• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

SBCAG Rejects State Housing Mandate

Seeks Consultation In Hopes of Lowering Required Units


Saturday, August 18, 2007
By Chris Meagher (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

Looking for a genuine consultation from state officials, local government officials decided Thursday not to accept the housing mandate dumped on Santa Barbara County from on-high, but rather to seek modifications to the mandates which would lessen the required allocation of housing units or perhaps eliminate them altogether.

Representatives from each of the eight county jurisdictions and the five county supervisors who make up the board of the Santa Barbara Association of Government (SBCAG) said they liked the idea of just ignoring the requirements altogether, but were hesitant to do so because of unknown legal consequences that might come as a result of violating the statute.

Since a response to the state’s Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) was due by August 10, SBCAG executive director Jim Kemp sent a letter to HCD requesting additional time to review the draft allocation as well as for a meeting with HCD officials for a true consultation, as required by law. While the HCD has met with SBCAG once in the past — when the latter received its allotment of 13,312 new housing units between now and 2014 — SBCAG officials didn’t feel the meeting reflected the “consultative spirit of the law.” The law requires HCD to “meet and consult with the regional agency regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used to develop the Regiongal Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) determination.” Instead, the board feels the housing mandate is part of an unaccountable, out-of-touch state bureaucracy that is imposing itself on local jurisdictions where it doesn’t know or understand the layout or problems facing the potential for housing in those places.

HCD develops a RHNA as housing need targets for each city and county. SBCAG’s RHNA was last done in 2002. Of the nine jurisdictions throughout the county, Goleta is the only considered to be out of compliance with the state. The city is currently in the compliance review process by HCD.

Many committee members expressed interest in declining HCD’s allocation and informing the department that SBCAG wouldn’t be completing the RHNA requirement. “We don’t want a revised allocation,” said Carpinteria’s Joe Armendariz. “We don’t want an allocation at all.” But the others agreed there was a need to exhaust possible administrative remedies before filing a suit. SBCAG currently has no legal contingency fund.

Kemp pointed out in the letter that, while the population growth rate for San Luis Obispo County is 46.9 percent for 2000-2050, Santa Barbara County – which currently has about 140,000 more people — is expected to be 33.2 percent. But Santa Barbara County has been allocated more than 8,000 more homes than its neighbor to the north.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

Everyone knows we need housing, yet the committe opts for a "do nothing" approach.

nomdecrayola (anonymous profile)
August 20, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Perhaps SBCAG and the Independent could publish a guide detailing which laws are to be followed and which laws are to be ignored. It could be entitled `the real law'.

Laws from the state (`on high') requiring EIR's, wetlands protection, traffic modeling... to be followed.
Laws from the state (`on high') that require fairness with respect to race, religion, sexual orientation... to be followed.

Labor laws from the fed (`higher than on high') to be followed.

Housing requirements from the state... to be ignored!

pardallchewinggumspot (anonymous profile)
August 21, 2007 at 7:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)

"dumped from on-high" = clear bias in reporting by Meagher.

nomdecrayola (anonymous profile)
August 21, 2007 at 9:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Clear Sky
Temperature:
57.9°
Wind:
5 W

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Local Heroes 2008
  • Best Of 2008
  • Tea Fire 2008
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • California’s Great Olive Oil Flood
  • Santa Barbara’s Alpine Connection
  • Supes Begin 2009 by Tackling Greka Oil Spills
  • Hey Bush, Read This
  • Fishbon’s Art of Participatory Celebration
  • Enjoy Year-Round Fun with the Santa Barbara Ski and Sports Club, Founded in 1955
  1. Crazy Cat Lady
  2. Just Say ‘Know’ to Teen Sex
  3. California’s Great Olive Oil Flood
  4. Who’s Your Farmer?
  5. Libraries Busy in Faltering Economy
  6. Jerry Roberts Beating Wendy McCaw
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.