• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Developers Set Sights on Bishop Ranch


Thursday, May 1, 2008
By Margaret Connell
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

The much-anticipated Bishop Ranch application has now been filed at Goleta City Hall. A 240-acre parcel south of Cathedral Oaks between Los Carneros and Glen Annie roads, the ranch is zoned for agriculture in the Goleta General Plan and has been since the mid 1980s.

Margaret Connell

During the General Plan process three years ago, Encino-based Larwin Company ran a massive public relations campaign, generating hundreds of postcards in support of developing this site. The council at that time, of which I was a member, determined that it was preferable to place major housing sites south of the 101, along the Hollister corridor, close to work sites and transportation. In November 2007, following the election of new councilmembers, the Bishop Ranch group decided to try again. It invited the community to a series of workshops to seek input on what people would like to see on this property.

In a series of meetings, including a tour of the ranch, topics included housing, parks, open space, infrastructure, and commercial shopping areas. Around 100 people attended each session. It was made clear at the start that the question was not whether Bishop Ranch would be developed, but how it should be done.

Bishop Ranch 2000, through its managing agent J. Michael Nolte, is seeking initiation of a General Plan amendment to change its zoning from agriculture to “Mixed Use: Bishop Ranch.” This follows on the heels of the current council’s move to rezone the Shelby parcel on Cathedral Oaks from agriculture to residential.

The conceptual plan includes approximately 1,195 residential units, seven acres of neighborhood-serving commercial, 83 acres of passive city parkland, and approximately 17 acres of active parkland for sports. The housing would be a mix of single-family, high-density residential, condos, and townhouses. There would be 240 affordable units at an inclusionary rate of 20 percent. (Hollister Avenue sites, meanwhile, require a 30 percent inclusionary rate.)

The developer claims that Bishop Ranch has not been used for agriculture for at least 50 years, other than some failed efforts in the mid ’80s. However, an aerial photo from 1935 shows orchards covering most of the site. With viable orchards on three sides, it seems improbable that it could not have been productively farmed if there were a desire to do so, though today water supply might be a problem.

Nolte also cites a letter from Bob Braitman, the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), who wrote while studying Goleta cityhood that LAFCO “declined to include lands planned to remain in agriculture or open space based on the view that only lands projected for urban use should be included in the city.” From this, Nolte concludes that “Bishop Ranch must be considered for urban use, as requested by this General Plan amendment initiations request.” But LAFCO does not make land use decisions; the Goleta City Council does.

There are things that are attractive about this proposal, if you accept that this site is ripe for development. It includes a variety of housing types, though few affordable to workers in Goleta. The area around the old ranch house, with many magnificent trees, would be preserved as a public park. A neighborhood shopping center is added north of the freeway. And Calle Real might one day join Los Carneros to Glen Annie, adding a much-needed east-west connector. But the traffic impacts would be huge, and at a time when local produce is in demand, it is tragic to contemplate the loss of agricultural land that could be farmed by a better farmer.

Michael Keston, CEO of the Larwin Company, has invested a lot in this enterprise. Although he’s from Los Angeles County, he should know better than to expect fast movement on this proposal in Santa Barbara County. Nonetheless, he projects getting permits in four years.

This discussion will continue with my online article next week, so tune in to independent.com/goleta on Monday, May 5, where I will explain my opposition to this project, which I also fought against while I was on the Goleta City Council.

Goleta Grapevine appears every Monday morning online at independent.com/goleta. To contact the author, who helped craft the original General Plan during her time as a councilmember and as mayor, email margaretconnell@earthlink.net.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

Dearest Margaret: Thanks for the update and for staying on top of Goleta's present and future. I'm thinking about all those new housing units, and all the new people in them. The buyers will come from outside our area. They will be rude on the (ever-more-congested) road; they will have children, who will expect the now-false "American Dream" and a new home for themselves, new cars, new tennis shoes, electronic gadgets, etc. And then they will complain how nothing should be built on the Gaviota Coast or north of Cathedral Oaks Road, and they'll bemoan the loss of "openness" and breathing room. ... They'll be like Gary Earl, living on newly-converted ag land himself, crying about how the next parcel should remain natural or open or in farming.
Larwin and its people are looking so short-term -- fill in the empty spaces, makes lots of money, send THEIR kids to college, retire, and die rich white men with flowery obituaries filled with Christian platitudes. ... Well, maybe we've all lost sight of the future. Our way of life will have to crash and burn somewhere down the line. Peak oil? Collapse of the oceans and the food chain? Global warming?
None of it looks good, does it? ... Looking forward to your next column. peace, love, dope, BH

BongHit (anonymous profile)
May 1, 2008 at 9:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Yep...I wondered how long it was going to take them to ruin this beautiful open space with some more ugly stuccoed and red-tiled crap construction jammed in cheek by jowl.

Any time any green space is discovered by greedy developers, they glom right onto it, build their faux-Spanish-designed ghettoes for rich out of towners and ugly, desperate yuppies, grab the money and run back to their gated out-of-town mansions...leaving those of us who live here with the mess and stink.

Amen, Bong Hit. You hit it all right on the head!

Holly (anonymous profile)
May 2, 2008 at 12:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)

One reason this part of the Bishop Ranch hasn't been farmed for many years is they have no water. Their water supply from Lake Cachuma is instead being given to Goleta Water District (delivered to the District's Corona Del Mar Water Treatment Plant in the foothills on the ranch on the north side of Cathedral Oaks). In exchange, the District is providing water to the Camino Real Market Place. So water that was originally intended for agriculture is instead being used for commerce. And this transfer is perfectly legal, according to the parties involved.

wignoutinca (anonymous profile)
May 2, 2008 at 5:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Haze
Temperature:
61.0°
Wind:
7 SW

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Tea Fire 2008
  • Local Heroes 2008
  • Chamomile Café
  • Reprieve for Modoc Road Evictees
  • Which Canyon Will Burn Next?
  • Zach Gill’s Timely Tidings
  • Thanksgiving Turkey
  1. Saving the Riviera
  2. Obituary for Susan Lake
  3. Hannah-Beth Jackson Concedes to Tony Strickland
  4. Green Building Techniques Save Home on Mountain Drive
  5. From Black Friday to Blessed Friday
  6. Embers to Ashes
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.