Members of the Santa Barbara Sheriff’s Department working with this year’s marijuana eradication effort cleared a total of 34,996 plants from Los Padres National Forest. According to a statement from Sheriff’s spokesperson Sergeant Alex Tipolt, the Drug Enforcement Administration estimates street value of these plants at more than $87 million.
Marijuana eradication is an annual activity for the Sheriff’s Department, in which deputies work with agents of the Department of Justice’s Campaign Against Marijuana Production (CAMP) in identifying places where large-scale marijuana growing operations are located and then disposing of these illegal plants. This week, approximately 35 law enforcement officers participated in the identification and removal of nine growing operations. Two operations near Juncal Dam yielded 13,501 plants; three found west of Lake Cachuma yielded 18,555 plants; four in the Bear Canyon area yielded 2,940 plants. Tipolt noted that no arrests were made in the effort, though those responsible seemed to be Mexican nationals who lived in or near the operations.
Tipolt concluded his report on the matter saying that such marijuana cultivation is often “the work of dangerous drug cartels” and therefore posed a threat to the safety of visitors to Los Padres, as these pot growers are frequently armed and sometimes even set booby traps designed to injure or kill anyone that might happen to stumble upon the hidden narcotics. Tipolt advised that anyone who sees people traipsing about Los Padres with irrigation tubing or notices usual water flows or new trails leading to locations that would have no apparent attraction to casual hikers should call the Sheriff’s Department.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This

Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
Cue the anti-immigration comments in
5
4
3
2
1
mesamike (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2008 at 4:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Dam immigrants are stealing our jobs ...man!
sa1 (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2008 at 6:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
mesa dude: explain the anti immigration comments..
azuresees (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 6:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think I got mesamike's reference:
"the unholy abundance of wordy Minutemen types who have chimed in on this website with dicey, Manechaen commentary on local gangs and crime are going to show up any minute!"
mesamike said it much better. (But where are those Minutemen?)
binky (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 8:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Much of the illegal agricultural use of our National Forest lands are the work of Mexican cartels and their employees - sent across the border to tend for (and guard with their lives) a plot of land for 6 months.
Running across an illegal marijuana patch in the wild is a far more frightening proposition than encountering a bear or cougar. Neither of those species carry rifles.
While I love to rage *against* the "War on Drugs," I certainly believe that these plantations are harmful to our National Forests - fertilizers, runoff, and the danger posed to recreational users of this land, are all factors that need to be appreciated here.
Please, grow your cannabis on private property.
fearbeneath (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 8:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
fearbeneath,
No property owner in their right mind would allow large amounts of these plants to be grown on their property in fear that their property would be seized.
I'm glad you recognize the WOsD as being a bad thing, but just chalk this up to another problem created by it.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 10:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"mesa dude: explain the anti immigration comments.."
I was just expecting the usual suspects to get on their soapbox and begin ranting.
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/jul...
The last comment was removed....
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/jul...
The first comment is a prime example.
If I had more time I could find plenty more references. Just look at any of the articles regarding the recent high profile crimes.
mesamike (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 11:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm with fearbeneath and Barney Frank. Pot should be leagalized for personal use and grown on private property. The jailings, ecological damage, and the vast amounts of money spent on the eradification of this Divine plant would all go away. Stay tuned to the Rep. Barney Frank proposal.
Livedinsb (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 4:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I worked with the Forest Service, once upon a time. Let's talk about the total nonsense that these statistics represent:
35000 plants - we will *generously* estimate that they produce 8 quality ounces per plant of re-sellable female cannabis flowers. A somewhat low figure, but given the area and conditions of the farms, not unreasonable. That gives us roughly 17000 pounds of cannabis.
The VERY BEST cannabis in Santa Barbara clubs goes for $9000/ pound, resale. The clubs buy it for closer to $4000/ pound. Again, this is for the very best in California (and henceforth, the world.) Cannabis grown outdoors by Mexican cartels is not going to possess tremendous quality. Access to sophisticated growing equipment simply isn't feasible in the National Forest. So we'll guess they can offload their crop for about $2000/ pound.
17000 pounds of medium-grade cannabis for $2000/ pound (generous figures) would be about 34 million dollars. Optimistically, about 30% of what is claimed. I'd call that a significant margin of error. Historically, the entire plant has even been weighed for "street value" - rootball, vegetative material, and all. Not very truthful.
Just another way the war on drugs is propagandizing the American taxpayer.
A wise teacher once told me:
"There are three types of lies: Lies, Damn Lies...
and Statistics."
drberticus (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 5:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Read 7/28 article by David Samuels in the New Yorker Magazine on pot in California; very interesting read and nothing to do with immigration. But it seems to me that the capitalist a.k.a. "republican" society we live in now reflects the truth of the matter; we want it now and we want it cheap, no matter what the human cost. Go China!
rose (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 5:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
livedinsb and rose,
I urge you to see who the Republican co-sponsor of the bill livedinsb referred to.
He is still running for President.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 6:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey Doc: Can we cut through the mustard here?
"Again, this is for the very best in California (and henceforth, the world.) Cannabis grown outdoors by Mexican cartels is not going to possess tremendous quality."
Does the term *quality* mean you ain't gonna get so stoned as the good **it?
I thought we were talking about the cure aspects of ingesting smoke....Oh yeah, smoke....go figure..Carbon footprint...But that is an OK carbon footprint, huh?
Just like Mayor Gavin Newsom and his war on plastic bottles and shopping bags....Well...all plastic except for the thousands of plastic drug syringes he doles out to the dopers in his berg...Then there's the bio-hazard when the addicts toss their slammers into the sand next to the swing sets that kids play in. But hey...Maybe he used a plastic condom when he cheated on his ol' lady...just a paw print in the grand scheme of things.
Back to the subject: I agree if someone is so sick that they need pain relief--GIVE THEM WHAT THEY NEED. If I was dyin', I would want whatever, but to be frank, my niece , who has been a pot head since her teens, walked in, **tched about menstrual cramps--got a freakin Rx...WHY?
Unless someone tells me different, I'm throwing down the BS card and saying that the large agenda behind "Compassionate Care" is just an increment toward a high society.
Sure there are some legit patients, and God love em, but refer back to my first sentence.
I now splay myself for ideological dissection. Yes I was snotty about Newsome, but call me a liar...
azuresees (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 7:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Azure, obviously the "boozed" society in your mind is better that a "high" society? Maybe we should burn all the vineyards in SYV then? Ask Fess and Firestone what they think about that.
Ok to abuse oxycotin but not pot, right? Just ask Rush Limbaugh, the shining intellect of the Republican party.
How does CAMP spend every year? Ask the laid off state workers where they think the budget money should be going...
sa1 (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 10:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well, maybe I'm not saying keep it illegal. Maybe I'm saying that Compassonate Care should just fess up if that is what they are seeking.
It's like the guy at the Carrillo off ramp who holds up the "Homeless Vet" sign versus the other guy who holds up the "Why Lie...I need a drink" sign..That's where I was heading..
azuresees (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2008 at 5:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
maybe the rash of immigration comments is warranted and some people need to stop being so delicate about the problem here.
CNN reports on the illegal immigration problem: "Mexican cartels running pot farms in U.S. national forest."
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/08/08/pot....
"Illegal immigrants connected to Mexico's drug cartels are growing hundreds of millions of dollars worth of marijuana in the heart of one of America's national treasures, authorities say. It's a booming business that, federal officials say, feeds Mexico's most violent drug traffickers."
drberticus (anonymous profile)
August 9, 2008 at 2:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment