Independent Discussion Guidelines
This is not the land of freedom. You must suffer until your very last breath.
spacey (anonymous profile)November 5, 2014 at 11:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I have had cancer twice. Chemo, radiation and chemo caused me great suffering. I had great and caring treatment at Sansum and the Cancer Center but my odds were good and I am 6 years out from cancer, a survivor. If my diagnosis was terminal, I would want the option of ending the suffering. Fortunately, I have that option. I live in Washington state now. Some Californians are moving to Oregon to be able to end their suffering. It's time for California to put the issue on the ballot.
LHThom (anonymous profile)November 5, 2014 at 2:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Look at this lopsided response! In such a "progressive" state as CA, why is this still even an issue? On the other hand, legalizing pot failed.....Maybe not so progressive after all.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)November 9, 2014 at 10:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
agree all. I have older relatives who definitely like living in Oregon due to its logical 'death with dignity' law. Some respondents may have a much different view if they're 75 or 85... Let's put a simply worded proposition, modeled on OR or Washington State's, on the ballot in '16.
DavyBrown (anonymous profile)November 9, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)