WEATHER »

More Than Maintenance Workers


I was just wondering why City of Santa Barbara is contracting out work that they historically did themselves for a hell of a lot less. For instance, why can’t City of Santa Barbara maintenance workers do the Stearns Wharf handrail jobs themselves? Hands-on maintenance and structural work on the wharf is how workers stay on the pulse of the “living,” ever-changing wharf, as well as remaining visible and aware of what’s going on among the public.

Right now I am living in Atlanta, Georgia, but my heart still resides in Santa Barbara. I grew up there and worked for the City of Santa Barbara’s Waterfront division at Stearn’s Wharf under Cmdr. Paul Nefstead, David Meyerson, and Judd Conley from 1980-86.

On a hot sunny day in late June, with President Reagan helping Fess Parker dedicate his resort and the USS Enterprise anchored off shore, I was replacing handrails half-way up the causeway, on deck with my partner, when I noticed smoke and fire coming from the back of the Museum of Natural History’s Sea Center on the shore-ward finger. Having city employees as the maintenance workers doubles as a security force. Much like any well-run ship, they are the heart of Santa Barbara’s Stearn’s Wharf and a presence that is hard to imagine the waterfront without.

They are needed to keep wharf maintenance a busy, visible, and vigilant presence on deck.

To submit a comment on this article, email letters@independent.com or visit our Facebook page. To submit information to a reporter, email tips@independent.com.



event calendar sponsored by:

Making State Street Great Again

City Hall hosted a packed meeting on downtown woes.

Clear the Shelters’ on August 18

Santa Barbara joins nationwide pet adoption drive.

Coastal Commission Looks to State Lands for Hollister Ranch Options

Commissioners are exploring all avenues for public access.

Saving Mountain Dwellers from Wildfire

Will more fuel breaks on San Marcos Pass protect them?

Downtown Bungalow Haven Wins Big Appeal

City councilmembers voted unanimously against the proposed “monolithic” fourplex.