DACA Was Unconstitutional

On Tuesday, it was announced that Pres. Trump had officially rescinded DACA but given Congress six months to address the issue. It was the right move.

In our system of government, the legislature makes laws, the Executive Branch enforces the law, and the Supreme Court gives its opinion on whether or not certain laws are constitutional and legal.

Why did DACA have to go? According to George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley (a liberal), “In ordering this blanket exception, President Obama was nullifying part of a law that he simply disagreed with … If a president can claim sweeping discretion to suspend key federal laws, the entire legislative process becomes little more than a pretense … The circumvention of the legislative process not only undermines the authority of this branch but destabilizes the tripartite system as a whole.”

In other words, his actions were inconsistent with the Constitution’s separation of powers. In simple terms Obama’s actions were unconstitutional.

The ball is now in Congress’s court.

To submit a comment on this article, email or visit our Facebook page. To submit information to a reporter, email

Be succinct, constructive, and relevant to the story. Leaving a comment means you agree to our Discussion Guidelines. We like civilized discourse. We don't like spam, lying, profanity, harassment or personal attacks.

comments powered by Disqus
event calendar sponsored by:

Santa Barbara Rental Prices Have Skyrocketed Over the Last Five Years

The average rent for a South Coast studio is $1,553.

Trio Stops the Show at Board of Education

More than a dozen appeal to Santa Barbara Unified School District to maintain music classes and programs.

Santa Barbara District Attorney Endorses Villaraigosa for Governor

Joyce Dudley preferred the former Los Angeles mayor’s positions on crime and education.

San Marcos Principal Files Suit Against Santa Barbara Unified School District

Ed Behrens charges emotional and physical distress due to demotion.

City Water Use Hits 1958 Levels

Population was twice today's; revenue close to falling short of expenses.