had been finding it difficult to retain or recruit experienced pipeline inspectors. Because the Fire Marshal’s office regarded its federal inspection work ancillary to its primary mission, it turned this duty back to the federal Department of Transportation, which in turn, gave it over to a relatively new and obscure federal agency called the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration — better known as PHMSA (pronounced “pimsa”), which then had to resume its function of inspecting all of California’s oil and gas pipelines.
Organizations like Pipeline Safety Trust — which bird-dogs pipeline companies from an environmental safety vantage point — have expressed concern that PHMSA is too underfunded and understaffed to absorb so monumental a new burden. (In the last few months, Congress authorized the agency to hire 100 new pipeline inspectors. How many have been hired since then remains unclear.) In addition, Pipeline Safety Trust — which publishes a blog called The Smart Pig, the name of a key pipeline safety inspection process — reported there have been 175 “incidents” involving Plains All American pipelines throughout the United States — 11 in California — in the past 10 years. No deaths were caused and no injuries were reported from these incidents, but nearly $24 million in property damage was inflicted.
Reports vary as to the fines collected by PHMSA, but they range from $185,000-$284,000. “In terms of the fines they impose, it’s really a lot less than they are authorized,” said Samya Lutz with the Pipeline Safety Trust. She added that the number of investigations launched by the federal pipeline safety agency was quite low in relation to the number of incidents. An incident is defined as any occurrence leading to loss of life, an injury requiring hospitalization, or property damage in excess of $50,000. If more than five barrels are spilled — or five gallons escapes the property lines — that, too, constitutes an incident. While there are recent reports of a half-gallon leak on the Plains pipeline by Refugio, that’s too small to be deemed an “incident.” Of the 11 Plains incidents that occurred in California, it remains unclear if any involved the Refugio pipeline.
In addition, the Environmental Protection Agency ordered Plains to pay $41 million in remediation costs associated with 10 pipeline spills occurring in Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma between 2004-2007 that wound up putting 6,510 barrels of crude – 273,420 gallons – into nearby waterways. The culprit in most of these instances was typically corroded pipeline pipes.
More comically, perhaps, last year this time, a Plains pipeline ruptured by a pump station in an industrial neighborhood in Los Angeles, causing crude to spray 40 feet into the air and shower the roof of the strip club next door. Neither the strippers nor customers were injured, but two people working at a medical store nearby got so sick from the fumes they had themselves hospitalized. In that instance, 450 barrels escaped. Among the many tools used in the cleanup effort were absorbent diapers.
Even more incriminating is information provided by Plains All American in its most recent Securities and Exchange Commission report. That report itemizes $82 million in environmental liabilities. The EPA dinged the company $6 million for a 120-barrel spill in Bay Springs, Mississippi, in February 2013. The Canadian government assessed the company $15 million in cleanup costs for two spills in June 2013. And this February, a Canadian National Energy Board audit levied a $76 million penalty on the company for slipshod environmental safety practices.
Paul Wellman
Greg Armstrong, CEO of Plains All American Pipeline, answers questions at a press conference following the May 19 oil spill. (May 20, 2015)
To put this into perverse context, Plains All American CEO Greg L. Armstrong, who received $5.5 million in total compensation last year – is guaranteed an $87 million golden parachute severance package whether he’s terminated with or without cause.
The huge irony here is that at the time of its inception in 1987, the Plains All American Pipeline now unleashing torrents of criticism was considered by environmentalists to be a major breakthrough in environmental sanity. A massive amount of oil development was slated to occur in the Santa Barbara Channel in the mid-1980s as Santa Barbara was regarded by the oil industry to be one of the most petrochemically bountiful places to drill in the United States. All along the Gaviota Coast, big oil companies, like Chevron and Exxon, were proposing massive industrial sites to store and process oil drilled from state and federal waters off the coast.
Paul Wellman
Waves off Refugio Beach churn and move the oil spill along the coastline (May 19, 2015)
In response, the South Coast environmental community insisted that any processing that took place had to be consolidated into as few spots as possible to minimize the industrialization of the coast. It was a hard fight. The oil companies resisted. In addition, the environmentalists pushed for the creation of a pipeline that all the oil companies could and should use. In the days before Plains All American Pipeline, the oil companies moved their cargo via large tanker ships that would park along the coast. Not only did tankers emit unacceptable volumes of air pollution, but the prospect of an oil spill from an offshore tanker posed immense containment challenges. Again, the oil companies resisted. It was not in their DNA to share equipment with competitors.
In that context, the development of the Plains All American pipeline was an enormous breakthrough. If one accepted the inevitability of a spill, better from a pipeline where it could be contained, the thinking went, than in the open seas. Little wonder that it was a former administrative assistant to then-county supervisor Bill Wallace — the most effective and determined foe, at least among elected officials, the oil industry has ever faced in Santa Barbara — who spearheaded the pipeline project to completion. John Stahl, Wallace’s “just do it” political consigliere, jumped ship from the county to work for Plains All American Pipeline. And he got the project approved.
Paul Wellman
An estimated 21,000 gallon oil spill just North of Refugio State Beach coating 4 miles of the shoreline and a sheen 50-100 yards wide (May 19, 2015)..
But when county energy planners, such as former county Energy Division czar Rob Almy, insisted the county have access to safety inspection records for the pipeline welds, Plains All American balked — big time. The pipeline, the company argued, was an interstate project. As such it insisted, only the federal government had the legal authority to conduct inspections and hold the project’s feet to the regulatory fire. The matter went to court and essentially the county lost. As part of a settlement agreement, the county would be given authority to inspect and regulate the soil and vegetation on the ground above the pipeline, but anything underneath was the federal government’s responsibility.
How and why Plains All American was approved without an automatic shutoff valve remains unclear at this time. A media consultant for the company told The Independent that the information was not immediately available. For Drude this reality came as a shock. “I just found out,” he said. “We had no regulatory authority.” When asked if such equipment was required of other operators in the county, Drude stated, “Absolutely.”
In addition to automatic shutoff valves, most Santa Barbara pipelines are equipped to automatically issue alarms if the pressure level changes beyond certain industry norms. To the extent such were in place and functioning also remains unclear.
Drude noted that his department meets on a monthly basis with the operators of other oil pipelines to discuss safety concerns and address them. When the California Fire Marshal had oversight over Plains All American, the company’s representatives were not regular attendees at such meetings. Since the federal agency known as PHMSA took over, they have not shown up either. “They don’t come to our meetings.”
Drude is not one to throw stones at other regulators. “Everybody could have been doing their jobs the best their jobs could be done,” he said. “The pipe itself could have just given way. It happens. We just don’t know.” That’s one of the reasons, he said, he’d really like to see what the hole in the pipeline looks like.
As always in such matters, the $64 billion question is what Plains All American knew and when did they know it. In other words, when did the company know — or should have known — there was a leak, and how long did it take for the company to act? In either case, Plains All American will be on the hook for millions in damages. But if it can be shown the company acted negligently or with disregard for safety procedures, the penalties could be staggering. Dispatched to the scene were representatives from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles, specializing in the prosecution of environmental crimes. One was seen walking along the beach with oil on his hands this Wednesday, as were representatives with the California Attorney General’s Office, who specialize in environmental prosecutions. Santa Barbara District Attorney Joyce Dudley was also on hand accompanied by her chief investigator Dave Saunders. Although the track record of the Santa Barbara prosecutor’s office has been anemic to nonexistent when it’s come to environmental crime for decades, Saunders has some experience in this regard from his days with the Ventura County District Attorney’s Office.
Photo Gallery
Refugio Oil Spill Aerial and On Site Visit
Aerial and onsite photos of the Plains All American Pipeline oil spill
At this point, many key details of what happened remain unknown. But the morning the spill happened, County Fire Department investigator Chris Olmstead was already close by. He just happened to be conducting an oil spill containment drill with representatives of another oil company, which owns a facility two miles north of Plains All American’s. Olmstead received a dispatch that Engine 18, which operates out of Gaviota, was on its way in response to complaints about intense oily odors. Olmstead headed south, and by the time he and Engine 18 connected near the Refugio Beach, it was obvious a serious spill was underway. It was Olmstead who would track the leak back to “a gushing stream of sludge.” He would track it across the freeway and over a wire fence and finally to its source. When Olstead got there, two representatives from Plains All American — who’d been with him earlier — were already there. What time that was, Olmstead said, he didn’t record.
To date, county authorities say Plains has been exceptionally cooperative.
Link:
County and Goleta Declare State of Emergency After Refugio Oil Spill



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Share Article
Pinterest









Comments
"That’s because Plains All American took Santa Barbara County to court and won...." Well let's blame the judge then not the pipeline!
Look how useless the many tax paid departmental acronyms were.
(Is there anyone who isn't named in this unbelievable "oversight"?)
Yet "flying blind" sure seems to fly with our liberal environmentalist government worried about blaming others for creating this oily mess!
Does anyone else notice every headline these days seems to implicate everyone except the people paid to make sure this doesn't happen?
Where's Obama? Preaching how he's going to save the world from global warming with his vision of a military-industrial complex?
touristunfriendly (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 3:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nick, you are truly amazing, thank you. The oil companies always lobby hard for limited regulations. Then, when an incident occurs, they declare loudly that they were following the law. The same thing is going on with fracking. Mark my words, 10 years down the road when the groundwater is all contaminated with fracking chemicals, the drillers will announce their strict adherence to all regulations. How can a pipeline company operate without leak detection alarms? Ludicrous.
shortrees (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 4:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Compliments to Nick Welsh for the well-researched article. There certainly are plenty of people to blame for this incident (even if it's decided it's not an "incident" since no one was killed). Federal agencies and Santa Barbara agencies who didn't bother to come to meetings; the courts, PAAP itself for weasling out of oversight--when is that not a self-interested move?
As long as oil interests control politics (through "donations" to sympathetic senators and representatives) and as long as the public acquiesces to Big Oil and car industries' efforts to keep the status quo, this sort of thing--oil companies wiggling out of oversight, overseers failing to do their jobs, lack of funding for oversight--will keep happening.
It's only when there is the political and social will to change to renewable energy that we will see the end of oil spills and CO2 pollution.
Scandy (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 4:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This should be in the "opinion" section, not the news section. This article is full of conjecture but little fact.
Botany (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 4:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks for the article. Good research in so little time. Court records are news not opinion.
Also, great job on the Independent interview with Rachel Maddow tonight.
tabatha (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 6:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Botany - Is this article different? If you're up for some real conjecture:
Did anyone else notice HAARP patterns in the late morning on the 19th?
I did, and I was concerned about earthquakes, since HAARP wave patterns have been visible in satellite photos prior to many earthquakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-zcz...
14noscams (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 6:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nick - Best reporting I've seen in the Independent in years. Thank you and keep at it.
oaintw (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 6:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Was there any seismic evidence for an earthquake? No one knows how the pipe broke yet. Wait for evidence, not opinion/conjecture.
tabatha (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 6:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow, hard to believe. Great report. The only pipe without an automatic shutoff valve says it all. Speechless. Some heads are gonna roll.
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 8:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You have to be kidding me! Any pipeline built in the last 30 years that does not have automatic leak shutdown technology is simply design and operational malfeasance. The reason that Plains sued the County to escape regulation was to avoid the extra safeguards that would have prevented this disaster. The oil companies fought tooth and nail to prevent the local air pollution control districts from regulating air pollution from offshore oil platforms and luckily they lost that fight. This is all "coulda, woulda, shoulda," at this point. Hopefully, the huge fines that will be levied can go to help preserve the Gaviota Coast from further depredation.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 8:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Top-notch reporting, Nick, in a very compressed time frame. Thank you for this substantive, well-researched, informative article. We are shocked and saddened by this disaster, and information helps.
Maggie (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 8:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I never thought the Independent would write an article showing the ineffectiveness of federal safety regulations. That part at least was kind of nice.
Better make sure Plains All American pays to clean it up- all of it- and help restore the aquatic life that once was.
They should be paying the volunteers as well.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 8:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lois Capps serves on the Congressional Pipeline Safety oversight committee - giving new meaning to our coastal Ribbon of Shame.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-109...
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 9:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Barry Soetoro refuses to nominate new head of PHMSA - pipeline safety agency, despite Democratic pleas to do so: http://thehill.com/policy/energy-envi...
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 9:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
2010 Pipeline Safety hearings before - Lois Capp - serving on the House Energy and the Environment subcommittee:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-111...
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 9:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
2011 Pipeline Safety and Community Protection Act - hearings before Lois Capps - subcommittee member:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112...
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 9:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
tabatha - there wasn't an earthquake. A pipe broke. We would have noticed an earthquake. I mentioned earthquakes because HAARP has been used to cause earthquakes at fracking operations. HAARP could be used to sabotage an oil pipeline.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 9:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you for this reporting. Outstanding and very helpful in getting an appreciation of what happened.
at_large (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 9:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lois Capps 'Serving You": Mrs. Capps serves on the powerful Committee on Energy and Commerce. She sits on the Health, Energy & Power, and Environment & the Economy subcommittees. From these posts, Capps focuses on Medicare reform, the nursing shortage, cancer, mental health, energy policy, and the protection of our air and water.
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 10:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Apparently Jarv believes that Lois Capps, who sits on committees run by Republicans, people opposed in principle to government regulation, should have somehow figured out how to impose more government regulation, for which Jarvis of course would have castigated her.
Jarv also reports, "Barry Soetoro refuses to nominate new head of PHMSA - pipeline safety agency, despite Democratic pleas to do so."
There are often things that children do for no sensible reason other than that they believe it will draw attention to themselves and annoy the grown-ups -- hence Jarv's pleasure in repeating his "Soetoro" idiocy, apparently unaware that all it accomplishes is alert people that anything appearing with the Jarvis name attached is going to be worthless and likely dishonest as well. And sure enough -- the letter to which he refers was written yesterday, so Obama has hardly had time to "refuse" to act on it.
As I've noted before, on reading anything Jarvis writes, it's best to take Mary McCarthy's line to heart, that "every word [he] writes is a lie, including 'and' and 'the'."
pk (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 10:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think the Independent should investigate previous Plains All American spills and see if they were held totally liable for cleaning up the spills, damages and whether complete restoration of the area occurred or whether there is still fallout from some of their previous accidents.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 11:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lois Capps had 17 years to get the one Santa Barbara County pipeline under federal jurisdiction right, no matter which party held the majority on the committee since she had the majority green light more often than not prior to 2010.
Just like she failed to over-see her staff at official office functions, the one claim to fame she bragged about protecting our central coast environment but this slipped her purview too.
No one can absolve the pipeline company itself unless it is determined it was sabotage or an unforeseeable Act of God, but Capps for goodness sakes made coastal protection her primary claim to fame every single time she ran.
I would like to know if Capps even knew about this single aberrational pipeline in our county, since the Poodle found out this critical information in less than 48 hours. Arf.
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 11:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The prior Plains spills and fines are easily available online over the past 10 years, as well and national incidents in the entire industry.
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2015 at 11:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Article: "This isn’t to say the Plains pipeline has operated free of regulatory oversight. Since its inception in 1987, the pipeline has been subject to federal inspections."
JJ: "Lois Capps had 17 years to get the one Santa Barbara County pipeline under federal jurisdiction...."
-------
14noscams: "HAARP could be used to sabotage an oil pipeline."
How? Did you not read the response to your nonsense on EdHat?
tabatha (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 12:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think Jarivs's real name is Annie, and this is her theme song. How else could someone find the energy to post so often?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMzoq...
dolphinpod14 (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 5:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
According to Jarvis, Lois Capps "had the majority green light more often than not prior to 2010."
According to reality, Lois Capps was in the minority 5 of 7 times prior to 2010.
pk (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 6:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Did Lois Capps even know about the one pipeline in our county that was directly under her federal jurisdiction?
Poodle learned about this unique pipeline within 48 hours. Is there any paper trail to show Capps fought to bring similar protective regulations for the operation of this one single pipeline within her exclusive jurisdiction?
Just asking. Since Capps was consistently voted the nicest person in Congress, did she not even gain any favorable treatment by her colleagues on either side of the aisle on this pressing matter under her unique control? Why did she not bring public pressure over this one unique pipeline in our county.
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 7:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
We rely on carbon for energy and so much else. Look at all the plastic around us (toys, packaging, computers!) plus all the gas we need, the heat & AC we use in our homes. Catastrophes of this nature are inevitable, the best we can do for the environment is reducing the demand for oil & plastic or for humans to go extinct
amyb (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 7:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
We rely on carbon for energy and so much else. Look at all the plastic around us (in cars, packaging, computers) plus all the gas we need, the heat & AC we use in our homes. Catastrophes of this nature are inevitable, the best we can do for the environment is reducing the demand for oil & plastic or for humans to go extinct.
amyb (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 7:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Caught in yet another clear lie, Jarvis, as usual, can't be bothered to address it directly, because in his world, facts don't matter. Again as usual, his response to having his dishonesty exposed is to spread some additional nonsense.
Lois Capps was the nicest person in Congress, so of course she should have been able to convince the Republican leadership to... what exactly? That they should conduct a special investigation into a pipeline that she should have known was problematic because, in Jarvis' bizarre phrasing, it was supposedly "under her unique control"?
Why does he think anyone takes him as anything other than a joke? Just asking.
pk (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 7:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Here is a song about the first spill recorded in 1969. What changes? NADA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iORCh...
edukder (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 8:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Of course the criminal always blames the police, the DA, the courts, the constitution, society, his/her family. his/her schoolteachers, etc. It's always someone else's fault.
Same thing with the defenders of the oil industry around here. It is the lack of federal oversight, a shortcoming in Lois Capps, the usage of gasoline in Priuses, the environazis, the EDC, Barry Soetoro, the United Nations, Elizabeth Warren, Jerry Brown, Barbara Boxer, etc that causes oil spills in their opinion.
But it all comes down to Plains All American Pipeline, who stuffed their responsibility. And oh boy, the defenders of the oil industry are now going to get what they asked for, good and hard:
federal oversight, Lois Capps, people in Priuses bashing them, the environazis, the EDC, Barry Soetoro, the United Nations, Elizabeth Warren, Jerry Brown, Barbara Boxer, etc.
And then Plains All American Pipeline will wail and moan all the way to the bank.
sevendolphins (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 9:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
sevendolphins, my argument is a bit more complicated than that. Jarvis' might not be, but mine is.
I am absolutely certain that oil industry regulations in this country protect the oil companies. I am certain that oil companies get away with polluting and when there are accidents they are some how able to evade total liability to clean up and restore all of the damage 100% and give complete restitution to all those they damaged.
There is an abalone farm just down the way from this oil spill. They collect ocean water and farm kelp for their operation. How will they be affected by this? Will they be compensated by Plains All American? Will Plains All American completely restore the affected areas and help re-establish wildlife in those affected areas? Are they compensating all of the federal clean-up agencies completely or is the taxpayer going to help foot the bill?
Were all of the fishermen in the gulf fairly compensated for their losses? Were all of the other damaged businesses fairly compensated? Is there still economic fallout from that spill that is being overlooked?
Let me explain to you why this is important - if oil companies are completely and totally responsible for all of the damages they cause, including loss of business and total restoration in the case of an accident - then they have to figure those costs against adding safety equipment so accidents don't happen. That is how business works, they consider the risk of investment versus the return. When the government gets in the way and creates pro-oil industry regulations that shield these companies from being completely liable for their accidents, then the companies don't have an incentive to be as safe as they need to be because their financial risk is reduced.
You can't expect that people who own oil companies are going to have as much respect for the environment as you or I. But you CAN hold them financially responsible for their actions and help deter them from having these unsafe practices - or - you can allow the government to create industry regulations which will inevitably be written by the oil industry and then passed on to politicians who they give significant campaign contributions. But you can't just block campaign contributions because that won't fix the problem. They could promise them a job later on, or give their cousin a really lucrative job, there is no way to stop government corruption.
So you can keep fighting the oil industry and add to the millions of pages of government regulation and play a legal and political game of cat and mouse, or you can simply hold these companies responsible for their actions. I posit that the second alternative is the most simple and effective at protecting the environment.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 10:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It's way past time for Nick's Pulitzer. Please, Indy management, enter this story for Pulitzer consideration.
zygote (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 11:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Boy there's that word again "Republicans"! This time it's being used to describe someone standing in the way of liberal progressive reform.
Anyone viewed the Drudge page today....
There's McConnell, a self described party leader.... Patting Obama on the back, looking like a 100 year old Pee-Wee Herman watching porn!
touristunfriendly (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 11:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Pulitzer-worthy would include quotes from Lois Capps, who sits on the House "powerful Energy and Commerce" committee which oversees federal pipeline safety in this area, since Welsh discovered this was uniquely the sole federally regulated pipeline we have in Ms Capp's district.
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 11:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This article evokes thoughts of the Revolutionary Days of the Federalists vs the Anti-Federalists.
There wasn't enough Federal oversight?...because the Federal Government didn't allow Santa Barbara County to have oversight? Reminds me of the desegregation of schools back in the 50s....what a fascinating article. Meanwhile, the Federal Government tells us which creeks to pour water into from the Cachuma Dam (the Hilton, for the trout).
It has become such a morass of agencies and bureaucracies, and it's always someone else's fault.
We need to bring back freedom of association and community rights so that people can feel responsible and in control of what happens in their own back yard.
Schifter (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 11:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Terrific article, thank you Nick. The NYTimes has shown at of 1700 pipeline companies Plains is in the #4 position for most fractions per year. Remember when the oil-loving "NO on P" folks scared voters into No on P with their threats of massive litigation vs. SB County. It not only scared voters but apparently frightened the Independent since in Oct. 2014 they endorsed NO on P - blasphemy, and certainly NOT pro-environment.
DrDan (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 11:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If you've watched the clean-up news conferences broadcast each evening on KEYT, you've witnessed the Pipeline's CEO and local Project Manager refusal to discuss his company's long record of poor pipeline satety maintenance. Here's why:
A 5/21 LA Times analysis of data from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration "shows Plains' rate of incidents per mile of pipe is more than three times the national average. Such incidents may include problems with pipelines, storage tanks and drains, among others. Among more than 1,700 pipeline operators listed in a database maintained by the federal agency, only four companies reported more infractions than Plains Pipeline"
[Source: http://www.latimes.com/local/californ....
FACT CHECK ALERT: Alternatively, you can read Jarvis-Jarvis's five (5) carnivalesque postings above, including links to over 600 pages of transcripts of three (3) Congressional hearings (2 under Republican gavels, 1 under Democrats), all intended to lay the blame for the insufficient pipeline regulatory oversight at Lois Capp's doorstep, as "tabatha" and "pk" have detailed above.
J-J's continuing misinformation campaign is designed, as he revealed in an earlier post, "...to deny- divert- digress- dismiss- distort - denigrate...," which he (laughably) attributes to myself and others. Habitues of this board will fully recognize J-J's MO.
I'm reiterating my complaint that J-J's online mayhem to The Independent -- which is only too well aware of his activities -- is rendering a disservice to its readership by not using its legal and judicious editorial perogatives to end J-J's abuse of its resources for his bizarre political ends. Free speech is a foundation of our society. Abusive use of the same IS NOT!
bookman (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 11:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yup, somebody's really gonna have to pay for that cleanup, all right. Guess who? The gas prices that are hovering around four dollars right now may be over five dollars by the end of summer.
nativeson (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 12:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nick's article is good reporting but hardly 'investigative'. That the Plains pipeline was under State/Federal monitoring should be common knowledge. One thing Nick failed to mention is that Plains and the company that owns and operates the four platforms off of Point Conception, PXP, were one and the same a few years ago. And that PXP was at the center of a controversial proposal to drill horizontally into State Tidelands from an aging Federal Platform Irene off shore of Vandenburg. PXP's proposal was vigorously supported by EDC, who crafted the deal with PXP (behind closed doors), GOO, CEC, and other environmental groups as well as virtually all local politicians. The 'Deal' was killed by the State Lands Commission when member John Garamendie voted against it. Moral....be careful who you crawl into bed with.
dontoasthecoast (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 12:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh that is total garbage, nativeson.. gas prices will not be affected by a spill like this, there is plenty of oil coming in foreign and domestic that dictate the gas prices.
All Plains American can go out of business if it comes to that for all I care - they should pay for EVERYTHING and restore everything. They were the ones who decided not to buy the safety equipment for their pipe.
If All Plains American were to go out of business, they will sell their infrastructure to other oil companies who, odds are, have a much better safety record. That is exactly what is supposed to happen.
But hey, let's put this argument on a bigger scale and see how your theory works out. Let's say the spill was big enough and expensive enough and that this company going out of business had a significant enough impact on the market to raise gas prices by 10 or 20 cents for some time. If they are that big and that neglectful, that means they have been getting away with using equipment that is less safe and they have been able to put oil on the market all this time at a cheaper rate than it should have cost with the proper safety equipment. That means we would have been receiving a discount all this time on our gas, a discount that was inflated by the fact that they weren't spending money on that safety equipment. Had they spent the money on the safety equipment for all their infrastructure, then gas would have been slightly higher and we never would have experienced the spill.
The point is that yes, the consumer ultimately pays for oil that goes toward safety equipment that prevents spills or toward the damage from the oil spills, but they have to pay for ONE or the OTHER. The oil company is responsible and supposed to be smart enough to invest in enough safety equipment to prevent spills based on the risk of a spill and the cost of damages vs. the cost of the safety equipment. If the business does a poor job making these decisions, then they go out of business. That's how the free market helps regulate these things - but we don't have a free market, we have a regulated oil industry with regulated protections in place for that industry that causes them to make poor decisions in this area.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 12:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Natural seeps in the area of this oil spill leak as much oil in 5 days as the amount of oil that's reached the ocean due to this pipeline leak. This is only the OIL from natural seeps, and doesn't include methane and non-methane gases. Coal Oil Point natural seeps leak 100 barrels of oil a day, or 4200 gallons/day. The 2012 research that determined this was based on an 18 square meter area; an area equivalent to a square 2.63 miles long on each side. There's obviously a big difference between 100 barrels of oil spread over an area of ocean this large and an amount that's concentrated in a small area with a 2-foot diameter pipe as its source. The amount of oil reported as reaching the ocean due to this pipeline leak is 21000 gallons, or 500 barrels. Around 9000 gallons, or 43%, has been cleaned up so far, so, according to reported estimates of the amount spilled, there's around 12000 gallons remaining, 286 barrels. This is an amount produced by natural seeps in less than 3 days.
It's a mess, and it sounds like we won't know the cause of the leak for a while.
Natural seeps leak through faults on the seafloor. I haven't found any research on the effect of earthquakes on seepage through faults in our local seafloor, and it seems like a potentially important issue.
There is the equivalent of more than 80 Exxon Valdez oil spills on the ocean floor in SB’s offshore oil field.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10...
The only way, other than satellite photos, to see the "normal" amount of oil on the surface of the ocean from natural seeps is from the air, and I'm sure it would amaze most locals. There's an FAA designated aerobatic practice area over Gaviota, one of 2 in the county, and I've spent a lot of hours there with a great view of oil slicks.
Our definition of a "pristine" environment (from another comment) isn't the natural (oily) local environment. Fortunately there are natural oil-eating bacteria to clean up oil from natural seeps as well as accidental and presumably. preventable oil spills.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 12:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The buck stops with the Plains company - they "built" it and they will pay the fines, and pay for the clean-up. I don't know how much clearer it could be who is responsible. Personal responsibility. Corporate responsibility.
Yesterday was anti-Chevron day for the messes they have created and not cleaned up. It was not anti-US government day, or anti-US-congress day or anti-Ecuador day (where some of the worst spills are).
The BP Gulf Disaster - BP is paying for the clean-up. The local congress critters where the disaster took place were not hauled over the coals for not overseeing the Deepwater Horizon for the state of its infrastructure.
Please stop with the childish babbling. Or, maybe, just continue. It further reduces your credibility, if you ever had very much, where your posts will be completely ignored.
tabatha (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 12:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
14scams - wildlife thrives in the COP area under normal conditions. Wildlife has been killed with this spill, which is not as large as it could have been. Please think through the difference.
tabatha (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 12:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
14noscams - 105,000 gallons has been reported as the leak. And climbing. As estimated by Plains All American Pipeline themselves.
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la...
z28racergirl (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 1:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
tabatha with two contradictory statements:
"they "built" it and they will pay the fines, and pay for the clean-up."
"Yesterday was anti-Chevron day for the messes they have created and not cleaned up."
There you have it, I am right again.
These companies are never held liable for all their damages even though they say they are and I would be willing to bet with some investigative work one could find that taxpayer funds are in part used for these clean-ups and the clean-ups don't actually clean everything up, local affected citizens and businesses get stiffed and don't receive just compensation. And you know what else? It's probably all legal, written right into the oil industry regulations. That is why regulations are worthless and we need to focus on making these companies truly accountable for their actions.
You see, businesses treat this like a math equation...
If the risk with the automatic safety shut off takes it down from a 1% chance of a spill in 10 years time to a .2% chance of a spill within 10 years time, and the predicted cost of a spill is $50 million without the shutoff valve and $10 million with the shut off valve - if the shut off valve costs $100k then a business can figure out what the most economic decision is.
.01 x $50 million = $500k risk cost to not institute automatic safety valve
.005 x $10 million = $50k risk cost if automatic safety valve is installed + $100k for the automatic safety valve = $150k
So if you compare the costs, $500k vs. $150k the rational business decision would be to install the automatic safety valves.
However, if the company has a liability cap or doesn't end up having to pay for the full clean-up, you can see how that result might change.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 1:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
FYI: WoodsHole states "20-25 tons of oil" naturally escape into the SB channel every day. Don't know what the equivalent is gallons for tons.
http://www.whoi.edu/oilinocean/page.d...
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 1:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Jarvis has already been caught lying and speaking nonsense. He either ignores it when someone points this out or simply repeats it. His right to make a fool of himself shouldn't be restricted. It's easy enough to expose him and his unwillingness or inability to let truth or reality get in the way of his politics. No one takes him as anything more than a sad specimen of partisan dementia.
pk (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 1:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
EVWorld states:
"Wealthy, seriously-upscale Santa Barbara -- where homes average a million dollars -- sits at the epicenter of the second largest natural offshore oil seep on the planet. Only the Caspian Sea surpasses it.
In the national debate about opening up more of America's offshore regions to oil and gas drilling -- and setting aside the problem of carbon dioxide-induced climate change -- a sixty mile long stretch of coastline that reaches roughly from Ventura Country west north west to San Luis Obispo Country, well south of the Big Sur coast, has some 2,000 active sea floor oil seeps.
According to former JPL physicist Bruce Allen, the tectonically active zone is estimated to have leaked some 800 million barrels of oil over the last 10,000 years."
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 1:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So apparently because there are things we can't control, we shouldn't try to control the things we can.
pk (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 1:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nearly half (40%) of the sea spill has now been cleaned up, according to BreitbartCA:
"The oil spill in the ocean totaled 105,000 gallons of crude oil; roughly 21,000 gallons reached the seashore. By Thursday, over 8,358 gallons of oil and water had been dealt with across 9 miles of the coast.
.......
Five pelicans and a young sea lion were being treated after having been found covered with oil."
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 2:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
His nonsense about Obama and Capps exposed, Jarvis responds by repeating some of that nonsense and then posting some information whose relevance he seems to take for granted, even though, with regard to the present topic, it has nothing to add on the question of what can be done to avoid problems caused by irresponsible human behavior.
pk (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 2:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
""Yesterday was anti-Chevron day for the messes they have created and not cleaned up."
There you have it, I am right again."
I don't know what point you are trying to make. But here is a guess answer. The messes made by Chevron have not been cleaned up by Chevron or anyone else. They are still messes.
tabatha (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 2:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
pk - he reads Breitbart. Enough said.
tabatha (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 2:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Another spectacular article. Pulitzer level work.
The pipe was 20 inches: where, physically, was the pressure measurement and the physical control valve?
DBS
drdan93109 (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 2:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Plains makes the following statement:
We are part of the Santa Barbara community and we deeply regret that this release has happened. On behalf of the Plains family – the 350 employees located here in the state of California and the more than 5,000 employees located across the country – we will do everything in our power to make this right.
(Source: edhat) Hold 'em to it, watchdogs.
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 2:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
tabatha - "14scams - wildlife thrives in the COP area under normal conditions. Wildlife has been killed with this spill, which is not as large as it could have been. Please think through the difference."
Don't try to think -
Coal Oil Point seeps have been there for thousands of years. Marine life that isn't compatible with the environment doesn't live there and hasn't in a very long time. The environment is essentially static and has been for thousands of years. There's a lot more oil on the sea floor there and high methane escape (82% of county CH4) and other volatile chemicals than in this small oil spill.
The marine environment was altered in a very short period of time in a small area due to this spill.
The difference between the 2 regions is that this spill is an example of a cause-effect relationship resulting from a change in environment, and Coal Oil Point is a static environment.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 3:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
tabatha - "pk - he reads Breitbart. Enough said."
Don't read AP stories reposted on Breitbart - gotta maintain that left-wing bigotry; ignorance is strength.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I've been around Coal Oil Pt for 30 years, 14, and yeah the seeps are indeed there, but they aren't ruining miles of also amazing beaches up at Refugio, are they? We can and should do something fierce about this oil pipeline rupture and Plains's dereliction AND the weakness of our SB County Supes. We need a new vastly expanded MEASURE P in next election which eliminates this pipeline method from land to sea and or sea to land: enough. Phase it out in 5 years.
I don't read Breitbart but I also don't see CNN...my news is almost always only in print, foreign sources whenever possible incl. BBC, Guardian, Int'l Wall St. Journal, ...it's pretty scanty. But pk is correct that mentally ill JJ simply regurgitates what several other commenters have labeled Fox or Breitbart or...even! Andy Caldwell. He just clogs up the effort for actual discussion with his troll [topic diverting!] ruses...
DavyBrown (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 3:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"I don't know what point you are trying to make. But here is a guess answer. The messes made by Chevron have not been cleaned up by Chevron or anyone else. They are still messes."
They were probably all cleaned up within "regulation".
I'm against regulations - regulations that are written by oil companies and passed by politicians they have corrupted. I'm for holding companies responsible for restitution of all victims. That's called a free market. That is one reason why philosophical libertarians are against regulations, they end up benefiting the rich and powerful. Free markets regulate companies and hold them responsible. Government regulates small competitors out of the market and reduces innovation and safety.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 3:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
drdan93109 - The pipeline is 24".
http://www.plainsupdate.com/go/doc/72...
14noscams (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 3:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
z28racergirl - "14noscams - 105,000 gallons has been reported as the leak"
And 21,000 gallons is the quantity reported to have reached the beach from the breach in the onshore pipeline.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 3:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
More regulations? Yes on P? What the hell does this have to do with what happened at Refugio? NOTHING.
Our Federal Government is not enforcing the laws that we have on the books.
Obama has done nothing. Bush did nothing. This is not a Save the Earth/Drill for Energy or right wing/left wing issue. It is purely our politics of big money which is pervasive and not specific to the party in charge.
Start telling HBJ, Das and Lois to stop making new laws and focus on finding out what rules are not being enforced. Of course that mundane process is far less sexy than calling yourself a Water Guardian...Instead of protesting about theoretical boogeymen instead protest our current representative for not having a clue and reporting back to us about how ineffectual our oversight actually is.
nomoresanity (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 4:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
NOT CLEANED UP IN ECUADOR
"Mr. Correa’s allegations relate to the decades-old disaster, when Texaco operated in the Amazon Rainforest. The company operated in the rainforest for decades, in pursuit of oil. In the process, Texaco drilled 350 oil wells across the Amazon. The company’s operations caused systematic environmental damage from a sustained period of environmentally damaging activity.
Texaco merged with Chevron in 2001, with the latter inheriting the former’s legal liability. A legal success in 2012, saw the Ecuadorian government win a $19 billion environmental penalty against the US oil multinational, which was later reduced to $9.5 billion.
Chevron has refused to pay the penalty, with a US federal judge ruling in Chevron’s favor, that the fine was not enforceable in March 2014.
Activists and environmentalists across the world gathered on May 21, for International Anti-Chevron Day, as they continue to argue that Chevron should take responsibility for the clean-up in Amazon."
---------------------------
FEDERAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS EXCEEDED ???
Update by the Unified Command of Refugio Response
May 22, 2015 12:00 pm
Safety Statement from Plains All American Pipeline
Source: Patrick Hodgins, Senior Director of Safety & Security/ Plains All American Pipeline
Safety and environmental responsibility are core values to Plains. Since 2008, Plains has significantly increased its size and spending related to our U. S. integrity management and safety programs.
- We have more than doubled safety and training staff since 2008.
- Our integrity management staff has increased by approximately 50 percent.
- Spending on our maintenance and integrity has risen significantly increasing to $300 million in 2014.
- We have implemented several programs that are above and beyond those required by federal regulation.
- We have an integrated integrity management program that assesses risks and threats to our pipelines and uses a number of tools to assess their integrity.
- Close interval surveys have been conducted on Plains’ pipelines (each inch of a pipeline is physically walked to conduct this survey)
- In-line inspection tools have been run on substantially all Plains’ pipelines to inspect for internal and external corrosion, dents and/or cracks.
- Regarding Line 901, which experienced the accidental release on May 19, we have exceeded the federal regulatory requirement, inspecting it two times within the last three years.
---------- Note the last sentence.
tabatha (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 5:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What does that have to do with what happened here? You want more laws?
Anyone remember PG&E and the gas line explosion in The Bay? Same thing.
nomoresanity (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 6:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"What does that have to do with what happened here?" It is a statement by Plains about the incident. It has everything to do with what happened here. Read it again.
An automatic shut-off valve should be mandatory. Then what happened here would not have happened here.
tabatha (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 6:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
OK, loonpt, but even if gas prices don't go up, where do you think the money comes from that the oilers are using to pay for the cost of cleanup? First there's a trust, then some insurance, etc. But where does that money come from if not from the consumer? Everything that is being done to clean up the oil spill is being paid for either with funds supplied at one time or another by the consumer or with funds created by money supplied by the consumer.
nativeson (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 7:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ya nativeson you're right, but what have we learned from privatizing profits and socializing losses? If the company doesn't have to pay for the full brunt clean ups, then what incentive do they have to be safe? I've just gone through in detail the mechanisms and formulas that would be used to determine investment in safety equipment and bearing the full bore of the cost is essential. The other option is the government plays pipe-cops and goes around inspecting everybody's pipes, and when it fails then the taxpayers take on a significant portion of the liability. The government sucks and doing things and enforcing things, so it is better to make the oil companies and insurance companies have the right incentives to police their own equipment.
There are plenty of oil companies - if one goes out of business because they have a poor safety record and have to make a lot of accident payouts, then they will sell their equipment to another company with a better safety record. What's the problem?
loonpt (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 8:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
loonpt: "I'm against regulations - regulations that are written by oil companies and passed by politicians they have corrupted. I'm for holding companies responsible for restitution of all victims. That's called a free market. That is one reason why philosophical libertarians are against regulations, they end up benefiting the rich and powerful. Free markets regulate companies and hold them responsible. Government regulates small competitors out of the market and reduces innovation and safety."
But I think judges and lawyers will be bought and sold on the free market and justice will even be more favoring of the rich corps. There has to be a balance between regulation and individualism. I am in favor of more socialism due to our effects on one another, but government must be better managed...lots of stings on politicians and enforcers. Publicly financed elections are a must. Dreaming of Tomorrowland.
sbindyreader (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 9:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes sbindyreader, no doubt local corruption will exist. But is it easier to pay off 50 state judges, 3,144 county judges and 19,354 city judges or is it easier to just pay off 269 members of congress? The more centralized power is, the easier it is to corrupt.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 10:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
As the News-Press would say, "Drill, baby, Drill!" I hope the News-Press will be taking a stand against all this second guessing of the value of bringing up oil in the area. It has always taken a stance that it's a good thing. It knows the Democrats attempt to stop the oil pipeline being built across our nation is short-sighted, left wing pansy nonsense. Same thing will drilling and fracking right here at home. Come on, News-Press. Don't changes gears now, when we need you most. Wendy, stick to your real principles! A little oil does the earth good. This piddling spill is no reason to bleed your friend Dick Cheney and Halliburton dry!
conductorphil (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2015 at 11:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Coal Oil Point seeps have been there for thousands of years. Marine life that isn't compatible with the environment doesn't live there and hasn't in a very long time. The environment is essentially static and has been for thousands of years. "
--- quoted ---
“Literature reviews of marine hydrocarbon seepage usually conclude that the area along the northern Santa Barbara Channel is one of the most prolific hydrocarbon seepage areas in the world.”
—Journal of Geophysical Research, “The world’s most spectacular marine hydrocarbon seeps (Coal Oil Point, Santa Barbara Channel, California)” (1999)
Another study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research notes that not only is there active life around the seep sites, but there are actually more organisms than areas where no seepage occurs:
“There is a well-developed community of bottom-dwelling marine organisms in the sediments associated with the seeps at Coal Oil Point. Comparison of the benthic fauna at an oil seep with the fauna in an area free of seepage showed that there are higher densities of individual organisms near the seep.”
“The waters of the Santa Barbara Channel form one of the most biologically productive ecosystems found on earth.”
—Santa Barbara Channelkeeper
“The Santa Barbara Channel contains some of the most biologically diverse waters on the planet. Within these waters is the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary, which is host to the densest seasonal population of blue whales in the world.”
—United States Coast Guard
Meanwhile, as voluminous amounts of oil drain into the ocean marine life thrives. A combination of natural features and phenomena like ocean currents, wind patterns and submarine canyons create a region of exceptional habitat. A wealth of marine life flourishes from plankton to blue whales, which return to the Santa Barbara Channel seasonally in greater numbers than anywhere else on earth.
No less than 27 species of whales, dolphins or porpoises have been spotted and a handful of different types of seals and sea lions breed on the Channel Islands and mainland shore. The islands are home to over 150 endemic species and have been called the “North American Galapagos.” Thereon eleven species of seabirds occupy important nesting sites including bald eagles. A cornucopia of other smaller wildlife inhabits the region, too, many of which despite their relatively puny size are no less spectacular.
Despite the abundant natural hydrocarbon seeps, the Santa Barbara Channel supports prolific marine ecosystems of immeasurable value that are home to iconic wildlife like few other places on earth. The region is a national natural treasure. Sometimes, oil and animals do mix.
http://yankeebarbareno.com/2013/04/22...
Another BS smackdown.
tabatha (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 1:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Seriously Tabatha-quoting that this area has been called the "North American Galapagos" by a few Occupier nuts? There are like, well, almost, zero similarities.
I call by brain the "Giant Brain from Outer Space that will Save the Planet". Please refer to me that way now that this quote is in print.
Obviously automatic shut off valves should be mandatory in these circumstances and the rules appear to specify them under these environmental circumstances. The lack of enforcement by appropriate agencies and associated lax oversight by our limp officials is the problem.
nomoresanity (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I just read that Tabatha is the Google Queen Daughter of JarvisJarvis. Can I begin quoting that as fact? I mean, the Google Queen is proven but your DNA with Jarvis was previously a family secret...
nomoresanity (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 8:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Naw, tabatha is the daughter of Cut-And-Paste, who is remotely related to Document Dump. No relation. Some bloodlines however do connect her to Nikita Kruschev, of the We Will Bury You fame.
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 8:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
conductorphil, you need to distinguish between a well-run business and a sloppy business; not just the nature of the product. This would give you the opportunity to make cogent points on topic, instead of merely knee-jerk regurgitated sound bites.
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 8:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
In honor of Memorial Day, just because this needs to be remembered and who wants to wait until Labor Day:
..."California unions are overwhelmingly powerful because although the state has just 11 percent of the nation’s population, California’s public sector unions collect and spend $1 billion, or 25 percent of all U.S. public sector union dues each year."
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 9:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yet with the costs to battle this in court and the amount of money that this will cost in cleanup, to be levied fines and countless lawsuits, To not include a auto-shut off system in this section is going to be so much more expensive than if they had just included the system in the original design.
Sounds like a risk management mistake of the highest order... And a total and complete failure on every single division of our Govt. Nice work Brownie, heck of a job!
Sam_Tababa (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
No one yet knows the cause of the rupture. Who knows, maybe it was sabotage since it sits so close to the public highway. Just sayn' before you measure the rope.
Let's at least wait until they make the last pipeline inspection report public - was there obvious corrosion in this section or not. Did the sinkhole precede the break or form after the break. How geologically unstable was this section of land.
Should a pipeline have been installed along this section of the coast anyway? Did Lois Capps have prior notice of this as an unsuitable area when she was spending the last 17 years crafting pipeline safety regulations and protecting our coast.
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 9:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Lois Capps yet again?
Jarvis Syndrome, incurable.
pk (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 10:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Jarvis, you need to get off the sabotage rhetoric, your giving the climate change crowd way too much credit. The focus should be elsewhere, like cost. We talk about the cost of "clean-up" but the boots on the ground doing the actual cleaning account for far less than the coast guard and the EPA, whose sole purpose is "monitoring". The politicians cost us as well. Not only are we paying them to say it's all some corporations fault, but they'll be emptying our pockets next year because of this mess while they let the infrastructure needs deteriorate. (Did you know New Jersey produces more solar energy than us?)
I've yet to hear anyone in the media ask someone at this enviro-love in how is the government going to save us from this happening again. We all know why that question won't be asked, it's because we know what answer we'll get... "It's all some corporations fault."
touristunfriendly (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 10:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Got it. P..(aid-flac)..K
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Not part of the media of course, but some of us have asked Lois Capps, since for 17 years she sat on the 'powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee", how she intends to write even further federal pipeline safety regulations.... to save us from this happening again.
What would Laura Capps Burton have done to pick up the regulatory cudgel for us, where mom left off?
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 10:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is the ninth post in this string in which Jarvis has accused Lois Capps of something or other in relation to this pipeline, including the one in which he claimed that she "had the majority green light more often than not prior to 2010," which is true, if 2 is greater the 5, the number of times she actually was in the majority vs. being in the minority.
And of course a few posts above he couldn't help tossing in something completely irrelevant about public service unions, because he's Jarvis, and constantly reminding us that he has opinions is something Jarvis has to do.
pk (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 10:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
pk, learn the difference between a question mark and an exclamation mark. It will improve the quality of your own responses.
What did Lois Capps know about this curious sole federal pipeline under her exclusive jurisdiction in her own coastal California district she served for 17 years? (NB: that was a question mark.)
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 10:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
PHMSA issues a Corrective Response Order to Plains, in response to this pipeline incident.
http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pv_obj_cache...
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 11:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Meet Jeffrey Weise from PHMSA who will be over-seeing the federally mandated investigation of this incident.
http://phmsa.dot.gov/portal/site/PHMS...
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 11:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Is Jarvis an idiot for thinking that no one can see that the context of his repeated remarks about Lois Capps shows that he thinks she should be held accountable for the oil spill? Is Jarvis an idiot for thinking that somehow she should have been able to get the Republican-dominated Congress to investigate this one pipeline? Is Jarvis an idiot for letting his partisan bias convince him that she was in the majority more often than not when 30 seconds spent checking the claim would have shown he was wrong?
Is Jarvis really such an idiot that he thinks he can get away with all of his crap just by repeating it over and over and not really caring whether any of it corresponds to reality?
!
pk (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 11:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What diid Lois Capps know and when did she know it?
What a splendid media opportunity if Lois could display her repeated efforts to regulate the safety Pipeline 901 in her own district and the mean old GOP told her no, no, no.
Otherwise one might say Lois Capps ....... went to Washington and had no intention of representing her own district. But who would say that? (Question mark.)
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 11:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think Jarvis is paid by the word, or he has a Capps fetish, or his hands are chained to his keyboard - or all three. He is rapidly proving what a clown car of one looks like. Too bad, the Independent has good stuff above the "Comments" line.
tabatha (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 11:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The new menu of Democratic buzz words just in time for the up-coming election cycle: add "clown car", as it is now showing up with increasing frequency.
Seems the old standbys Koch Bros, Citizens United, fair share, working families, for the children, Wall Street, banksters etc. are all losing their partisan and inflammatory zing.
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 11:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
By golly, seek and ye shall find. The Dems have already delivered the 2016 GOP clown car:
15834442837_cf625c7505_b.jpg
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 11:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Actually, the new buzzword is "Jarvisbation" -- achieving self-gratification by repeated public exposure of one's dishonesty.
pk (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 11:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sorry PaidhacK, Harf and Psaki already have dibs on that one.
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 11:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
No one could get paid enough for the job of tracking your childishly self-satisfied and compulsively repetitive dishonesty. I just do it now and then, as an unpaid service to the community of Indy readers, who might benefit by having a bit of light cast onto the darker corners of TrollWorld.
pk (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 12:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
AlJazeera updates us on the spill:
"There's no estimate to how much damage the spill caused, but a dead dolphin was found in Santa Barbara Harbor and three dead pelicans were recovered.
It's not clear if the dolphin found in the harbor, about 20 miles from the source of the spill, died from exposure to oil, said Veterinarian Michael Ziccardi.
Two sea lions, an elephant seal and six pelicans have been rescued, said Ziccardi, director of the Oiled Wildlife Care Network.
Workers wearing yellow protective suits, rubber gloves and face masks scrubbed pelicans with toothbrushes in a soapy bath at the International Bird Rescue in the San Pedro section of Los Angeles.
"Our goal is to get these birds stabilized, to get them warm, hydrated, comfortable and get them washed as soon as possible and then rehabilitated so they can go back home," Christine Fiorello with the Oiled Wildlife Care Network said in a video interview with The Associated Press."
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 12:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Jarvis as you are the designated driver of the Culpepper Clown Car, you should know why that buzzword was created. The avalanche of poorly prepared presidential candidates just makes the once serious GOP look like a sinking ship of fools. Of course our local party mirrors that national trend. Look at the last empty suit blow hard congressional candidate , Mitchum, a loser's loser.
Herschel_Greenspan (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 12:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
As some wags say: First world problems, when compared to the daily reports of ISIS hacking its way around the Middle East and Africa.
However, in honor of the Soetoro administration: #Bring Back Our Birds
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 12:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
About a quarter of the posts on this thread are nothing more than ad hominem attacks. How do you do that when the thread is about an oil spill?
BTW: Until H Greenspan posted it, I didn’t know about the term “Clown car” as used by dem Dems (relative to the spate of Republican candidates), but it is actually a compliment, since at least we might be able to look forward to a bit of comic relief after a tragic eight years.
nativeson (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 12:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Agree, we ought to stay closer to the topic and not just try to invent clever ways to insult one another. Guilty as charged.
It is a bit difficult, however, to point out lies and dishonesty without calling the poster a dishonest liar.
Point taken, though.
pk (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 1:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks, pk. I read this thread and despaired of ever seeing the tone of this forum raised. You renew hope.
lucas (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 4:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Never letting a crisis go to waste, ABC News rallies to the cause and highlights locals who fight hard in this town to turn the clock back to the days of horses, mud and flies:
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wire...
(PK: this is an opinion. This is not dishonesty or lies. It is an opinion.)
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 4:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nick,
Thank you for this outstanding investigative piece! The sad truth is that nobody cares or understands the complex regulation process that has failed us. Your article raises the bar and brings light to this critical issue. Regulations to maximize oil and gas industry profits applies not only to its pipelines, but also to the storage and transportation sectors. Just down the coast, Plains has a dummy, bankrupt limited liability company Rancho LPG, LLC., which stores 26 million gallons of butane and another 300,000 gallons of LPG which it sends by pipeline, train, and truck. Built in 1973 to secretly import Algerian LPG, this seismically substandard facility is located on the Palos Verdes Earthquake Fault Zone, a liquefaction and methane zone, immediately adjacent to the Phillips Refinery, and within 1000 feet of a pre-existing residential community.It was exempt from CEQA (Thanks EPA) and was built in secret with NO permits. After locals discovered what it was, permits were written 4 years after the fact! A tremendous group of activists have been working day and night to get this facility moved. They successfully got the attention of the EPA, who, after a lengthy investigation, fined Rancho a pittance and declared Rancho was now "in compliance." "In compliance" with WHAT? Regulations written by the American Petroleum Industry lobby!
This HAS to stop. Plains has paid off local politicians wherever it does business to say, "Gee. Sorry. There is nothing we can do because Plains is "in compliance." With a likely worst case scenario blast zone between 3-5 miles, an accident here will prove much worse than an oil spill.
Marcie (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 4:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Marcie writes: "Plains has paid off local politicians wherever it does business to say, "Gee. Sorry. There is nothing we can do because Plains is "in compliance."
Marcie, do you realize you might be talking about our very own local politician Lois Capps who sits on the "powerful" Energy and Commerce Committee and for the past 17 years has been writing federal pipeline safety compliance regulations?
JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 4:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
for those who've wondered why I and others are now calling for a renewed and MUCH STRONGER Measure P in the next election: it's about sustainable energy resources and phasing out this entire petroleum BS in SB County. When I suggested this yesterday, nomoresanity at 4:44 pm yesterday wrote, "More regulations? Yes on P? What the hell does this have to do with what happened at Refugio? NOTHING."
But this oil apologist is wrong, indeed: see this Noozhawk coverage of a rally for just such an expanded Measure P: http://www.noozhawk.com/article/refug...
And OK lucas, pk, native...trying to rise above our resident troll's repetitious crud...
DavyBrown (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 8:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"crud" or "crude"?.. as in "crude oil".
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2015 at 11:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Go home, Jarvis. You're drunk.
allegro805 (anonymous profile)
May 24, 2015 at 2:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
DB-Why have you become an apologist for the nitwit Progressives? You are not typically this stupid. Answer what Prop P has to do with this spill or why and expanded Prop P is the answer. There are currently laws on the books that are not enforced, and you want more laws? Instead of marching down State St the protesters should be occupying the offices of HBJ, Das, and Lois. This comment string has repeated inferences about local politicians being bought out etc. Do something useful and work to create a system of government with your own Progressives that makes them and the regulatory agencies do their job. If "Big Oil" has bribed everyone how come the criminals taking the bribes are not the targets of your emotion and action?
The power grid is already precariously under fed and you want to create a magic clean, renewable, and economically feasible power source? Hydro electric is going backwards due to the drought and you have a magic answer that will create portable, dense energy packets that will not cripple our economy.
Again, you are not this damn stupid.
nomoresanity (anonymous profile)
May 26, 2015 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Try holding the local judiciary accountable for deciding that regulatory lawsuit in Plains' favor.
And for all of you GOO types: if you are serious about eliminating your dependency on fossil fuels, then get rid of your cars, all nylon and plastics, the finish on your furniture, tires (including bicycle), batteries (manufactured using fossil fuel), food (fuel needed for farming), and the thousands of other everyday products that depend on fossil fuel in one way or another. Or better yet, get real and demand effective regulation from your government. After all, isn't the government responsible for all solutions and a perfect life for everyone according to the "progressive" creed?
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
May 26, 2015 at 11:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Now that's journalism. Thank you Nick, your memory is exceptional about the history and subsequent spill is admirable. Naming the names, laying out the process and digging for the loose ends is what you're all about. Here's gratitude to you and your talent.
gnusman (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2015 at 12:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
scandy is clearly a troll for the big oil companies. The people and powers that be need to come down hard on this company. It is very clear that they will pay a slight fine in comparison to the bill money that our elected officials let them. blue and red I might add and where the hell is lois blathering on capps? I called her office and got a child on the phone bleating about her knee surgery. WTF Cares. Get a news crew to her house and let her tell us how she cares so much or hanna beth bla bla blah or how about jerry brown gets his butt down here and actually see how big oil is not cleaning this shit up. The tax payers and misguided locals getting toxified by crude trying to "clean up the spill" with home depot buckets. get the hazmat guys out here that have not been out here the media news crap clips were just that. Local people were down there in cancer immune damaging alley cleaning up the poor dead creatures. Get a Clue! This is our home town and the company should clean it up and be held to punitive damages that will make them shit blood.
chastity (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2015 at 9:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You cannot be serious about this crazy bitch right? republicans? the us is run by left wing elitists who make the big money from oil, banks pharma and ag. You are one deluded communist if you think that idiot capps gives a rats ass. She didnt pay her taxes/ remember? the whole death by car? remember? the kick the can down the street about two terms remember? you are a dumb twat. crawl back under your troll rock and die. or go for a swim!
Apparently Jarv believes that Lois Capps, who sits on committees run by Republicans, people opposed in principle to government regulation, should have somehow figured out how to impose more government regulation, for which Jarvis of course would have castigated her.
chastity (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2015 at 9:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
As I stated in an earlier post, Jarvis was arrested on Monday for attacking three police officers with a squirt gun filled with india ink, as well as pelting them with nerf balls. It was a suicide-by-cop attempt because he was despondent over the fact that his DVR had failed to record this weeks episode of Keeping up with the Kardashians. He was transferred to the psychiatric ward at cottage hospital where he found out that his neighbor, Bebe Regurgo, had recorded the episode for him. So moved was Jarvis that he found a renewed faith in humanity and said life had new meaning. Moved by this, the cops he attacked dropped all charges, although Jarv will have to pay for the dry cleaning expenses of the cop he attacked with the squirt gun, which Jarvis has agreed to do.
dolphinpod14 (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2015 at 9:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
chastity - The right-wing elite bankers finance the left wing. Taxes aren't a wise topic - Abe Moldanado owed the IRS around a million in back taxes, including a significant amount that were illegally deducted - a pricey salt-water aquarium as a business expense, etc.
Plains isn't an oil drilling or oil exploration company; they're a pipeline owner and operator of 6000 miles of pipeline. tabatha's strawman argument of Amazon environmental damage due to oil drilling is only that; a non sequitur. So is the environmental destruction in Tibet resulting from lithium mining for batteries for EV's - but that's green environmental destruction; not worth mentioning.
This is a January 2013 GAO report on pipeline safety. Valves aren't required or used by the majority of pipeline operators that contributed info to the report. I posted the link on the article about the letter written by Capps, Feinstein and Boxer.
http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/651408.pdf
14noscams (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2015 at 10:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)